| Literature DB >> 35954147 |
Lilong Wang1, Linlin Wang1, Chunhong Yan1, Chunqing Ai1, Chengrong Wen1, Xiaoming Guo2, Shuang Song1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to clarify the potential mechanism of fucoidans found in Ascophyllum nodosum on anti-inflammation and to further explore the relationship between their structures and anti-inflammation. Two novel fucoidans named ANP-6 and ANP-7 and found in A. nodosum, were separated and purified and their structures were elucidated by HPGPC, HPLC, GC-MS, FT-IR, NMR, and by the Congo red test. They both possessed a backbone constructed of →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→, →3)-α-L-Fucp2S4S-(1→, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→, and →3,6)-β-D-Galp4S-(1→ with branches of →2)-α-L-Fucp4S-(1→ and →3)-β-D-Galp-(1→. Moreover, ANP-6 and ANP-7 could prevent the inflammation of the LPS-stimulated macrophages by suppressing the NO production and by regulating the expressions of iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10. Their inhibitory effects on the TLR-2 and TLR-4 levels suggest that they inhibit the inflammation process via the blocking of the TLR/NF-κB signal transduction. In addition, ANP-6, with a molecular weight (63.2 kDa), exhibited stronger anti-inflammatory capabilities than ANP-7 (124.5 kDa), thereby indicating that the molecular weight has an influence on the anti-inflammatory effects of fucoidans.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammation; chemical structure; molecular weight; sulfated polysaccharides
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954147 PMCID: PMC9368091 DOI: 10.3390/foods11152381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Chemical characteristics of the fucoidan from A. nodosum. Stepwise elution curve of the crude ANP on a DEAE−52 column (A), HPGPC profiles of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (B), FT−IR spectra of ANP-6, dS-ANP-6, ANP-7, and dS-ANP-7 (C), HPLC profiles of monosaccharide standards, ANP-6, and ANP-7 (D), and the Congo red experiment of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (E).
Chemical compositions of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
| Sample | Total Sugar | Uronic Acid | Sulfate Content | Protein Content (%) | Total Polyphenols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANP-6 | 61.67 ± 1.34 | 3.39 ± 0.29 | 39.88 ± 1.61 | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.01 ± 0.002 |
| ANP-7 | 60.88 ± 1.36 | 2.70 ± 0.37 | 42.06 ± 1.48 | 0.01 ± 0.006 | 0.01 ± 0.003 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data are the result of a statistical analysis using the Student’s t-test.
Methylation analysis and mode of linkage of dS-ANP-6 and dS-ANP-7.
| Sample | Methylated Derivative | Deduced Linkage | Characteristic | Molar Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS-ANP-6 | 2,3,4-Me3-Fuc | Fuc | 43, 57, 71, 89, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189 | 1.1 |
| 2,3,4,6-Me4-Gal | Gal | 43, 57, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 205 | 2.4 | |
| 2,4-Me2-Fuc | →3)-Fuc | 43, 58, 85, 89, 101, 117, 131, 159, 173, 189, 201, 233 | 12.6 | |
| 3,4-Me2-Fuc | →2)-Fuc | 43, 87, 99, 129, 143, 159, 189, 201 | 2.6 | |
| 2,4,6-Me3-Gal | →3)-Gal | 43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 161, 173, 233 | 1.6 | |
| 2,3,4-Me3-Gal | →6)-Gal | 43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 173, 189, 233 | 1.0 | |
| 2,4-Me2-Gal | →3,6)-Gal | 43, 58, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189, 201 | 3.0 | |
| 2,4,6-Me3-Man | →3)-Man | 43, 59, 87, 101, 115, 129, 145, 173, 189, 215 | 0.2 | |
| dS-ANP-7 | 2,3,4-Me3-Fuc | Fuc | 43, 57, 71, 89, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189 | 1.2 |
| 2,3,4,6-Me4-Gal | Gal | 43, 57, 71, 87, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 205 | 2.3 | |
| 2,4-Me2-Fuc | →3)-Fuc | 43, 58, 85, 89, 101, 117, 131, 159, 173, 189, 201, 233 | 13.6 | |
| 3,4-Me2-Fuc | →2)-Fuc | 43, 87, 99, 129, 143, 159, 189, 201 | 2.4 | |
| 2,4,6-Me3-Gal | →3)-Gal | 43,71,87,99,101,117,129,161,173,233 | 1.6 | |
| 2,3,4-Me3-Gal | →6)-Gal | 43, 71, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 143, 161, 173, 189, 233 | 1.0 | |
| 2,4-Me2-Gal | →3,6)-Gal | 43, 58, 87, 99, 101, 117, 129, 142, 161, 189, 201 | 2.9 | |
| 2,4,6-Me3-Man | →3)-Man | 43, 59, 87, 101, 115, 129, 145, 173, 189, 215 | 0.2 |
Figure 21H NMR spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and 13C NMR spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Figure 3COSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and HSQC spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Chemical shift assignments of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
| Sample | Sugar Residue | Chemical Shift (ppm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1/C1 | H2/C2 | H3/C3 | H4/C4 | H5/C5 | H6/C6 | |||
| ANP-6 | A | →2)-α-L-Fuc | 5.20/100.1 | 3.71/74.6 | 4.02/68.9 | 4.50/81.0 | 3.86/67.9 | 1.16/15.6 |
| B | →3)-α-L-Fuc | 5.34/98.9 | 4.50/78.2 | 4.42/74.8 | 4.30/80.3 | 4.28/67.5 | 1.23/16.3 | |
| C | →3,6)-β-D-Gal | 4.68/102.7 | 3.64/71.4 | 4.81/78.5 | 4.60/77.3 | 3.90/73.7 | 3.84/66.8 | |
| D | →6)-β-D-Gal | 4.47/103.3 | 3.58/69.4 | 4.26/74.5 | 4.07/70.1 | 3.86/76.2 | 4.08/67.1 | |
| E | →3)-β-D-Gal | 4.42/103.9 | 3.42/71.2 | 4.25/80.3 | 3.69/69.1 | 3.62/73.3 | 3.65/61.1 | |
| ANP-7 | A | →2)-α-L-Fuc | 5.20/100.1 | 3.71/74.5 | 4.02/68.9 | 4.50/80.9 | 3.86/67.9 | 1.16/15.5 |
| B | →3)-α-L-Fuc | 5.33/98.7 | 4.50/78.3 | 4.43/75.0 | 4.31/80.3 | 4.28/67.5 | 1.27/16.4 | |
| C | →3,6)-β-D-Gal | 4.68/102.9 | 3.64/71.5 | 4.82/78.3 | 4.60/77.3 | 3.89/73.5 | 3.84/66.8 | |
| D | →6)-β-D-Gal | 4.48/103.2 | 3.58/69.3 | 4.28/74.5 | 4.08/70.1 | 3.85/76.3 | 4.07/67.1 | |
| E | →3)-β-D-Gal | 4.40/103.8 | 3.42/71.2 | 4.25/80.4 | 3.70/69.1 | 3.62/73.2 | 3.65/61.1 | |
Figure 4TOCSY spectra of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) and NOESY spectra of ANP-6 (C) and ANP-7 (D).
Figure 5Hypothetical structures of ANP-6 and ANP-7.
Figure 6Effects of ANP-6 (A) and ANP-7 (B) on cell viability and NO production (C) and against LPS-induced toxicity (D). The results were expressed as means ± SD (n = 6). Values are significantly different from the LPS group at # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001. Or * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 against the control group.
Figure 7Effects of ANP-6 and ANP-7 on mRNA levels of iNOS (A), COX-2 (B), TNF-α (C), IL-1β (D), IL-6 (E), IL-10 (F), TNF-α/IL-10 ratio (G), IL-1β/IL-10 ratio (H), IL-6/IL-10 ratio (I), TLR-2 (J), TLR-4 (K) and the possible signaling pathways of ANP-6 and ANP-7 (L). Results were indicated as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values are significantly different from the LPS treated or control group at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.