| Literature DB >> 35953934 |
Maria Dos Santos Costa1, Hallana Cristina Menezes da Silva1, Simone Cardoso Soares1,2, Ramon Marin Favarato3, Eliana Feldberg3, Ana Lúcia Silva Gomes4, Roberto Ferreira Artoni5, Daniele Aparecida Matoso6.
Abstract
Rex retroelements are the best-known transposable elements class and are broadly distributed through fish and also individual genomes, playing an important role in their evolutionary dynamics. Several agents can stress these elements; among them, there are some parasitic compounds such as the organochlorophosphate Trichlorfon. Consequently, knowing that the organochlorophosphate Trichlorfon is indiscriminately used as an antiparasitic in aquaculture, the current study aimed to analyze the effects of this compound on the activation of the Transposable Elements (TEs) Rex1, Rex3, and Rex6 and the structure of heterochromatin in the mitotic chromosomes of the tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum). For this, two concentrations of the pesticide were used: 30% (0.261 mg/L) and 50% (0.435 mg/L) of the recommended LC50-96 h concentration (0.87 mg/L) for this fish species. The results revealed a dispersed distribution for Rex1 and Rex6 retroelements. Rex3 showed an increase in both marking intensity and distribution, as well as enhanced chromosomal heterochromatinization. This probably happened by the mediation of epigenetic adaptive mechanisms, causing the retroelement mobilization to be repressed. However, this behavior was most evident when Trichlorfon concentrations and exposure times were the greatest, reflecting the genetic flexibility necessary for this species to successfully adapt to environmental changes.Entities:
Keywords: FISH; heterochromatinization; organophosphate; repetitive elements
Year: 2022 PMID: 35953934 PMCID: PMC9367383 DOI: 10.3390/ani12151945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Experimental design using C. macropomum as a model organism. The tanks were randomly distributed: the tanks 5, 3, and 9 with C0 corresponding to 0.0 mg/L of Trichlorfon diluted in the water (three tanks with six specimens = 18 specimens analyzed); the tanks 4, 6, and 8 with C1 corresponding to 0.261 mg/L of Trichlorfon; and the tanks 1, 2, and 7 with C2 corresponding to 0.435 mg/L of Trichlorfon. Then 18 fish per treatment were analyzed, six per tank. N sampled—54 fish.
Figure 2(a)-I–C-banding of C. macropomum in the control group (C0-0.0 mg/L of Trichlorfon). Heterochromatic regions are marked in the pericentromeric portions of chromosomes, conventional configuration for C-banding of tambaqui. For details, see references [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. 2(a)-II–C-banding after exposition to trichlorfon to 30% LC50–96 h-48 h (C1 = 0.261 mg/L). 7, 8, 16, and 18 chromosomes are marked. 2(a)-III–C-banding after exposition to 50% LC50–96 h-48 h (C2 = 0.435 mg/L), bi-telomeric markings are observed in 4 chromosomes, beyond 7, 8, 16, and 18 chromosomes are marked. 2(a)-IV-C-banding after exposition to 50% LC50–96 h-72 h, bi-telomeric markings are observed in 4 and 8 chromosomes, terminal markings in 7 and 16 chromosomes, and interstitial markings in 18 chromosomes. 2(a)-V–C-banding after exposition to 50% LC50–96 h-96 h, bi-telomeric markings are observed in 4, 7, and 8 chromosomes, terminal markings in 16 and 26 chromosomes, centromeric and terminal markings in 1 chromosomes, and interstitial mark in 18 chromosomes. 2(b)-VII–FISH of Rex3 of C. macropomum in control group (C0 = 0.0 mg/L of Trichlorfon). 2(b)-VIII-FISH after exposition to 30% LC50–96 h-48 h (C1 = 0.261 mg/L of Trichlorfon). Slight markings are observed on the telomeric portions on most chromosomes. The same situation for 2(b)-IX and 2(b)-X that correspond to 30% LC50–96 h-72 h and 50% LC50–96 h-48 h of Trichlorfon, respectively. In 2(b)-XI and 2(b)-XII, that correspond to 50% LC50–96 h-72 h and 50% LC50–96 h-96 h (extreme condition), intense markings are observed on the telomeres or centromeric regions on most chromosomes. For the most extreme conditions of the experiment, gradual amplification of Rex3 markings is observed with the increase in the parasiticide Trichlorfon.
Figure 3Chromosomal mapping of the Rex1 by FISH in C. macropomum. (a) FISH in the control group (C0 = 0.0 mg/L of Trichlorfon). (b) 30% LC50–96 h-48 h of Trichlorfon (C1 = 0.261 mg/L). Even at higher concentrations, (c) 30% LC50–96 h-72 h, (d) 50% LC50–96 h-48 h (C2 = 0.435 mg/L of Trichlorfon), (e) 50% LC50–96 h-72 h, (f) 50% LC50–96 h-96 h, an increase of markings was observed in Rex1 retroelements after treatment.
Figure 4Chromosomal mapping of the Rex6 by FISH in C. macropomum. (a) FISH in the control group (C0 = 0.0 mg/L of Trichlorfon), (b) 30% LC50–96 h-48 h of Trichlorfon (C1 = 0.261 mg/L), (c) 30% LC50–96 h-72 h, (d) 50% LC50-96 h-48 h (C2 = 0.435 mg/L of Trichlorfon), (e) 50% LC50–96 h-72 h, (f) 50% LC50–96 h-96 h. It was observed that there was no amplification pattern for Rex6 even at the highest concentration of pesticide.