Literature DB >> 35943676

Generating novel pituitary datasets from open-source imaging data and deep volumetric segmentation.

Rachel Gologorsky1, Edward Harake2, Grace von Oiste3, Mustafa Nasir-Moin3, William Couldwell4, Eric Oermann3,5,6, Todd Hollon7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The estimated incidence of pituitary adenomas in the general population is 10-30%, yet radiographic diagnosis remains a challenge. Diagnosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of radiographic features in both normal (e.g. complex anatomy, pregnancy) and pathologic states (e.g. primary endocrinopathy, hypophysitis). Clinical symptoms and laboratory testing are often equivocal, which can result in misdiagnosis or unnecessary specialist referrals. Computer vision models can aid in pituitary adenoma diagnosis; however, a major challenge to model development is the lack of dedicated pituitary imaging datasets. We hypothesized that deep volumetric segmentation models trained to extract the sellar and parasellar region from existing whole-brain MRI scans could be used to generate a novel dataset of pituitary imaging.
METHODS: Six open-source whole-brain MRI datasets, created for research purposes, were included for model development. Deep learning-based volumetric segmentation models were trained using 318 manually annotated MRI scans from a single open-source MRI dataset. Out-of-distribution volumetric segmentation performance was then tested on 418 MRIs from five held-out research datasets.
RESULTS: On our annotated images, agreement between manual and model volumetric segmentations was high. Dice scores (a measure of overlap) ranged 0.76-0.82 for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution model testing. In total, 6,755 MRIs from six data sources were included in the final generated pituitary dataset.
CONCLUSIONS: We present the first and largest dataset of pituitary imaging constructed using existing MRI data and deep volumetric segmentation models trained to identify sellar and parasellar anatomy. The model generalizes well across patient populations and MRI scanner types. We hope our pituitary dataset will be an integral part of future machine learning research on pituitary pathologies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer vision; Dataset generation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pituitary gland; Volumetric segmentation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35943676     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01255-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   3.599


  17 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Jeffrey Dean; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Automated deep-neural-network surveillance of cranial images for acute neurologic events.

Authors:  Joseph J Titano; Marcus Badgeley; Javin Schefflein; Margaret Pain; Andres Su; Michael Cai; Nathaniel Swinburne; John Zech; Jun Kim; Joshua Bederson; J Mocco; Burton Drayer; Joseph Lehar; Samuel Cho; Anthony Costa; Eric K Oermann
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  The Image and Data Archive at the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging.

Authors:  Karen L Crawford; Scott C Neu; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa; William T Couldwell; Charles E Barr; William E Dodge; Mary Lee Vance; Ian E McCutcheon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke cleft cyst involving both intrasellar and suprasellar regions: differentiation using MRI.

Authors:  S H Choi; B J Kwon; D G Na; J-H Kim; M H Han; K-H Chang
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization.

Authors:  R C Petersen; P S Aisen; L A Beckett; M C Donohue; A C Gamst; D J Harvey; C R Jack; W J Jagust; L M Shaw; A W Toga; J Q Trojanowski; M W Weiner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Outcome of Transsphenoidal Surgery for Cushing Disease: A Single-Center Experience Over 32 Years.

Authors:  William F Chandler; Ariel L Barkan; Todd Hollon; Alla Sakharova; Jayson Sack; Barunashish Brahma; David E Schteingart
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Machine learning for semi-automated classification of glioblastoma, brain metastasis and central nervous system lymphoma using magnetic resonance advanced imaging.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Swinburne; Javin Schefflein; Yu Sakai; Eric Karl Oermann; Joseph J Titano; Iris Chen; Sayedhedayatollah Tadayon; Amit Aggarwal; Amish Doshi; Kambiz Nael
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-06

9.  Imaging Errors in Distinguishing Pituitary Adenomas From Other Sellar Lesions.

Authors:  David B Altshuler; Chris A Andrews; Hemant A Parmar; Stephen E Sullivan; Jonathan D Trobe
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism.

Authors:  A Di Martino; C-G Yan; Q Li; E Denio; F X Castellanos; K Alaerts; J S Anderson; M Assaf; S Y Bookheimer; M Dapretto; B Deen; S Delmonte; I Dinstein; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Fair; L Gallagher; D P Kennedy; C L Keown; C Keysers; J E Lainhart; C Lord; B Luna; V Menon; N J Minshew; C S Monk; S Mueller; R-A Müller; M B Nebel; J T Nigg; K O'Hearn; K A Pelphrey; S J Peltier; J D Rudie; S Sunaert; M Thioux; J M Tyszka; L Q Uddin; J S Verhoeven; N Wenderoth; J L Wiggins; S H Mostofsky; M P Milham
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.