To the Editor,The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented restrictions on mobility and activity. Health
care services have been disrupted
: Many services have been labeled as nonessential and resources diverted. Persons with
substance use disorders (SUDs) have experienced many challenges in continuing their recovery
journeys.[2, 3] They are also at an increased
risk of contracting COVID-19.[4, 5]An important aspect of addiction care services has been providing brief, evidence-based
psychosocial interventions.
In resource-limited settings like that of India, these tasks have been shifted to
paraprofessionals, such as nurses and counselors.
In north Indian states, community-level surveys show that Punjab, with a population of
three crores,
is most affected by SUDs.[9, 10] Two-thirds
of households in Punjab have at least “one drug addict.”The government of Punjab launched Outpatient Opioid Assisted Therapy (OOAT) Centers
to provide agonist therapy for those with opioid use disorders. Deaddiction counselors
(DCs) are a paraprofessional cadre recruited to address the psychosocial care needs of persons
with SUDs. Counselors are inducted after completing their postgraduate or master’s level
education in the streams of sociology, social work, or psychology. Their roles are to screen
patients, assess drug use history, assist the psychiatrist, educate treatment seekers, engage
families, and provide brief psychosocial interventions. Varying backgrounds and disparate
training in counseling pose challenges to service parity.During the pandemic, as in-person health care services were disrupted or suspended, changes
were made to the provision of addiction care services across the country.[13, 14] The frequency of visits to OOAT centers was
reduced from once daily to once fortnightly.
Counseling services for persons with SUDs and their families became
inaccessible.[13, 16]As yet, there have been no reports of engaging DCs to aid in providing substance-related
counseling services. We report here an introductory telemental health training for the DCs in
Punjab.
Methods
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, conducted a
short-term synchronous training from February to March 2021 on Zoom videoconferencing.A mandatory pretraining survey on attitudes and practices and a posttraining survey (one
month after completion of training) were conducted to identify attributable changes. All
participants were provided with the option of engaging in another self-assessment survey.
This was conducted before and six weeks after completion of training to assess knowledge
with regard to diagnosing and managing mental health conditions. This survey contained
case-based questions highlighting common practice issues.After each session that lasted 90 min to 120 min (Table 1), feedback for improvement was sought.
Trainers adopted adult learning principles.
Case-based learning was done in which clinical and management problems were discussed
and possible solutions were identified. The topics included groundings in their clinical and
practical experiences and managing mental health conditions, especially in busy OOAT
centers. Discussions were participatory and inclusive, in a supportive atmosphere. Video and
document resources complementing the discussion themes were provided, and mentorship by the
resource persons continued.
Table 1.
Details of Training Program and Feedback
Topic
How Would you Rate the Content of the Session?
The Session was Interactive and Engaging
The Session Highlighted Issues I Face in my Practice
Overview of substance use disorders
9.3
4.6
4.1
Basics of counseling in addiction disorders
9.5
4.5
4.2
Brief interventions in addiction disorders
7.8
4.2
3.9
Details of Training Program and FeedbackThis manuscript reports the results of surveys and how they inform on proceeding forward
with the capacity building during the pandemic. All survey data were anonymized during
collection and stored in password- protected files. No prior ethical permissions were deemed
necessary, keeping in mind the Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines.
Results
A total of 229 DCs, with a mean (±SD) age of 31 (±5.6) years and a mean experience of 3
(±2.2) years, enrolled for the training. A total of 75% of the respondents worked in OOAT
centers. Over 50% of these DCs had no prior clinical exposure. The majority reported having
received cumulative training of fewer than three months postinduction. A total of 95%
(n = 217) expressed the need for further training. Most reported facing
challenging counseling situations and dissatisfaction with their current knowledge and
practices. The average pretraining score was 5.6 (±2), and the average posttraining score
was 5.9 (±3). Pre- and posttraining surveys using case-based scenarios demonstrated a change
in knowledge scores (3%). Participants’ feedback on a visual analog scale ranging from one
to ten for each session are presented in Table 1. These demonstrate high participant
engagement and satisfaction. The most common expected benefits of training were being able
to identify mental health issues in patients (28%), identifying when to refer patients to a
psychiatrist or a mental health professional (4%), conducting individual psychotherapy for
all patients (4.5%), and identifying mental health issues in the carers of patients
(7%).
Discussion
These results show that mental health training as part of capacity building for DCs is
feasible. Posttraining assessments showed modest improvement. A shorter duration of
engagement may have limited the change in scores.We note that DCs perceived their short-term training to be inadequate. They reported facing
challenging situations. The majority of them worked in OOAT centers, and they expected
certain benefits and competencies to be developed via mental health training. Competency in
identifying mental health concerns was most frequently reported.Skills, such as counseling and motivational interviewing, may be better inculcated during
professional training. Postinduction training may be less effective in imparting these
skills as there is reduced scope for supervised or peer learning. However, these short-term
training programs attempt to bridge this gap while adopting adult learning principles and
emphasizing case-based learning, discussions, and demonstrative role-plays.The training provided and the results obtained are unique and support the initiation of
remote mental health training for DCs, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote mental
health training has proven just as effective as in-person training.[19, 20] The reported need for training has increased.
Digitally delivered training has gained acceptance.These capacity-building initiatives are incremental steps toward realizing the Punjab
pyramid model of care.
They address demand and harm reduction aspects while also broadening the community
base for identification and interventions in SUDs.
Strengths
This is the first report of successful telemental health training for DCs and
capacity-building initiatives for SUD care in India during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participatory, interactive, inclusive, and experience-based sessions provided the bedrock
for this initiative’s success. Regular feedback surveys demonstrated positive change and
outcome.
Conclusion
Digital delivery of mental health training may allow better progress toward capacity
building even during the pandemic. Health administrators can ensure better mental health
care delivery by initiating such training programs toward realizing various health policy
objectives.