Literature DB >> 35949794

Predictive Significance of Tumour Size in Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Shahab Hajibandeh1, Mohammed Barghash2, Rao Muhammad A Khan3, David Milgrom4, Saira Ali2, Sofia Ali5, Baqar Ali3.   

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the predictive significance of tumour size in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods All patients undergoing curative surgery for colon or rectum cancer performed by a single colorectal surgeon between January 2013 and January 2020 were considered eligible for inclusion. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were modelled to assess whether colonic or rectal tumour size could predict R0 resection, specimen length, number of harvested and positive lymph nodes, lymphocytic infiltration, venous invasion, and overall survival. Results A total of 192 patients were eligible for inclusion. In patients with colon cancer, tumour size was the independent predictor of the number of harvested lymph nodes (P<0.001), the number of positive lymph nodes (P=0.001), and lymphocytic infiltration (P=0.009). However, it did not predict R0 resection (P=0.563), specimen length (P=0.111), specimen length >120 mm (P=0.186), >12 harvested lymph nodes (P=0.145), venous invasion (P=0.103), and five-year overall survival (P=0.543). In patients with rectal cancer, tumour size was the independent predictor of the number of harvested lymph nodes (P<0.001) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P<0.001). However, it did not predict R0 resection (P=0.108), specimen length (P=0.774), specimen length >120 mm (P=0.405), >12 harvested lymph nodes (P= 0.069), lymphocytic infiltration (P=0.912), venous invasion (P= 0.105), and five-year overall survival (P=0.413). Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that tumour size on its own may not have a significant predictive value in oncological or survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative surgery for colon or rectum cancer.
Copyright © 2022, Hajibandeh et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic cancer; prognosis; rectal cancer; risk prediction; tumor size

Year:  2022        PMID: 35949794      PMCID: PMC9357253          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  21 in total

1.  Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kitajima; Takahiro Fujimori; Shigehiko Fujii; Jun Takeda; Yasuo Ohkura; Hitoshi Kawamata; Toshihide Kumamoto; Shingo Ishiguro; Yo Kato; Tadakazu Shimoda; Akinori Iwashita; Yoichi Ajioka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Toshiaki Watanabe; Tetsuichiro Muto; Ko Nagasako
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab; Abdul Razack; Abhiram Sharma; James Gunn; John E Hartley
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Oshiro; M Mori; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with stage IIa colon cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Santullo; Alberto Biondi; Ferdinando C M Cananzi; Valeria Fico; Flavio Tirelli; Riccardo Ricci; Gianluca Rizzo; Claudio Coco; Claudio Mattana; Domenico D'Ugo; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Tumor size predicts long-term survival in colon cancer: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Sukamal Saha; Mohammed Shaik; Gregory Johnston; Supriya Kumar Saha; Lindsay Berbiglia; Micheal Hicks; Jill Gernand; Sandeep Grewal; Madan Arora; David Wiese
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The relationship of depth of penetration and tumor size to the number of positive nodes in Dukes C colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N Wolmark; E R Fisher; H S Wieand; B Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Tumor size is associated with the systemic inflammatory response but not survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Em Crozier; Donald C McMillan; Colin S McArdle; Wilson J Angerson; John H Anderson; Paul G Horgan; Ruth F McKee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Tumor characteristics in colorectal cancer and their relationship to treatment and prognosis.

Authors:  T Bjerkeset; I Morild; S Mørk; O Søreide
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  A critical reappraisal for the value of tumor size as a prognostic variable in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chien-Hsin Chen; Mao-Chih Hsieh; Ping-Kun Hsiao; En-Kwang Lin; Yen-Jung Lu; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.