Literature DB >> 25265492

Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma.

Georgina V Long1, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Helen Gogas, Evgeny Levchenko, Filippo de Braud, James Larkin, Claus Garbe, Thomas Jouary, Axel Hauschild, Jean Jacques Grob, Vanna Chiarion Sileni, Celeste Lebbe, Mario Mandalà, Michael Millward, Ana Arance, Igor Bondarenko, John B A G Haanen, Johan Hansson, Jochen Utikal, Virginia Ferraresi, Nadezhda Kovalenko, Peter Mohr, Volodymyr Probachai, Dirk Schadendorf, Paul Nathan, Caroline Robert, Antoni Ribas, Douglas J DeMarini, Jhangir G Irani, Michelle Casey, Daniele Ouellet, Anne-Marie Martin, Ngocdiep Le, Kiran Patel, Keith Flaherty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition, as compared with BRAF inhibition alone, delays the emergence of resistance and reduces toxic effects in patients who have melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations.
METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 423 previously untreated patients who had unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation to receive a combination of dabrafenib (150 mg orally twice daily) and trametinib (2 mg orally once daily) or dabrafenib and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate, response duration, and safety. A preplanned interim overall survival analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the dabrafenib-trametinib group and 8.8 months in the dabrafenib-only group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the dabrafenib-trametinib group, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.99; P=0.03). The overall response rate was 67% in the dabrafenib-trametinib group and 51% in the dabrafenib-only group (P=0.002). At 6 months, the interim overall survival rate was 93% with dabrafenib-trametinib and 85% with dabrafenib alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.94; P=0.02). However, a specified efficacy-stopping boundary (two-sided P=0.00028) was not crossed. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups, although more dose modifications occurred in the dabrafenib-trametinib group. The rate of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was lower in the dabrafenib-trametinib group than in the dabrafenib-only group (2% vs. 9%), whereas pyrexia occurred in more patients (51% vs. 28%) and was more often severe (grade 3, 6% vs. 2%) in the dabrafenib-trametinib group.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of dabrafenib and trametinib, as compared with dabrafenib alone, improved the rate of progression-free survival in previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT01584648.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25265492     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  584 in total

1.  A Multikinase and DNA-PK Inhibitor Combination Immunomodulates Melanomas, Suppresses Tumor Progression, and Enhances Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Alexander K Tsai; Asra Y Khan; Christina E Worgo; Lucy L Wang; Yuanyuan Liang; Eduardo Davila
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 2.  Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Authors:  Eva Muñoz-Couselo; Jesús Soberino García; José Manuel Pérez-García; Vanesa Ortega Cebrián; Javier Cortés Castán
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

3.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma: a synergistic and potentially safe combination partner with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick A Ott
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  New therapeutic strategies for BRAF mutant colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Ryan B Corcoran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Systemic BRAF/MEK Inhibitors as a Potential Treatment Option in Metastatic Conjunctival Melanoma.

Authors:  Joel M Mor; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2016-12-08

6.  Influence of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on therapy management in patients with stage III/IV malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Susann-Cathrin Schüle; Thomas Kurt Eigentler; Claus Garbe; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A phase II study of combined therapy with a BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib) and interleukin-2 (aldesleukin) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Meghan J Mooradian; Alexandre Reuben; Peter A Prieto; Mehlika Hazar-Rethinam; Dennie T Frederick; Brandon Nadres; Adriano Piris; Vikram Juneja; Zachary A Cooper; Arlene H Sharpe; Ryan B Corcoran; Keith T Flaherty; Donald P Lawrence; Jennifer A Wargo; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  Dabrafenib Therapy in 30 Patients with Melanoma Metastatic to the Brain: a Single-centre Controlled Retrospective Study in Hungary.

Authors:  Eszter Gorka; Dániel Fabó; András Gézsi; Kata Czirbesz; Imre Fedorcsák; Gabriella Liszkay
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 10.  Classifying BRAF alterations in cancer: new rational therapeutic strategies for actionable mutations.

Authors:  Matthew Dankner; April A N Rose; Shivshankari Rajkumar; Peter M Siegel; Ian R Watson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.