Li-Ming Pu1, Yin Liu2, De-Xin Zhou1, Xi-Jia Tang1, Chao-Nan Fan1, Wen Chen1, Jian-da Ma3, Jian-Zi Lin3, Lie Dai4, Li Ling5,6. 1. Faculty of Medical Statistic，School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong, Guangzhou, China. 2. The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Henan, Zhengzhou, China. 3. Department of Rheumatology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 4. Department of Rheumatology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. dailie@mail.sysu.edu.cn. 5. Faculty of Medical Statistic，School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong, Guangzhou, China. lingli@mail.sysu.edu.cn. 6. Clinical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. lingli@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR), DAS28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) are widely used to assess disease activity as low, moderate, or high or in remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, these indicators can generate inconsistent results, influencing treatment decisions and limiting comparisons across studies. We aimed to establish equations for conversion from DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP to SDAI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, including 933 outpatients who were simultaneously assessed using DAS28ESR, DAS28CRP, and SDAI. The patients were divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We developed equations to convert DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP values into SDAI values by bisquare-weighted robust regression to obtain SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP. In addition to using kappa values to assess consistency, differences in disease activity classification between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP were examined by the Stuart-Maxwell test and the Bowker test. RESULTS: Two quadratic equations were developed as follows: SDAI-DAS28ESR = 1.168 × (DAS28ESR)^2 - 2.432 × (DAS28ESR) + 2.649 and SDAI-DAS28CRP = 1.2 × (DAS28CRP)^2 - 0.3522 × (DAS28CRP) - 0.6014. After applying the equations, the Stuart-Maxwell test and the Bowker test were no longer significant between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI or between SDAI-DAS28CRP and SDAI. The kappa values increased from 0.57 to 0.73 between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI and 0.76 to 0.86 between SDAI-DAS28CRP and SDAI. CONCLUSION: SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP are interchangeable with the SDAI on the group level, which will facilitate comparisons among studies. In addition, the equations improved consistency between indicators. Key Points • There is disagreement in assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR), DAS28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and simplified disease activity index (SDAI). • We developed and validated two quadratic equations to convert DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP into SDAI. We found there was no longer significant difference in disease activity between indicators after applying the equations. • This work may allow comparisons across studies which use different indicators.
INTRODUCTION: Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR), DAS28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) are widely used to assess disease activity as low, moderate, or high or in remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, these indicators can generate inconsistent results, influencing treatment decisions and limiting comparisons across studies. We aimed to establish equations for conversion from DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP to SDAI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, including 933 outpatients who were simultaneously assessed using DAS28ESR, DAS28CRP, and SDAI. The patients were divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We developed equations to convert DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP values into SDAI values by bisquare-weighted robust regression to obtain SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP. In addition to using kappa values to assess consistency, differences in disease activity classification between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP were examined by the Stuart-Maxwell test and the Bowker test. RESULTS: Two quadratic equations were developed as follows: SDAI-DAS28ESR = 1.168 × (DAS28ESR)^2 - 2.432 × (DAS28ESR) + 2.649 and SDAI-DAS28CRP = 1.2 × (DAS28CRP)^2 - 0.3522 × (DAS28CRP) - 0.6014. After applying the equations, the Stuart-Maxwell test and the Bowker test were no longer significant between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI or between SDAI-DAS28CRP and SDAI. The kappa values increased from 0.57 to 0.73 between SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI and 0.76 to 0.86 between SDAI-DAS28CRP and SDAI. CONCLUSION: SDAI-DAS28ESR and SDAI-DAS28CRP are interchangeable with the SDAI on the group level, which will facilitate comparisons among studies. In addition, the equations improved consistency between indicators. Key Points • There is disagreement in assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR), DAS28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and simplified disease activity index (SDAI). • We developed and validated two quadratic equations to convert DAS28ESR and DAS28CRP into SDAI. We found there was no longer significant difference in disease activity between indicators after applying the equations. • This work may allow comparisons across studies which use different indicators.
Authors: Bernard Combe; Robert Landewe; Claire I Daien; Charlotte Hua; Daniel Aletaha; Jose María Álvaro-Gracia; Margôt Bakkers; Nina Brodin; Gerd R Burmester; Catalin Codreanu; Richard Conway; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Joao Fonseca; Karim Raza; Lucía Silva-Fernández; Josef S Smolen; Diana Skingle; Zoltan Szekanecz; Tore K Kvien; Annette van der Helm-van Mil; Ronald van Vollenhoven Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Robert B M Landewé; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Gerd R Burmester; Maxime Dougados; Andreas Kerschbaumer; Iain B McInnes; Alexandre Sepriano; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Maarten de Wit; Daniel Aletaha; Martin Aringer; John Askling; Alejandro Balsa; Maarten Boers; Alfons A den Broeder; Maya H Buch; Frank Buttgereit; Roberto Caporali; Mario Humberto Cardiel; Diederik De Cock; Catalin Codreanu; Maurizio Cutolo; Christopher John Edwards; Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings; Paul Emery; Axel Finckh; Laure Gossec; Jacques-Eric Gottenberg; Merete Lund Hetland; Tom W J Huizinga; Marios Koloumas; Zhanguo Li; Xavier Mariette; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Eduardo F Mysler; Jose A P da Silva; Gyula Poór; Janet E Pope; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand; Kenneth G Saag; Anja Strangfeld; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Marieke Voshaar; René Westhovens; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Dimitrios Boumpas; Gerd Burmester; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Maarten de Wit; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Alan Gibofsky; Juan Jesus Gomez-Reino; Boulos Haraoui; Joachim Kalden; Edward C Keystone; Tore K Kvien; Iain McInnes; Emilio Martin-Mola; Carlomaurizio Montecucco; Monika Schoels; Désirée van der Heijde; Desirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Robert Landewé; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Maya Buch; Gerd Burmester; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Cécile Gaujoux-Viala; Laure Gossec; Jackie Nam; Sofia Ramiro; Kevin Winthrop; Maarten de Wit; Daniel Aletaha; Neil Betteridge; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Maarten Boers; Frank Buttgereit; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Nemanja Damjanov; Johanna M W Hazes; Marios Kouloumas; Tore K Kvien; Xavier Mariette; Karel Pavelka; Piet L C M van Riel; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; David L Scott; Tuulikki Sokka-Isler; John B Wong; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 19.103