David B Altshuler1, Chris A Andrews, Hemant A Parmar, Stephen E Sullivan, Jonathan D Trobe. 1. Departments of Neurosurgery (DBA, SES, JDT), Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (CAA, JDT), Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology (HAP), Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SES), and Neurology University of Michigan (SES, JDT), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas and nonadenomatous lesions in the sellar region may be difficult to distinguish by imaging yet that distinction is critical in guiding management. The nature of the diagnostic errors in this setting has not been well documented. METHODS: Two neurosurgeons and 2 neuroradiologists of differing experience levels viewed deidentified MRIs of 18 nonadenomatous sellar lesions and 21 adenomas. They recorded their diagnoses, the imaging features they used to make those diagnoses, and their confidence in making those diagnoses. RESULTS: Among the 18 nonadenoma cases, 11 (61%) were incorrectly diagnosed as adenoma by at least 1 reader, including Rathke cleft cyst, plasmacytoma, aneurysm, craniopharyngioma, chordoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, metastasis, and undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma. Among the 21 adenoma cases, 8 (38%) were incorrectly diagnosed by at least 1 reader as craniopharyngioma, Rathke cleft cyst, sinonasal carcinoma, hemangioblastoma, and pituitary hyperplasia. Incorrect imaging diagnoses were made with high confidence in 13% of readings. Avoidable errors among the nonadenomatous cases occurred when readers failed to appreciate that the lesion was separate from the pituitary gland. Unavoidable errors in those cases occurred when the lesions were so large that the pituitary gland had been obliterated or the imaging features of a nonadenomatous lesion resembled those of a cystic pituitary adenoma. Avoidable errors in misdiagnosis of adenomas as nonadenomas occurred when readers failed to appreciate features highly characteristic of adenomas. An unavoidable error occurred because a cystic adenoma had features correctly associated with craniopharyngioma. CONCLUSIONS: Errors in imaging differentiation of pituitary adenoma from nonadenomatous lesions occurred often and sometimes with high confidence among a small sample of neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists. In the misdiagnosis of nonadenomatous lesions as adenomas, errors occurred largely from failure to appreciate a separate pituitary gland, but unavoidable errors occurred when large lesions had obliterated this distinguishing feature. In the misdiagnosis of adenomas as nonadenomatous lesions, avoidable errors occurred because readers failed to recognize imaging features more characteristic of adenomas and because cystic adenomas share features with craniopharyngiomas and Rathke cleft cysts. Awareness of these errors should lead to improved management of sellar lesions.
BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas and nonadenomatous lesions in the sellar region may be difficult to distinguish by imaging yet that distinction is critical in guiding management. The nature of the diagnostic errors in this setting has not been well documented. METHODS: Two neurosurgeons and 2 neuroradiologists of differing experience levels viewed deidentified MRIs of 18 nonadenomatous sellar lesions and 21 adenomas. They recorded their diagnoses, the imaging features they used to make those diagnoses, and their confidence in making those diagnoses. RESULTS: Among the 18 nonadenoma cases, 11 (61%) were incorrectly diagnosed as adenoma by at least 1 reader, including Rathke cleft cyst, plasmacytoma, aneurysm, craniopharyngioma, chordoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, metastasis, and undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma. Among the 21 adenoma cases, 8 (38%) were incorrectly diagnosed by at least 1 reader as craniopharyngioma, Rathke cleft cyst, sinonasal carcinoma, hemangioblastoma, and pituitary hyperplasia. Incorrect imaging diagnoses were made with high confidence in 13% of readings. Avoidable errors among the nonadenomatous cases occurred when readers failed to appreciate that the lesion was separate from the pituitary gland. Unavoidable errors in those cases occurred when the lesions were so large that the pituitary gland had been obliterated or the imaging features of a nonadenomatous lesion resembled those of a cystic pituitary adenoma. Avoidable errors in misdiagnosis of adenomas as nonadenomas occurred when readers failed to appreciate features highly characteristic of adenomas. An unavoidable error occurred because a cystic adenoma had features correctly associated with craniopharyngioma. CONCLUSIONS: Errors in imaging differentiation of pituitary adenoma from nonadenomatous lesions occurred often and sometimes with high confidence among a small sample of neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists. In the misdiagnosis of nonadenomatous lesions as adenomas, errors occurred largely from failure to appreciate a separate pituitary gland, but unavoidable errors occurred when large lesions had obliterated this distinguishing feature. In the misdiagnosis of adenomas as nonadenomatous lesions, avoidable errors occurred because readers failed to recognize imaging features more characteristic of adenomas and because cystic adenomas share features with craniopharyngiomas and Rathke cleft cysts. Awareness of these errors should lead to improved management of sellar lesions.
Authors: Rachel Gologorsky; Edward Harake; Grace von Oiste; Mustafa Nasir-Moin; William Couldwell; Eric Oermann; Todd Hollon Journal: Pituitary Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Cheng Jiang; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Joseph R Linzey; Rushikesh S Joshi; Sung Jik Cha; Sudharsan Srinivasan; Daniel Alber; Akhil Kondepudi; Esteban Urias; Balaji Pandian; Wajd N Al-Holou; Stephen E Sullivan; B Gregory Thompson; Jason A Heth; Christian W Freudiger; Siri Sahib S Khalsa; Donato R Pacione; John G Golfinos; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Daniel A Orringer; Honglak Lee; Todd C Hollon Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 5.315