Literature DB >> 35944166

Electrophilic Reagents for the Direct Incorporation of Uncommon SCF2CF2H and SCF2CF3 Motifs.

Jordi Mestre1, Miguel Bernús1, Sergio Castillón1, Omar Boutureira1.   

Abstract

The introduction of fluoroalkylthioether groups has attracted the attention of the drug-discovery community given the special physicochemical and pharmacokinetic features they confer to bioactive compounds, yet these are often limited to standard SCF3 and SCF2H moieties. Herein, two saccharin-based electrophilic reagents have been disclosed for the incorporation of uncommon SCF2CF2H and SCF2CF3 motifs. Their reactivity performance, multigram-scale preparation, and divergent derivatization have been thoroughly investigated with a variety of nucleophiles, including natural products and pharmaceuticals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35944166      PMCID: PMC9400389          DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Org Chem        ISSN: 0022-3263            Impact factor:   4.198


Introduction

The introduction of fluoroalkyl motifs has been a cornerstone in synthetic, medicinal, and crop chemistry by virtue of the fine-tuning optimization of physicochemical properties of the modified compounds.[1] Over the last few years, the so-called fluorinated emerging motifs(2) have entered this arena to find structural alternatives to the most exploited CF3 and F substituents. In this immense scenario, thiofluoroalkyl motifs (SRF) occupy a privileged position since the association of fluoroalkyl chains with sulfur results in a powerful combination.[3] The high electronegativity induced by the fluorine atoms combined with the electronic density of the chalcogen, renders highly lipophilic fragments.[4] In medicinal chemistry, these attributes are interesting as they lead to more metabolically stable and higher cell-membrane/blood–brain barrier-permeable ingredients, thus increasing the bioavailability of drug candidates.[5] Fluoroalkyl modified thioethers not only show outstanding Hansch lipophilicity (e.g., CF3, 0.88 vs SCF3, 1.44)[6] but also serve as pivotal groups to access other appreciated derivatives, including fluorinated sulfones, sulfonamides, and sulfoximines.[7] Collectively, these groups exhibit unique properties and represent new avenues for the development of improved bioactive compounds (Figure A). Classically, SRF motifs have been prepared by fluoroalkylation of SH, S2, SCl, or SCN moieties via S–RF disconnection (Figure B, right panel).[8] However, this strategy is not amenable to late-stage functionalization as it requires a preinstalled sulfur handle in the parent molecule. For this reason, fluoroalkylthiolating reagents (and other direct, one-pot protocols) have emerged as a power alternative for the direct modification of target compounds via C–S disconnection (Figure B, left panel).[9]
Figure 1

(A) Selected drugs containing fluoroalkylthioether groups. (B) Synthetic strategy and disconnections to R–SRF motifs. (C) Reports on the installation of selected SRF motifs and MedChem targets. Biophysical significance of SCF2CF3 and SCF2CF2H motifs.[10,11] Hits obtained with the Reaxys database.

(A) Selected drugs containing fluoroalkylthioether groups. (B) Synthetic strategy and disconnections to R–SRF motifs. (C) Reports on the installation of selected SRF motifs and MedChem targets. Biophysical significance of SCF2CF3 and SCF2CF2H motifs.[10,11] Hits obtained with the Reaxys database. In recent years, most of the vast number of reports describing nucleophilic, electrophilic, radical, or oxidative fluoroalkylthiolating agents/protocols are limited to the introduction of SCF3,[12] followed in number by SCF2H.[13,14] Despite recent advances in the field, drug development comprising other polyfluorinated ethyl congeners is virtually absent (Figure C, left panel). Compared to the SCF3 motif, SCF2CF2H and SCF2CF3 fragments confer a larger van der Waals volume (81.7 and 87.7 Å3, respectively vs 58.3 Å3 for SCF3).[10] Thus, higher lipophilicity is expected because of the increase in fluorination degree, although subtle differences in polarity may arise due to the uncommon fluorination patterns (Figure C, right panel).[15] Alike the CF2H group,[16] examination of the electrostatic potential surface of PhSCF2CF2H indicates a terminal electropositive region, suggesting the capability of this group to act as a hydrogen bond donor (Supporting information (SI), Figures S5 and S6). Besides a few one-pot nucleophilic/radical methods,[17] to the best of our knowledge, only two N-electrophilic sulfenamide reagents have been disclosed by Billard for the introduction of the SCF2CF3 motif. However, the electrophilic reactivity shown is limited to the modification of two examples of activated aromatics (phenol and 1,3-dimethoxybenzene), ethynyl lithium, and Grignard nucleophiles.[18] On the other hand, although mechanistically different to the prototypical N-electrophilic reagents, the in situ-generated –SC2F5 anion from either sulfenamide reagents by Billard[19] or from benzothiazolium reagents by Hopkinson[20] enabled the formal incorporation of the SCF2CF3 motif via nucleophilic substitution of halides, tosylates/mesylates, or alcohols, respectively. Concerning the other potentially valuable SCF2CF2H fragment, and although recent efforts have been undertaken toward the development of tetrafluoroethylation protocols,[21,22] direct transfer of tetrafluoroethylthioether units still remains uncharted.[23]

Results and Discussion

Reagent Design and Development

Willing to develop electrophilic reagents able to transfer the aforementioned thiofluoroalkyl chains, we turned our attention to imide- and sulfonamide-based scaffolds. Typically, the N–S–RF triad in these reagents is constructed by a general nucleophilic approach from either thiolate salts and N-Cl compounds (for SCF3)[24] or AgCF2H and N-SCl precursors (for SCF2H).[13] However, longer fluoroalkyl thiols show very low stability due to α-fluoride elimination processes.[25] Thus, all our first attempts using the in situ-generated M+–SC2F5, (M+ = Ag+, Cu+, NMe4+)[26] were unsuccessful (Figure A). In view of these results, we decided to adjust the synthetic strategy using electrophilic +SRF synthons for the preparation of the final electrophilic reagents (Figure B).[27] Thus, chlorination of readily available 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl 1a and pentafluoroethyl 1b benzyl thioethers gave access to key sulfenyl chlorides 1c,d,[28] which reacted with various imide, and sulfonamide salts to render a family of N-reagents 2a–8a, 8b, featuring succinimide, phthalimide, saccharine, and sulfonamides as representative leaving groups. Importantly, this synthetic protocol uses cheap and widely available starting materials, making it suitable for scaling-up reactions (up to 52 g of 8a prepared). The choice of the optimal reagent was based on a balance between synthetic yield, reactivity, stability, and cost (SI, Table S1). Saccharine-SCF2CF2H 8a and SCF2CF38b exhibited the best overall results (Figure C). Both reagents showed robust stability not only in the solid state but also in solution as demonstrated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TGA) analyses as well as solvent stability studies (SI, Figures S1–S3).
Figure 2

(A) Preliminary attempts for the preparation of SCF2CF3 reagent 3b using the standard nucleophilic route. (B) Umpolung (electrophilic) route to SCF2CF2H 2a–8a and SCF2CF38b reagents. (C) Reagent optimization. See the SI for details. TMS = trimethylsilyl, TCCA = trichloroisocyanuric acid.

(A) Preliminary attempts for the preparation of SCF2CF3 reagent 3b using the standard nucleophilic route. (B) Umpolung (electrophilic) route to SCF2CF2H 2a–8a and SCF2CF38b reagents. (C) Reagent optimization. See the SI for details. TMS = trimethylsilyl, TCCA = trichloroisocyanuric acid.

Reaction Scope

With the optimal reagents in hand, their applicability was first evaluated with representative nucleophiles (Scheme A). First, a preliminary solvent compatibility study of 8a with N-H indole demonstrated that solvents of different nature (chlorinated, aprotic polar, and aprotic nonpolar solvents) do not substantially affect the performance of the reaction with yields of 9a up to >95% (SI, Figure S4). Thus, reaction of N-H indole in CH2Cl2 with 8a,b afforded 9a (99%) and 9b (85%) after heating at 40 °C for 1 or 24 h, respectively. Reaction with phenol required the addition of TfOH as a promoter and afforded 10a (97%) and 10b (86%). Next, we assayed the suitability of other nucleophiles to afford N–, O–, and S–SRF bonds.[29] Thus, reaction with benzylamine gave the desired products 11a (93%) and 11b (87%) after 1 h at room temperature, while reaction with 2-mercaptobenzoxazole afforded instantaneously disulfides 12a (99%) and 12b (89%). Unlike phenol, which required a protic acid that activates the electrophilic reagent, preliminary results with alcoholic nucleophiles indicate the necessity of an exogenous base (e.g., Et3N) to deprotonate the hydroxyl moiety and deliver the desired products. Thus, adamantol derivatives 13a (91%) and 13b (89%) were obtained after 1 h at room temperature, using Et3N as a base. Reactions with the preformed enolate of 2,2-dimethylcyclopentanone afforded the double substitution products 14a (53%) and 14b (38%). Attempts to selectively obtain the monosubstituted product were unsuccessful due to the increased reactivity of the monosubstituted intermediate. Treatment of diethyl benzylmalonate with sodium hydride (NaH) and subsequent reaction with 8a,b afforded 15a and 15b in 88 and 93% yield, respectively. Alkenes are also suitable nucleophiles as demonstrated with 2-vinylnaphthalene, using an addition/elimination sequence that afforded E/Z mixtures (up to 96:4) of vinylic SCF2CF2H 16a (99%) and SCF2CF316b (56%). While treatment of phenylacetylene with 8a in the presence of CuBr failed to deliver the desired product,[18] reaction of the alkyne with n-BuLi and subsequent reaction with 8a,b rendered 17a (84%) and 17b (>95%). Similarly, generation of the organolithium intermediate from 4-bromobiphenyl by lithium–bromine exchange afforded 18a (70%) and 18b (62%) after subsequent reaction with 8a,b.[30]
Scheme 1

(A) Scope of Nucleophiles and (B) Functionalization of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals

Conditions: 1H-Indole (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, 40 °C. PhOH (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.2 equiv), TfOH (1.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. BnNH2 (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. 2-Mercaptobenzoxazole (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Adamantol (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.3 equiv), Et3N (2.5 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. (i) 2,2-Dimethylcyclopentan-1-one (1.0 equiv), KHMDS (1.2); (ii) 8a,b (2.5 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) Diethyl 2-benzylmalonate (1.0 equiv), NaH (3 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.7 equiv), THF, rt. (i) 2-Vinylnaphthalene (1.0 equiv), TMSCl (3 equiv), 8a,b (2.2 equiv); (ii) DBU (6 equiv), MeCN, rt. (i) Phenylacetlylene (1.0 equiv), n-BuLi (1.1 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) 4-Bromo-1,1′-biphenyl (1.0 equiv), n-BuLi (1.1 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) Tri-O-benzyl-d-glucal (1.0 equiv), 3 Å MS, TMSCl (3 equiv), 8a,b (2.2 equiv); (ii) DBU (6 equiv), MeCN, rt. (1S,2R)-(+)-Norephedrine (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (3 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Fluoxetine (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.5 equiv), Et3N (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. (i) Donepezil (1.0 equiv), KHMDS (1.3 equiv); (ii) 8a (1.3 equiv), THF, −78 °C. Piperine (1.0 equiv), 8a (2.2 equiv), TMSCl (1.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Ketorolac (1.0 equiv), 8a (2.0 equiv), TMSCl (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. -Naproxen (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.5 equiv), TfOH (1.2 equiv), CHCl3, 40 °C (for 25a) or 70 °C (for 25b). Isolated yields given. Yields in parenthesis were determined by 19F NMR using 1,4-difluorobenzene (DFB) as internal standard (see the SI for details). MS = molecular sieves, TfOH = trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, HMDS = hexamethyldisilazane, THF = tetrahydrofuran, TMS = trimethylsilyl, DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene.

(A) Scope of Nucleophiles and (B) Functionalization of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals

Conditions: 1H-Indole (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, 40 °C. PhOH (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.2 equiv), TfOH (1.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. BnNH2 (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. 2-Mercaptobenzoxazole (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Adamantol (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.3 equiv), Et3N (2.5 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. (i) 2,2-Dimethylcyclopentan-1-one (1.0 equiv), KHMDS (1.2); (ii) 8a,b (2.5 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) Diethyl 2-benzylmalonate (1.0 equiv), NaH (3 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.7 equiv), THF, rt. (i) 2-Vinylnaphthalene (1.0 equiv), TMSCl (3 equiv), 8a,b (2.2 equiv); (ii) DBU (6 equiv), MeCN, rt. (i) Phenylacetlylene (1.0 equiv), n-BuLi (1.1 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) 4-Bromo-1,1′-biphenyl (1.0 equiv), n-BuLi (1.1 equiv); (ii) 8a,b (1.2 equiv), THF, −78 °C. (i) Tri-O-benzyl-d-glucal (1.0 equiv), 3 Å MS, TMSCl (3 equiv), 8a,b (2.2 equiv); (ii) DBU (6 equiv), MeCN, rt. (1S,2R)-(+)-Norephedrine (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (3 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Fluoxetine (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.5 equiv), Et3N (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. (i) Donepezil (1.0 equiv), KHMDS (1.3 equiv); (ii) 8a (1.3 equiv), THF, −78 °C. Piperine (1.0 equiv), 8a (2.2 equiv), TMSCl (1.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. Ketorolac (1.0 equiv), 8a (2.0 equiv), TMSCl (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt. -Naproxen (1.0 equiv), 8a,b (1.5 equiv), TfOH (1.2 equiv), CHCl3, 40 °C (for 25a) or 70 °C (for 25b). Isolated yields given. Yields in parenthesis were determined by 19F NMR using 1,4-difluorobenzene (DFB) as internal standard (see the SI for details). MS = molecular sieves, TfOH = trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, HMDS = hexamethyldisilazane, THF = tetrahydrofuran, TMS = trimethylsilyl, DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene. Next, having demonstrated the versatility of our reagents with model nucleophiles, we aimed to evaluate their efficiency for the direct/late-stage modification of natural products and pharmaceuticals (Scheme B).[31] First, the aforementioned addition/elimination protocol also worked well for the benzyl-protected d-glucal to afford 19a (80%) and 19b (78%).[32] Interestingly, despite the large volume of SCF2CF3 and SCF2CF2H groups, they have less impact on the conformation of 2-substituted-d-glucals than their alkyl (e.g., CF2CF3, CF3) counterparts as indicated by the analysis of diagnostic coupling constants 3J3,4 = 4–4.6 Hz and 3J4,5 = 5–5.8 Hz (intermediate conformation deformed toward the 5H4) (SI, Figure S7).[33,34] (+)-Norephedrine was chemoselectively N-modified to 20a (59%) and 20b (90%) under mild reaction conditions without competitive O-substitution. The secondary amine of fluoxetine (Prozac) also reacted successfully to deliver 21a,b in 77% and 87% yield, respectively. Donepezil, a drug used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, was reacted with potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS) to generate the enolate that subsequently reacted with 8a to afford 22a in an excellent 99% yield. Similarly to 2-vinylnaphthalene and d-glucal, the use of the same addition/elimination protocol with piperine (black pepper alkaloid) and 8a in the presence of trimethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl) as a promoter, afforded 23a as a separable mixture of E/Z-isomers 23a (66%) and 23a (15%), resulting from the modification of the conjugated diene system as determined by NMR and X-ray (for the E-isomer) analysis. Reaction of 8a with ketorolac, an anti-inflammatory agent, afforded 24a (87%) with the exclusive modification of the pyrrole moiety, thus demonstrating the compatibility of our reagent 8a with carboxylic acids. Finally, when naproxen was reacted with 8a and TfOH as a promoter, 25a (93%) was obtained as an 81:19 mixture of C10/C17 regioisomers. In contrast, reaction with 8b afforded 25b (92%) as the sole C10-isomer.

Large Scale and Derivatization

Next, multigram-scale reactions (20 mmol) with a series of unprotected and N-Me-protected indoles afforded gram amounts of the corresponding SCF2CF2H-analogues 9a, 26a, and 27a with yields up to 99% (Figure A). Notably, reaction crudes are substantially clean and only excess of 8a and saccharine are observed, which indeed can be simply removed by sequential washings with aqueous Na2CO3. In addition, reactions with 5-substituted indoles bearing Cl, CN, and NO2 moieties afforded analogues 28a–30a (up to 92%) that further demonstrate the functional group compatibility/tolerance of our reagents.
Figure 3

(A) Multigram-scale preparation of tetrafluoroethylthio indoles and (B) derivatization reactions. See the SI for details. Boc, tert-butoxycarbonyl; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide; HMDS, hexamethyldisilazane; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid.

(A) Multigram-scale preparation of tetrafluoroethylthio indoles and (B) derivatization reactions. See the SI for details. Boc, tert-butoxycarbonyl; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide; HMDS, hexamethyldisilazane; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid. Because the 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethylthio moiety represents an interesting platform for accessing other compounds, various derivatization reactions were evaluated (Figure B). First, sulfenamide fluoxetine derivatives 21a,b were oxidized to sulfonamides 31a (56%) and 31b (75%) using H2O2 and a molybdenum catalyst. This methodology represents an overall workable strategy to obtain uncommon, fluorinated sulfonamides (Figure B, upper panel). Noteworthily, the same oxidation conditions could be applied to the oxidation of thioether 9a to the corresponding sulfone 32a (95%) (Figure B, lower panel). Next, after N-Boc protection of indole 9a to 33a (Boc2O, Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h, 97%), the SCF2CF2H moiety of product 33a was deprotonated with KHMDS and the resulting carbanion quenched with benzophenone. Finally, N-Boc removal with TFA gave access to CF2CF2-bridged 34a in 76% yield. This strategy serves as a proof of concept for the functionalization with electrophiles of terminal SCF2CF2H-containing compounds.[22] Finally, Suzuki cross-coupling of 5-bromoindole 26a with an aryl boronic acid partner smoothly afforded 35a in an excellent 90% yield, thus demonstrating group compatibility with Pd-catalyzed transformations.

Conclusions

In summary, two new reagents for the direct introduction of uncommon SCF2CF2H and SCF2CF3 motifs have been disclosed. These electrophilic agents are synthetized in three steps from simple and readily available starting materials and can be obtained in a multigram scale. Electrophilic introduction has proven successful in a range of different nucleophiles, including amines, alcohols, thiols, electron-rich (hetero)aromatics, phenols, ketones, 1,3-diesters, and alkenes as well as organolithium alkyne and arene derivatives. The robustness of the transformation, including its operational/purification simplicity has been further demonstrated with a range of complex structures, including blockbuster drugs and natural products. Multigram-scale reactions and product derivatization to sulfones, sulfonamides, and deprotonation of SCF2CF2H-addition to electrophiles as well as orthogonal metal-mediated reactions have also been demonstrated. We expect our findings will provide new opportunities in drug and agrochemical discovery by expanding the toolbox of reagents for the introduction of new fluorinated motifs into natural products and active principal ingredients.

Experimental Section

General Remarks

Proton (1H NMR), carbon (13C{1H}) NMR), and fluorine (19F NMR) nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury spectrometer or a Bruker Avance Ultrashield (400 MHz for 1H), (100.6 MHz for 13C{1H}), and (376.5 MHz for 19F). Spectra were fully assigned using COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY. All chemical shifts are quoted on the δ scale in parts per million (ppm) using the residual solvent as internal standard (1H NMR: CDCl3 = 7.26, CD2Cl2 = 5.32, CD3OD = 3.31 and (13C{1H} NMR: CDCl3 = 77.16, CD2Cl2 = 54.0, CD3OD = 49.0). Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz with the following splitting abbreviations: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, and app = apparent. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a FTIR–ATR spectrophotometer. Absorption maxima (νmax) are reported in wavenumbers (cm–1). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on an LC–MS system (UHPLC 1290 Infinity II Series coupled to a qTOF/MS 6550 Series, both Agilent Technologies (Agilent Technologies). For the ionization, an ESI operating on positive or negative ionization or an APCI operating on positive or negative ionization was used. Water and methanol with 0.05% formic acid were used as mobile phases. The quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (qTOF) operated in high-resolution MS scan mode between 100–1000 m/z. For GC–HRMS mass determination the compounds were directly analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (7200 GC–qTOF from Agilent Technologies). For ionization, electron impact ionization was used. The chromatographic column was a 5HP–MS from Agilent and carried gas was He. The quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (qTOF) operated in high-resolution MS scan mode between 100–600 m/z. Nominal and exact m/z values are reported in Daltons. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out using commercial backed sheets coated with 60 Å F254 silica gel. Visualization of the silica plates was achieved using a UV lamp (λmax = 254 nm), 6% H2SO4 in EtOH, cerium molybdate, and/or potassium permanganate staining solutions. Flash column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60 Å CC (230–400 mesh). Mobile phases are reported in relative composition (e.g., 1:1 EtOAc/hexane v/v). All reactions using anhydrous conditions were performed using oven-dried apparatus under an atmosphere of argon. Brine refers to a saturated solution of sodium chloride. Anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) was used as drying agent after reaction work-up, as indicated. All reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Cymit, Carbosynth, Apollo Scientific, Fluorochem and Manchester Organics chemical companies. General crystallization procedure: a sample of the product was charged in an HRMS vial and was dissolved using a minimal amount of THF. The HRMS vial was fitted inside a bigger vial containing pentane and the latter was capped and left unperturbed overnight. Slow vapor diffusion caused growing of crystals that showed good quality for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. X-ray figures in the article were rendered with CyLview software.

Benzyl(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfane (1a)

A 250 mL round-bottom flask (reaction flask A), equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with potassium hydroxide (90%, 1.68 g, 30 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous and deoxygenated MeCN (100 mL) was added followed by benzyl mercaptan (11.7 mL, 100 mmol) and an argon balloon was attached through the rubber septa using a needle. Then, a second flask (reaction flask B) containing NaI (2.25 g, 15 mmol) in anhydrous and deoxygenated THF (100 mL) was attached to a reflux condenser connected to a Teflon (PTFE) tube and the outlet was immersed in the solution of reaction flask A. Then, reaction flask B was heated to 70 °C with an aluminum heating block and TMSCF3 was added (4 × 11 mL, 74.4 mmol, every 30 min) while bubbling was observed in reaction flask A. If overpressure was observed by dilation of the balloon connected to flask A, this was detached, emptied, and connected again to liberate excess of pressure. When bubbling stopped after additions of TMSCF3, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for further 3 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated in a rotary evaporator without heating, the crude redissolved in Et2O and washed with 10% aqueous KOH and brine. The organic phase was dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under gentle vacuum in a rotary evaporator without heating. The product was distilled under reduced pressure to afford 1a (15.1 g, 67%) as a colorless liquid. Rf (hexane): 0.26; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.48–7.31 (m, 5H), 5.80 (tt, J = 53.9, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 135.5, 129.2, 129.0, 128.1, 123.8 (tt, J = 283.4, 30.1 Hz), 109.9 (tt, J = 252.8, 38.2 Hz), 32.4 (t, J = 4.0 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.03 (td, J = 9.0, 3.2 Hz, 2F), −132.00 (dt, J = 54.0, 9.0 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1496, 1455, 1383, 1212, 1105, 990, 808, 768, 697, 663, 636, 551; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C9H7F4S– (m/z): calcd 223.0210; found 223.0201.

Benzyl(perfluoroethyl)sulfane (1b)

A flask containing dry KF (8.3 g, 142.4 mmol) and benzylthiocyanate (32.0 g, 213.6 mmol) was evacuated and backfilled with argon three times followed by sequential addition of anhydrous MeCN (110 mL). Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and TMSCF2CF3 (25 mL, 142.4 mmol) was added with a syringe. The mixture was stirred under argon at 40 °C with an aluminum heating block for 48 h. Next, the reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature and diluted with Et2O. The organic phase was washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. After filtration, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by distillation under reduced pressure to afford 1b (27.59 g, 80%) as a colorless liquid. Rf (hexane): 0.44; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.37–7.28 (m, 5H), 4.16 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 134.81, 129.3, 1291, 128.3, 119.0 (qt, J = 284.2, 35.8 Hz), 121.7 (tt, J = 288.1, 40.3 Hz), 33.1 (t, J = 3.9 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −83.4 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 3F), −92.4 (q, J = 3.7 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1496, 1455, 1099, 1030, 774, 766, 755, 695, 480, 465. After extensive analyses with different spectrometric techniques the molecular peak could not be found; only fragmentation can be described by HRMS (TOF EI) for (Bn)+ C7H7+ (m/z): calcd 91.0542; found 91.0543.

1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite (1c)

To a solution of benzyl thioether 1a (43.07 g, 192 mmol) in CHCl3 (100 mL) was bubbled an excess of chlorine gas (27.2 g, 384 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and the conversion monitored by 19F NMR. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was distilled to collect the desired 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c as a yellowish solution in CHCl3 (115 mL, 1.59 M, 96%). To determine the concentration of 1c in CHCl3, 0.5 mL of the distilled fraction was transferred to an NMR tube followed by addition of 1,4-difluorobenzene (DFB, 20 μL, internal standard) and the concentration was analyzed by quantitative 19F NMR. 19F NMR (CHCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −97.40 (m, 2F), −133.90 (dt, J = 53.6, 8.3 Hz, 2F). DFB referenced to −119.70 ppm.

Perfluoroethyl hypochlorothioite (1d)

To a solution of benzyl thioether 1b (26.85 g, 110.9 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (110 mL) was bubbled an excess of chlorine gas (4.7 g, 332.6 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and the conversion monitored by 19F NMR. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was distilled to collect the desired perfluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1d as a solution yellowish in CH2Cl2 (71 mL, 1.13 M, 72%). To determine the concentration of 1d in CH2Cl2, 0.5 mL of the distilled fraction was transferred to an NMR tube followed by addition of 1,3-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene (BTB, 20 μL, internal standard) and the concentration was analyzed by quantitative 19F NMR. 19F NMR (CH2Cl2, 376.5 MHz): δ −81.46 (t, J = 2.6 Hz, 3F), −97.50 (m, 2F). BTB referenced to −62.90 ppm.

1-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)pyrrolidine-2,5-dione (2a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium succinimide salt (206 mg, 1.5 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (5 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (0.63 mL, 1 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by flash column chromatography (1:1 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 2a (203 mg, 88%) as a white solid. Rf (2:3 EtOAc/hexane): 0.28; m.p.: 61–63 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.96 (tt, J = 53.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (s, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 175.1, 120.8 (tt, J = 291.9, 30.0 Hz), 109.5 (tt, J = 253.8, 35.7 Hz), 28.6; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −98.1 (td, J = 8.9, 3.8 Hz, 2F), −132.8 (dt, J = 53.2, 8.9 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1717, 1299, 1217, 1115, 1001, 812, 656, 621, 547, 462, 438; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C6H6F4NO2S+ (m/z): calcd 232.0050; found 232.0057.

2-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)isoindoline-1,3-dione (3a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium phthalimide salt (278 mg, 1.5 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (1.6 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (0.63 mL, 1 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 3a (170 mg, 60%) as a white solid. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.14; m.p.: 78–80 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.01–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.81 (m, 2H), 5.98 (tt, J = 53.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 166.4, 135.4, 131.6, 124.7, 120.9 (tt, J = 291.5, 30.2 Hz), 109.43 (tt, J = 253.8, 35.8 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −98.96 (td, J = 8.8, 3.8 Hz, 2F), −132.98 (dt, J = 53.2, 8.8 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1747, 1719, 1281, 1100, 1038, 868, 714, 689, 626, 526, 402; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C10H6F4NO2S+ (m/z): calcd 280.0050; found 280.0056.

N-(Phenylsulfonyl)-N-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)benzamide (4a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium N-(phenylsulfonyl)benzamide salt (790 mg, 2.64 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (5 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 (1.25 mL, 2 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 4a (605 mg, 77%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p.: 47–49 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.13–8.08 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.60 (m, 3H), 7.60–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.46–7.40 (m, 2H), 5.89 (tt, J = 53.1, 3.6 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 171.7, 137.0, 134.8, 133.3, 131.9, 129.5, 129.4, 129.1, 128.6, 121.2 (tt, J = 293.7, 30.4 Hz), 109.0 (tt, J = 253.6, 36.0 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −94.81 (d, J = 234.3 Hz, 1F), −98.94 (d, J = 234.3 Hz, 1F), −133.65 (m, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1716, 1360, 1170, 1101, 1053, 1024, 562, 545; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C15H12F4NO3S2+ (m/z): calcd 394.0189; found 394.0192.

6-Nitro-2-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)benzo[d]isothiazol-3(2H)-one 1,1-Dioxide (5a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium 6-nitrobenzo[d]isothiazol-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide salt (703 mg, 2.64 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (5 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (1.25 mL, 2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 5a (186 mg, 26%) as a yellowish solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p.: 70–72 °C (decomposes); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.87 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.76 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (tt, J = 53.0, 3.8 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 157.2, 152.4, 139.2, 130.6, 130.0, 128.3, 120.5 (m), 118.2, 109.2 (tt, J = 254.1, 35.1 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −96.60 (m, 2F), −133.18 (d, J = 53.0 Hz, 2F); HRMS could not be obtained due to instability of the final product.

N-(Phenylsulfonyl)-N-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)benzenesulfonamide (6a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with silver N-(phenylsulfonyl)benzenesulfonamide salt (404 mg, 1.5 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (1.6 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (0.63 mL, 1 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 6a (386 mg, 90%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p.: 123–125 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.02–7.96 (m, 4H), 7.70–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.48 (m, 4H), 6.18 (tt, J = 53.0, 4.7 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 137.5, 135.0, 129.2, 129.0, 120.0 (tt, J = 296.4, 29.0 Hz), 109.0 (tt, J = 253.1, 34.2 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −99.29 (td, J = 10.1, 4.7 Hz, 2F), −135.08 (dt, J = 53.0, 10.1 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1362, 1151, 1082, 863, 755, 723, 684, 575, 539, 466; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+· C14H11F4NO4S3+· (m/z): calcd 428.9786; found 428.9786.

N-(Methylsulfonyl)-N-((perfluoroethyl)thio)methanesulfonamide (7a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium N-(methylsulfonyl)methanesulfonamide salt (1.06 g, 5.02 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (8 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (2.26 mL, 3.6 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 7a (1.1 g, 87%) as a white solid. Rf (3:7 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p.: 41–43 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 6.12 (tt, J = 52.9, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 120.6 (tt, J = 293.6, 29.8 Hz), 109.1 (tt, J = 253.3, 34.9 Hz), 43.2; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −98.7 (td, J = 9.2, 4.1 Hz, 2F), −134.0 (dt, J = 52.9, 9.2 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1353, 1161, 1118, 996, 961, 909, 794, 755, 526, 500, 472, 429; HRMS (TOF EI) for (M)+· C4H7F4NO4S3+· (m/z): calcd 304.9468; found 304.9458.

2-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)benzo[d]isothiazol-3(2H)-one 1,1-Dioxide (8a)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium saccharin salt (46.17 g, 209 mmol). Subsequently, CHCl3 (100 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.59 M solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1c in CHCl3 was added (105 mL, 167 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 8a (52 g, 99%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p: 75–78 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.17 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.05–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.96–7.89 (m, 1H), 6.12 (tt, J = 52.8, 4.3 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 158.9, 137.8, 136.5, 135.1, 126.5, 126.2, 120.3 (tt, J = 294.3, 30.1), 120.0, 109.2 (tt, J = 253.9, 34.6 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −96.9 (bd, J = 225.0 Hz, 1F), −99.8 (bd, J = 225.0 Hz, 1F), −133.9 (m, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1761, 1338, 1214, 1099, 978, 936, 806, 746, 668, 592, 528, 500; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C9H5F4NO3S2+ (m/z): calcd 315.9720; found 315.9727.

2-((Perfluoroethyl)thio)benzo[d]isothiazol-3(2H)-one 1,1-Dioxide (8b)

A round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with potassium saccharin salt (20.32 g, 91.83 mmol). Subsequently, the flask was cooled down to 0 °C and a 1.13 M solution of perfluoroethyl hypochlorothioite 1d in CH2Cl2 was added (71 mL, 79.85 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sintered funnel and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 8b (25.55 g, 96%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): decomposes; m.p: 68–70 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.18 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.05–7.98 (m, 2H), 7.96–7.89 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 158.5, 138.0, 136.5, 135.1, 126.6, 126.1, 122.1, 118.2 (tq, J = 41.8, 299.5 Hz), 118.1 (qt, J = 286.7, 35.3 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.4 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 3F), −95.36 (m, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1764, 1351, 1194, 1096, 930, 749, 671, 590, 576, 529, 499, 414; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C9H5F5NO3S2+ (m/z): calcd 333.9626; found 333.9619.

3-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (9a)

An 8 mL reaction vial, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 1H-indole (35 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) was added to the flask and the mixture was stirred at 40 °C with an aluminum heating block for 1 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:4 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 9a (71 mg, 95%) as a brownish solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.39; m.p: 48 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.44 (bs, 1H), 7.88–7.81 (m, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.28 (m, 2H), 5.75 (tt, J = 53.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 136.1, 133.3, 129.9, 123.6, 122.2 (tt, J = 284.4, 28.5 Hz), 121.8, 119.4, 111.9, 109.4 (tt, J = 252.8, 36.8 Hz), 94.4 (t, J = 3.9 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −94.4 (td, J = 9.8, 4.0 Hz, 2F), −133.7 (dt, J = 53.7, 9.8 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3383, 1376, 1095, 1070, 759, 750, 676, 651, 618, 584, 536, 426; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C10H8F4NS+ (m/z): calcd 250.0308; found 250.0302.

Large-Scale Preparation of 9a

To a solution of 1H-indole (2.34 g, 20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added reagent 8a (6.93 g, 22 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Then, EtOAc (150 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 9a (4.95 g, 99%) as a brownish solid.

3-((Perfluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (9b)

To a round-bottom flask containing 1H-indole (18 mg, 0.15 mmol) was sequentially added anhydrous CH2Cl2 (0.6 mL) and reagent 8b (55 mg, 0.17 mmol) under argon. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C with an aluminum heating block for 24 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography (1:4 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 9b (34 mg, 85%) as a yellowish solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.22; m.p: 62 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.50 (bs, 1H), 7.85–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 136.1, 133.5, 130.0, 123.6, 121.8, 124.5–118.0 (m), 119.5, 117.4 (m), 111.8, 94.0 (t, J = 3.7 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.47 (t, J = 3.4 Hz, 3F), −93.13 (q, J = 3.4 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3380, 1316, 1194, 1092, 958, 746, 555, 533, 426; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C10H7F5NS+ (m/z): calcd 268.0214; found 268.0205.

4-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)phenol (10a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with phenol (28 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (32 μL, 0.36 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (114 mg, 0.36 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 10a (66 mg, 97%) as a yellowish semisolid. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.14; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.51 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.75 (tt, J = 53.8, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 158.0, 139.2, 122.4 (tt, J = 283.9, 29.2 Hz), 116.6, 109.6 (tt, J = 252.9, 37.6 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.74 (td, J = 9.2, 3.4 Hz, 2F), −132.58 (dt, J = 53.8, 9.5 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3370, 1586, 1496, 1212, 1113, 996, 833, 524; HRMS (TOF ES–) for (M–H)− C8H5F4OS– (m/z): calcd 225.0003; found 225.0004.

4-((Perfluoroethyl)thio)phenol (10b)[18b]

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with phenol (28 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (32 μL, 0.36 mmol). Then, reagent 8b (120 mg, 0.36 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 10b (41 mg, 56%) as a colorless syrup. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.29; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.51 (m, 2H), 6.87 (m, 2H), 5.40 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 158.3, 139.4, 120.4 (m), 119.9 (m), 116.7; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.4 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 3F), −92.8 (q, J = 3.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3286, 1584, 1495, 1433, 1334, 1195, 1088, 960, 831, 749, 523; HRMS (TOF ES–) for (M–H)− C8H4F5OS– (m/z): calcd 242.9909; found 242.9913.

N-Benzyl-S-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thiohydroxylamine (11a)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with benzylamine (33 μL, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, reagent 8a (99 mg, 0.32 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 11a (48 mg, 67%) as a yellowish liquid. Rf (pentane): 0.15; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 7.59–7.17 (m, 5H), 5.98 (tt, J = 53.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.12 (bs, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 100.6 MHz): δ 139.2, 129.2, 128.7, 128.4, 123.8 (tt, J = 286.0, 29.1 Hz), 110.1 (tt, J = 251.2, 37.0 Hz), 58.5; 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 376.5 MHz): δ −103.0 (td, J = 8.5, 3.8 Hz, 2F), −135.1 (dt, J = 53.9, 8.7 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3356, 1214, 1108, 1003, 814, 699; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C9H10F4NS+ (m/z): calcd 240.0465; found 240.0462.

N-Benzyl-S-(perfluoroethyl)thiohydroxylamine (11b)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with benzylamine (22 μL, 0.2 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was added using a syringe. Then, reagent 8b (70 mg, 0.21 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 11b (39 mg, 76%) as a colorless oil. Rf (pentane): 0.35; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 7.46–7.26 (m, 5H), 4.24 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (bs, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 100.6 MHz): δ 139.1, 129.2, 128.8, 128.5, 121.3 (tq, J = 289.7, 39.8 Hz), 119.6 (qt, J = 286.2, 37.3 Hz), 58.4; 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.77 (t, J = 3.1 Hz, 3F), −102.53 (q, J = 2.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3853, 3744, 2924, 2372, 2320, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1457; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C9H7F5NS– (m/z): calcd 256.0225; found 256.0216.

2-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)disulfaneyl)benzo[d]oxazole (12a)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2-mercaptobenzoxazole (48 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and anhydrous MeCN (2 mL) were added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and the organic residue was redissolved in pentane, extracted, and concentrated again under reduced pressure to afford 12a as a yellow oil (85 mg, 99%). Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.33; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.74–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.33 (m, 2H), 6.11 (tt, J = 53.2, 3.5 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 159.6, 152.6, 141.8, 125.9, 125.2, 121.3 (t, J = 290.5, 30.0 Hz), 120.1, 110.7, 109.2 (t, J = 253.7, 36.1 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −95.02 (td, J = 8.6, 3.6 Hz, 2F), −132.96 (dt, J = 53.3, 8.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1499, 1450, 1237, 1218, 1125, 1096, 1079, 984, 803, 757, 744; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C9H4F4NOS2– (m/z): calcd 281.9676; found 281.9673.

2-((Perfluoroethyl)disulfaneyl)benzo[d]oxazole (12b)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2-mercaptobenzoxazole (48 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and anhydrous MeCN (2 mL) were added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and reagent 8b (107 mg, 0.32 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and the organic residue was redissolved in pentane, extracted, and concentrated again under reduced pressure to 12b (81 mg, 89%) as a white-off solid. Rf decomposes; m.p.: 71–73 °C (decomposes); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.74–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.57–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.40–7.32 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 158.8, 152.6, 141.9, 125.9, 125.3, 120.28 (tq, 118.0, J = 295.8, 41.1 Hz), 118.4 (qt, J = 287.0, 36.0 Hz), 110.8; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.27 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 3F), −94.91 (q, J = 2.9 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1500, 1449, 1232, 1127, 1092, 801, 745; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C9H3F5NOS2– (m/z): calcd 299.9582; found 299.9575.

(Adamantan-1-yloxy)(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfane (13a)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 1-adamantol (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was added using a syringe followed by triethylamine (104 μL, 0.75 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (123 mg, 0.39 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 13a (78 mg, 91%) as a colorless oil. Rf (pentane): 0.26; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.99 (tt, J = 53.5, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (bs, 3H), 1.80 (m, 6H), 1.61 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 123.3 (tt, J = 286.6, 28.2 Hz), 109.17 (tt, J = 252.9, 35.6 Hz), 82.6, 41.6, 35.9, 31.4; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −103.9 (td, J = 9.9, 4.3 Hz, 2F), −135.1 (dt, J = 53.5, 9.9 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2913, 2855, 1214, 1118, 1000, 892, 819; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C12H15F4OS– (m/z): calcd 283.0785; found 283.0780.

(Adamantan-1-yloxy)(perfluoroethyl)sulfane (13b)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 1-adamantol (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was added using a syringe followed by triethylamine (104 μL, 0.75 mmol). Then, reagent 8b (130 mg, 0.39 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 13b (54 mg, 60%) as a colorless oil. Rf (pentane): 0.66; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.24 (bs, 3H), 1.81 (m, 6H), 1.69–1.54 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 121.1 (m), 118.9 (qt, J = 286.8, 36.8 Hz), 83.2, 41.6, 35.9, 31.5; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −81.9 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 3F), −102.5 (q, J = 3.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3853, 3649, 2923, 2852, 1699, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1507, 1457, 1035. After extensive analyses with different spectrometric techniques the molecular peak could not be found; only fragmentation can be described by HRMS (TOF EI) for (Adamantyl)+ C10H15+ (m/z): calcd 135.1168; found 135.1169; (pentafluoroethyl)+ C2F5+ (m/z): calcd 118.9915; found 118.9910; SC2F4+ (m/z): calcd 131.9651; found 131.9645.

2,2-Dimethyl-5,5-bis((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)cyclopentan-1-one (14a)

A 0.35 M stock solution of 2,2-dimethylcyclopentan-1-one potassium enolate was prepared using the following procedure: a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2,2-dimethylcyclopentan-1-one (113 μL, 0.9 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (1.5 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a solution of potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (1.0 M in toluene, 1.1 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. Then, to a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with reagent 8a (237 mg, 0.75 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added using a syringe. The mixture was cooled down to −78 °C and then, the previously prepared enolate solution (0.86 mL, 0.35 M, 0.3 mmol) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane) to afford 14a (60 mg, 53%) as a colorless liquid. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.31; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 5.99 (tdd, J = 53.4, 5.1, 2.8 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.08 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 100.6 MHz): δ 210.7, 127.1–120.4 (m), 112.4–106.5 (m), 65.3, 44.6, 37.8, 35.1, 26.8; 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 376.5 MHz): δ −88.02 (dt, J = 234.5, 8.3 Hz), −89.89 (ddd, J = 234.5, 14.2, 9.2 Hz), −132.4 (m), −134.50 (ddt, J = 295.2, 53.5, 9.2 Hz); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2975, 1743, 1461, 1382, 1208, 1113, 984, 877, 812, 634, 553; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C11H13F8OS2+ (m/z): calcd 377.0275; found 377.0268.

2,2-Dimethyl-5,5-bis((perfluoroethyl)thio)cyclopentan-1-one (14b)

A 0.35 M stock solution of 2,2-dimethylcyclopentan-1-one potassium enolate was prepared using the following procedure: a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2,2-dimethylcyclopentan-1-one (113 μL, 0.9 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (1.5 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a solution of potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (1.0 M in toluene, 1.1 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. Then, to a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with reagent 8b (250 mg, 0.75 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added using a syringe. The mixture was cooled down to −78 °C and then, the previously prepared enolate solution (0.86 mL, 0.35 M, 0.3 mmol) was added using a syringe. Then, the mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane) to afford 14b (47 mg, 38%) as a colorless liquid. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.47; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 2.71 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.29 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 100.6 MHz): δ 210.7, 127.1–120.4 (m), 112.4–106.5 (m), 65.3, 44.6, 37.8, 35.1, 26.8; 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 376.5 MHz): δ −88.02 (dt, J = 234.5, 8.3 Hz), −89.89 (ddd, J = 234.5, 14.2, 9.2 Hz), −132.4 (m), −134.50 (ddt, J = 295.2, 53.5, 9.2 Hz); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1751, 1328, 1212, 1099, 953, 751; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C11H11F10OS2+ (m/z): calcd 413.0086; found 413.0085.

Diethyl 2-Benzyl-2-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)malonate (15a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with NaH (60% in mineral oil, 9 mg, 0.23 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (1.5 mL) was added using a syringe followed by diethyl 2-benzylmalonate (35.5 μL, 0.15 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. Then, reagent 8a (118 mg, 0.38 mmol) was quickly added to the flask and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with aqueous NH4Cl, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 15a (51 mg, 88%) as a colorless oil. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.26; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.30–7.18 (m, 5H), 5.80 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.29–4.15 (m, 4H), 3.64 (s, 2H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 167.2, 134.1, 130.7, 128.3, 127.8, 124.06 (tt, J = 287.4, 29.3 Hz), 109.47 (tt, J = 254.4, 36.4 Hz), 64.7, 63.2, 41.3, 13.9; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −88.79 (td, J = 8.9, 3.5 Hz, 2F), −132.48 (dt, J = 53.7, 8.9 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2985, 1260, 1224, 1114, 990, 860, 810, 701; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C16H19F4O4S+ (m/z): calcd 383.0935; found 383.0922.

Diethyl 2-Benzyl-2-((perfluoroethyl)thio)malonate (15b)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with NaH (60% in mineral oil, 22 mg, 0.9 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by diethyl 2-benzylmalonate (71 μL, 0.3 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. Then, reagent 8b (170 mg, 0.51 mmol) was quickly added to the flask and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (9:0.5 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 15b (112 mg, 93%) as a yellowish oil. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.35; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.34–7.19 (m, 5H), 4.32–4.18 (m, 4H), 3.68 (s, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 166.7, 134.0, 130.7, 128.4, 127.8, 122.1 (tq, J = 292.3, 40.9), 118.2 (qt, J = 286.8, 34.9 Hz), 65.3, 63.3, 41.2 (d, J = 1.9 Hz), 13.8; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −83.44 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 3F), −88.59 (q, J = 3.5 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1739, 1311, 1259, 1217, 1095, 1083, 959, 750, 701; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C16H18F5O4S+ (m/z): calcd 401.0840; found 401.0828.

(E/Z)-(2-(Naphthalen-2-yl)vinyl)(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfane (16a)

A 25 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2-vinylnaphthalene (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous MeCN (9 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trimethylsilyl chloride (114 μL, 0.9 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h. Next, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, 269 μL, 1.8 mmol) was added and the mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 16 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane) to afford 16a (85 mg, 99%) as a white solid as an inseparable 96:4 E/Z mixture. Rf (hexane): 0.24; m.p: 48–50 °C; FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2320, 1699, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1507, 1457, 1105; HRMS (TOF EI) for (M)+· C14H10F4S+· (m/z): calcd 286.0434; found 286.0435. E-isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.87–7.79 (m, 3H), 7.76 (d, J = 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (dt, J = 6.7, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 5.92 (tt, J = 53.8, 3.2 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 141.0, 133.6, 133.5, 132.9, 128.8, 128.4, 127.9, 127.5, 126.8, 126.8, 123.2, 122.7 (tt, J = 284.4, 30.0 Hz), 111.5 (t, J = 5.0 Hz), 109.8 (tt, J = 253.1, 38.3 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.94 (td, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 2F), −132.08 (dt, J = 54.0, 8.9 Hz, 2F). Selected signals for the Z-isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 6.98 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −93.93 (td, J = 8.4, 2.8 Hz, 2F), 131.9–132.1 (m, 2H).

(E/Z)-(2-(Naphthalen-2-yl)vinyl)(perfluoroethyl)sulfane (16b)

A 25 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 2-vinylnaphthalene (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous MeCN (9 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trimethylsilyl chloride (228 μL, 1.8 mmol). Then, reagent 8b (220 mg, 0.66 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at 65 °C for 16 h. Next, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, 269 μL, 1.8 mmol) was added and the mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 16 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane) to afford 16b (51 mg, 56%) as a white solid as an inseparable 88:12 E/Z mixture. Rf (hexane): 0.50; m.p: 46–48 °C; FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1507, 1338, 1202, 1092, 947, 862, 819, 795, 748, 624, 479; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+· C14H9F5S+· (m/z): calcd 304.0340; found 304.0334. E-isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.89–7.80 (m, 3H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.57 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 142.4, 133.8, 133.5, 132.6, 128.8, 128.5, 127.9, 127.8, 127.0, 126.9, 123.2, 120.3 (tq, J = 288.8, 40.7 Hz), 118.9 (qt, J = 286.3, 37.2 Hz), 110.6 (t, J = 5.0 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.98 (t, J = 3.3 Hz, 2F), −93.76 (q, J = 3.7 Hz, 2F). Selected signals for the Z-isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.02 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −83.24 (t, J = 3.3 Hz, 2F), −94.69 (q, J = 3.6 Hz, 2F).

(Phenylethynyl)(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfane (17a)

A 0.42 M stock solution of lithium phenylacetylide was prepared using the following procedure: a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with phenylacetlylene (102 mg, 1.0 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a titrated solution of n-BuLi (2.88 M in hexanes, 0.38 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. To a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, reagent 8a (114 mg, 0.36 mmol) was charged. The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2.2 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Then, the previously prepared solution of lithium phenylacetylide (0.72 mL, 0.3 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 15 min and then left to warm up to room temperature. Finally, the crude was cooled down to 0 °C and first quenched with H2O (5 mL) and secondly with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (5 mL). The mixture is transferred to an extraction funnel and the organic layer is separated and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 17a (59 mg, 84%) as a colorless liquid. Rf (hexane): 0.40; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.50–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.30 (m, 3H), 6.05 (tt, J = 53.4, 3.8 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 132.2, 129.7, 128.5, 121.6, 121.4 (tt, J = 290.1, 29.5 Hz), 108.9 (tt, J = 254.0, 35.8 Hz), 99.8, 66.9 (s, J = 6.6 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −95.12 (td, J = 8.9, 3.8 Hz, 2F), −133.50 (dt, J = 53.4, 9.0 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2923, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1457, 465; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+. C10H6F4S+· (m/z): calcd 234.0126; found 234.0116.

(Perfluoroethyl)(phenylethynyl)sulfane (17b)[18c]

A 0.41 M stock solution of lithium phenylacetylide was prepared using the following procedure: a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with phenylacetlylene (102 mg, 1.0 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a titrated solution of n-BuLi (2.58 M in hexanes, 0.43 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. To a 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, reagent 8b (120 mg, 0.36 mmol) was charged. The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Then, the previously prepared solution of lithium phenylacetylide (0.73 mL, 0.3 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 15 min and then left to warm up to room temperature. Finally, the crude was cooled down to 0 °C and first quenched with H2O (5 mL) and secondly with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (5 mL). The mixture is transferred to an extraction funnel and the organic layer is separated and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 17b (40 mg, 53%) as a yellowish semisolid. Rf (hexane): 0.61; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.57–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.32 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 132.4, 129.9, 128.6, 121.7, 119.1 (tq, J = 294.8, 40.0), 118.6 (qt, J = 287.1, 36.4 Hz), 101.0, 65.9 (t, J = 6.4 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.59 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 3F), −94.61 (q, J = 2.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2922, 2320, 1221, 1109, 958, 753; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+· C10H5F5S+· (m/z): calcd 252.0032; found 252.0024.

[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yl(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)sulfane (18a)

A 0.18 M stock solution of [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yllithium was prepared using the following procedure: a 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 4-bromo-1,1′-biphenyl (233 mg, 1.0 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (5.5 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a titrated solution of n-BuLi (2.88 M in hexanes, 0.36 mL, 1.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1.5 h. To a 25 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, reagent 8a (114 mg, 0.36 mmol) was charged. The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (8.4 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Then, the previously prepared solution of [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yllithium (1.8 mL, 0.3 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min and then left to warm up to room temperature. Finally, the crude was cooled down to 0 °C and first quenched with H2O (3 mL) and secondly with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (3 mL). The mixture is transferred to an extraction funnel and the organic layer is separated and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (pentane) to afford 18a (60 mg, 70%) as a white solid. Rf (pentane): 0.48; m.p: 42–44 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.75–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.58 (m, 4H), 7.53–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.35 (m, 1H), 5.82 (tt, J = 53.8, 3.4 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 143.68, 139.66, 137.38, 128.96, 128.12, 128.05, 127.20, 122.45 (tt, J = 284.9, 29.3 Hz), 122.05, 109.43 (tt, J = 253.2, 37.5 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −91.8 (td, J = 9.5, 2.8 Hz, 2F), −133.7 (dt, J = 53.8, 9.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1477, 1379, 1097, 1005, 836, 760, 688, 673, 626, 473; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+· C14H10F4S+· (m/z): calcd 286.0439; found 286.0427.

[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yl(perfluoroethyl)sulfane (18b)

A 2.0 M stock solution of [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yllithium was prepared using the following procedure: a 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 4-bromo-1,1′-biphenyl (233 mg, 1.0 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (5.5 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Next, a titrated solution of n-BuLi (2.58 M in hexanes, 0.39 mL, 1.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1.5 h. To a 25 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, reagent 8b (160 mg, 0.48 mmol) was charged. The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous THF (8 mL) was added using a syringe and the mixture was cooled down to −78 °C. Then, the previously prepared solution of [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yllithium (0.2 mL, 0.4 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min and then left to warm up to room temperature. Finally, the crude was cooled down to 0 °C and first quenched with H2O (3 mL) and secondly with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (3 mL). The mixture is transferred to an extraction funnel and the organic layer is separated and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane) to afford 18b (76 mg, 62%) as a white solid. Rf (hexane): 0.55; m.p: 54–56 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.72 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.56 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.36 (m, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 144.5. 141.2, 139.9, 139.8, 138.0, 129.4, 128.6, 128.5, 127.6, 121.6 (t, J = 3.3 Hz), 121.1–114.5 (m); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.82 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 3F), −92.15 (q, J = 3.6 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2319, 1336, 1204, 1104, 1089, 970, 837, 761, 718, 690; HRMS (APCI+) for (M)+· C14H9F5S+· (m/z): calcd 304.0345; found 304.0333.

1,5-Anhydro-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-2-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio-d-arabino-hex-1-enitol (19a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with tri-O-benzyl-d-glucal (42 mg, 0.1 mmol) and 3 Å molecular sieves (300 mg, 3 g/mmol glucal). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous MeCN (1.5 mL) and reagent 8a (38 mg, 0.12 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Then, trimethylsilyl chloride (38 μL, 0.3 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred until complete consumption of the starting material as monitored by TLC (ca. 3.5 h). Next, 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene (45 μL, 0.6 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, filtered through Celite washed with H2O, brine, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 19a (44 mg, 80%) as a colorless oil. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.19; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.40–7.23 (m, 15H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 5.87 (tdd, J = 53.7, 4.9, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 4.47–4.40 (m, 1H), 4.08 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (dd, J = 5.0, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dd, J = 10.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (dd, J = 10.7, 4.2 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 156.1, 137.8, 137.7, 137.5, 128.7, 128.6, 128.24, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 125.9–119.3 (m), 108.2 (tdd, J = 252.7, 38.6, 35.3 Hz), 97.0 (t, J = 2.9 Hz), 77.0, 76.3, 73.6, 73.4, 72.9, 67.9; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.6 (m, 1F), −95.1 (m, 1F), −133.74 (m, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1613, 1454, 1365, 1210, 1184, 1102, 1065, 989, 914, 811, 735, 695; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + Na)+ C29H28F4NaO4S+ (m/z): calcd 571.1537; found 571.1540.

1,5-Anhydro-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-2-(perfluoroethyl)thio-d-arabino-hex-1-enitol (19b)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with tri-O-benzyl-d-glucal (126 mg, 0.3 mmol) and 3 Å molecular sieves (900 mg, 3 g/mmol glucal). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous MeCN (9 mL) and reagent 8b (220 mg, 0.66 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Then, trimethylsilyl chloride (228 μL, 1.8 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred until complete consumption of the starting material as monitored by TLC (ca. 4 h). Next, 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene (538 μL, 3.6 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 18 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, filtered through Celite washed with H2O, brine, and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (hexane to 5:1 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 19b (130 mg, 78%) as a colorless oil. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.43; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.69–7.49 (m, 15H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (s, 2H), 4.67 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (dd, J = 5.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (dd, J = 10.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (dd, J = 10.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 156.6, 137.8, 137.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.8, 124–114 (m), 118.9 (qt, J = 284.8, 37.2), 97.1 (t, J = 2.3 Hz), 77.5, 76.5, 73.8, 73.6, 73.2, 72.2, 67.8; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.39 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 3F), −92.79 (q, J = 3.4 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1614, 1454, 1329, 1206, 1186, 1091, 1027, 957, 914, 748, 695; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + Na)+ C29H27F5NaO4S+ (m/z): calcd 589.1442; found 589.1444.

(1S,2R)-1-Phenyl-2-(((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)amino)propan-1-ol (d-(+)-norephedrine-SCF2CF2H (20a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with (1S,2R)-(+)-norephedrine (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe. Next, reagent 8a (284 mg, 0.9 mmol) was quickly added to the flask and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:10 MeOH/CH2Cl2) to afford 20a (50 mg, 59%) as a colorless syrup. Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.67; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.41–7.27 (m, 5H), 5.90 (tt, J = 53.8, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.33–3.21 (m, 1H), 2.88 (bd, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (bs, J = 69.3 Hz, 1H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 140.7, 128.6, 128.0, 126.3, 122.9 (tt, J = 285.5, 28.0 Hz), 109.5 (tt, J = 250.8, 37.6 Hz), 75.4, 63.3, 14.9; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −102.45 (dtd, J = 244.7, 8.4, 4.0 Hz, 1F), −103.18 (dtd, J = 20.8, 8.8, 4.0 Hz, 1F), −134.74 (dt, J = 53.7, 8.5 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3350, 2310, 1699, 1684, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1507, 1457, 1111, 703; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C11H12F4NOS– (m/z): calcd 282.0581; found 282.0574.

(1S,2R)-2-(((Perfluoroethyl)thio)amino)-1-phenylpropan-1-ol (d-(+)-norephedrine-SCF2CF3 (20b)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with (1S,2R)-(+)-norephedrine (46 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe. Next, reagent 8b (300 mg, 0.9 mmol) was quickly added to the flask and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:10 MeOH/CH2Cl2) to afford 20b (81 mg, 90%) as a colorless syrup. Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.71; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.42–7.28 (m, 5H), 4.84 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.37–3.24 (m, 1H), 2.97 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (s, J = 37.0 Hz, 1H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 140.5, 128.6, 128.0, 126.4, 120.3 (tq, J = 290.5, 38.9 Hz), 119.0 (qt, J = 287.4, 37.2 Hz), 75.7, 63.2, 14.7; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −82.56 (t, J = 3.1 Hz), −102.79 (dq, J = 245.6, 2.8 Hz), −103.52 (dq, J = 245.8, 2.8 Hz); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3370, 2310, 1699, 1684, 1653, 1558, 1541, 1507, 1457, 1208; HRMS (TOF ES–) for (M–H)− C11H11F5NOS– (m/z): calcd 300.0487; found 300.0479.

N-Methyl-N-(3-phenyl-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)propyl)-S-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thiohydroxylamine (Fluoxetine-SCF2CF2H, 21a)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with fluoxetine (155 mg, 0.5 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added using a syringe. Next, reagent 8a (237 mg, 0.75 mmol) was quickly added to the flask followed by triethylamine (77 μL, 0.55 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Lastly, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 21a (170 mg, 77%) as a colorless syrup. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.45; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.46 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 4H), 7.34–7.26 (m, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.82 (tt, J = 54.1, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.32–3.16 (m, 2H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 2.35–2.12 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 160.6 (bq, J = 1.1 Hz), 140.9, 129.0, 128.1, 126.9 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 125.9, 125.7 (tt, J = 289.4, 30.4 Hz), 124.8 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 123.1 (q, J = 32.7 Hz), 115.9, 109.6 (tt, J = 251.1, 38.0 Hz), 77.8, 56.9, 48.4, 37.2; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −61.59 (s, 3F), −97.63 (bs, 2F), −133.77 (bd, J = 54.3 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1615, 1517, 1324, 1248, 1105, 1066, 835, 812, 701; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C19H19F7NOS+ (m/z): calcd 442.1070; found 442.1063.

N-Methyl-S-(perfluoroethyl)-N-(3-phenyl-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)propyl)thiohydroxylamine (Fluoxetine-SCF2CF3, 21b)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with fluoxetine (155 mg, 0.5 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added using a syringe. Next, reagent 8b (250 mg, 0.75 mmol) was quickly added to the flask followed by triethylamine (77 μL, 0.55 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Lastly, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 21b as a colorless syrup (200 mg, 87%). Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.51; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 4H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.23 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.39–3.21 (m, 2H), 3.02 (s, 3H), 2.36–2.25 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.13 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 160.6 (bq, J = 1.0 Hz), 140.8, 129.1, 128.2, 126.9 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 125.9, 123.2 (q, J = 32.7 Hz), 123.0 (tq, J = 294.2, 40.0 Hz) 125.0 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 115.9, 118.7 (qt, J = 285.4, 36.7 Hz), 77.7, 56.9, 48.2, 37.2; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −61.63 (s, 3F), −83.43 (s, 2F), −98.99 (bs, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1615, 1517, 1325, 1249, 1202, 1108, 1067, 948, 835, 700; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C19H18F8NOS+ (m/z): calcd 460.0976; found 460.0968.

2-((1-Benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl)-5,6-dimethoxy-2-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-ethyl)thio)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one (Donepezil-SCF2CF2H, 22a)

To a solution of donepezil (114 mg, 0.3 mmol) in anhydrous THF (1.5 mL) at −78 °C was added KHMDS (1.0 M in toluene, 0.4 mL, 0.38 mmol) and stirred at the same temperature for 1 h. Then, a solution in anhydrous THF (2 mL) of the reagent 8a (142 mg, 0.45 mmol) was added dropwise under argon to the donepezil potassium enolate solution and the reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h. Next, water was added to the reaction mixture (5 mL) and the product was extracted successively with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The organic crude was purified by flash column chromatography (from CH2Cl2 to 1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2) to afford 22a (152 mg, 99%) as a brown syrup. Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.35; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.34–7.20 (m, 5H), 7.20 (s, 1H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 5.76 (tt, J = 53.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.57 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (s, 2H), 3.42 (d, J = 17.9 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (bd, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 2.07–1.86 (m, 3H), 1.82 (dd, J = 14.4, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.68–1.46 (m, 3H), 1.42–1.21 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 201.1, 156.6, 150.1, 145.8, 138.3, 129.3, 128.2, 127.0, 126.8, 124.3 (tt, J = 287.1, 29.4 Hz), 109.4 (tt, J = 253.8, 36.2 Hz), 107.1, 105.2, 63.4, 60.0, 56.4, 56.2, 53.6, 53.5, 44.7, 41.8, 33.8, 33.3, 33.0; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −87.07 (m, 2F), −132.39 (ddt, J = 294.9, 54.0, 10.0 Hz, 1F), −133.29 (ddt, J = 294.9, 54.2, 10.0 Hz, 1F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1701, 1592, 1504, 1457, 1311, 1271, 1115, 742; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C26H30F4NO3S+ (m/z): calcd 512.1877; found 512.1878.

(2E,4E)-5-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-1-(piperidin-1-yl)-2-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-ethyl)thio)penta-2,4-dien-1-one (23aE) and (2Z,4E)-5-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-1-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)penta-2,4-dien-1-one (23aZ)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with piperine (86 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trimethylsilyl chloride (46 μL, 0.36 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (208 mg, 0.66 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the crude purified by flash column chromatography (from CH2Cl2 to 1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2) to afford 23a (82 mg, 66%) as a yellow solid and 23a (19 mg, 15%) as a yellow solid. E-isomer: Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.70; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.19 (dd, J = 15.4, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (tt, J = 53.5, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 2H), 3.72–3.30 (m, 4H), 1.73–1.52 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 167.8, 149.0, 148.5, 145.9, 141.3, 130.5, 123.4, 122.8 (tt, J = 286.8, 28.8 Hz), 121.9, 117.3 (t, J = 2.8 Hz), 109.3 (tt, J = 253.4, 35.6 Hz), 108.7, 106.2, 101.6, 48.6 (bs), 43.7 (bs), 25.9 (bs), 24.6; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −91.83 (td, J = 9.8, 4.1 Hz, 2H), −133.97 (dt, J = 53.3, 9.9 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2940, 2320, 1624, 1490, 1447, 1255, 1108, 1038, 977, 810; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C19H20F4NO3S+ (m/z): calcd 418.1095; found 418.1093. Z-isomer: Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.76; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 6.93 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (dd, J = 15.5, 11.1 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (tt, J = 53.4, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 5.99 (s, 2H), 3.69 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.43–3.34 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.53 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 165.7, 149.0, 148.5, 145.8, 140.2, 130.3, 123.4, 122.8 (tt, J = 286.4, 29.2 Hz), 121.7, 117.4 (t, J = 3.0 Hz), 109.3 (tt, J = 253.3, 34.8 Hz), 108.8, 106.0, 101.6, 48.2, 43.1, 26.4, 25.7, 24.6; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −93.01 (bs, 2F), −134.53 (bd, J = 53.2 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2940, 2859, 1620, 1504, 1490, 1445, 1254, 1209, 1107, 1038, 993, 972, 810; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + H)+ C19H20F4NO3S+ (m/z): calcd 418.1095; found 418.1091.

5-Benzoyl-7-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid (Ketorolac-SCF2CF2H, 24a)

A 10 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with ketorolac (77 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trimethylsilyl chloride (76 μL, 0.6 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (189 mg, 0.6 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the crude purified by flash column chromatography (10:1:0.1 CH2Cl2/MeCN/AcOH) to afford 24a (101 mg, 87%) as a purple syrup. Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.29; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 10.17 (bs, 1H), 7.90–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 5.79 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.67–4.50 (m, 2H), 4.16 (dd, J = 9.0, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.03–2.80 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 185.3, 176.67, 147.3, 138.2, 132.3, 131.4, 129.1, 128.6, 128.2, 122.1 (tt, J = 284.2, 29.2 Hz), 109.5 (tt, J = 252.9, 37.3 Hz), 95.3 (t, J = 4.0 Hz), 48.9, 42.2, 32.3; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.83 (dtd, J = 231.8, 9.4, 3.4 Hz, 1F), −93.5 (dtd, J = 231.4, 9.4, 3.7 Hz, 1F), −132.9 (m, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2934, 2375, 2320, 1716, 1633, 1457, 1393, 1258, 1213, 1110, 998, 725; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (2 M + Na)+ C34H26F8N2NaO6S2+ (m/z): calcd 797.0997; found 797.1001.

2-(6-Methoxy-7-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)naphthalen-2-yl)propanoic acid (25a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with rac-naproxen (69.1 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CHCl3 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (32 μL, 0.36 mmol). Then, reagent 8a (141.8 mg, 0.45 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C with an aluminum heating block for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (10:1:0.1 CH2Cl2/MeCN/AcOH) to afford 25a (102 mg, 93%) as a purple syrup as an inseparable 81:19 C10/C17 mixture. C10-isomer: Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.40; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 11.0 (bs, 1H), 8.4 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.8 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.6 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.5 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.2 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 5.7 (tt, J = 53.7, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.9 (s, 2H), 3.8 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.5 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 180.9, 161.0, 136.9, 135.8, 134.0, 129.5, 128.2, 126.8, 126.0, 125.1, 122.6 (tt, J = 287.2, 28.53 Hz), 113.4, 109.7 (tt, J = 253.3, 36.3 Hz), 56.9, 45.2, 18.1; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.6 (td, J = 10.2, 4.1 Hz, 1F), −133.1 (dt, J = 53.9, 10.2 Hz, 1F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2978, 1706, 1595, 1498, 1274, 1207, 1106, 1065, 979, 806; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + Na)+ C16H14F4NaO3S+ (m/z): calcd 385.0492; found 385.0474. Selected signals for the C17-isomer: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.8 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.1–7.1 (m, 1H), 6.1 (tt, J = 53.6, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.9 (s, 3H). 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −95.7 (td, J = 9.9, 4.4 Hz, 1F), −135.0 (dt, J = 53.6, 10.0 Hz, 1F).

2-(6-Methoxy-7-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)naphthalen-2-yl)propanoic acid (25b)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with rac-naproxen (69.1 mg, 0.3 mmol). The flask was then evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Subsequently, anhydrous CHCl3 (3 mL) was added using a syringe followed by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (32 μL, 0.36 mmol). Then, reagent 8b (150.0 mg, 0.45 mmol) was quickly added to the flask. The mixture was stirred at 70 °C with an aluminum heating block for 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and dried over MgSO4. Upon filtration, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (10:1:0.1 CH2Cl2/MeCN/AcOH) to afford 25b (105 mg, 92%) as a purple syrup. Rf (1:19 CH3OH/CH2Cl2): 0.58; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 10.0 (bs, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (s, 3H), 3.91 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.61 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 180.5, 161.2, 136.7, 135.6, 134.2, 129.3, 128.2, 126.7, 125.7, 120.1 (m), 117.3 (m), 113.3, 103.8, 56.8, 45.0, 18.0; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −83.1 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 3F), −91.1 (q, J = 3.5 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 2917, 1704, 1596, 1458, 1328, 1274, 1196, 1096, 951, 806, 748; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + Na)+ C16H13F5NaO3S+ (m/z): calcd 403.0398; found 403.0378.

5-Bromo-3-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (26a)

To a solution of 5-bromoindole (3.92 g, 20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added reagent 8a (6.93 g, 22 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Then, EtOAc (150 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 26a (6.33 g, 96%) as a brownish solid. Rf (3:7 EtOAc/hexane): 0.31; m.p: 50 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.48 (s, 1H), 7.95 (bs, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.7 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 134.8, 134.3, 131.7, 126.6, 122.1, 122.1 (tt, J = 285.5, 30.0 Hz), 115.3, 113.3, 109.4 (tt, J = 252.8, 37.2 Hz), 94.1 (t, J = 4.0 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −93.47 (td, J = 9.4, 3.7 Hz, 2F), −133.05 (dt, J = 53.7, 9.4 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3853, 3470, 2321, 1457, 1208, 1103, 994, 799, 585, 513; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C10H7BrF4NS+ (m/z): calcd 327.9413; found 327.9403.

1-Methyl-3-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (27a)

To a solution of 1-methyl-1H-indole (2.62 g, 20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added reagent 8a (6.93 g, 22 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Then, EtOAc (150 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 27a (5.20 g, 98%) as a brownish solid. Rf (1:9 EtOAc/hexane): 0.31; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.84 (bd, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.29 (m, 4H), 5.76 (tt, J = 53.6, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 137.4, 137.3, 130.7, 123.0, 122.1 (tt, J = 283.9, 28.1 Hz), 121.4, 119.4, 110.1, 109.33 (tt, J = 252.6, 36.5 Hz), 91.8 (t, J = 3.9 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −94.99 (td, J = 10.0, 4.1 Hz, 2F), −133.96 (dt, J = 53.6, 10.0 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1512, 1210, 1103, 1080, 996, 972, 812, 741, 543, 426; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C11H10F4NS+ (m/z): calcd 264.0465; found 264.0459.

5-Chloro-3-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (28a)

To a solution of 5-chloroindole (45.5 mg, 0.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Then, EtOAc (50 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 10 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 28a (77 mg, 90%) as a brownish solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.25; m.p: 66–67 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.59 (bs, 1H), 7.77 (bd, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.6, 0.4 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 Hz, 1H), 5.76 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.7 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 134.5, 134.5, 131.2, 127.8, 124.1, 122.1 (tt, J = 284.3, 29.0 Hz), 119.1, 113.0, 109.4 (tt, J = 252.8, 37.1 Hz), 94.3 (t, J = 3.8 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −93.53 (td, J = 9.2, 3.5 Hz, 2F), −133.08 (dt, J = 53.5, 9.2 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3471, 3438, 1461, 1407, 1381, 1210, 1105, 1010, 994, 892, 801, 590, 493; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C10H7ClF4NS+ (m/z): calcd 283.9918; found 283.9896.

3-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole-5-carbonitrile (29a)

To a solution of 1H-indole-5-carbonitrile (43 mg, 0.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. Then, EtOAc (50 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 10 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 29a (76 mg, 92%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.10; m.p: 130–131 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 9.44 (bs, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.70 (bs, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.2, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.79 (bt, J = 53.7, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 138.2, 135.7, 130.1, 126.2, 125.3, 122.1 (tt, J = 284.6, 29.6 Hz), 120.4, 113.2, 109.5 (tt, J = 253.0, 37.8 Hz), 104.6, 95.5 (t, J = 4.0 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.56 (bt, J = 8.3 Hz, 2F), −132.55 (dt, J = 53.8, 8.3 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3280, 2227, 1618, 1471, 1418, 1381, 1341, 1242, 1213, 1107, 1011, 995, 811, 675, 637; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C11H6F4N2S+ (m/z): calcd 275.0261; found 275.0281.

5-Nitro-3-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (30a)

To a solution of 5-nitro-1H-indole (49 mg, 0.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added reagent 8a (104 mg, 0.33 mmol) under vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for 24 h. Then, EtOAc (50 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (4 × 10 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 30a (75 mg, 85%) as a yellow solid. Rf (4:6 EtOAc/hexane): 0.29; m.p: 147–149 °C; 1H NMR (CD3CN, 400 MHz): δ 10.37 (bs, 1H), 8.50 (d, J = 2.1, 1H), 8.07 (bs, J = 9.0, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.59 (dd, J = 9.0, 0.5 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (tt, J = 53.0, 3.9, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 143.9, 140.5, 139.0, 130.4, 123.2 (tt, J = 283.1, 28.7 Hz), 119.1, 116.4, 113.9, 110.6 (tt, J = 250.7, 36.3 Hz), 95.8 (t, J = 3.9 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −94.50 (td, J = 9.5, 3.9, Hz, 2F), −134.80 (dt, J = 53.6, 9.3 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3316, 1518, 1325, 1304, 1213, 1078, 992, 835, 816, 738; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C11H6F4N2S+ (m/z): calcd 295.0159; found 295.0186.

1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoro-N-methyl-N-(3-phenyl-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)pro-pyl)ethane-1-sulfonamide (Fluoxetine-SO2CF2CF2H, 31a)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 21a (132 mg, 0.3 mmol) and ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (37 mg, 0.03 mmol). Next, CH3OH (2 mL) was added using a syringe followed by H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 340 μL, 3 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. Lastly, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:4 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 31a as a colorless syrup (134 mg, 56%). Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.33; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.44 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.27 (m, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.12 (tt, J = 52.4, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.09–3-30 (bs, 2H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 2.43–2.08 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 160.1, 140.1, 129.2, 128.4, 127.0 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 125.8, 124.4 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 123.3 (q, J = 32.8 Hz), 115.9, 115.9 (tt, J = 291.6, 26.5 Hz), 107.9 (tt, J = 255.7, 30.3 Hz), 77.4, 48.3, 37.3, 35.9; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −61.66 (s, 1F), −119.33 (m, 2F), −135.62 (dtd, J = 52.4, 7.9, 2.1 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1615, 1517, 1373, 1326, 1247, 1177, 1109, 1067, 837, 702, 584; HRMS (APCI–) for (M)−· C19H18F7NO3S–· (m/z): calcd 473.0896; found 473.0886.

1,1,2,2,2-Pentafluoro-N-methyl-N-(3-phenyl-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)pro-pyl)ethane-1-sulfonamide (Fluoxetine-SO2CF2CF3, 31b)

A 5 mL round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with 21b (138 mg, 0.3 mmol) and ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (37 mg, 0.03 mmol). Next, CH3OH (2 mL) was added using a syringe followed by H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 340 μL, 3 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 65 °C with an aluminum heating block for 16 h. As the mixture contained still starting material (observed by TLC), H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 340 μL, 3 mmol) and ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (37 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added again, letting the mixture stirred at 65 °C with an aluminum heating block for 16 h more. Lastly, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 31b as a colorless syrup (185 mg, 75%). Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.43; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.44 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.27 (m, 4H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.24 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (bs, 1H), 3.42 (bs, 1H), 3.09 (s, 3H), 2.43–2.06 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 160.1, 140.0, 129.2, 128.5, 127.0 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 125.8, 123.4 (q, J = 32.7 Hz), 124.5 (q, J = 270.2 Hz), 117.5 (tt, J = 287.6, 31.8 Hz), 115.9, 113.6 (tq, J = 295.0, 40.2 Hz), 77.4, 48.5, 37.3, 36.0; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −61.67 (s, 3F), −79.65 (bs, 3F), −115.92 (bs, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1615, 1518, 1389, 1325, 1222, 1162, 1111, 1068, 836, 702, 593; HRMS (APCI–) for (M–H)− C19H16F8NO3S– (m/z): calcd 490.0729; found 490.0723.

3-((1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethyl)sulfonyl)-1H-indole (32a)

To a solution of indole 9a (249 mg, 1 mmol) in CH3OH (5 mL) was added ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (61 mg, 0.05 mmol). H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 306 μL, 3 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 16 h. A second batch of H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 500 μL, 4.9 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Water was added to the reaction mixture and the product was extracted successively with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 32a (267 mg, 95%) as an orange solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.17; m.p: 92–93 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 9.56 (bs, 1H), 8.00–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.41–7.28 (m, 2H), 6.30 (tt, J = 52.3, 5.6 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 136.4, 135.6, 125.0, 124.5, 124.0, 119.6, 114.6 (tt, J = 293.6, 26.6 Hz), 113.0, 108.1 (tt, J = 254.7, 28.8 Hz), 105.7; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −120.91 (td, J = 8.2, 5.6 Hz, 2F), −134.56 (dt, J = 52.2, 8.2 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3358, 1148, 1111, 741, 670, 608, 583, 550, 532, 487, 419; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C10H8F4NO2S+ (m/z): calcd 282.0206; found 282.0202.

tert-Butyl 3-((1,1,2,2-Ttetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (33a)

To a solution of indole 9a (498 mg, 2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added Et3N (557 μL, 4 mmol) and 4–(dimethylamino)pyridine (12 mg, 0.1 mmol). At room temperature, di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (523 mg, 2.4 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 16 h. Water was then added and the product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 33a (680 mg, 97%) as a white solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.51; m.p: 71 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 2H), 5.78 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 148.8, 135.5, 134.5, 131.6, 125.5, 123.8, 122.2 (tt, J = 286.0, 29.1 Hz), 119.7, 115.5, 109.4 (tt, J = 252.9, 37.1 Hz), 100.5 (t, J = 3.7 Hz), 85.2, 28.1; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −92.35 (td, J = 9.0, 3.3 Hz, 2F), −132.91 (dt, J = 18.5, 8.8 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 1742, 1449, 1371, 1356, 1252, 1224, 1153, 1115, 1064, 747; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C15H16F4NO2S+ (m/z): calcd 350.0832; found 350.0823.

3-((1H-Indole-3-yl)thio)-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoro-1,1-diphenylpropan-1-ol (34a)

To a Schlenk tube charged with indole 33a (175 mg, 0.5 mmol) and benzophenone (182 mg, 1 mmol), was added anhydrous DMF (5 mL) under argon. The reaction mixture was cooled to −40 °C and KHMDS (1 M, 1 mL) was added and the mixture stirred at the same temperature for 15 min. Et2O (30 mL) and water (2 mL) were added at −40 °C under stirring and the organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (3 × 10 mL), dried with Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated. The residue was diluted with trifluoroacetic acid (5 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction crude was then concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was diluted with Et2O (30 mL) and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (3 × 10 mL), dried with Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 34a (151 mg, 76%) as a brown solid. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.18; m.p: 112 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.36 (s, 1H), 7.78–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.70–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.42–7.31 (m, 8H), 7.30–7.22 (m, 2H), 3.07 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 140.6, 136.1, 133.2, 130.3, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 125.3 (tt, J = 291.2, 36.0), 123.2, 121.4, 119.7, 117.8 (tt, J = 267.3, 30.7), 111.6, 95.5, 79.9 (t, J = 24.1 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −81.01 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2F), −109.64 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3534, 3419, 1448, 1092, 741, 698; HRMS (TOF ES+) for (M + Na)+ C23H17F4NNaOS+ (m/z): calcd 454.0859; found 454.0847.

5-(4-Phenoxyphenyl)-3-((1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)thio)-1H-indole (35a)

To a reaction vial equipped with a magnetic stir bar was added 26a (98 mg, 0.3 mmol), (4–phenoxyphenyl)boronic acid (71 mg, 0.33 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (35 mg, 0.03 mmol) and toluene (2 mL). Then, Na2CO3 (79 mg, 0.75 mmol), water (0.3 mL) and EtOH (0.6 mL) were successively added and the reaction mixture was sparged with argon for 5 min. The vial was then capped with a rubber septum and the reaction mixture stirred at 90 °C with an aluminum heating block for 24 h. After reaction completion, the reaction crude was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane to 1:4 EtOAc/hexane) to afford 35a (113 mg, 90%) as a yellowish syrup. Rf (1:4 EtOAc/hexane): 0.27; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.54 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.69–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.18–7.08 (m, 5H), 5.79 (tt, J = 53.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): δ 157.3, 156.5, 137.0, 135.4, 134.7, 133.8, 130.4, 129.8, 128.8, 123.3, 123.1, 122.2 (tt, J = 284.2, 28.6 Hz), 119.2, 118.9, 117.4, 112.0, 109.53 (tt, J = 252.8, 36.9 Hz), 94.7 (t, J = 3.9 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz): δ −94.00 (td, J = 9.7, 4.0 Hz, 2F), −133.43 (dt, J = 53.6, 9.5 Hz, 2F); FTIR–ATR (neat) ν in cm–1: 3409, 1489, 1470, 1235, 1107, 993, 809; HRMS (APCI+) for (M + H)+ C22H16F4NOS+ (m/z): calcd 418.0883; found 418.0873.
  57 in total

1.  Data-mining for sulfur and fluorine: an evaluation of pharmaceuticals to reveal opportunities for drug design and discovery.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ilardi; Edon Vitaku; Jon T Njardarson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Recent advances in trifluoromethylation reactions with electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents.

Authors:  Sebastián Barata-Vallejo; Beatriz Lantaño; Al Postigo
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  U.S. FDA Approved Drugs from 2015-June 2020: A Perspective.

Authors:  Priyadeep Bhutani; Gaurav Joshi; Nivethitha Raja; Namrata Bachhav; Prabhakar K Rajanna; Hemant Bhutani; Atish T Paul; Raj Kumar
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Use of ArSO2SRf reagents: an efficient tool for the introduction of SRf moieties.

Authors:  Xavier Pannecoucke; Tatiana Besset
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Direct Trifluoromethylthiolation and Perfluoroalkylthiolation of C(sp(2))-H Bonds with CF3SO2Na and RfSO2Na.

Authors:  Lvqi Jiang; Jinlong Qian; Wenbin Yi; Guoping Lu; Chun Cai; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Structural reevaluation of the electrophilic hypervalent iodine reagent for trifluoromethylthiolation supported by the crystalline sponge method for X-ray analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Vinogradova; Peter Müller; Stephen L Buchwald
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  N-Trifluoromethylthio-dibenzenesulfonimide: A Shelf-Stable, Broadly Applicable Electrophilic Trifluoromethylthiolating Reagent.

Authors:  Panpan Zhang; Man Li; Xiao-Song Xue; Chunfa Xu; Qunchao Zhao; Yafei Liu; Haoyang Wang; Yinlong Guo; Long Lu; Qilong Shen
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  "Ligandless" Pentafluoroethylation of Unactivated (Hetero)aryl and Alkenyl Halides Enabled by the Controlled Self-Condensation of TMSCF3-Derived CuCF3.

Authors:  Jordi Mestre; Sergio Castillón; Omar Boutureira
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  CF2H, a Hydrogen Bond Donor.

Authors:  Chanan D Sessler; Martin Rahm; Sabine Becker; Jacob M Goldberg; Fang Wang; Stephen J Lippard
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Direct Synthesis of Acyl Fluorides from Carboxylic Acids with the Bench-Stable Solid Reagent (Me4N)SCF3.

Authors:  Thomas Scattolin; Kristina Deckers; Franziska Schoenebeck
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.005

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electrophilic Reagents for the Direct Incorporation of Uncommon SCF2CF2H and SCF2CF3 Motifs.

Authors:  Jordi Mestre; Miguel Bernús; Sergio Castillón; Omar Boutureira
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.198

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.