Nikhil V Jain1,2, Affaf A Gharatkar3, Bandish A Parekh3, Smita I Musani1, Umang Deepak Shah1. 1. Department of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics & Oral Implantology, M. A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra India. 2. 102, A- Adinath Appt. 281, Tardeo Road, Mumbai, 400007 India. 3. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, M. A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra India.
Abstract
AIM: Placement of implants in the maxillary anterior region needs to be preceded by careful analysis of the area as in addition to the functional aspect the esthetic outcome is of prime importance. This descriptive study evaluated anatomical characteristics and dimensions of the nasopalatine canal (NC) from coronal, sagittal and axial aspects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) giving it a three dimensional analytical approach. Also the dimensions of the corresponding buccal bone plate (BBP) of the alveolar process were evaluated. Additionally, the influence of age and gender on these characteristics was also analyzed. METHODS: A total of 81-CBCT scans of patients with one or no upper central incisors present were selected. Sagittal slices were used for measurements of the NC and BBP and to evaluate shape of the NC. Coronal slices were used to assess NC shape and axial slices to assess number of incisive foramina and foramina of Stenson. RESULTS: The most prevalent canal shape was: cylindrical (48.14 %) in sagittal aspect; Y-type (49.38 %) in coronal aspect; and one incisive foramen with two Stenson's foramina [1-(2-5)] (60.49 %) in axial aspect. Mean NC length was 11.13 ± 3.23 mm; statistically significant differences were detected between genders (p < 0.001). Mean nasopalatine angle was 69.32° ± 7.70. Mean BBP length was 17.12 ± 3.97 mm and mean BBP width was 5.71 ± 1.29 mm, significant differences were detected between genders (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates variability of the NC in terms of anatomical characteristics and dimensions; hence, a thorough CBCT analysis is highly recommended for better surgical outcomes and to reduce the post-operative complications in implant dentistry.
AIM: Placement of implants in the maxillary anterior region needs to be preceded by careful analysis of the area as in addition to the functional aspect the esthetic outcome is of prime importance. This descriptive study evaluated anatomical characteristics and dimensions of the nasopalatine canal (NC) from coronal, sagittal and axial aspects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) giving it a three dimensional analytical approach. Also the dimensions of the corresponding buccal bone plate (BBP) of the alveolar process were evaluated. Additionally, the influence of age and gender on these characteristics was also analyzed. METHODS: A total of 81-CBCT scans of patients with one or no upper central incisors present were selected. Sagittal slices were used for measurements of the NC and BBP and to evaluate shape of the NC. Coronal slices were used to assess NC shape and axial slices to assess number of incisive foramina and foramina of Stenson. RESULTS: The most prevalent canal shape was: cylindrical (48.14 %) in sagittal aspect; Y-type (49.38 %) in coronal aspect; and one incisive foramen with two Stenson's foramina [1-(2-5)] (60.49 %) in axial aspect. Mean NC length was 11.13 ± 3.23 mm; statistically significant differences were detected between genders (p < 0.001). Mean nasopalatine angle was 69.32° ± 7.70. Mean BBP length was 17.12 ± 3.97 mm and mean BBP width was 5.71 ± 1.29 mm, significant differences were detected between genders (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates variability of the NC in terms of anatomical characteristics and dimensions; hence, a thorough CBCT analysis is highly recommended for better surgical outcomes and to reduce the post-operative complications in implant dentistry.