| Literature DB >> 35945512 |
Xiaochen Liu1, Yunlin Wang1, Wenxiao Jia2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the application value of magnetic resonance (MR)-perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in the early imaging diagnosis of rabbit spinal tuberculosis.Entities:
Keywords: Hemodynamics; Perfusion parameters; Perfusion weighted imaging; Spinal tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35945512 PMCID: PMC9361608 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00870-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 2.795
Fig. 1The characteristics of the dynamic changes of blood flow perfusion of microvessels inside the vertebra of spinal tuberculosis disease at 4 (A), 6 (B) and 8 (C) after weeks of infection in the experiment group. The left is the scan image of the region of interest (ROI), and the right is the pseudo-color image
Fig. 2The time-signal intensity curve (TIC) of magnetic resonance (MR)- Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) at 4 (A), 6 (B) and 8 (C) weeks after infection in the experiment group
The comparison of parameters between the experiment group and the control group after 4, 6 and 8 weeks after operation (, %)
| Parameter | Group | 4 weeks | 6 weeks | 8 weeks | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efirst | Experiment group (n = 26) | 0.94 ± 0.37 | 1.51 ± 0.29 | 1.95 ± 0.43 | 58.060 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.34 ± 0.26 | 0.55 ± 0.23 | 0.93 ± 0.14 | 58.138 | 0.000 | |
| t | 7.311 | 14.213 | 12.556 | 139.699 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| Vfirst | Experiment group (n = 26) | 0.96 ± 0.27 | 1.26 ± 0.15 | 1.95 ± 0.23 | 155.370 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.57 ± 0.12 | 0.85 ± 0.19 | 45.589 | 0.000 | |
| t | 8.685 | 19.304 | 20.456 | 182.234 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| Ee | Experiment group (n = 26) | 0.75 ± 0.15 | 0.97 ± 0.13 | 1.32 ± 0.32 | 52.591 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.73 ± 0.16 | 0.75 ± 0.15 | 0.95 ± 0.11 | 22.037 | 0.000 | |
| t | 0.490 | 5.941 | 5.988 | 74.540 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.626 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| Ve | Experiment group (n = 26) | 1.00 ± 0.22 | 1.21 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.20 | 20.786 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.95 ± 0.12 | 0.90 ± 0.13 | 0.84 ± 0.12 | 5.832 | 0.004 | |
| t | 1.181 | 7.956 | 11.458 | 7.474 | 0.001 | |
| P | 0.243 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| PH | Experiment group (n = 26) | 941.00 ± 109.27 | 1448.67 ± 175.97 | 2191.47 ± 1002.39 | 33.977 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 749.00 ± 91.01 | 1042.67 ± 128.89 | 1148.93 ± 105.62 | 107.130 | 0.000 | |
| t | 7.394 | 10.195 | 5.665 | 56.998 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| TTP | Experiment group (n = 26) | 31.06 ± 1.03 | 33.53 ± 1.45 | 38.61 ± 4.93 | 95.791 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 33.42 ± 1.45 | 38.92 ± 1.70 | 42.71 ± 4.68 | 79.754 | 0.000 | |
| t | 7.288 | 8.910 | 0.881 | 135.660 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.382 | |||
| MSI | Experiment group (n = 26) | 1.07 ± 0.23 | 1.49 ± 0.29 | 1.92 ± 0.47 | 45.506 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.83 ± 0.29 | 1.08 ± 0.25 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 17.609 | 0.000 | |
| t | 3.608 | 5.903 | 8.124 | 77.663 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| Emax | Experiment group (n = 26) | 1.18 ± 0.28 | 1.69 ± 0.56 | 2.84 ± 0.80 | 63.471 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.86 ± 0.19 | 1.44 ± 0.49 | 1.61 ± 0.42 | 31.296 | 0.000 | |
| t | 5.255 | 1.858 | 7.533 | 98.108 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.068 | 0.000 | |||
| SER | Experiment group (n = 26) | 1.02 ± 0.29 | 1.52 ± 0.39 | 1.94 ± 0.50 | 39.373 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 0.87 ± 0.24 | 1.04 ± 0.25 | 1.20 ± 0.25 | 14.192 | 0.000 | |
| t | 2.159 | 5.606 | 7.228 | 57.121 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.035 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| washout | Experiment group (n = 26) | 13.00 ± 4.87 | 16.07 ± 4.07 | 31.82 ± 4.50 | 151.756 | 0.000 |
| Control group (n = 9) | 19.70 ± 5.04 | 18.19 ± 4.20 | 23.23 ± 6.56 | 7.012 | 0.002 | |
| t | 5.234 | 1.985 | 5.916 | 118.766 | 0.000 | |
| P | 0.000 | 0.052 | 0.000 |
Efirst First-pass enhancement rate, Vfirst First-pass enhancement velocity, Ee Early enhancement rate, Ve Early enhancement velocity, PH peak height, TTP time to peak, MSI maximum slope of increase, Emax Maximum signal enhancement rate, SER Signal enhancement ratio
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of early enhancement parameters in diagnosing early-phase spinal tuberculosis
| Variables | AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Cut-off value | Y-index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efirst | 4 weeks | 0.82 | (0.68, 0.97) | 72.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.003 |
| 6 weeks | 0.76 | (0.58, 0.93) | 48.00 | 100.00 | ≥ 1.54 | 0.48 | 0.019 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.76 | (0.60, 0.92) | 48.00 | 100.00 | ≥ 2.02 | 0.48 | 0.019 | |
| Vfirst | 4 weeks | 0.56 | (0.31, 0.81) | 84.00 | 50.00 | ≥ 0.64 | 0.34 | 0.596 |
| 6 weeks | 0.61 | (0.38, 0.83) | 76.00 | 60.00 | ≥ 1.15 | 0.36 | 0.333 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.62 | (0.39, 0.86) | 84.00 | 50.00 | ≥ 1.38 | 0.34 | 0.258 | |
| Ee | 4 weeks | 0.75 | (0.59, 0.91) | 56.00 | 90.00 | ≥ 0.77 | 0.46 | 0.022 |
| 6 weeks | 0.77 | (0.58, 0.96) | 80.00 | 70.00 | ≥ 0.88 | 0.50 | 0.013 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.77 | (0.61, 0.93) | 72.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 1.15 | 0.52 | 0.014 | |
| Ve | 4 weeks | 0.53 | (0.30, 0.76) | 36.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 1.05 | 0.16 | 0.784 |
| 6 weeks | 0.59 | (0.36, 0.82) | 84.00 | 50.00 | ≥ 1.01 | 0.34 | 0.411 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.59 | (0.34, 0.84) | 80.00 | 60.00 | ≥ 1.20 | 0.40 | 0.411 | |
AUC area under ROC curve, 95%CI 95% Confidence interval, Efirst First-pass enhancement rate, Vfirst First-pass enhancement velocity, Ee Early enhancement rate, Ve Early enhancement velocity
Fig. 3The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of early enhancement parameters. Efirst, First-pass enhancement rate; Vfirst, First-pass enhancement velocity; Ee, Early enhancement rate; Ve, Early enhancement velocity
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of peak parameters and Washout in diagnosing early-phase spinal tuberculosis
| Variables | AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Cut-off value | Y-index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH | 4 weeks | 0.78 | (0.62, 0.94) | 80.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 865.00 | 0.60 | 0.010 |
| 6 weeks | 0.74 | (0.58, 0.91) | 64.00 | 90.00 | ≥ 1402.00 | 0.54 | 0.026 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.75 | (0.57, 0.93) | 76.00 | 70.00 | ≥ 1476.50 | 0.46 | 0.024 | |
| TTP | 4 weeks | 0.58 | (0.35, 0.81) | 88.00 | 40.00 | ≤ 32.50 | 0.28 | 0.454 |
| 6 weeks | 0.60 | (0.35, 0.85) | 84.00 | 50.00 | ≤ 36.00 | 0.34 | 0.342 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.59 | (0.35, 0.84) | 100.00 | 40.00 | ≤ 44.50 | 0.40 | 0.391 | |
| MSI | 4 weeks | 0.78 | (0.58, 0.98) | 96.00 | 70.00 | ≥ 0.90 | 0.66 | 0.010 |
| 6 weeks | 0.77 | (0.58, 0.95) | 92.00 | 60.00 | ≥ 1.21 | 0.52 | 0.014 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.77 | (0.60, 0.95) | 76.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 1.72 | 0.56 | 0.013 | |
| Emax | 4 weeks | 0.75 | (0.56, 0.94) | 68.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 1.07 | 0.48 | 0.021 |
| 6 weeks | 0.78 | (0.62, 0.94) | 56.00 | 100.00 | ≥ 1.66 | 0.56 | 0.012 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.83 | (0.68, 0.97) | 84.00 | 80.00 | ≥ 2.28 | 0.64 | 0.003 | |
| SER | 4 weeks | 0.78 | (0.60, 0.97) | 60.00 | 90.00 | ≥ 1.01 | 0.50 | 0.010 |
| 6 weeks | 0.78 | (0.62, 0.94) | 84.00 | 70.00 | ≥ 1.22 | 0.54 | 0.011 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.88 | (0.76, 0.99) | 76.00 | 100.00 | ≥ 1.78 | 0.76 | 0.001 | |
| Washout | 4 weeks | 0.46 | (0.20, 0.71) | 76.00 | 50.00 | ≥ 11.49 | 0.26 | 0.701 |
| 6 weeks | 0.42 | (0.20, 0.64) | 100.00 | 10.00 | ≥ 12.84 | 0.10 | 0.465 | |
| 8 weeks | 0.54 | (0.29, 0.79) | 88.00 | 50.00 | ≥ 25.25 | 0.38 | 0.715 | |
AUC area under ROC curve, 95%CI 95% Confidence interval, PH peak height, TTP time to peak, MSI maximum slope of increase, Emax Maximum signal enhancement rate, SER Signal enhancement ratio
Fig. 4The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of peak parameters and washout. PH peak height, TTP time to peak, MSI maximum slope of increase; Emax Maximum signal enhancement rate, SER Signal enhancement ratio