| Literature DB >> 35954312 |
Beata Filip-Psurska1, Honorata Zachary1, Aleksandra Strzykalska1, Joanna Wietrzyk1.
Abstract
Vitamin D3, which is well known to maintain calcium homeostasis, plays an important role in various cellular processes. It regulates the proliferation and differentiation of several normal cells, including immune and neoplastic cells, influences the cell cycle, and stimulates cell maturation and apoptosis through a mechanism dependent on the vitamin D receptor. The involvement of vitamin D3 in breast cancer development has been observed in numerous clinical studies. However, not all studies support the protective effect of vitamin D3 against the development of this condition. Furthermore, animal studies have revealed that calcitriol or its analogs may stimulate tumor growth or metastasis in some breast cancer models. It has been postulated that the effect of vitamin D3 on T helper (Th) 17 lymphocytes is one of the mechanisms promoting metastasis in these murine models. Herein we present a literature review on the existing data according to the interplay between vitamin D, Th17 cell and breast cancer. We also discuss the effects of this vitamin on Th17 lymphocytes in various disease entities known to date, due to the scarcity of scientific data on Th17 lymphocytes and breast cancer. The presented data indicate that the effect of vitamin D3 on breast cancer development depends on many factors, such as age, menopausal status, or obesity. According to that, more extensive clinical trials and studies are needed to assess the importance of vitamin D in breast cancer, especially when no correlations seem to be obvious.Entities:
Keywords: Th17 lymphocytes; breast cancer; calcitriol; dendritic cells; vitamin D
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954312 PMCID: PMC9367508 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Examples of clinical/epidemiological data regarding the impact of vitamin D on breast cancer incidence/progression/metastasis.
| Factor Studied | Type of Studies | Observed Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunlight exposition | Case–control | Sunlight measures are not associated with breast cancer risk but may depend on timing of exposure and genetic background | [ |
| Prospective | UV radiation has no association with breast cancer risk | [ | |
| Systematic review and meta-analysis | Exposure to sun for longer than an hour a day during the summer could decrease the risk of breast cancer | [ | |
| Cancer database analysis | Breast cancer is diagnosed more often in spring and fall; breast cancer seasonality is latitude-dependent | [ | |
| Retrospective analysis | Sunlight exposure may be associated with more prevalent TNBC | [ | |
| Population-based | Spending more daylight hours outdoors in a year was associated with lower risk of ER+, ER−, and TNBC | [ | |
| Population-based case–control | Factors suggestive of increased cutaneous production of vitamin D are associated with reduced breast cancer risk | [ | |
| Death certificate based case–control | Breast cancer was negatively associated with residential and occupational sunlight | [ | |
| Vitamin D dietary intake | Population-based | In the pooled analysis, dietary vitamin D and calcium were not associated with risk of breast cancer subtypes. Vitamin D: possible inverse associations between intake of ≤800 IU/d (compared with nonuse) and risk of several subtypes, with strongest effects observed for TNBC; no association was found for >800 IU/d | [ |
| Prospective | Higher intakes of calcium and vitamin D may be associated with lower risk of premenopausal breast cancer, but not among postmenopausal women | [ | |
| Nutrition cohort | Women with the highest intake of dietary calcium (>1250 mg/d) were at a lower risk of breast cancer than ≤500 mg/d; but neither use of supplemental calcium nor vitamin D intake was associated with breast cancer risk | [ | |
| Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial and cohort study | Only some evidence for a reduction in breast cancer risk and total invasive cancer risk among calcium and vitamin D users | [ | |
| Case–control | High calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D nutrient intake pattern was associated with a significant decrease in breast cancer risk | [ | |
| Case–control | Supplementation with vitamin D, fatty acids EPA, and DHA was inversely associated with breast cancer | [ | |
| Case–control | The risk of breast cancer was lower by 67% if the serum level of 25(OH)D was ≥24.6 ng/mL and lower by 68% if the serum level of calcium was ≥9.6 mg/dL; higher (than-normal) calcium serum level, considered separately, and a slightly lower-than- normal vitamin D serum level may protect against breast cancer among postmenopausal women, independent of dietary patterns and supplements | [ | |
| 25(OH)D plasma level | Observational | Low 25(OH)D serum levels, alone and in combination with BsmI VDR genotype, may increase the risk of breast cancer in a UK Caucasian population | [ |
| Cross-sectional analytical study | 25(OH)D deficiency is widespread among breast cancer patients | [ | |
| Nested case–control | No overall association was found between plasma 25(OH)D and breast cancer risk; women with high, compared with low, plasma 25(OH)D levels in the summer have a reduced breast cancer risk, and plasma 25(OH)D may be inversely associated with risk of tumors expressing high levels of VDR | [ | |
| Case–control | Low serum 25(OH)D levels, high tissue VDR levels, and high ERα gene expression were associated with increased risk of breast cancer | [ | |
| Unmatched case–control | Severe vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) was significantly higher in chemotherapy-naïve (41.1%) than in TAM-treated (11.2%) patients; vitamin D deficiency was not significantly associated with tumor characteristics or | [ | |
| Nested case–control | No association was found between plasma level of free 25(OH)D and overall risk of breast cancer; no association was found for plasma vitamin D binding protein (DBP) as well; neither the total nor the calculated free 25(OH)D and breast cancer association substantially varied by plasma DBP levels | [ | |
| Cross-sectional | Significant correlation was observed between low vitamin D levels and advanced stage of breast cancer, particularly in postmenopausal patients | [ | |
| Prospective | Maintaining an optimal 25(OH)D status at diagnosis and during the 1-year follow-up period is important for improving breast cancer patient survival | [ | |
| Prospective | Serum levels of 25(OH)D were significantly higher in patients with early-stage breast cancer than in those with locally advanced or metastatic disease | [ | |
| Case–control | Women with low levels of 25(OH)D, as compared to women in the middle tertile, had a high risk of breast cancer with an unfavorable prognosis | [ | |
| Case–cohort | In women with elevated risk of breast cancer, high serum 25(OH)D levels and regular vitamin D supplement use were associated with lower rates of postmenopausal breast cancer over 5-year follow-up | [ | |
| Cross-sectional | Low and decreased level of vitamin D might correlate with progression and metastasis of breast cancer | [ | |
| Retrospective cohort study | 25(OH)D serum level < 16 ng/mL was associated with poor survival in breast cancer patients, regardless of age, lymph node status, stage, or breast cancer subtype | [ | |
| Single-center prospective cohort study | Low 25(OH)D status is associated with better breast cancer survival; high 25(OH)D levels (>110 nmol/L) are associated with poorer breast cancer survival | [ | |
| Meta-analysis | Lower 25(OH)D concentrations were not significantly associated with increased incidence of most cancers assessed; increased risk of breast cancer and decreased risk of lymphoma were noted with higher 25(OH)D concentrations | [ | |
| Systematic review and meta-analysis | Association of low levels of vitamin D with increased risk of recurrence and death was noted in early-stage breast cancer patients | [ | |
| Meta-analysis | A protective relationship was observed between circulating vitamin D (measured as 25(OH)D) and breast cancer development in premenopausal women | [ | |
| Genome-wide association studies | No evidence was found supporting the association between 25(OH)D and risk of breast cancer | [ | |
| Retrospective | Vitamin D deficiency was associated with inability to achieve complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy | [ | |
| Pooled cohort | Higher 25(OH)D concentrations, ≥60 ng/mL, were associated with a dose–response decrease in breast cancer risk. | [ | |
| 1,25(OH)2D3 plasma level | Prospective | breast cancer patients have lower 1,25(OH)2D3 (40 ± 21) levels than healthy women (53 ± 23 pg/mL) | [ |
| VDR tumor tissue expression | Observational | VDR expression inversely related to aggressive tumor characteristics (large tumor size, hormonal receptor negativity, and triple-negative subtype); VDR expression did not influence any patient survival outcomes | [ |
| Retrospective | VDR expression was negatively associated with tumor size and lymph node involvement. High VDR expression speaks for better patient outcome | [ | |
| Prospective cohort study | High VDR expression in invasive breast tumors was associated with favorable prognostic factors and lower risk of breast cancer death | [ | |
| Case–control | VDR was upregulated in breast cancer tissues especially in hormone-negative breast cancer | [ | |
| State-of-the-science review | The role of VDRs in cancer etiology is still equivocal | [ | |
| VDR CTCs expression | Observational | VDR+ CTCs were detected in 46% of CTC+ patients | [ |
| CYP27B1/CYP24A1 tumor tissue expression | Observational | mRNA expression of CYP27B1 was downregulated in tumor tissues, compared with normal tissues; the mRNA expression of CYP24A1 was significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues | [ |
| Observational | Expression of CYP24A1 mRNA was reduced by about 58% in breast cancer tissues | [ | |
| Observational | CYP27B1 expression was lower in invasive carcinomas (44.6%) than in benign lesions (55.8%). In contrast, CYP24A1 expression was inreased in carcinomas (56.0% in in situ and 53.7% in invasive carcinomas) compared to benign lesions (19.0%) | [ | |
| Prospective | No correlation was observed between 24-hydroxylase, 1α-hydroxylase, and VDR expression in tumor tissue | [ | |
| Vitamin D-binding protein | Meta-analysis | Borderline decrease in cancer risk was noted for subjects with high levels of DBP | [ |
| Vitamin D-related gene polymorphism | Case–control | Two | [ |
| Population-based, case–control | None of the analyzed polymorphisms ( | [ | |
| Large population-based case–control | Increased risk for breast cancer was found in postmenopausal Caucasian women with the | [ | |
| Case–control | The VDR | [ | |
| Case–control | [ | ||
| Unmatched case–control | [ | ||
| Case–control | GG genotype of | [ | |
| Observational | VDR gene polymorphisms ( | [ | |
| Case–control | Significantly increased risk of breast cancer was associated with | [ | |
| Comparative | Early-onset patients revealed an association between rs10735810 and increased breast cancer risk; rs1544410, rs731236, and rs4516035 showed no association with disease | [ | |
| Case–control | [ | ||
| Multicenter, prospective | Odds ratio for the rs2228570 ( | [ | |
| Case–control correlative | Vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with development of AI-induced arthralgia (AIA); patients with | [ | |
| Systematic review and network meta-analysis | Recessive polymorphism model with the rs2228570 ( | [ | |
| State-of-the-science review | VDR polymorphisms may affect the risk and mortality of breast cancer, according tomenopausal status, vitamin D level, and breast cancer risk and mortality | [ | |
| Systematic review of the literature | VDR polymorphisms Fok1, Bsm1, Taq1, Apa1, and Cdx2 were analyzed, but no; conflicting data were obtained | [ |
Interventional studies in breast cancer patients and healthy volunteers.
| Vitamin D Dosage Used for Treatment | Patient Characteristics; Trial Type | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy people | |||
| 2000 IU/d of vitamin D3 and 1500 mg/d of calcium for 4 years | 2303 healthy postmenopausal women, 55 years or older; 4-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, population-based randomized clinical trial | Among healthy postmenopausal older women a mean baseline serum 25(OH)D level of 32.8 ng/mL, vitamin D3 and calcium supplementation didn’t decrease significantly the risk of all-type cancer in a 4 years study | [ |
| 2000 IU/d for 5 years | 1617 participants (793 in the vitamin D group and 824 in the placebo group); randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, with a two-by-two factorial design | Treatment did not reduce the incidence of breast cancer | [ |
| Breast cancer patients | |||
| 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily for 12 weeks | 168 breast cancer survivors; single-arm nonrandomized before-and-after trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the identification code: IRCT2017091736244N1 | The association between the | [ |
| 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily for 12 weeks | 176 breast cancer survivors who had completed treatment protocol, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy; trial has been registered on the IRCT under the identification code: IRCT2017091736244N1 | 85% of women had insufficient and inadequate levels of plasma 25(OH)D at baseline; aa genotype of | [ |
| 50,000 IU/week for 8 weeks | 56 breast cancer patients; 2 treatment arms: placebo and vitamin D3 through a 2-month intervention period; double-blind, placebo-controlled trial | Supplementation with vitamin D3 increased the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in breast cancer women; no effect was found on inflammatory markers. Serum TAC in the TT/Tt and Ff genotypes was more responsive to vitamin D supplement compared with FF/ff and tt genotypes | [ |
| 40,000 IU/d of vitamin D3 or placebo for 2–6 weeks prior to breast surgery | 120 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients; prospective, randomized, phase 2, double-blinded presurgical window of opportunity trial; trial registration: NCT01948128. | Significantly higher levels of serum 25(OH)D in the vitamin D-treated group were not associated with any significant effects on tumor proliferation and apoptosis | [ |
| 10,000 IU daily in the interval between biopsy and surgery | 29 breast cancer patients; controlled, and blinded trial in women with core needle biopsies positive for breast cancer, but without the presence of metastatic lesions; ancillary study of a breast cancer trial (NCT01472445) | Vitamin D supplementation can decrease circulating 27-hydroxycholesterol in breast cancer patients, likely by CYP27A1 inhibition. This suggests a new and additional modality by which vitamin D can inhibit ER+ breast cancer growth; a larger study is needed for verification | [ |
| 10,000 IU vitamin D3 and 1000 mg calcium each day for 4 months | 40 patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates; single-arm, phase 2 study | Treatment was safe, and reduced inappropriately elevated PTH levels caused by long-term bisphosphonate use; no significant palliative benefit or any significant change in bone resorption was observed | [ |
| 2000 IU/1000 mg and 4000 IU/1000 mg based on baseline serum 25(OH)D for 12 weeks | 82 breast cancer patients treated with letrozole | Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly improved serum 25(OH)D concentrations and decreased letrozole-induced arthralgia | [ |
| 50,000 IU/week for 12 weeks | 60 breast cancer patients treated with letrozole | Vitamin D3 supplementation is safe, and may reduce disability from AI-induced arthralgias | [ |
| 30,000 IU oral vitamin D3/week for 24 weeks | 160 women with stage I–III breast cancer starting adjuvant letrozole and 25(OH)D level ≤ 40 ng/mL | Treatment was safe and effective in achieving adequate vitamin D levels, but not associated with a decrease in AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms | [ |
| 800 IU/d with calcium but women with baseline 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL also received 16,000 IU of vitamin D3 every 2 weeks for 3 months | 290 breast cancer patients starting AI, prospective cohort | 40 ng/mL 25(OH)D may prevent development of AI-induced arthralgia but higher loading doses are required to achieve this level in women with deficiency at baseline | [ |
Summary of animal experiments in breast cancer models with the use of vitamin D, calcitriol, or its analogs, alone or combined with anticancer therapies.
| Animal Model | Vitamin D Metabolite/Analog Used | Schedule of Treatment | Monotherapy/Combined Treatment/Other | Effect Observed | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4T1 mouse mammary gland cells | Vitamin D3 (VD) | Day 17 after tumor inoculation, 5 μg/kg of VD/d, 7 days treatment | - | Increase in tumor growth | [ |
| 4T1, 67NR, E0771 mouse mammary gland cancers | Calcitriol (Cal) 1 µg/kg three times a week p.o. or | Cal: 7 days after implantation till day 21; | - | 4T1: increased metastasis; 67NR: no effect; E0771: decreased tumor growth | [ |
| 4T1 mouse mammary gland cells | Calcitriol, PRI-2191, and PRI-2205 0.5, 1, and 10 µg/kg, respectively, three times a week s.c. | 7 days after implantation till day 33 | Postmenopausal OVX model | Transiently decreased metastasis | [ |
| 4T1 mouse mammary gland cells | Calcitriol, PRI-2191, and PRI-2205 0.5, 1, and 10 µg/kg, respectively, three times a week s.c. | 7 days after implantation till day 33 | - | Increased metastasis | [ |
| E0771 mouse mammary gland cancer | Cholecalciferol gavage 40 IU/d/mouse | 7 days after cell injection for 2 weeks | Normal mice | Antitumor, antimetastatic effect | [ |
| LM3 mouse breast adenocarcinoma | EM1 20 and 50 µg/kg | Started when tumors were 50–70 mm3, 7 injections for 2 weeks | - | Tumor growth—no effect; decrease in lung metastasis | [ |
| ER–breast cancer/ER+ breast cancer | 24R,25(OH)2D3 | HCC38, 2 weeks after inoculation, 24R,25(OH)2D3 100 ng/d, 3 times a week, 10-week treatment | - | Protumorigenic when breast cancer was of Erα-66– and Erα-36 ± status: | [ |
| 4T1 mouse mammary gland cells | Calcitriol 0.3 μg/kg b.w. once every other day i.p. | From the day before tumor cells were injected | - | Antimetastatic | [ |
| 16/c mouse mammary adenocarcinoma | Calcitriol or PRI-2191 10 μg/kg for 5 consecutive days s.c. | From day 5 after tumor inoculation | Cisplatin: 3 mg/kg i.p. at day 6 after tumor cell inoculation; clodronate: days 5 and 8, i.p., 1.5 mg/mouse/d | 54% tumor growth inhibition by combined treatment with PRI-2191; 41% inhibition by treatment with PRI-2191 alone; no effect of calcitriol | [ |
| 16/c mouse mammary adenocarcinoma | PRI-1906 or PRI-2191 1 μg/kg/d for 9 consecutive days s.c. | Started from day 1 or 5 after tumor cell inoculation | Cyclophosphamide (CY) i.p. 100 mg/kg on day 4 after tumor cell inoculation | Potentiation of CY antitumor effect by both analogs. PRI-1906 alone—no effect; PRI-2191—25% of inhibition | [ |
| MDA-MB-231-luc | Calcitriol 1 µg/kg | 3 days prior to photodynamic therapy (PT) | 5-Aminolevulinate-based PT | Increased PT effect * | [ |
| MMTV-Wnt1 mouse mammary gland cells | Calcitriol 25 ng/mouse | 10 weeks after standard (STD) and high-fat (HFD) diet | STD and HFD | Decreased tumor volume | [ |
| MMTV-Wnt1 mouse mammary gland cells | Calcitriol 50 ng/mouse three times a week | 8 weeks prior to tumor inoculation and continued | - | Decreased tumor volume | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | Calcitriol 50 ng/mouse three times a week i.p. | After 6 weeks of tumor growth continued for 4 weeks | - | Decreased tumor growth | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | Calcitriol 0.025, 0.05, or 0.1 μg/mouse, three times a week i.p. | After 6 weeks of tumor growth continued for 4 weeks | Pre- and postmenopausal (OVX) models | Decreased tumor growth (~60%) | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | PRI-2191 and PRI-2205 1.0 μg/kg/d or 10.0 μg/kg/d, respectively, three times a week s.c. | From day 39 after tumor cell inoculation up to day 67 | - | Decreased tumor growth by PRI-2205 | [ |
| MCF-7 (VEGF-transfected) with MDA-435S human breast cancer cells | Calcitriol 12.5 pmol/d s.c. (micro-osmotic pumps)/28 days; next weekly s.c. dose of 12.5 pmol/d 7 times | 6 days before cell implantation and during 8 weeks | - | Decreased tumor angiogenesis | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | Calcitriol and analogs: TX 522 and TX 527 5, 80, and 25 μg/kg, respectively, every other day i.p. | Started 4 days after tumor transplantation | - | Cal: no effect; both analogs: decrease in tumor volume and mitotic figures | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | EB1089 45 pmol/d (osmotic pumps) | Started with 150–200 mm3 tumors for 8 days | Irradiation after end of EB1089 (2 × 5 Gy) | Delayed tumor growth and decreased tumor volume (50%) in combined treatment | [ |
| MCF-7 human breast cancer | PRI-2191 1.0 µg/kg b.w./d, PRI-2205 10.0 µg/kg b.w./d | Started 5 days after tumor cell inoculation | Anastrozole: 5 days/week, | Significantly decreased MCF-7 tumor volume after single or combined treatment | [ |
| T47D or TDC human breast cancer | Calcitriol 0.03 μg/kg, 2 times a week i.p. | Started when tumors were palpable during 4 weeks | - | Decreased tumor growth, no effect on angiogenesis | [ |
| MCF10DCIS.com human DCIS model | BXL0124 0.1 μg/kg, 6 times a week i.p. | Next day after tumor inoculation for 4 weeks or for 5 weeks | - | Inhibition of DCIS to IDC progression; 43% reduction in tumor volume | [ |
| SUM149 human inflammatory breast cancer cell line | Quantum dots with calcitriol 40 nM i.v. | Started with 80 mm3 tumors | Quantum dots with calcitriol conjugated with anti MUC-1 Ab | Enhanced concentration of quantum dots in tumor and lungs | [ |
| Transgenic model of hormone-induced mammary cancer (LH-overexpression) | EB1089 0.027 μg per animal s.c. | From 3 to 5 weeks of age | - | Decreased growth to regression | [ |
| Freshly collected breast cancer samples xenografted into animals | Calcitriol 0.06 μg intratumoral | 6 weeks after transplantation, weekly (6–11) | - | No effect | [ |
| N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-induced mammary tumor (rats) and MCF10DCIS.com | Gemini 0072 and Gemini 0097 0.1, 0.3, or 0.03 μg/kg, 5 days a week i.p. | 1 week after NMU; day 4 after MCF10DCIS.com cell implantation | 60% inhibition of NMU-induced mammary tumor and suppression of MCF10DCIS.com | [ | |
| NMU- and DMBA (7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene)-induced mammary carcinogenesis | 1α-Hydroxy-24-ethylcholecalciferol 25, 40, 50 μg/kg of diet | 2 weeks before carcinogen | - | Chemopreventive effects | [ |
* Calcitriol alone stimulates differentiation and proliferation in MDA-MB-231-luc tumors.
Figure 1Differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells (Tn). Naive CD4+ T cells (stem cell-like cells), under the influence of different cytokines secreted upon direct contact with antigen-presenting cell (APC), can differentiate into various types of effector cells: Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, and Treg. CD4+ T cell subsets are defined by the production of specific cytokines and the expression of specific transcription factors.
Figure 2The role of IL-23 in IL-17 gene expression. IL-23R pairs with IL-12Rβ1 forming IL-23R complex required for IL-23 signaling. This receptor is constitutively associated with Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) and Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2) which are activated after ligand biding, leading to STAT3 phosphorylation (P). Other molecules in IL-23 signaling cascade are also identified. MAC—macrophages, DC—dendritic cells, IL—interleukin, PGE2—prostaglandin E2, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor α, STAT3—signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, PI3K—phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Akt—serine/threonine-protein kinase, NF-κB—nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, IκB—NF-κB inhibitor, and p19 and p40—subunits of IL-23.
Figure 3Summary of Th17 cell plasticity. In the circles, the names of T cells are presented with main transcription factors listed below the names. Outside the circles, the cytokines secreted by the specific cells are listed. Transcription factors: AhR—aryl hydrocarbon receptor, RORγt—retinoid-acid-receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor γ, IRF1—interferon regulatory factor 1, PU.1—transcription factor encoded by SPI1 gene, BATF—basic leucine zipper transcriptional factor ATF-like, BCL6—B-cell lymphoma 6, T-bet—member of T-box family of transcription factors, GATA3—GATA binding protein 3, and FOXP3—forkhead box P3. Cytokines: IL—interleukin, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor α, IFN-γ—interferon γ, and TGF-β—transforming growth factor β. Cells: Tr1—type 1 regulatory T cells, Tfh—T follicular helper cells, Th—T helper cells, and Treg—T regulatory cells.
Figure 4The anti- and pro-tumor effects of Th17 cells. The recruitment and differentiation of Th17 cells in the tumor environment is influenced by factors produced by dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages (MAC), fibroblasts, and cancer cells. Th17 cells differentiated in this way may show various effects on tumor development. CCL—C-C motif chemokine ligand, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor α, TGF-β—transforming growth factor β, CXCL—C-X-C motif chemokine ligand, MMP—matrix metalloproteinase, STAT3—signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor, PGE2—prostaglandin E2, IFN-γ—interferon γ, IL—interleukin, CTLs—cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and NK—natural killer cells.
Figure 5Summary of the mechanisms of vitamin D direct action on breast cancer cells. Rb—retinoblastoma, CDK—cyclin-dependent kinase, c-Myc—c-myelocytomatosis, C/EBPα—CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein α, p21 and p27—cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, BRCA—breast cancer susceptibility gene, ROS—reactive oxygen species, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor α, Bcl-2—B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2, MMP—matrix metalloproteinase, ECM—extracellular matrix, Id1—inhibitor of DNA binding 1, VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor, and NFκB—nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells.
Figure 6Summary of the effects of vitamin D on various cells in tumor microenvironment and on immune system in breast cancer. CAFs—cancer-associated fibroblasts, iTh17—induced Th17, EC—endothelial cell, Treg—regulatory T lymphocytes, CD8+—CD8+ T lymphocytes, Ly6C—lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, NRG1—neuregulin 1, WNT5A—Wnt family member 5A, PDGFC—platelet-derived growth factor C, DUSP1—dual specificity phosphatase 1, NFKBIA—NFκB inhibitor α, TREM-1—triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, Il6—interleukin 6, Ccl5—C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (RANTES—Regulated on Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed and Secreted), Cxcl1—C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1, Pparg—peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, Pgc1a—PPARγ coactivator 1α, Cebpa—CCAAT enhancer-binding protein α, VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor, OVX—ovariectomized, AMPK—5′-AMP-activated protein kinase, E0771, 4T1, Mmtv-Wnt—mouse mammary gland cancer cell lines.
Figure 7The effect of calcitriol or its analogs on Th17 cells in young and aged mammary gland tumor-bearing mice. Young (~8 weeks old) or aged ovariectomized (~50 weeks old) BALB/c mice were transplanted orthotopically (ort.) with 4T1 mouse mammary gland cancer cells, and then injected s.c. with calcitriol or tacalcitol. Increased metastatic potential was observed in young mice treated with calcitriol or tacalcitol, whereas in aged mice decreased metastasis count was noticed. In young mice, lung tissue showed increased osteopontin gene (Spp1) expression with increased osteopontin (OPN) protein level and plasma level of 17β-estradiol and TGF-β, which may contribute to increased Th17 cell differentiation and increased metastatic spread of 4T1 tumors. In aged mice, OPN level in tumor tissue, as well as plasma level of OPN and 17β-estradiol, was decreased with lower IL-17A production by induced Th17 cells (iTh17), leading to decreased metastatic potential of 4T1 cells.