| Literature DB >> 35954644 |
Hanwen Chen1, Caixia Wang1, Tianci Lu1, Baole Tao1, Yuan Gao1, Jun Yan1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of physical activity on mobile phone addiction among college students. A total of 9406 students, ranging from freshmen to seniors, from 35 colleges in four regions of Jiangsu Province were selected using the whole group sampling method. Questionnaires, particularly the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ), the positive psychological capital scale (PPQ), the social adjustment diagnostic questionnaire (SAFS), and the mobile phone addiction index scale (MPAI), were administered. We found that physical activity negatively predicted mobile phone addiction among university students. Social adaptation partially mediates between physical activity and mobile phone addiction among university students, with separate mediation of psychological capital playing no indirect role. Psychological capital and social adjustment mediate the chain between physical activity and mobile phone dependence among college students. Our findings suggest that physical activity is an important external factor influencing college students' mobile phone dependence, and it indirectly affects university students' mobile phone addiction through psychological capital and social adaptation. Improving the physical activity level of college students, enhancing their psychological capital, and promoting improved social adaptation are important ways to prevent mobile phone addiction among college students.Entities:
Keywords: mobile phone addiction; physical activity; psychological capital; social adaptation; the intermediary effect
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954644 PMCID: PMC9367822 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Participants’ demographics and characteristics.
| Participant Characteristics | Men ( | Women ( | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean or | ±SD or % | Mean or | ±SD or % | Mean or | ±SD or % | ||
|
| 19.69 | 1.1 | 19.52 | 1.04 | 19.5 | 1.07 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| Han Chinese | 3357 | 95.50% | 5574 | 94.60% | 8931 | 95% | <0.001 |
| Others | 159 | 4.50% | 316 | 5.40% | 475 | 5% | |
|
| |||||||
| First grade | 1803 | 51.30% | 2918 | 49.50% | 4721 | 50.20% | |
| Second grade | 1611 | 45.80% | 2727 | 46.30% | 4338 | 46.10% | |
| Third grade | 79 | 2.20% | 198 | 3.40% | 277 | 2.90% | |
| Fourth grade | 23 | 0.70% | 47 | 0.80% | 70 | 0.70% | |
|
| |||||||
| Total MET minutes/week | 3485.01 | 3102.46 | 2588.13 | 2548.89 | 2923.39 | 2802.44 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| PPQ (score) | 120.58 | 22.7 | 118.63 | 19.33 | 119.36 | 20.67 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| SAFS (score) | 3.79 | 11.28 | 1.52 | 11.79 | 2.37 | 11.65 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| MPAI (score) | 41.92 | 14.96 | 43.78 | 13.12 | 43.08 | 13.86 | <0.001 |
| Addiction | 1279 | 36.4% | 2237 | 35.6% | 3377 | 35.9% | |
| Not addictive | 2098 | 63.6% | 3792 | 64.4% | 6029 | 64.1% | |
Correlation between variables.
| Physical Activity | Psychological Capital | Social Adaptation | Mobile Phone Addiction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Activity | 1 | |||
| Psychological Capital | 0.106 ** | 1 | ||
| Social Adaptation | 0.113 ** | 0.544 ** | 1 | |
| Mobile Phone Addiction | −0.06 ** | −0.167 ** | −0.275 ** | 1 |
Note: n = 9406 ** p < 0.01.
Regression analysis of variable relationships in the model.
| Regression Equation | Overall Fit Index | Significance of Regression Coefficient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result Variable | Predictive Variable | R | R2 | F |
| SE | t |
| Mobile phone addiction | Gender | 0.09 | 0.01 | 15.233 | 0.121 | 0.022 | 5.589 *** |
| Ethnicity | 0.129 | 0.047 | 2.737 ** | ||||
| Age | 0.023 | 0.012 | 1.906 | ||||
| Grade | 0.003 | 0.022 | 0.141 | ||||
| Physical activity | −0.048 | 0.01 | −4.739 ** | ||||
| Psychological capital | Gender | 0.13 | 0.02 | 31.681 | −0.066 | 0.021 | −3.071 ** |
| Ethnicity | −0.159 | 0.047 | −3.402 *** | ||||
| Age | −0.037 | 0.012 | −3.12 ** | ||||
| Grade | −0.039 | 0.021 | −1.844 | ||||
| Physical activity | 0.1 | 0.104 | 9.686 *** | ||||
| Social adaptation | Gender | 0.55 | 0.3 | 682.359 | −0.131 | 0.018 | −7.233 |
| Ethnicity | 0.044 | 0.039 | 1.131 | ||||
| Age | −0.005 | 0.01 | −0.546 | ||||
| Grade | 0.04 | 0.018 | 2.216 * | ||||
| Physical activity | 0.047 | 0.009 | 5.421 *** | ||||
| Psychological capital | 0.537 | 0.009 | 61.902 *** | ||||
| Mobile phone addiction | Gender | 0.28 | 0.08 | 115.172 | 0.077 | 0.02 | 3.688 *** |
| Ethnicity | 0.114 | 0.045 | 2.524 * | ||||
| Age | 0.015 | 0.011 | 1.347 | ||||
| Grade | 0.006 | 0.02 | 0.327 | ||||
| Physical activity | −0.02 | 0.01 | −2.023 * | ||||
| Psychological capital | −0.021 | 0.012 | −1.819 | ||||
| Social adaptation | −0.256 | 0.012 | −21.66 *** | ||||
Note: gender, nationality, age, and grade all adopt virtual coding. * means that p-value is <0.05; ** means that p-value is <0.01; *** means that p-value is <0.001.
Figure 1Mediation model of psychological capital and social adaptation between physical activity and mobile phone addiction. Note: * means that p-value is <0.05; *** means that p-value is <0.001.
Chain-mediated model effect tests for psychological capital and social adaptation.
| Benefit Type | Effect Value | BootSE | Bootstrap 95% CI | Proportion of Relative Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | ||||
| Total effect | −0.048 | 0.01 | −0.0691 | −0.0283 | 100% |
| Direct effect | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.0402 | −0.0006 | 41.67% |
| Indirect effect 1 | −0.002 | 0.002 | −0.0053 | 0.0008 | 4.20% |
| Indirect effect 2 | −0.012 | 0.002 | −0.0169 | −0.0076 | 25% |
| Indirect effect 3 | −0.014 | 0.002 | −0.0174 | −0.0107 | 29.20% |
| Total indirect effect | −0.028 | 0.003 | −0.0344 | −0.0225 | 58.33% |
Note: Boot SE, Boot LLCI, and Boot ULCI refer to the standard errors and lower and upper 95% confidence intervals of the indirect effects estimated by the bias-corrected percentile Bootstrap method, respectively. Indirect effect 1: physical activity → psychological capital → mobile phone addiction; indirect effect 2: physical activity → social adaptation → mobile phone addiction; indirect effect 3: physical activity → psychological capital → social adaptation → mobile phone addiction.