Literature DB >> 35945297

Urinary incontinence in systemic sclerosis: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Gregor John1,2, Elisabetta Zanatta3, Pamela Polito3, Silvia Piantoni4, Micaela Fredi4, Yann Coattrenec5, Romain Guemara6, Franco Franceschini4, Marie-Elise Truchetet7, Franco Cozzi3, Paolo Airò4, Carlo Chizzolini5,8.   

Abstract

Investigate the natural history of urinary incontinence (UI) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and assess its impact on quality of life (QoL). A longitudinal, international observational study followed 189 patients with SSc for a median duration of 5 years (IQR: 4.8-5.3). Presence, subtype and severity of UI, hospital admission and QoL were assessed using serial self-administered questionnaires. Mortality data came from national death registries. Multilevel mixed-effect logistic regressions explored factors associated with UI. Cox models adjusted the effects of UI on hospitalization and death for age, sex and subtype of SSc. Mean annual rates of new-onset UI and remission were 16.3% (95%CI 8.3%-24.2%) and 20.8% (95%CI 12.6-29.1), respectively. Among UI patients, 57.9% (95%CI 51.8-64.0) changed from one UI subtype to another. Between annual questionnaires, the severity of UI was the same in 51.1% (95%CI 40.8-61.4), milder or resolved in 35.2% (95%CI 25.3-44.9), and worse in 13.8% (95%CI 6.7-20.9). Anti-centromere antibodies, digestive symptoms, sex, age, neurological or urological comorbidities, diuretics and puffy fingers were all associated with UI. The two strongest predictors of UI and UI subtypes were a recent UI episode and the subtype of previous leakage episodes. UI at inclusion was not associated with hospital admission (adjusted HR: 1.86; 95%CI 0.88-3.93), time to death (aHR: 0.84; 95%CI 0.41-1.73) or change in QoL over time. Self-reported UI among SSc patients is highly dynamic: it waxes and wanes, changing from one subtype to another over time.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death; Hospital admission; Natural history; Quality of life; Scleroderma; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35945297      PMCID: PMC9548477          DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05178-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   3.580


Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) affects the quality of life (QoL) [1] and work productivity [2], increases the risks of falls [3], mood disorders [4, 5] and institutionalisation [6], and it has been associated with higher mortality [7, 8]. Thus, UI has a significant impact on individuals and their medical care [9]. UI is now recognised as a highly prevalent condition in cases of systemic sclerosis (SSc), affecting 52–63% of patients [10, 11]. Epidemiology and associated factors are very different to those of UI in the general population or in other conditions [10]. Thus, its pathogenesis possibly involves SSc-specific mechanisms that have yet to be fully elucidated [12]. Fibrosis and vascular anomalies have been reported in the bladder of SSc patients [13-18]. However, an autopsy study found no more fibrosis in the bladders of sclerodermic patients, than in controls [19]. Alteration of the nervous system, notably dysfunction of the parasympathetic system seen in SSc, could play a role in UI [16, 18]. But Minervini et al. failed to link autonomic function and urinary symptoms [16]. Menopause can appear earlier in SSc and might play a role in women [20]. Finally, an antibody-mediated mechanism is supported by in vitro analysis [21], and parallels made with other rheumatologic diseases [22]. To date, there were no data available on the natural history of UI in SSc. Some reports have found a higher prevalence of UI in the limited form of SSc or among patients having anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) [11], whereas others have found an association with anti-topoisomerase I (anti-Scl70) antibodies [10], with a very different prognosis [23]. Thus, we aimed to investigate the natural history of UI in SSc, the factors influencing it and explore UI as an indicator of unfavourable outcomes by focusing on QoL, physical well-being and the risks of hospital admission or death.

Patients and methods

Study overview

This international, prospective, observational study enrolled patients suffering from SSc at four European tertiary hospital centres from January 2013 to December 2015. Patients underwent three annual evaluations of their lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) by questionnaires in two centers, two annual evaluations in one center and one evaluation in the last center. All patients were then followed until death or to 31 December 2019. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Locally appointed ethics committee has approved the research protocol. Written informed consent has been obtained from all patients included in the study. The following sections summarise our cohort population data, inclusion process and variable management, which have been published previously [11, 24].

Study outcomes

The main outcome was continence evolution at annual clinical evaluations. The secondary outcomes were first UI episode, QoL, first hospital admission, number of admission, length of stay, and death. Scenarios of urinary continence evolution between study visits were “new-onset UI”, “resolved UI symptoms”, “worsening of UI symptoms”, “decreasing UI symptoms”, and “changing UI subtype”. The first described patients continent of urine in the previous study visit, who complained of UI in the follow-up visit. The second described patients continent of urine, who used to complain of UI in the last study visit. The three last scenarios refer to patients with UI in two study visits, who changed the frequency of UI episodes (from daily to monthly for example), or changed the subtype of UI (changing from stress to urge UI for example).

Study population

Eligible patients were aged 18 or older and satisfied the ACR/EULAR 2013 SSc criteria [25]. They were included consecutively at each participating centre. Those unable or unwilling to follow the study’s rules, end-of-life patients, pregnant women and anuric patients were excluded.

Symptoms and measurement

At inclusion and each annual study visit, participants completed a thirty-minute self-administered questionnaire on their LUTS, QoL, functional status, disease activity, medication, medical history and demographic characteristics. Patients were classified as having the limited or diffuse cutaneous form of SSc, according to Le Roy et al. [26]. At each study visit, UI was characterised using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaires (ICIQ-FLUTS and ICIQ-MLUTS) [27]. These explore the last four weeks’ LUTS and use standards recommended by the International Continence Society [28]. Participants could also complete a between-visits form for new episodes of UI occurring between study visits. UI was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine and was subdivided into stress (SUI), urge (UUI) and mixed UI. Leakage severity was further stratified according to leakage frequency (monthly, weekly or daily leakage). The 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) [29, 30] was summarised into its physical component (PCS) and mental component (MCS), and the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire was provided as a single, transformed scale ranging from 0 to 100 points [31]. Functional activities were explored using the Scleroderma modified Health Assessment Questionnaire and Disability Index (SSc-HAQ-DI) and the Cochin scale [32]. First hospital admission, length of stay and number of admissions between study visits were collected using self-administered questionnaires and participating hospitals’ electronic databases. Data on the date of death were obtained from national death registries and each participating hospital’s electronic databases until the end of December 2019. Each participating centre stratified the cause of death into SSc-related and SSc-unrelated based on their expertise.

Statistics

The initial sample involved five institutions and was calculated to demonstrate differences in UI prevalence between SSc subtypes at the baseline evaluation [11]. However, only four of the five institutions took part in the prospective cohort, which was therefore composed of 189 SSc individuals. Comparisons between the continent and incontinent participants were performed using the appropriate chi-squared test or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables. The two-sided Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables. Variables for the same individual measured on two occasions (QoL, HAQ-DI and Cochin scale) were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. To evaluate factors associated with the natural history of UI, we calculated multilevel mixed-effect logistic regressions accounting for repeated measures and patients being clustered in different study centres. Analyses were repeated for any evolutions in UI scenarios at annual clinical evaluations. A random intercept was given to any individual to account for repeated measures. Other models explored risks by UI subtype and severity (dependent variables). Potential associated factors were chosen based on our previous publications [11, 24]. Considering the small sample size and the number of events, we performed exploratory univariate analyses and decided not to perform multivariate analyses. The unadjusted effects of UI on time-dependent outcomes (first UI episode, first hospital admission or death) were analysed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and unweighted, two-sided, log-rank tests to compare groups. Participants with unknown status on 31 December 2019 were considered lost to follow-up and were censored from their last medical visit. Multivariate Cox models were used to adjust for age, sex and type of SSc. The same analyses were performed according to the subtype and severity of UI and SSc-related death. The significance level was set at 5%, and all analyses were performed using STATA statistical software, version 12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

A total of 189 SSc patients were followed for a median duration of 5 years (IQR: 4.8–5.3) (Fig. 1). Their second and third study visits were at a median of 1.1 (IQR: 1.0–1.1) and 2.1 (IQR: 2.0–2.7) years after inclusion, respectively. Patients’ principal characteristics are given in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Study flowchart

Table 1

Main characteristics and differences between groups with or without urinary incontinence at inclusion

Urinary incontinence
Entire cohort(189)Present(111)Absent(78)Pvalue
General
 Age, median y (IQR)60 (50–69)62 (51.5–70.5)58.5 (47–66)0.057
 Men, n (%)20 (10.7)5 (4.6)15 (19.2)0.002
 Body mass index23.0 (20.5–26.3)23.3 (20.3–27.7)22.9 (20.7–25.3)0.520
 Smoking status
  Current14 (7.5)8 (7.4)6 (7.7)0.311
  Former65 (34.9)33 (30.6)32 (41.0)
  Never107 (57.5)67 (62.0)40 (51.3)
 Children2 (1–2)2 (1–2)2 (1–2)0.978
 Birth–natural route1 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)0.943
Comorbid conditions
 Diabetes9 (5.0)6 (5.7)3 (4.1)0.641
 Heart disease23 (13.1)14 (13.3)9 (12.7)0.891
 Pulmonary disease71 (39.4)41 (38.3)30 (41.1)0.708
 Neurological palsy*4 (2.2)3 (2.8)1 (1.4)0.650
 Urological/ gynaecological disease9 (5.0)6 (5.7)3 (4.1)0.461
Medication
 Corticoids78 (41.9)41 (38.0)37 (47.4)0.196
 Diuretics45 (24.2)30 (27.8)15 (19.3)0.178
 Opioids15 (8.1)6 (5.6)9 (11.5)0.139
 Side effects14 (7.6)9 (8.3)5 (6.5)0.781
Systemic sclerosis
 Diffuse cutaneous SSc63 (33.9)27 (25.0)36 (46.1)0.003
 Limited cutaneous SSc123 (66.1)81 (75.0)42 (53.8)0.003
 Anti-nuclear antibodies179 (98.4)102 (98.1)77 (98.7)0.737
 ACA65 (35.5)46 (43.8)19 (24.4)0.007
 Scl70 antibodies70 (38.3)38 (36.2)32 (41.3)0.506
 Disease duration (y)11.8 (6.7–18.9)12.6 (6.7–19.8)10.8 (6.3–17.5)0.385
 Age at first Raynaud (y)42.5 (30.7–52.4)43.2 (33.4–52.6)41.0 (28.2–52.4)0.465
 MRSS4 (2–10)4 (2–9)6 (2–12)0.078
 Digestive symptoms142 (77.2)88 (83.2)54 (69.2)0.028
 Digital ulceration97 (53.3)47 (45.2)50 (64.1)0.011
 Finger-skin thickening94 (51.7)59 (56.2)35 (45.5)0.152
 Synovitis15 (8.2)9 (8.5)6 (7.7)0.845
 Lung fibrosis49 (27.6)29 (27.1)20 (27.8)0.921
 Pulmonary hypertension18 (10.1)14 (13.1)4 (5.6)0.130
Disability
 HAQ-DI0.625 (0.125–1.25)0. 625 (0.25–1.25)0.375 (0.0–1.125)0.026
 6MWT (m)380 (315–460)340 (280–395)410 (340–525)0.019

ACA, Anti-centromere antibodies; Scl70, an antibody directed against topoisomerase; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; y, year; SSc, systemic sclerosis; IQR, interquartile range; MRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; 6MWT, 6-min walking test

*Neurological diseases (central or peripheral) that result in palsy; † Known urethral stricture, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, prolapse (uterus, rectum or bladder), or bladder cancer in the past; ‡ Medical drugs with known urinary side effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressant, antipsychotic, antiparkinsonians, muscle relaxant, antihistamines, antispasmodic)

Study flowchart Main characteristics and differences between groups with or without urinary incontinence at inclusion ACA, Anti-centromere antibodies; Scl70, an antibody directed against topoisomerase; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; y, year; SSc, systemic sclerosis; IQR, interquartile range; MRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; 6MWT, 6-min walking test *Neurological diseases (central or peripheral) that result in palsy; † Known urethral stricture, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, prolapse (uterus, rectum or bladder), or bladder cancer in the past; ‡ Medical drugs with known urinary side effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressant, antipsychotic, antiparkinsonians, muscle relaxant, antihistamines, antispasmodic)

Urinary incontinence status and severity over time

Of 189 patients, 118 were followed for their urinary symptoms for one year and 86 for two years (Fig. 1). The time to first UI episode is presented in Fig. 2. After a steep drop due to patients with UI at inclusion, the curve followed a shallower decrease due to new UI episodes among patients continent of urine at study inclusion.
Fig. 2

Time to first urinary incontinence episode shown against urinary continence status at admission and for the complete study-cohort. After a steep drop due to patients with UI at inclusion (dash), the curve shows a shallower decrease due to new UI episodes among patients continent of urine at study inclusion (long dash-dot). UI: urinary incontinence

Time to first urinary incontinence episode shown against urinary continence status at admission and for the complete study-cohort. After a steep drop due to patients with UI at inclusion (dash), the curve shows a shallower decrease due to new UI episodes among patients continent of urine at study inclusion (long dash-dot). UI: urinary incontinence Continence status changed for 34 (29%) of 118 patients between their inclusion and their second visit; it changed for 22 (26%) of 86 patients between their second and third study visits. The yearly rate of new-onset UI was 16.3% (95% CI 8.3%–24.2%). Each year, the symptoms of 20.8% (95% CI 12.6–29.1) of patients suffering from UI resolved, 57.9% (95% CI 51.8–64.0) changed from one subtype of UI to another (e.g., from stress to urge), and 34.2% (95% CI 28.4–40.1) kept the same UI subtype (Fig. 3). Between annual evaluations, the severity of UI was the same in 51.1% (95% CI 40.8–61.4) of patients, milder or resolved in 35.2% (95% CI 25.3–44.9) and worse in 13.8% (95% CI 6.7–20.9) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Prevalence and types of urinary incontinence (UI) between first and second study visits (panel A) and between second and third study visits (panel B). Small boxes and arrows show the percentages of patients whose subtype of UI had changed. * Due to missing data, the sums of the proportions do not equal 100 per cent. UI: urinary incontinence

Fig. 4

Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence (UI) between first and second study visits (panel A) and between second and third study visits (panel B). Small boxes and arrows show the percentages of patients whose severity of UI had changed. * Due to missing data, the sums of the proportions do not equal 100 per cent. UI: urinary incontinence

Prevalence and types of urinary incontinence (UI) between first and second study visits (panel A) and between second and third study visits (panel B). Small boxes and arrows show the percentages of patients whose subtype of UI had changed. * Due to missing data, the sums of the proportions do not equal 100 per cent. UI: urinary incontinence Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence (UI) between first and second study visits (panel A) and between second and third study visits (panel B). Small boxes and arrows show the percentages of patients whose severity of UI had changed. * Due to missing data, the sums of the proportions do not equal 100 per cent. UI: urinary incontinence

Factors associated with the evolution of UI in SSc

Factors associated with the natural history of UI are reported in Supplementary Table S1 and S2. Presenting with puffy fingers on clinical evaluation increased the composite risk of “new-onset UI” or “worsening of UI symptoms” (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.2–5.9). None of the factors was constantly associated with the risk of either “new-onset UI” or “worsening of UI symptoms”. The combined chance of being attributed an outcome of “decreasing severity of UI”, “resolving UI symptoms” or “maintaining continence” decreased with previous episodes of SUI (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1–0.4) or UUI (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1–0.4), the presence of ACA (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.04–0.5) or digestive symptoms (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1–0.9), and it was higher in men (OR 9.2; 95% CI 1.2–73.4). These factors’ effects on the risk of “decreasing severity of UI” or the risk of “resolving UI symptoms” were inconstant (Supplementary Table S1). The risk of UUI at subsequent visits increased with previous episodes of UUI (OR 18.6; 95% CI 8.5–40.6) or SUI (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1–12.9), ACA positivity (OR 16.9; 95% CI 2.5–116), digestive symptoms (OR 32.4; 95% CI 3.3–320), an age above than median (OR 9.5; 95% CI 1.5–59.6) and higher frequencies of episodes of UI (Supplementary Table S2). The risk of SUI at the subsequent visit increased with previous episodes of SUI (OR 19.1; 95% CI 8.8–41.6) or UUI (OR 8.4; 95% CI 2.3–31.3) and with higher frequencies of episodes of UI. However, the risk was lower for men (OR 0.01; 95% CI 0.001–0.35). Age, neurological palsy, urological comorbidities, UUI, SUI, diuretic treatments, ACA positivity, the limited cutaneous form of SSc and the previous severity of episodes of UI were inconstantly associated with monthly, weekly or daily episodes of UI (Supplementary Table S2).

Quality of life and disability

Except for the “physical functioning” domain of SF-36, patients’ QoL remained stable from the first to the third study visit, and there were no statistical differences between patients with and without UI. This was also true for changes in disability between these two evaluations and between the continent and incontinent patients (Supplementary Table S3).

Hospital admission and mortality

Between their inclusion and their third study visit, 43 (36%) patients were hospitalised at least once, with a median length of stay of 8 days (IQR: 5–18). UI at inclusion was not associated with time to first hospital admission in our univariate (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.63–2.16) or adjusted analyses (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.67–2.42). This was also true when considering different subtypes of UI and severity (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate and multivariable Cox regressions of risk of hospital admission and death stratified by urinary incontinence (UI), UI severity and UI subtype

Univariate analysisAdjusted models
By UI (binary)By UI severityBy UI types
Hospital admission
 UI (any)1.2 (0.7–2.3)1.3 (0.7–2.4)
 Monthly UI1.0 (0.4–2.1)1.1 (0.5–2.5)
 Weekly UI1.2 (0.5–2.8)1.4 (0.6–3.4)
 Daily UI1.8 (0.7–4.4)2.0 (0.7–5.2)
 Stress UI0.9 (0.4–2.3)1.1 (0.5–2.6)
 Urge UI1.6 (0.5–4.7)1.5 (0.5–4.7)
 Mixed UI1.3 (0.6–2.7)1.3 (0.6–2.9)
 Age (continuous)1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*
 Male sex0.6 (0.2–1.5)1.5 (0.5–4.2)1.8 (0.6–5.5)1.6 (0.7–4.6)
 Limited form of SSc0.4 (0.2–0.8)*0.4 (0.2–0.7)*0.3 (0.2–0.7)*0.3 (0.2–0.7)*
Death
 UI (any)1.0 (0.5–1.9)0.9 (0.5–1.9)
 Monthly UI0.7 (0.3–1.8)0.7 (0.3–1.9)
 Weekly UI0.9 (0.3–2.4)0.9 (0.3–2.6)
 Daily UI2.2 (0.9–5.4)1.7 (0.6–4.7)
 Stress UI0.9 (0.4–2.2)1.0 (0.4–2.5)
 Urge UI2.6 (1.0–6.7)2.1 (0.8–5.8)
 Mixed UI0.6 (0.2–1.6)0.6 (0.2–1.6)
 Age (continuous)1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*1.0 (1.0–1.1)*
Male sex0.6 (0.2–1.6)0.7 (0.2–2.1)0.9 (0.3–2.6)0.7 (0.2–2.2)
 Limited form of SSc0.8 (0.4–1.6)0.7 (0.3–1.5)0.6 (0.3–1.4)0.8 (0.3–1.8)

SSc: systemic sclerosis; UI: urinary incontinence

Univariate and multivariable Cox regressions of risk of hospital admission and death stratified by urinary incontinence (UI), UI severity and UI subtype SSc: systemic sclerosis; UI: urinary incontinence Thirty deaths (19%) occurred during the median follow-up time of 5 years (IQR: 4.8–5.3), of which 22 (73%) were deemed to be SSc-related. UI at baseline was not associated with time to death in either our univariate (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.49–1.92) or adjusted analyses (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.46–1.91). There were also no associations between UI severity or UI subtype and death from any cause (Table 2) or SSc-related death (data not shown).

Discussion

This longitudinal, prospective, international multicentre study demonstrated that self-reported urinary incontinence (UI) among systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is a highly dynamic phenomenon. Over a period of two years, almost 40% of participants changed their urinary status, and an episode of urine leakage (transient or persistent) affected the majority of patients. Nevertheless, compared to continent patients, UI was not associated with an unfavourable change in QoL or functional status over time or with an increased risk of hospital admission or death in SSc. In contrast to previous beliefs that UI is a binary and constant disease, there is growing evidence that UI changes over time, with active and inactive phases. In the general population, the annual incidence of new-onset UI is 2%–10% among men and 3%–20% among women, with remission rates of 27%–32% and 3%–12%, respectively [33-35]. Thus, patients may experience periods of incontinence followed by periods of continence [36]. After 50–60 years old, rates of new-onset UI are lower than rates of remission, leading to a higher overall prevalence of UI in older individuals [37]. Although the present study had no control group, incidence rates of UI in SSc patients seemed to be higher than in the general population, notably for younger participants. This higher level of new-onset UI came with the previously observed higher prevalence of UI in SSc patients [10, 11]. Although UI is commonly divided into clinically independent subtypes, about a quarter of SSc patients in the present study changed from one UI subtype to another between annual visits. This has also been observed in longitudinal studies of women without SSc [35, 38]. Furthermore, the treatment of one component of mixed UI (e.g. SUI by medication or surgery) may result in the remission of the other component (UUI) [35]. Thus, the boundary between UI subtypes appears to be narrow. Due to its dynamic nature, UI must be reassessed often (at least once a year) among SSc patients. This reassessment is important to adapt UI management on its severity and subtype and to look for factors that might influence or predict its evolution. Although results were inconstant across the different natural history scenarios of UI over time, several factors—including ACA antibodies, digestive symptoms and, to a lesser extent, sex, age, neurological palsy, urological comorbidities, diuretic treatments, the limited cutaneous form of SSc and the presence of puffy fingers on clinical evaluation—appeared to be potentially associated with UI. Nevertheless, the two strongest predictors of UI and its subtypes were a recent UI episode and the subtype of the previous leaking episodes (SUI or UUI). Understanding the factors that influence the evolution of UI, and which phases of UI have the most significant health effects, will help to reassure some patients, provide tailored treatments for severe episodes of UI that are unlikely to resolve, and also give prevention based on risk factors. The present study had some limitations. First, as previously mentioned, because no controls were included, it was impossible to confirm whether SSc patients had higher new-onset or remission rates than the general population. Second, UI diagnoses were based on self-reported questionnaires without objective measures. The ICIQ questionnaires have nevertheless been correlated with objective measures of UI in other studies [39, 40]. Third, except for the corticosteroids, no information on suppressive medication was available in the study. Finally, the sample size was small, and the analysis of each scenario of continence evolution over time was restricted to subgroups (e.g. patients with UI for symptoms resolution). This affected the study’s power to detect influencing factors. In conclusion, UI is a dynamic condition in SSc that waxes and wanes, eventually changing from one form to another subtype. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 44 KB)
  39 in total

1.  [Evaluation of quality of life in patients with systemic sclerosis by administering the SF-36 questionnaire].

Authors:  R Cossutta; S Zeni; A Soldi; P Colombelli; A Belotti Masserini; F Fantini
Journal:  Reumatismo       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun

2.  Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults.

Authors:  T V Perneger; A Leplège; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The association of depressive symptoms and urinary incontinence among older adults.

Authors:  E Dugan; S J Cohen; D R Bland; J S Preisser; C C Davis; P K Suggs; P McGann
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Clinical epidemiological insights into urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Vatché A Minassian; Tony Bazi; Walter F Stewart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Systemic Sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

Authors:  François Rannou; Serge Poiraudeau; Alice Berezné; Thierry Baubet; Véronique Le-Guern; Jean Cabane; Loïc Guillevin; Michel Revel; Jacques Fermanian; Luc Mouthon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-02-15

6.  Urinary incontinence and depression.

Authors:  B H Zorn; H Montgomery; K Pieper; M Gray; W D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Urinary Incontinence in a National Cohort of Older Women: Implications for Caregiving and Care Dependence.

Authors:  Emmy Yang; Nadra E Lisha; Louise Walter; Juno Obedin-Maliver; Alison J Huang
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Severe urinary bladder involvement in systemic sclerosis. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  L La Civita; L Fiorentini; A Tognetti; G Pasero; C Ferri
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  An observational cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed digital ulcer disease secondary to systemic sclerosis registered in the EUSTAR database.

Authors:  Monika Brand; Rebecca Hollaender; Daniel Rosenberg; Martin Scott; Elke Hunsche; Alan Tyndall; Valentina Denaro; Patricia Carreira; Cecilia Varju; Barbara Gabrielli; Stefania Zingarelli; Paola Caramaschi; Katarina Simic-Pasalic; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Massimiliano Vasile; Carina Mihai; Edoardo Rosato; Alessandra Vacca; Thierry Zenone; Walid A Mohamed; Codrina Ancuta; Giuseppe Zampogna; Simona Rednic; Nadia Jabaar; Laura Belloli; Maria R Pozzi; Rosario Foti; Ulrich A Walker
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 10.  Urinary Incontinence as a Predictor of Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gregor John; Claire Bardini; Christophe Combescure; Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.