| Literature DB >> 35953973 |
Chongshan Yuan1, Changze Li1, Xinyuan Chen1, Syed Muhammad Tahir1, Aiwu Zhang1, Min Wu1.
Abstract
Sika deer velvet antler is the most important animal nutraceutic in traditional Chinese medicine. Reducing the breeding cost of sika deer by looking for a low-cost diet is the main research direction at present. The purpose of this experiment was to find an alternative diet for sika deer and reduce the cost of the diet by using spent mushroom substrate (SMS) as a concentrate supplement. The apparent digestibility for sika doe and the hematological changes of sika doe and suckling fawn were measured by replacing 10% of the concentrate supplement with SMS of Pleurotus ostreatus (SMS-MP). Compared with the control group, the digestibility of dry matter (DM), total protein (TP), globulin (GLO), and cholesterol (CHOL) of sika doe were significantly decreased (p < 0.05), and glucose (GLU), alanine (Ala), phenylalanine (Phe), and proline (Pro) of sika doe were significantly increased (p < 0.05) after the replacement of SMS-MP. Compared with the control group, the serum GLU of suckling fawn was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) and the phosphatase (ALP) was significantly increased after the replacement of SMS-MP (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the immune globulin and amino acid of suckling fawns between the two groups (p > 0.05). The present findings confirm the applicability of SMS-MP as a sika doe concentrate supplement. At the same time, using SMS, a waste resource, can not only reduce the breeding cost of sika doe, but also make full use of SMS to reduce environmental pollution.Entities:
Keywords: blood hematological; digestibility; sika deer; spent mushroom substrate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35953973 PMCID: PMC9367358 DOI: 10.3390/ani12151984
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Ingredients of concentrate supplement (%).
| Ingredients | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Corn | 49.0 |
| Soybean meal | 49.0 |
| NaCl | 1.5 |
| Stone powder | 0.2 |
| Bone meal | 0.1 |
| Ca(HCO3)2 | 0.2 |
Nutritional ingredients of concentrate supplement (%, DM).
| Parameter | Control | Experimental |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein (CP) | 15.61 ± 0.21 | 15.33 ± 0.61 |
| Energy (MJ/Kg) | 16.64 ± 0.43 | 16.16 ± 0.26 |
| Ether extract (EE) | 12.72 ± 0.32 | 12.12 ± 0.28 |
| Organic matter (OM) | 95.72 ± 0.05 | 95.43 ± 0.05 |
Feed intake and nutrient digestibilities of sika doe.
| Parameter | Control | Experimental |
|---|---|---|
| Organic matter intake (g·d−1) | 1593.85 ± 43.58 | 1543.27 ± 120.54 |
| Dry matter intake (g·d−1) | 1665.67 ± 45.53 | 1617.12 ± 126.31 |
| Digestibility of CP (%) | 81.25 ± 3.85 | 81.15 ± 2.89 |
| Digestibility of EE (%) | 66.06 ± 7.00 | 67.65 ± 4.65 |
| Digestibility of OM (%) | 67.38 ± 6.21 | 67.03 ± 3.48 |
| Digestibility of DM (%) | 64.62 ± 6.08 a | 58.01 ± 8.50 b |
a,b Different letters within the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Comparison of serum biochemical parameters of sika doe and suckling fawn.
| Parameter | Abbreviation | Sika Doe | Suckling Fawn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | ||
| Albumin (g/L) | ALB | 28.40 ± 0.40 | 28.17 ± 1.55 | 28.17 ± 0.76 | 28.47 ± 1.15 |
| Total protein (g/L) | TP | 67.70 ± 1.97 a | 63.23 ± 1.53 b | 52.93 ± 2.70 | 53.50 ± 2.88 |
| Globulin (g/L) | GLO | 39.30 ± 1.71 a | 35.07 ± 0.06 b | 24.77 ± 2.18 | 25.03 ± 2.27 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | Ca | 2.43 ± 0.11 | 2.40 ± 0.14 | 2.38 ± 0.20 | 2.55 ± 0.08 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | GLU | 6.46 ± 1.43 b | 9.63 ± 0.67 a | 8.55 ± 0.87 a | 6.82 ± 0.24 b |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | BUN | 4.96 ± 1.02 | 6.38 ± 0.48 | 5.48 ± 1.31 | 5.93 ± 0.49 |
| Amylase (U/L) | AMY | 10.00 ± 4.00 | 6.67 ± 3.21 | 7.67 ± 1.53 | 11.33 ± 2.31 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | CHOL | 2.13 ± 0.11 A | 1.75 ± 0.04 B | 2.90 ± 0.27 | 2.23 ± 0.56 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) | ALT | 47.67 ± 6.11 | 50.33 ± 10.97 | 63.00 ± 21.00 | 72.0 ± 12.12 |
| Total bilirubin (umol/L) | TBIL | 4.64 ± 1.08 | 4.57 ± 1.59 | 4.10 ± 3.10 | 3.47 ± 0.85 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | ALP | 199.67 ± 83.34 | 111.67 ± 15.95 | 391.67 ± 38.07 b | 541.67 ± 45.65 a |
| Inosine (umol/L) | CRE | 128.33 ± 38.55 | 168.00 ± 28.05 | 106.00 ± 13.75 | 111.67 ± 4.51 |
| Creatine Kinase (U/L) | CK | 170.33 ± 16.65 | 169.33 ± 13.61 | 397.00 ± 10.65 | 402.67 ± 9.02 |
a,b Different letters within the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05). A,B Different letters within the same row were highly significantly different (p < 0.01).
Globulin of sika doe and suckling fawn (mg/mL).
| Parameter | Sika Doe | Suckling Fawn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | |
| Immunoglobulin A (IgA) | 62.60 ± 10.95 | 64.09 ± 9.67 | 81.53 ± 5.31 | 79.15 ± 4.36 |
| Immunoglobulin G (IgG) | 27.23 ± 13.75 | 36.34 ± 6.11 | 37.34 ± 20.98 | 25.00 ± 8.52 |
| Immunoglobulin M (IgM) | 3.08 ± 1.71 | 4.93 ± 1.24 | 3.29 ± 1.14 | 3.11 ± 0.75 |
Plasma amino acid of sika doe and suckling fawn (µmol/mL).
| Parameter | Sika Doe | Suckling Fawn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | |
| Alanine (Ala) | 17.12 ± 4.23 B | 28.77 ± 0.78 A | 15.10 ± 3.94 | 28.27 ± 9.07 |
| Aspartic (Asp) | 504.01 ± 46.53 | 521.34 ± 45.94 | 453.60 ± 37.73 | 479.07 ± 8.63 |
| Isoleucine (Ile) | 1283.28 ± 271.60 | 1397.45 ± 186.74 | 545.75 ± 43.28 | 597.55 ± 74.55 |
| Leucine (Leu) | 47.71 ± 3.92 | 54.23 ± 1.82 | 37.38 ± 7.66 | 48.65 ± 1.81 |
| Phenylalanine (Phe) | 59.62 ± 5.07 b | 69.23 ± 1.87 a | 51.36 ± 18.89 | 54.96 ± 0.88 |
| Proline (Pro) | 3.87 ± 0.31 b | 4.48 ± 0.05 a | 3.02 ± 0.94 | 3.44 ± 0.06 |
| Serine (Ser) | 4.79 ± 1.05 | 5.91 ± 0.01 | 3.21 ± 0.56 | 3.56 ± 0.04 |
| Tyrosine (Tyr) | 1.94 ± 0.68 | 2.43 ± 0.00 | 1.28 ± 0.20 | 1.16 ± 0.00 |
| Valine (Val) | 47.15 ± 8.28 | 53.05 ± 0.27 | 40.06 ± 4.27 | 37.66 ± 0.42 |
a,b Different letters within the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05). A,B Different letters within the same row were very significantly different (p < 0.01).