B Hu1, L F Lin2, M Q Zhuang3, Z Y Yuan4, S Y Li5, Y J Yang6, M Lu7, S Z Yu8, L Jin9, W M Ye10, X F Wang11. 1. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: paul.binhu@gmail.com. 2. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: lanfanglin9020@gmail.com. 3. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, Shandong, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: xqq23678@gmail.com. 4. CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: yuanziyu0502@gmail.com. 5. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: shuyuanli816@gmail.com. 6. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: yyj229@263.net. 7. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, Shandong, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: lu.ming528@gmail.com. 8. Institute of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: szyu@shmu.edu.cn. 9. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: ljin007@gmail.com. 10. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: weimin.ye@ki.se. 11. MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; CMC Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: xiaofengautomatic@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliabilities and relative validities of the Chinese version of short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-S-C), the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-C), and the Total Energy Expenditure Questionnaire (TEEQ-C) in a population-based prospective study, the Taizhou Longitudinal Study (TZLS). STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal comparative study. METHODS: A total of 205 participants (male: 38.54%) aged 30-70 years completed three questionnaires twice (day one and day nine) and physical activity log (PA-log) over seven consecutive days. The test-retest reliabilities were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the relative validities were estimated by comparing the data from physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) and PA-log. RESULTS: Good reliabilities were observed between the repeated PAQs. The ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.80 for IPAQ-C, 0.67 to 0.85 for GPAQ-C, and 0.74 to 0.94 for TEEQ-C, respectively. Energy expenditure of most PA domains estimated by the three PAQs correlated moderately with the results recorded by PA-log except the walking domain of IPAQ-S-C. The partial correlation coefficients between the PAQs and PA-log ranged from 0.44 to 0.58 for IPAQ-S-C, 0.26 to 0.52 for GPAQ-C, and 0.41 to 0.72 for TEEQ-C, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed acceptable agreement between the three PAQs and PA-log. CONCLUSION: The three PAQs, especially TEEQ-C, were relatively reliable and valid for assessment of physical activity and could be used in TZLS.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliabilities and relative validities of the Chinese version of short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-S-C), the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-C), and the Total Energy Expenditure Questionnaire (TEEQ-C) in a population-based prospective study, the Taizhou Longitudinal Study (TZLS). STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal comparative study. METHODS: A total of 205 participants (male: 38.54%) aged 30-70 years completed three questionnaires twice (day one and day nine) and physical activity log (PA-log) over seven consecutive days. The test-retest reliabilities were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the relative validities were estimated by comparing the data from physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) and PA-log. RESULTS: Good reliabilities were observed between the repeated PAQs. The ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.80 for IPAQ-C, 0.67 to 0.85 for GPAQ-C, and 0.74 to 0.94 for TEEQ-C, respectively. Energy expenditure of most PA domains estimated by the three PAQs correlated moderately with the results recorded by PA-log except the walking domain of IPAQ-S-C. The partial correlation coefficients between the PAQs and PA-log ranged from 0.44 to 0.58 for IPAQ-S-C, 0.26 to 0.52 for GPAQ-C, and 0.41 to 0.72 for TEEQ-C, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed acceptable agreement between the three PAQs and PA-log. CONCLUSION: The three PAQs, especially TEEQ-C, were relatively reliable and valid for assessment of physical activity and could be used in TZLS.
Authors: Peng Hu; Murui Zheng; Jun Huang; Wenjing Zhao; Harry H X Wang; Xiong Zhang; Yuanyuan Chen; Hai Deng; Pengzhe Qin; Xudong Liu Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Xiaofen D Keating; Ke Zhou; Xiaolu Liu; Michael Hodges; Jingwen Liu; Jianmin Guan; Ashley Phelps; Jose Castro-Piñero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 3.390