Vatché A Minassian1,2, Tony Bazi3, Walter F Stewart4. 1. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. vminassian@partners.org. 2. Department of OB/GYN, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. vminassian@partners.org. 3. American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. Sutter Health System, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary incontinence (UI) is very common and heterogeneous among women with limited knowledge of progression or prognosis. Evidence based on clinical epidemiology can help to better understand the natural history of UI. METHODS: We examine the challenges of UI definition and its subtypes, its impact on quality of life and health-seeking behavior. We review the proposed pathophysiology of UI subtypes and known risk factors as they relate to our current knowledge of the disease state. Finally, we emphasize the role of epidemiology in the process of acquiring new insight, improving knowledge, and translating this information into clinical practice. RESULTS: Stress UI is most common overall, but mixed UI is most prevalent in older women. The three UI subtypes have some common risk factors, and others that are unique, but there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how they develop. Although the pathophysiology of stress UI is somewhat understood, urgency UI remains mostly idiopathic, whereas mixed UI is the least studied and most complex subtype. Moreover, there exists limited information on the progression of symptoms over time, and disproportionate UI health-seeking behavior. We identify areas of exploration (e.g., epigenetics, urinary microbiome), and offer new insights into a better understanding of the relationship among the UI subtypes and to develop an integrated construct of UI natural history. CONCLUSION: Future epidemiological strategies using longitudinal study designs could play a pivotal role in better elucidating the controversies in UI natural history and the pathophysiology of its subtypes leading to improved clinical care.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary incontinence (UI) is very common and heterogeneous among women with limited knowledge of progression or prognosis. Evidence based on clinical epidemiology can help to better understand the natural history of UI. METHODS: We examine the challenges of UI definition and its subtypes, its impact on quality of life and health-seeking behavior. We review the proposed pathophysiology of UI subtypes and known risk factors as they relate to our current knowledge of the disease state. Finally, we emphasize the role of epidemiology in the process of acquiring new insight, improving knowledge, and translating this information into clinical practice. RESULTS: Stress UI is most common overall, but mixed UI is most prevalent in older women. The three UI subtypes have some common risk factors, and others that are unique, but there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how they develop. Although the pathophysiology of stress UI is somewhat understood, urgency UI remains mostly idiopathic, whereas mixed UI is the least studied and most complex subtype. Moreover, there exists limited information on the progression of symptoms over time, and disproportionate UI health-seeking behavior. We identify areas of exploration (e.g., epigenetics, urinary microbiome), and offer new insights into a better understanding of the relationship among the UI subtypes and to develop an integrated construct of UI natural history. CONCLUSION: Future epidemiological strategies using longitudinal study designs could play a pivotal role in better elucidating the controversies in UI natural history and the pathophysiology of its subtypes leading to improved clinical care.
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Anne Stoddard; Holly Richter; Philippe Zimmern; Pamela Moalli; Stephen R Kraus; Peggy Norton; Emily Lukacz; Larry Sirls; Harry Johnson Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Mary K Townsend; Kim N Danforth; Bernard Rosner; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mary K Townsend; Kim N Danforth; Karen L Lifford; Bernard Rosner; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Emily S Lukacz; Tamara G Bavendam; Amanda Berry; Cynthia S Fok; Sheila Gahagan; Patricia S Goode; Cecilia T Hardacker; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Lewis; Lisa Kane Low; Jerry L Lowder; Mary H Palmer; Ariana L Smith; Sonya S Brady Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Agnes S Sundaresan; Annemarie G Hirsch; Amanda J Young; Jonathan Pollak; Bruce K Tan; Robert P Schleimer; Robert C Kern; Thomas L Kennedy; J Scott Greene; Walter F Stewart; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Brian S Schwartz Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017-11-10
Authors: Vatche A Minassian; Kaitlin A Hagan; Elisabeth Erekson; Andrea M Austin; Donald Carmichael; Julie P W Bynum; Francine Grodstein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sonya S Brady; Tamara G Bavendam; Amanda Berry; Cynthia S Fok; Sheila Gahagan; Patricia S Goode; Cecilia T Hardacker; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; Cora E Lewis; Jessica B Lewis; Lisa Kane Low; Jerry L Lowder; Mary H Palmer; Jean F Wyman; Emily S Lukacz Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Sonya S Brady; Linda Brubaker; Cynthia S Fok; Sheila Gahagan; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Lewis; Jerry L Lowder; Jesse Nodora; Ann Stapleton; Mary H Palmer Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2020-01-07
Authors: Sonya S Brady; Amanda Berry; Deepa R Camenga; Colleen M Fitzgerald; Sheila Gahagan; Cecilia T Hardacker; Bernard L Harlow; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; D Yvette LaCoursiere; Jessica B Lewis; Lisa K Low; Jerry L Lowder; Alayne D Markland; Gerald McGwin; Diane K Newman; Mary H Palmer; David A Shoham; Ariana L Smith; Ann Stapleton; Beverly R Williams; Siobhan Sutcliffe Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Vivian W Sung; Diane Borello-France; Diane K Newman; Holly E Richter; Emily S Lukacz; Pamela Moalli; Alison C Weidner; Ariana L Smith; Gena Dunivan; Beri Ridgeway; John N Nguyen; Donna Mazloomdoost; Benjamin Carper; Marie G Gantz Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 56.272