BACKGROUND: Vitamin D status is associated inversely with risk of colorectal cancer, but the association with adenoma risk is less clear. This meta-analysis examined the overall relationship between circulating (plasma or serum) 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D intake (dietary, supplemental, or total), and colorectal adenoma incidence in published studies. METHODS: A meta-analysis composed of 17 epidemiologic studies [1 cross-sectional, 9 case-control, and 7 cohort or nested case-control studies; 7 on 25(OH)D and 12 on vitamin D intake] published before December 2007 was done to examine the association between circulating 25(OH)D, vitamin D intake, and colorectal adenomas. Summary Peto odds ratios (OR) were computed for overall and stratified analyses. RESULTS: Circulating 25(OH)D was inversely associated with risk of colorectal adenomas: the OR was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.56-0.87] for high versus low circulating 25(OH)D. The highest quintile of vitamin D intake was associated with an 11% marginally decreased risk of colorectal adenomas compared with low vitamin D intake (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02). For recurrent adenomas, there was a decreased risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.72-1.07) among individuals with high versus low vitamin D intake. The inverse associations appeared stronger for advanced adenoma [OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90 for serum 25(OH)D and OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95 for vitamin D intake], but the number of studies was small. CONCLUSIONS: Both circulating 25(OH)D and vitamin D intake were inversely associated with colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrent adenomas. These results further support a role of vitamin D in prevention of colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrence.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D status is associated inversely with risk of colorectal cancer, but the association with adenoma risk is less clear. This meta-analysis examined the overall relationship between circulating (plasma or serum) 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D intake (dietary, supplemental, or total), and colorectal adenoma incidence in published studies. METHODS: A meta-analysis composed of 17 epidemiologic studies [1 cross-sectional, 9 case-control, and 7 cohort or nested case-control studies; 7 on 25(OH)D and 12 on vitamin D intake] published before December 2007 was done to examine the association between circulating 25(OH)D, vitamin D intake, and colorectal adenomas. Summary Peto odds ratios (OR) were computed for overall and stratified analyses. RESULTS: Circulating 25(OH)D was inversely associated with risk of colorectal adenomas: the OR was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.56-0.87] for high versus low circulating 25(OH)D. The highest quintile of vitamin D intake was associated with an 11% marginally decreased risk of colorectal adenomas compared with low vitamin D intake (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02). For recurrent adenomas, there was a decreased risk of 12% (95% CI, 0.72-1.07) among individuals with high versus low vitamin D intake. The inverse associations appeared stronger for advanced adenoma [OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90 for serum 25(OH)D and OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95 for vitamin D intake], but the number of studies was small. CONCLUSIONS: Both circulating 25(OH)D and vitamin D intake were inversely associated with colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrent adenomas. These results further support a role of vitamin D in prevention of colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrence.
Authors: Yong Gil Hwang; Hui-Chen Hsu; Fei-Chu Lim; Qi Wu; PingAr Yang; Gordon Fisher; Gary R Hunter; John D Mountz Journal: Adv Aging Res Date: 2013-05
Authors: Elizabeth A Hibler; Chengcheng Hu; Peter W Jurutka; Maria E Martinez; Elizabeth T Jacobs Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: María Elena Martínez; Elizabeth T Jacobs; John A Baron; James R Marshall; Tim Byers Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Veronika Fedirko; Roberd M Bostick; Michael Goodman; W Dana Flanders; Myron D Gross Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michael L Traub; John S Finnell; Anup Bhandiwad; Erica Oberg; Lena Suhaila; Ryan Bradley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Xiaosheng He; Kana Wu; Shuji Ogino; Edward L Giovannucci; Andrew T Chan; Mingyang Song Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Vincent T Janmaat; Anouk Van De Winkel; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Manon C W Spaander; André G Uitterlinden; Farzin Pourfarzad; Hugo W Tilanus; Agnieszka M Rygiel; Leon M G Moons; Pascal P Arp; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Ernst J Kuipers; Luc J W Van Der Laan Journal: Mol Med Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Veronika Fedirko; Roberd M Bostick; Qi Long; W Dana Flanders; Marjorie L McCullough; Eduard Sidelnikov; Carrie R Daniel; Robin E Rutherford; Aasma Shaukat Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.254