| Literature DB >> 35949542 |
Ceren Özeren Keşkek1, Emre Aytuğar2, Erhan Çene3.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal in axial, sagittal, and coronal sections with cone-beam computed tomography and to appraise the effect of gender, age, and dental status on the nasopalatine canal. Material andEntities:
Keywords: anatomy; cone-beam computed tomography; maxilla; radiology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35949542 PMCID: PMC9358607 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Res ISSN: 2029-283X
Figure 1The measurements of the nasopalatine canal (NPC) in sagittal section.
Yellow line = Stenson foramen width; green line = mid-level point width; blue line = incisive foramen width; red line = the length of the NPC.
Figure 2The measurement of the nasopalatine canal angle in sagittal section.
Yellow line = Stenson foramen (SF) width; blue line = incisive foramen (IF) width; white line = the line connecting anterior nasal spina (ANS) and posterior nasal spina (PNS); red line = the line passing through the midpoints of the widths of IF and SF.
Figure 3The classification of nasopalatine canal shapes in sagittal section.
A = cylindrical; B = hourglass; C = cone; D = funnel; E = banana; F = reverse funnel.
Figure 4The classification of nasopalatine canal (NPC) shapes in coronal section.
A = single NPC; B = two parallel NPC; C = Y type NPC.
Figure 5The measurements of the nasopalatine canal in coronal section.
Yellow line = Stenson foramen width; green line = mid-level point width; blue line = incisive foramen width.
Figure 6The numbers of Stenson foramen in axial section.
A = one; B = two; C = three; D = four.
Figure 7The shapes of Stenson foramen in axial section.
A = round; B = oval; C = heart.
The nasopalatine canal dimensions in sagittal section according to the general, gender, age groups and dental status
| N | IF | MP | SF | NPC length | NPC angle | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
|
|
| 1000 | 3.54 (1.11) | 2.25 (0.9) | 2.53 (1.01) | 9.49 (2.61) | 76.41 (9.08) |
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 497 | 3.31 (1.03) | 2.14 (0.83) | 2.4 (0.99) | 8.78 (2.32) | 75.21 (9.21) |
|
| |||||||
|
| 503 | 3.77 (1.14) | 2.37 (0.96) | 2.66 (1.01) | 10.19 (2.7) | 77.6 (8.81) | |
|
| |||||||
|
| - | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | |
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 119 | 3.16 (1.02)A | 2.25 (0.9)AB | 2.43 (1.01) | 9.01 (2.18)A | 79.64 (9.22)AB |
|
| |||||||
|
| 208 | 3.31 (0.88)AB | 2.13 (0.91)A | 2.5 (1) | 9.92 (2.58)B | 76.38 (9.16)A | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 226 | 3.58 (1.21)B | 2.05 (0.82)AB | 2.59 (0.99) | 9.63 (2.81)AB | 77.1 (8.94)AB | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 291 | 3.63 (1.07)BC | 2.3 (0.92)B | 2.55 (1.05) | 9.27 (2.6)AB | 76.19 (8.36)B | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 156 | 3.94 (1.23)BC | 2.36 (0.94)B | 2.53 (0.93) | 9.49 (2.62)C | 73.42 (9.52)AB | |
|
| |||||||
|
| - | 0.000b | 0.001b | 0.504 | 0.017c | 0.000b | |
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 818 | 3.53 (1.12) | 2.23 (0.9) | 2.54 (1.02) | 9.71 (2.57)A | 77.08 (8.79)A |
|
| |||||||
|
| 47 | 3.49 (1.02) | 2.31 (0.98) | 2.43 (0.92) | 9.12 (2.5)B | 76.3 (9.02)B | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 48 | 3.40 (1.05) | 2.2 (0.95) | 2.4 (0.91) | 8.65 (2.82)B | 74.7 (7.93)AB | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 87 | 3.84 (1.12) | 2.46 (0.83) | 2.63 (0.95) | 8.1 (2.47)B | 71.21 (10.67)B | |
|
| |||||||
|
| - | 0.082 | 0.07 | 0.655 | 0.000b | 0.000b | |
The nasopalatine canal dimensions in sagittal section according to the general, gender, age groups and dental status
aStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Mann-Whitney U test).
bStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
cStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.05 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
The uppercase superscript indicates statistical differences within column (Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis).
IF = incisive foramen; MP = mid-level point; SF = stenson foramen; NPC = nasopalatine canal; SD = standard deviation.
The nasopalatine canal dimensions in sagittal section according to the NPC shapes
| IF | MP | SF | NPC length | NPC angle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
|
| 3.34 (0.99)A | 2.55 (0.87)A | 2.86 (0.89)A | 9.03 (2.53)A | 75.85 (9.27) |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.93 (1.06)B | 1.59 (0.65)B | 3.21 (0.96)A | 10.36 (3.04)B | 78.04 (10.09) |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.53 (1.08)A | 1.98 (0.73)C | 1.59 (0.6)B | 9.4 (2.37)A | 76.18 (8.37) |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.99 (1.2)B | 2 (0.9)C | 2.02 (0.75)C | 9.96 (2.55)AB | 77.07 (8.93) |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.59 (0.92)AB | 3.04 (0.63)AD | 2.87 (0.85)AD | 11.79 (2.05)BC | 74.36 (7.01) |
|
| |||||
|
| 2.33 (0.85)C | 2.27 (0.87)AC | 3.5 (1.01)AD | 8.91 (2.48)AB | 78.13 (8.62) |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.54 (1.11) | 2.25 (0.9) | 2.53 (1.01) | 9.49 (2.61) | 76.41 (9.08) |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.148 |
aStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
The uppercase superscript indicates statistical differences within column (Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis).
IF = incisive foramen; MP = mid-level point; SF = stenson foramen; NPC = nasopalatine canal; SD = standard deviation.
The nasopalatine canal dimensions in coronal section according to the general, gender, age groups and dental status
| N | IF | MP | SF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
|
|
| 1000 | 3.36 (1.05) | 3.18 (1.1) | 3.98 (1.24) |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 497 | 3.23 (0.98) | 3.1 (1.05) | 3.9 (1.24) |
|
| |||||
|
| 503 | 3.5 (1.1) | 3.26 (1.14) | 4.06 (1.25) | |
|
| |||||
|
| - | 0.000a | 0.04b | 0.011b | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 119 | 2.94 (0.98)A | 2.78 (1.06)A | 3.86 (1.24)A |
|
| |||||
|
| 208 | 3.15 (1)A | 2.87 (0.94)A | 3.76 (1.2)A | |
|
| |||||
|
| 226 | 3.41 (1.05)B | 3.26 (1.1)B | 4 (1.22)AB | |
|
| |||||
|
| 291 | 3.46 (0.99)B | 3.36 (1.1)B | 4.1 (1.31)B | |
|
| |||||
|
| 156 | 3.73 (1.13)B | 3.46 (1.12)B | 4.11 (1.17)B | |
|
| |||||
|
| - | 0.000c | 0.000c | 0.014d | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 818 | 3.29 (1.02)A | 3.11 (1.07)A | 3.94 (1.23) |
|
| |||||
|
| 47 | 3.53 (1.1)AB | 3.4 (1.16)AB | 4.16 (1.46) | |
|
| |||||
|
| 48 | 3.48 (1.02)AB | 3.28 (1.1)AB | 3.94 (1.31) | |
|
| |||||
|
| 87 | 3.92 (1.2)B | 3.65 (1.21)B | 4.27 (1.16) | |
|
| |||||
|
| - | 0.000c | 0.000c | 0.075 | |
aStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Mann-Whitney U test).
bStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.05 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
cStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
dStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.05 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
The uppercase superscript indicates statistical differences within column (Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis).
IF = incisive foramen; MP = mid-level point; SF = stenson foramen; SD = standard deviation. LEGEND(2)
The nasopalatine canal dimensions in coronal section according to the NPC shapes
| IF | MP | SF | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
|
| 3.27 (1.05) | 2.98 (1.14)A | 3.74 (1.34)A |
|
| |||
|
| 3.46 (0.91) | 3.51 (0.92)B | 4.4 (1.11)B |
|
| |||
|
| 3.42 (1.08) | 3.27 (1.06)B | 4.08 (1.15)B |
|
| |||
|
| 0.079 | 0.000a | 0.000a |
aStatistically significant at level P ≤ 0.01 (independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test).
The uppercase superscript indicates statistical differences within column (Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis).
IF = incisive foramen; MP = mid-level point; SF = stenson foramen; NPC = nasopalatine canal; SD = standard deviation.