| Literature DB >> 35954114 |
Vincenzo Russo1,2, Marco Bilucaglia1,2, Riccardo Circi2, Mara Bellati3, Riccardo Valesi4, Rita Laureanti5, Giuseppe Licitra6, Margherita Zito1,2.
Abstract
Over the past few years, many studies have shown how territoriality can be considered a driver for purchasing agri-food products. Products with certification of origin are perceived as more sustainable, safer and of better quality. At the same time, producers of traditional products often belong to small entities that struggle to compete with large multinational food corporations, having less budget to allocate to product promotion. In this study, we propose a neuromarketing approach, showing how the use of these techniques can help in choosing the most effective commercial in terms of likeability and ability to activate mnemonic processes. Two commercials were filmed for the purpose of this study. They differed from each other in terms of emotional sequence. The first aimed primarily at eliciting positive emotions derived from the product description. The second aimed to generate negative emotions during the early stages, highlighting the negative consequences of humans' loss of contact with nature and tradition and then eliciting positive emotions by presenting cheese production using traditional techniques as a solution to the problem. Based on the literature on the emotional sequences in social advertising, we hypothesised that the second commercial would generate an overall better emotional reaction and activate mnemonic processes to a greater extent. Our results partially support the research hypotheses, providing useful insights both to marketers and for future research on the topic.Entities:
Keywords: agri-food products; emotions; neuromarketing; territoriality; traditional cheese
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954114 PMCID: PMC9368719 DOI: 10.3390/foods11152349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Descriptive plot with error bars of the MI, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and the theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). The vertical axis is expressed as unit-less z-scores.
Descriptive statistics (M = mean, SD = standard deviation, n = number) of the MI, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). All values are expressed as unitless z-scores.
| Theme | Video | M | SD | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nt | M | 0.001 | 0.251 | 18 |
| R | −0.015 | 0.687 | 17 | |
| Pr | M | −0.028 | 0.307 | 18 |
| R | −0.310 | 0.365 | 17 | |
| Prd | M | 0.021 | 0.515 | 18 |
| R | −0.076 | 0.347 | 17 | |
| Tr | M | 0.230 | 0.481 | 18 |
| R | −0.420 | 0.480 | 17 |
Figure 2Descriptive plot with error bars of the HR, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and the theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). The vertical axis is expressed as unit-less z-scores.
Descriptive statistics (M = mean, SD = standard deviation, n = number) of the HR, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). All values are expressed as unitless z-scores.
| Theme | Video | M | SD | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nt | M | 0.087 | 0.735 | 16 |
| R | −1.090 | 0.906 | 16 | |
| Pr | M | −0.310 | 0.538 | 16 |
| R | −0.970 | 0.866 | 16 | |
| Prd | M | 0.316 | 0.513 | 16 |
| R | −1.081 | 0.803 | 16 | |
| Tr | M | 0.232 | 1.241 | 16 |
| R | −0.324 | 1.514 | 16 |
Figure 3Descriptive plot with error bars of the EI, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and the theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). The vertical axis is expressed as unit-less z-scores.
Descriptive statistics (M = mean, SD = standard deviation, n = number) of the EI, split for the video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality). All values are expressed as unitless z-scores.
| Theme | Video | M | SD | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nt | M | 0.005 | 0.178 | 16 |
| R | −0.255 | 0.345 | 17 | |
| Pr | M | −0.124 | 0.129 | 16 |
| R | −0.272 | 0.352 | 17 | |
| Prd | M | 0.085 | 0.224 | 16 |
| R | −0.295 | 0.286 | 17 | |
| Tr | M | −0.084 | 0.273 | 16 |
| R | −0.280 | 0.581 | 17 |
Summary of the six research hypotheses H1–H6 that compared AWI, MI, HR and EI metrics across both the Video (M = The Myth, R = Rewind) and the Video × Theme (Nt = Nature, Pr = Product, Prd = Production, Tr = Territoriality) dimensions. The direction of the expected differences is also provided, alongside the associated significant p-values (n.s. stands for not-significant). The fully or partially confirmed hypotheses are marked as, † and *, respectively.
| Research Hypothesis | Metric | Direction | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 * | AWI | M > R | n.s. |
| HR | M > R | 0.045 | |
| EI | M > R | 0.009 | |
| H2 | AWI | Nt | n.s. |
| Prd | n.s. | ||
| Tr | n.s. | ||
| HR | Nt | n.s. | |
| Prd | n.s. | ||
| Tr | n.s. | ||
| EI | Nt | n.s. | |
| Prd | n.s. | ||
| Tr | n.s. | ||
| H3 | AWI | Pr | n.s. |
| HR | Pr | n.s. | |
| EI | Pr | n.s. | |
| H4 † | MI | M > R | 0.025 |
| H5 * | MI | Nt | n.s. |
| Prd | n.s. | ||
| Tr | 0.001 | ||
| H6 | MI | Pr | n.s. |