Janina Fischer-Mertens1, Felix Otte1,2, Andrea Roderwieser1,2,3, Carolina Rosswog1,2, Yvonne Kahlert1,2, Lisa Werr1,2, Anna-Maria Hellmann1,2, Maya Berding1,2, Bill Chiu4, Christoph Bartenhagen1,2, Matthias Fischer5,6. 1. Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 2. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 3. Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 4. Pediatric Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. matthias.fischer@uk-koeln.de. 6. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. matthias.fischer@uk-koeln.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The majority of high-risk neuroblastomas harbor telomerase activity, and telomerase-interacting compounds, such as 6-thio-2'-deoxyguanosine (6-thio-dG), have been found to impair the growth of telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines. It has remained unclear, however, how such drugs can be combined with other compounds used in current treatment concepts for neuroblastoma patients. METHODS: Growth-inhibitory effects of varying concentrations of 6-thio-dG in combination with etoposide, doxorubicin or ceritinib were determined in eight telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines with distinct genetic backgrounds. Tumor growth inhibition of subcutaneous xenografts from three different cell lines was assessed upon treatment with 6-thio-dG, the competitive telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, etoposide, or combinations of these compounds. RESULTS: Robust synergistic anti-tumor effects were observed for combinations of 6-thio-dG and etoposide or doxorubicin, but not for 6-thio-dG and ceritinib, in telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines in vitro. Treatment of mouse xenografts with combinations of 6-thio-dG and etoposide significantly attenuated tumor growth and improved mouse survival over etoposide alone in two of three cell line models. Treatment of xenograft tumors by imetelstat monotherapy decreased telomerase activity by roughly 50% and significantly improved survival over control in all three models, whereas treatment with imetelstat plus etoposide led to enhanced survival over etoposide monotherapy in one model. Mechanistically, the synergistic effect was found to be due to both increased apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that telomerase is an actionable target in telomerase-positive neuroblastoma, and demonstrates that combination therapies including telomerase-interacting compounds may improve the efficacy of established cytotoxic drugs. Targeting telomerase may thus represent a therapeutic option in high-risk neuroblastoma patients.
BACKGROUND: The majority of high-risk neuroblastomas harbor telomerase activity, and telomerase-interacting compounds, such as 6-thio-2'-deoxyguanosine (6-thio-dG), have been found to impair the growth of telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines. It has remained unclear, however, how such drugs can be combined with other compounds used in current treatment concepts for neuroblastoma patients. METHODS: Growth-inhibitory effects of varying concentrations of 6-thio-dG in combination with etoposide, doxorubicin or ceritinib were determined in eight telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines with distinct genetic backgrounds. Tumor growth inhibition of subcutaneous xenografts from three different cell lines was assessed upon treatment with 6-thio-dG, the competitive telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, etoposide, or combinations of these compounds. RESULTS: Robust synergistic anti-tumor effects were observed for combinations of 6-thio-dG and etoposide or doxorubicin, but not for 6-thio-dG and ceritinib, in telomerase-positive neuroblastoma cell lines in vitro. Treatment of mouse xenografts with combinations of 6-thio-dG and etoposide significantly attenuated tumor growth and improved mouse survival over etoposide alone in two of three cell line models. Treatment of xenograft tumors by imetelstat monotherapy decreased telomerase activity by roughly 50% and significantly improved survival over control in all three models, whereas treatment with imetelstat plus etoposide led to enhanced survival over etoposide monotherapy in one model. Mechanistically, the synergistic effect was found to be due to both increased apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that telomerase is an actionable target in telomerase-positive neuroblastoma, and demonstrates that combination therapies including telomerase-interacting compounds may improve the efficacy of established cytotoxic drugs. Targeting telomerase may thus represent a therapeutic option in high-risk neuroblastoma patients.
Authors: Shivanni Kummar; Helen X Chen; John Wright; Susan Holbeck; Myrtle Davis Millin; Joseph Tomaszewski; James Zweibel; Jerry Collins; James H Doroshow Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Georgina V Long; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Helen Gogas; Evgeny Levchenko; Filippo de Braud; James Larkin; Claus Garbe; Thomas Jouary; Axel Hauschild; Jean Jacques Grob; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Celeste Lebbe; Mario Mandalà; Michael Millward; Ana Arance; Igor Bondarenko; John B A G Haanen; Johan Hansson; Jochen Utikal; Virginia Ferraresi; Nadezhda Kovalenko; Peter Mohr; Volodymyr Probachai; Dirk Schadendorf; Paul Nathan; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas; Douglas J DeMarini; Jhangir G Irani; Michelle Casey; Daniele Ouellet; Anne-Marie Martin; Ngocdiep Le; Kiran Patel; Keith Flaherty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lori S Hart; JulieAnn Rader; Pichai Raman; Vandana Batra; Mike R Russell; Matthew Tsang; Maria Gagliardi; Lucy Chen; Daniel Martinez; Yimei Li; Andrew Wood; Sunkyu Kim; Sudha Parasuraman; Scott Delach; Kristina A Cole; Shiva Krupa; Markus Boehm; Malte Peters; Giordano Caponigro; John M Maris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Patrick A Thompson; Rachid Drissi; Jodi A Muscal; Eshini Panditharatna; Maryam Fouladi; Ashish M Ingle; Charlotte H Ahern; Joel M Reid; Tong Lin; Brenda J Weigel; Susan M Blaney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rani E George; Takaomi Sanda; Megan Hanna; Stefan Fröhling; William Luther; Jianming Zhang; Yebin Ahn; Wenjun Zhou; Wendy B London; Patrick McGrady; Liquan Xue; Sergey Zozulya; Vlad E Gregor; Thomas R Webb; Nathanael S Gray; D Gary Gilliland; Lisa Diller; Heidi Greulich; Stephan W Morris; Matthew Meyerson; A Thomas Look Journal: Nature Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 49.962