Literature DB >> 35947149

Role of cochlear reserve in adults with cochlear implants following post-lingual hearing loss.

Kruthika Thangavelu1, Markus Nitzge2, Rainer M Weiß2, Jochen Mueller-Mazzotta2, Boris A Stuck2, Katrin Reimann2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative assessments before cochlear implantation (CI) includes the examination of both tone hearing, and the level of the cochlear reserve indicated by speech understanding. The goal of this study was to explore the predictive influence of tone hearing and cochlear reserve in CI.
METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study, which included adult patients who had undergone CI between January 2012 and December 2019 in a tertiary care center. The pre-operative tone hearing, unaided maximum monosyllabic word recognition score (WRSmax), aided hearing gain, aided monosyllabic word recognition score at 65 dB (WRS65(HA)), and speech perception gap (SPG) were measured. The duration of unaided hearing loss (UHL) was also assessed. These variables were compared with post-operative monosyllabic word recognition score after CI at 65 dB (WRS65(CI)).
RESULTS: 103 patients and 128 ears were included in this study. Regardless of tone hearing, patients with better pre-operative WRSmax and WRS65(HA) performed better post-operatively. WRSmax was found to be the most important factor that was statistically significantly associated with WRS65(CI). SPG was statistically significantly associated with WRSmax and SPG ≥ 20% group performed better post-operatively. Any duration of unaided hearing loss was statistically significantly inversely associated with WRSmax above 0%.
CONCLUSION: Cochlear reserve represented by WRSmax may play the most important role as a predictive factor in outcomes after CI. SPG should be considered for indicating CI in patients, when WRS65(HA) does not reach WRSmax. Early rehabilitation with hearing aids and duration of hearing aid usage might play an important role in preserving cochlear reserve in adults.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Cochlear reserve; Speech perception gap; Speech understanding; Tone hearing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35947149     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07558-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   3.236


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 2.  Cochlear implant - state of the art.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.