| Literature DB >> 35954200 |
Kathryn M Denecke1,2, Catherine A McBain3, Brock G Hermes1, Sireesh Kumar Teertam2, Mehtab Farooqui1, María Virumbrales-Muñoz1, Jennifer Panackal2, David J Beebe1,4, Bolanle Famakin2, Jose M Ayuso3,4.
Abstract
Stroke is one of the main causes of death in the US and post-stroke treatment options remain limited. Ischemic stroke is caused by a blood clot that compromises blood supply to the brain, rapidly leading to tissue death at the core of the infarcted area surrounded by a hypoxic and nutrient-starved region known as the penumbra. Recent evidence suggests that astrocytes in the penumbral region play a dual role in stroke response, promoting further neural and tissue damage or improving tissue repair depending on the microenvironment. Thus, astrocyte response in the hypoxic penumbra could promote tissue repair after stroke, salvaging neurons in the affected area and contributing to cognitive recovery. However, the complex microenvironment of ischemic stroke, characterized by gradients of hypoxia and nutrients, poses a unique challenge for traditional in vitro models, which in turn hinders the development of novel therapies. To address this challenge, we have developed a novel, polystyrene-based microfluidic device to model the necrotic and penumbral region induced by an ischemic stroke. We demonstrated that when subjected to hypoxia, and nutrient starvation, astrocytes within the penumbral region generated in the microdevice exhibited long-lasting, significantly altered signaling capacity including calcium signaling impairment.Entities:
Keywords: astroyctes; microenviroment; microfluidics; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954200 PMCID: PMC9367413 DOI: 10.3390/cells11152356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Design and fabrication of polystyrene microfluidic device. (A) Side-view schematic of microfluidic device (B) Top-down view of the individual microfluidic chamber. (C) Side-view of the microfluidic device. (D) Picture showing microfluidic device bonded to a 0.175 mm sheet of polystyrene by ultrasonic welding. (E) Schematic depicting the use of medical-grade double-sided adhesive bound to 175 mm polystyrene sheet and cell culture flask. (F) Image depicting fully assembled polystyrene microfluidic device. (G) Picture showing a microdevice array containing 5 culture chambers. The chambers were filled with blue and red die for visualization purposes. (H) Scheme depicting the cells in the culture chamber. The asymmetric location of the perfused biomimetic vessel and the diffusion ports create a gradient of oxygen/nutrients across the culture chamber. (I) schematic showing the microdevice disassembly for cell isolation. (J) Panel illustrating top-view, and cross-section of the biomimetic blood vessel. Microvascular endothelial cells (fluorescent in green) were seeded in the lumen and imaged in a confocal microscope after 24 h in culture.
Figure 2Cell viability analysis at varying densities within polystyrene and PDMS microfluidic devices. (A) Schematic representation of polystyrene and PDMS microfluidic devices. Both devices had one lumen located in the culture chamber flank, creating an asymmetric oxygen and nutrient distribution. Since PDMS is permeable to oxygen, only a gradient of nutrient is created in the PDMS-based microdevice. (B) Fluorescence microscopy image of astrocytes within polystyrene microfluidic device at 5 million cells/mL. Live and dead cells are shown in green and red, respectively. The location of the lumen is shown in a dashed line. (C) Astrocytes within PDMS microfluidic devices at varying densities imaged at lumen and necrotic core. Red and blue backgrounds are used to denote results obtained in polystyrene and PDMS devices respectively. Green and red outlines are used to denote results obtained from the proximal and distal region respectively. (D) Astrocytes within polystyrene microfluidic devices at varying densities imaged at lumen and necrotic core. (E) Graphs depicting cellular viability of astrocytes at densities of 3 million/mL and 5 Million/mL within polystyrene and PDMS microfluidic devices. *, **, *** denote p-value < 0.05, 0.01, 0.005 respectively.
Figure 3Experimental Design. Illustration depicting experimental timeline beginning with the harvesting of rat astrocytes and culture within microfluidic device at different time periods followed by the extraction of astrocytes from device and culture of astrocytes prior to calcium signaling analysis and morphological analysis.
Figure 4Calcium signaling analysis. (A) Illustration depicting analysis of calcium waves generated by astrocyte signaling (B) Image depicting astrocytes stained with the calcium-sensing dye. Red outline highlights a pulsing astrocyte (C) Graph illustrating differing types of astrocyte calcium pulsing (D) Graphs analyzing percentage of pulsing astrocytes from device illustrating differences at proximal and distal locations at varying time points (E) Graphs analyzing percentage of pulsing astrocytes from device illustrating recovery potential of astrocytes at proximal and distal locations. *, **, *** denote p-value < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 respectively.
Figure 5Morphological Analysis. (A) Illustration depicting methodology for circularity morphological analysis. (B) Astrocytes extracted from the proximal region of the device after 3 days and placed in culture for 5 days prior to imaging. (C) Astrocytes extracted from the distal region of the device after 3 days and placed in culture for 5 days prior to imaging. (D) Violin graphs analyzing circularity of astrocytes at multiple time points after extraction from proximal and distal regions of the device. (E) Violin graphs analyzing area of astrocytes at multiple time points after extraction from proximal and distal regions of the device. ** and *** denote p-value < 0.01 and 0.005 respectively.