| Literature DB >> 35941691 |
Bohan Lv1, Xiuyan Yang1, Tian An1, Yanxiang Wu1, Zhongchen He2, Bowu Li2, Yijiao Wang2, Fang Tan2, Tingye Wang1, Jiajian Zhu1, Yuanyuan Hu1, Xiaokun Liu3, Guangjian Jiang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The principal objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with fatigue (D-T2DM) through exome and transcriptome sequencing.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Fatigue; Mitochondria; RNA sequencing; Whole-exome sequencing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35941691 PMCID: PMC9358875 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-022-00884-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 5.395
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects with D-T2DM | Diagnosed with T2DM Diagnosed T2DM for at least 3 months Diagnosed with “Dual Deficiency of Qi and Yin Syndrome” according to TCM pattern diagnoses, including the key symptoms: dry throat and mouth, fatigued spirit and lack of strength | Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, secondary diabetes, gestational diabetes, or unknown type of diabetes Patients with stage III hypertension or myocardial infarction Patients with severe primary diseases Patients with serious complications, such as infection and diabetic ketoacidosis |
| Healthy Subjects | FPG < 5.6 mmol/L Healthy and no associated symptoms of “Dual Deficiency of Qi nd Yin Syndrome” | Subjects with a family history of diabetes Subjects with hypertension or other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases Subjects are currently taking medications |
Fig. 1Characteristics of study subjects
The results of mutation sites screening (partial)
| Priority | POS | ID | Gene Name | Exonic Func | Gencode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 979560 | rs762554040 | AGRN | missense SNV | ENSG00000188157.14, ENST00000379370.6, ENST00000620552.4 |
| H | 1221564 | rs61740392 | SCNN1D | missense SNV | ENST00000379116.9, ENST00000325425.12, ENST00000400928.7, ENST00000379101.8, ENSG00000162572.20, ENST00000338555.6 |
| H | 1233779 | rs544359869 | ACAP3 | missense SNV | ENST00000354700.9, ENST00000476572.1, ENST00000467278.5, ENST00000492936.5, ENSG00000131584.18, ENST00000353662.4 |
| H | 1262875 | rs564546199 | CPTP | missense SNV | ENST00000343938.8, ENST00000464957.1, ENSG00000224051.6 |
| H | 1269024 | TAS1R3 | missense SNV | ENST00000339381.5, ENSG00000169962.4 | |
| H | 1269399 | rs571862161 | TAS1R3 | missense SNV | ENST00000339381.5, ENSG00000169962.4 |
| H | 1269623 | rs199779671 | TAS1R3 | missense SNV | ENST00000339381.5, ENSG00000169962.4 |
| H | 1309567 | rs199844974 | AURKAIP1 | missense SNV | ENST00000378853.3, ENST00000338338.9, ENST00000321751.9, ENST00000338370.7, ENSG00000175756.13 |
| H | 1309675 | rs758605382 | AURKAIP1 | missense SNV | ENST00000489799.1, ENST00000378853.3, ENST00000338338.9, ENST00000321751.9, ENST00000338370.7, ENSG00000175756.13 |
Harmful classification screening results of each patient
| Patient | Total | Pathogenic | LikelyPathogenic | VUS | LikelyBenign | Benign |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYD1 | 25,518 | 3 | 5 | 1240 | 1287 | 22,983 |
| QYD2 | 25,540 | 4 | 6 | 1253 | 1264 | 23,013 |
| QYD3 | 25,418 | 3 | 3 | 1262 | 1282 | 22,868 |
| QYD4 | 25,398 | 1 | 7 | 1312 | 1226 | 22,852 |
| QYD5 | 25,352 | 5 | 6 | 1241 | 1262 | 22,838 |
| QYD6 | 25,897 | 3 | 4 | 1323 | 1244 | 23,323 |
The top 15 shared mutated genes and their annotation results
| Priority | CHROM | POS | ID | GeneName | ExonicFunc | Patient shared number | Normal shared number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 2 | 113479751 | NT5DC4 | 6 | 0 | ||
| H | 2 | 113481035 | NT5DC4 | nonframeshift deletion | 6 | 0 | |
| H | 2 | 113483863 | rs368642527 | NT5DC4 | missense SNV | 6 | 0 |
| H | 1 | 201177415 | rs139658488 | IGFN1 | missense SNV | 4 | 0 |
| H | 1 | 201190586 | rs565007693 | IGFN1 | missense SNV | 4 | 0 |
| H | 1 | 55252706 | rs201017388 | TTC22 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 |
| H | 1 | 55252712 | rs370158426 | TTC22 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 |
| H | 1 | 55252757 | TTC22 | 3 | 0 | ||
| L | 1 | 100661986 | rs760164623 | DBT | 3 | 0 | |
| L | 1 | 100661987 | DBT | 3 | 0 | ||
| H + | 1 | 226555174 | rs565966803 | PARP1 | 3 | 0 | |
| H + | 1 | 226567629 | PARP1 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 | |
| H + | 1 | 226576415 | rs139232092 | PARP1 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 |
| H + | 1 | 226595617 | rs201256399 | PARP1 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 |
| H | 10 | 73464873 | rs535416598 | CDH23 | missense SNV | 3 | 0 |
Fig. 2Scatter plot of the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of mutated sites. A GO category of BP. B GO category of CC. C GO category of MF. D KEGG pathway
Fig. 3Gene-phenotype-disease association network. The circle size for each of the indicated genes represents the strength of the correlation with the disease. Nodes with a green color represent genes related to diabetes according to existing reports or databases; nodes with an orange color represent genes related to green color genes according to various associations
Fig. 4The top 20 genes in the network, which were ranked by association degree
Fig. 5Protein–protein interaction network of the shared mutated genes
Fig. 6Clustering heatmap of differentially expressed consensus mutated genes
Mutant genes and differentially expressed genes in D-T2DM patients
| Gene name | Number of patients | Corresponding transcript name | Log2 Fold Change | P value of DE RNA | q value of DE RNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH23 | 3 | ENSG00000107736 | 1.33058 | 0.00415 | 0.0562885 |
| FUS | 2 | ENSG00000089280 | − 1.24573 | 5.00E−05 | 0.00240707 |
| GRAMD1C | 2 | ENSG00000178075 | − 1.42239 | 0.00085 | 0.0200327 |
| LMNA | 2 | ENSG00000160789 | 1.04216 | 5.00E−05 | 0.00240707 |
| LRTOMT | 2 | ENSG00000184154 | 1.40101 | 0.0154 | 0.126948 |
| SFTPB | 2 | ENSG00000168878 | − 1.52488 | 0.0496 | 0.270932 |
| VSIG2 | 2 | ENSG00000019102 | 6.72329 | 0.0011 | 0.0235009 |
| XRCC3 | 2 | ENSG00000126215 | 1.42051 | 0.0026 | 0.0422863 |
Fig. 7The histogram of GO and the scatterplot of the KEGG pathway analysis. A Biological process. B Cellular Component. C Molecular Function. D KEGG pathway
Fig. 8Herb-gene interaction network. Green squares represent the differentially expressed consensus mutant genes; Circles represent the predicted herbs; Different colors represent the different number of herbs associated with the node, yellow nodes associated with one herb, orange nodes associated with two herbs, red nodes associated with three herbs