Literature DB >> 35937853

The incidence of different forms of ileus following surgery for abdominal birth defects in infants: a systematic review with a meta-analysis method.

Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk1,2, Gijsbert D Musters1, David J Nijssen1, Wouter J de Jonge2,3, Ralph de Vries4, L W Ernest van Heurn1,2, Joep P M Derikx1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives: Ileus following surgery can arise in different forms namely as paralytic ileus, adhesive small bowel obstruction or as anastomotic stenosis. The incidences of these different forms of ileus are not well known after abdominal birth defect surgery in infants. Therefore, this review aims to estimate the incidence in general between abdominal birth defects. Content: Studies reporting on paralytic ileus, adhesive small bowel obstruction or anastomotic stenosis were considered eligible. PubMed and Embase were searched and risk of bias was assessed. Primary outcome was the incidence of complications. A meta-analysis was performed to pool the reported incidences in total and per birth defect separately. Summary: This study represents a total of 11,617 patients described in 152 studies of which 86 (56%) had a follow-up of at least half a year. Pooled proportions were calculated as follows; paralytic ileus: 0.07 (95%-CI, 0.05-0.11; I 2=71%, p≤0.01) ranging from 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.23) in gastroschisis to 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.02-0.13) in omphalocele. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: 0.06 (95%-CI: 0.05-0.07; I 2=74%, p≤0.01) ranging from 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06-0.19) in malrotation to 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02-0.06) in anorectal malformations. Anastomotic stenosis after a month 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.03-0.06; I 2=59%, p=0.30) ranging from 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.14) in gastroschisis to 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.04) in duodenal obstruction. Anastomotic stenosis within a month 0.03 (95%-CI 0.01-0.10; I 2=81%, p=0.02) was reviewed without separate analysis per birth defect. Outlook: This review is the first to aggregate the known literature in order approximate the incidence of different forms of ileus for different abdominal birth defects. We showed these complications are common and the distribution varies between birth defects. Knowing which birth defects are most at risk can aid clinicians in taking prompt action, such as nasogastric tube placement, when an ileus is suspected. Future research should focus on the identification of risk factors and preventative measures. The incidences provided by this review can be used in those studies as a starting point for sample size calculations.
© 2021 Laurens D. Eeftinck Schattenkerk et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal birth defect; adhesive small-bowel obstruction; anastomotic stenosis; ileus; infant; paediatric surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 35937853      PMCID: PMC9294340          DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Surg Sci        ISSN: 2364-7485


Introduction

Ileus following surgery, consisting of both paralytic and mechanical causes, is a frequent complication after abdominal surgery, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, medical costs, and increased length of hospital stay [1], [2], [3], [4]. It is a clinical diagnosis which is characterized by intolerance to oral feeds, vomiting, abdominal distention, and the absence of flatus or stool. Ileus following surgery can arise in different forms which depend on the definition used. Common causes are paralytic ileus, adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) and anastomotic stenosis. Paralytic ileus is a transient form of ileus which arises shortly after the operation in a response to surgical stress and is based on temporarily intestinal paralysis [5]. Anastomotic stenosis and SBO are mechanical forms of ileus that present later after surgery and could lead to reoperation. Since abdominal birth defects are rare, the incidence of these forms of ileus are not well known. Yet, knowing the incidences would provide context for clinical decision making as well as a starting point for future research into preventative measures. Therefore, the objective of this review is to systematically aggregate the available data on the incidence of different forms of ileus following surgery for birth defects in infants.

Methods

Studies were selected according to the criteria outlined below based on the PRISMA Guidelines [6]. Our protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7 March 2019 (registration number: CRD42019119268).

Participants

All studies reporting on any form of ileus following surgery for birth defects as primary of secondary endpoint were considered eligible. Only articles that described infants (≤three years) and specifically named the different forms of ileus were included. Animal studies, in vitro studies, non-English or non-Dutch articles, congress abstracts and studies with less than 10 cases were excluded.

Search strategy

The electronic databases of the National Institutes of Health PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched in February 2020 using both simple search terms as well as hierarchical family forms (e.g. MESH). The search strategy was designed together with a medical information specialist (RV). It combined four groups of search terms and their equivalents [1]: terms related to the age group of the patients at the moment of surgery (e.g. infantile patients) [2]; terms related to the location of surgery (e.g. abdominal surgery) [3]; terms related to congenital abdominal anomalies (e.g. gastroschisis) [4]; terms related to post-operative complications (e.g. adhesive ileus). Mesh and search terms used in Pubmed are included in Appendix 1.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary endpoint was the pooled percentage of the three forms of ileus. We separately reviewed anastomotic stenosis within a month and after one month. Secondary endpoint was the pooled percentage per birth defect. Terms included in paralytic ileus are: ileus (not related to anastomotic stricture) and post-operative ileus. Terms that only implied feeding problems without specifying the reason were not included. Terms included in adhesive small bowel obstruction are: intestinal obstruction, small bowel obstruction, adhesive ileus and stricture (not related to anastomosis). No additional terms or definitions were used for anastomotic stenosis; each article that specifically stated anastomotic stenosis was included. The early anastomotic stenosis, occurring within one month, were excluded for the analysis into late onset anastomotic stenosis. For each complication separately, a Forest plot was created containing the estimated overall pooled proportion and the corresponding 95%-CIs. In each Forest plot, we also reported the pooled proportion and CIs per disease if [1]; at least three studies reported the specific complication in the disease or [2] if the total number of patients with the disease was ≥100 combined [3]; there was at least one event of a complication present in all studies on a specific disease combined. Birth defects that did not meet these criteria were present in the overall pooled proportion and reported as residuals. Follow-up was reported when relevant. For all studies with multiple arms, data of both trial-arms were combined. If only one arm matched the inclusion criteria, the appropriate arm was used. Additionally extracted parameters were: author, country of conduct, year of publication, journal, study design, duration of follow-up, number of participants and type of birth defect.

Data extraction

Titles and abstracts were screened to exclude nonrelated publications. Screening was done by two independent authors (LES, DN) using Rayyan. Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the two reviewers. If no consensus could be reached, a third specialist author was consulted (JD, GM). Then, the full texts of the remaining articles were read to determine eligibility for inclusion (LES, DN). If the full text was not found the authors were contacted. The reference lists of the included articles were cross checked to find additional articles.

Validity and eligibility assessment

All included articles were assessed for the methodological quality and risk of bias. For cohort studies the Newcastle Ottawa quality assessment scale was used [7]. In randomized controlled trials this was done using the Jadad scoring system [8]. The assessment was done by LES and DN separately.

Data synthesis

For each complication and each disease in a study, a weighted average of the logit proportions was determined by the use of the generic inverse variance method. The logit proportions were back transformed to the summary estimate and 95%-CIs were obtained in a summary proportion representing the pooled proportion of the form of ileus. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 and χ 2 statistics. Analyses were performed with the use of R-studio version 3.6.1 (package “meta” (Schwarzer, 2007) and “metaprop” (Viachtbauer, 2010)). The random-effects model was used for interpretation. Heterogeneity was deemed significant if the pooled data’s p value was <0.05 or χ 2 statistics were ≥75. Heterogeneity was interpreted as small (I 2≤0.25), medium (I 2=0.25–0.50) or strong (I 2≥0.50), according to Higgins [9].

Results

Study characteristics

In total, 5,784 records were identified. After automated removal of duplicates, 3,909 records were left for title and abstract screening. Of the 3,909 records, 722 were included and assessed for full text. Following full text evaluation 152 studies were included for quantitative analysis (Figure 1). Of the 152 studies, 118 were retrospective cohort studies, 25 were prospective cohort studies, four were retrospective multicentre cohort studies, two were retrospective matched case-control studies, two were randomized controlled trials and one was a combined study of a prospective and retrospective cohort. Studies were conducted in 31 different countries. Asian countries were most prominent with 58 studies, European studies represented 41, North- & South-America represented 38, Africa represented 9, The Middle-East 4 and Oceania represented 2. Of the 152 studies, 86 (57%) reported a follow-up of at least half a year.
Figure 1:

Flow-chart article selection.

Flow-chart article selection. This systematic review and meta-analysis represent 11,617 patients described in 152 studies presented in Table 1 []. Among these patients, the congenital conditions were divided as follows: Hirschsprung’s disease (n=4,341, 37%); gastroschisis (n=1,558, 13%); duodenal obstruction (n=1,068, 9%); anorectal malformations (n=1,047, 9%); small intestinal atresia (n=794, 7%); congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n=778, 7%); biliary atresia (n=681, 6%); malrotation (n=608, 5%); omphalocele (n=464, 4%); choledochal cyst (n=148, 1%); meconium ileus (n=54, >1%); Meckel’s diverticula (n=46, >1%); colonic atresia (n=30, >1%).
Table 1:

Study characteristics.

AuthorYearJournalCountryDesignFU>0.5yStudy durationAnomalyPOISBOAS < monthÀS > month
Stollman2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyNo1971–2004Small intestinal atresia2/11012/1101/1106/110
Guo2010Transplantation ProceedingsChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2006–2009Biliary atresia2/22XXX
Walter-Nicolet2009Journal of Paediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionFranceProspective cohort studyYes2004–2006GastroschisisX2/73XX
Wang2013Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis IntChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2008–2011Biliary atresiaX2/73XX
Lee2012Paediatric Surgery InternationalSouth KoreaRetrospective cohort studyNo2001–2010Small intestinal atresiaX3/11XX
Cox2005Paediatric Surgery InternationalSouth AfricaRetrospective cohort studyYes1966–2004Colonic atresiaX0/142/140/14
Festen2002Journal of Paediatric SurgeryNetherlandsMulti-centre (5) retrospective cohortYes1980–1992Small intestinal atresia1/15X4/151/14
Escobar2005Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes1972–2004Hirschsprung’s diseaseX5/33X5/33
Yan2017Biomedical ResearchChinaProspective cohort studyYes2011–2014Hirschsprung’s disease2/382/38X2/38
Mirshemirani2007Acta Medica IranicaIranProspective cohort studyYes1993–2003ARMXX0/300/30
Dariel2015European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryCanadaRetrospective cohort studyYes2006–2010GastroschisisX6/63XX
Mendez-Martinez2016European Journal of General MedicineMexicoProspective cohort studyNo2008–2013Gastroschisis6/427/42XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011Hirschsprung’s diseaseX19/65XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011MalrotationX13/45XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011Small intestinal atresiaX11/40XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011GastroschisisX9/85XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011Duodenal obstructionX10/93XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011OmphaloceleX4/44XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX6/75XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011ARMX4/58XX
Fredriksson2015British Journal of SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyYes1976–2011Biliary atresiaX0/28XX
Werbeck2010Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes1991–2010GastroschisisX2/13XX
Demirogullari2011Paediatric Surgery InternationalTurkeyRetrospective cohort studyNo1998–2011ARMX2/112XX
Rouzrokh2010Paediatric Surgery InternationalIranRetrospective cohort studyYes2006–2009Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX12/86
S. Li2017European Review for Medical and Pharmacological SciencesChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2006–2013Hirschsprung’s diseaseXX0/15X
Ghosh2016ANZ Journal of SurgeryAustraliaRetrospective cohort studyYes2005–2012Hirschsprung’s diseaseX3/50X2/50
Chen2014World J. Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2003–2012Duodenal obstructionX4/287XX
Bianchi1998Seminars in Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1984–1997Hirschsprung’s diseaseX2/13XX
Mattioli1998Journal of Paediatric SurgeryItalyRetrospective cohort studyNo1993–1996Hirschsprung’s diseaseXX0/80/8
Teitelbaum1998Seminars in Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYesXHirschsprung’s diseaseX4/24X0/24
Demirbilek1999Paediatric Surgery InternationalTurkeyRetrospective cohort studyYes1987–1997ARMXXX1/31
Santos1999Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1988–1999Hirschsprung’s diseaseX4/65XX
de la Torre2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryMexicoRetrospective cohort studyYes1994–2000Hirschsprung’s diseaseX0/10XX
Fleet2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1991–1997GastroschisisXXX1/10
Fleet2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1991–1997Small intestinal atresiaXXX1/6
Fleet2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1991–1997Colonic atresiaXXX0/3
Hay2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEgyptRetrospective cohort studyNoXBiliary atresiaX1/21XX
Langer2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSAProspective cohort studyNoXHirschsprung’s diseaseX2/2210/22X
Patwardhan2001Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1994–1999ARMX5/49XX
Snyder2001Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1969–2000GastroschisisX21/199XX
Snyder2001Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1969–2000Small intestinal atresiaX9/25XX
Höllwarth2002Journal of Paediatric SurgeryAustriaRetrospective cohort studyYes1988–2000Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXXX
Saxena2001The world journal of HerniaGermanyProspective cohort studyYes1984–1998Omphalocele1/502/50XX
Saxena2001Paediatric Surgery InternationalGermanyProspective cohort studyYes1984–1998GastroschisisX10/70XX
Önen2003Paediatric Surgery InternationalTurkeyProspective/retrospective cohortNo1990–2000Meckel’s diverticulumX2/34XX
Shah2003Journal of Paediatric SurgeryIndiaProspective cohort studyYesXARMXXX0/12
Weidner2003Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1998–2001Hirschsprung’s diseaseX0/15XX
Escobar2004Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes1972–2001Duodenal obstructionX5/169X1/169
Kubota2004Journal of Paediatric SurgeryJapanProspective cohort studyYes1990–2001Hirschsprung’s diseaseX1/41XX
Wester2004Journal of Paediatric SurgeryFinlandRetrospective cohort studyNo2000–2003Hirschsprung’s diseaseXX0/150/15
Majid2015Pakistan Paediatric JournalPakistanProspective cohort studyYesXDuodenal obstructionX3/27XX
Sauer2005Journal of Paediatric SurgeryCanadaRetrospective cohort studyNo1999–2003Hirschsprung’s diseaseX2/24X0/24
Thepcharoennirund2005Journal of Medical Association of ThailandThailandRetrospective cohort studyNo1987–2004Gastroschisis12/129XXX
Chiu2006Journal of Perinatal MedicineUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1994–2004GastroschisisX1/43XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1998–2003GastroschisisX2/32XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes1999–2003ARMX0/46XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2003OmphaloceleX0/25XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2001–2003Meconium ileusX5/20XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2001–2003MalrotationX3/23XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2001–2003Diaphragmatic herniaX1/25XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2001–2003Hirschsprung’s diseaseX2/33XX
Choudhry2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2001–2003Small intestinal atresiaX4/36XX
Lee2006Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes1981–2002Omphalocele1/20XXX
A. Li2006Chinese Medical JournalChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes1999–2004Hirschsprung’s diseaseX1/252X16/252
Liem2006Asian Journal of SurgeryVietnamProspective cohort studyYes2002–2004Hirschsprung’s disease0/53XXX
Maksoud-Filho2006Paediatric Surgery InternationalBrazilRetrospective cohort studyNo1998–2005GastroschisisX1/43XX
Owen2006Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyNo1990–2004GastroschisisX0/48XX
Banieghbal2007Journal of Paediatric SurgerySouth AfricaProspective cohort studyYes2002–2005Small intestinal atresiaXX2/16X
Dutta2007Journal of laparoendoscopicUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2002–2005Biliary atresiaX2/10XX
Menon2007Journal of Paediatric SurgeryIndiaProspective cohort studyYes1997–2005ARMXXX0/46
Riehle2007Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1993–2004Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX7/125XX
Stringer2007Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUnited KingdomProspective cohort studyYes1994–2006Biliary atresiaX2/60XX
Baglaj2007European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUnited KingdomRetrospective cohort studyNo1986–2006Small intestinal atresiaXXX2/26
Henrich2007Paediatric Surgery InternationalGermanyProspective cohort studyNo1994–2004Gastroschisis11/40XXX
Henrich2007Paediatric Surgery InternationalGermanyProspective cohort studyNo1994–2004Omphalocele3/26XXX
Ishikawa2008Paediatric Surgery InternationalJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo1990–2001Hirschsprung’s diseaseX1/49XX
Shinall2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1997–2001Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX3/60
Spilde2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2003–2007Duodenal obstructionXX2/29X
Tongsin2008Journal of Medical Association of ThailandThailandRetrospective cohort studyNo1988–2007Small intestinal atresia9/1423/142X8/142
van Eijck2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyNo1971–2004GastroschisisX14/55XX
van Eijck2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyNo1971–2004OmphaloceleX12/92XX
Zheng2008Paediatric Surgery InternationalChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2004–2007ARMX1/38XX
Dassinger2009Paediatric Surgery InternationalUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1993–2008Colonic atresiaXX0/12X
Ferreira2009Surgical EndoscopyFranceProspective cohort studyNoXCongenital diaphragmatic hernia1/30XXX
Gourlay2008Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes1993–2003Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX4/38XX
Hua2009Ghang Gung Medical JournalTaiwanRetrospective cohort studyYes1991–2006Choledochal cystX1/30XX
Liu2009Journal of LaparoendoscopicChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2003–2007Biliary atresiaX0/10XX
Obermayr2008European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryGermanyRetrospective cohort studyYes2002–2007Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX1/22
Takahashi2009Journal of Paediatric SurgeryJapanRetrospective cohort studyYes1963–2008Biliary atresia1/12XXX
Gunnarsdottir2009European Journal of paediatric SurgerySwedenProspective cohort studyYes2000–2007Hirschsprung’s diseaseX1/29XX
Hong2010European journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyChinaProspective cohort studyYes2004–2008Gastroschisis1/171/17XX
Payne2010Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal MedicineUSAMatched case-control studyYes1999–2007GastroschisisX9/127XX
Vu2010Paediatric surgery InternationalVietnamProspective cohort studyYes2004–2009Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX4/51
de Vos2011South African Journal of ScienceSouth AfricaRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2009ARMXXX4/39
Hill2011Journal of LaparoendoscopicUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2001–2010Duodenal obstruction14/58XX0/58
Karimi2011Paediatric Surgery InternationalNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyNo1984–2007Meconium ileusX4/34XX
Kozlov2010European Journal of SurgeryRussiaRetrospective cohort studyNo2005–2009Duodenal obstructionXX0/27X
Travassos2011Journal of Paediatric SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyYes1988–2010Hirschsprung’s diseaseX1/15X0/15
van der Zee2011World J. SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2010Duodenal obstructionXXX1/28
Li2012Paediatric surgery InternationalChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2009–2012Small intestinal atresiaX3/35XX
Liem2012Journal of Paediatric SurgeryVietnamProspective cohort studyYes2008–2010ARMXXX0/10
Romao2012Journal of Paediatric SurgeryCanadaRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2009Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX3/22XX
Sato2012Paediatric Surgery InternationalJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo2005–2011Small intestinal atresia1/25XXX
Sato2012Paediatric Surgery InternationalJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo2005–2011ARM1/13XXX
Weil2011Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2000–2009GastroschisisXXXX
Ghaffarpour2013Journal of Paediatric SurgerySwedenRetrospective cohort studyNoXDuodenal obstructionX0/28XX
Ferreira2013Journal of Paediatric SurgeryFranceRetrospective cohort studyYes2006–2010Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX9/37XX
Jensen2013Journal of LaparoendoscopicUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2005–2011Duodenal obstructionXXX1/66
Nam2013World Journal of SurgerySouth KoreaRetrospective cohort studyYes2008–2011Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX5/50XX
Nio2013Paediatric Surgery InternationalJapanProspective RCTYes2006–2011Biliary atresia2/69XXX
van der Zee2013World Journal of SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2011ARMX1/19X1/19
Diao2014International Journal of SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2011–2013Choledochal cystX0/27XX
Diao2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2011–2012ARMXXX0/31
Elder2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2011MalrotationX13/102XX
Friedmacher2014Paediatric surgery InternationalAustriaRetrospective cohort studyYes1975–2008GastroschisisX27/108X8/108
Ming2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes1992–2012ARMXXX3/66
Nasr2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryCanadaRetrospective matched case control cohort studyNo2000–2010Hirschsprung’s disease15/541/54X4/54
Shrestha2014Journal Nepal Paediatric SocietyNepalProspective cohort studyYes2008–2013Hirschsprung’s diseaseX0/12X0/12
Sulkowski2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective multi-centre database researchYes1999–2009Hirschsprung’s diseaseX82/1,555X83/1,555
Yang2014Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2011–2013ARMXXX0/20
Madadi-Sanjani2015Biomedical Research InternationalGermanyRetrospective cohort studyNo1975–2008Biliary atresiaX5/153XX
Martinez-Criado2015Cirugia EspanolaSpainRetrospective cohort studyNo2003–2012Hirschsprung’s diseaseX6/73X4/73
Miyano2015Journal of LaparoendoscopicJapanRetrospective cohort studyYes2007–2012MalrotationX1/14XX
Shangjie2014Cell Biochemical BiophysiologyChinaProspective cohort studyNo2009–2014Hirschsprung’s disease28/28127/281XX
Almosallam2016Ann Saudi MedicineSaudi ArabiaRetrospective cohort studyNo2000–2014ARMX4/104XX
Diao2016Surgical EndoscopyChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2013–2014ARMXXXX
Guerra2016Journal of Paediatric SurgeryCanadaRetrospective cohort studyNo1995–2014Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX5/36
Inoue2016Surgical endoscopyJapanRetrospective cohort studyYes2000–2014Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX4/24XX
Matsumoto2016Surgical TodayJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo1997–2015Choledochal cystX2/13XX
Raitio2016European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryEnglandRetrospective cohort studyYes2002–2014MalrotationXXXX
Diao2017Surgical endoscopyChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2013–2016ARMXXX0/15
Dingemann2017European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryGermanyMulticentre retrospective cohortNo2007–2012OmphaloceleX1/54XX
C. Lu2017Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaMulticentre retrospective cohortYes2005–2012Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX21/650
Y. Lu2017Transplantation ProceedingsChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2009–2014Biliary atresiaXXXX
Oh2017Surgical EndoscopySouth KoreaRetrospective cohort studyNo2005–2015Duodenal obstructionXXX0/22
Risby2017Journal of Paediatric SurgeryDenmarkRetrospective cohort studyYes1997–2009GastroschisisX12/47XX
Son2017Journal of Paediatric SurgeryVietnamRetrospective cohort studyNo2009–2015Duodenal obstructionXXX2/112
Tyson2017Journal of LaparoendoscopicUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2007–2015Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX5/54XX
van den Eijnden2017World Journal of SurgeryNetherlandsRetrospective cohort studyNo1989–2014Choledochal cystX1/300/30X
Zani2017Paediatric Surgery InternationalCanadaRetrospective cohort studyYes2004–2014Duodenal obstructionX4/92X6/92
Zmora2016American Journal of SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2007–2015GastroschisisX1/11XX
Zmora2016American Journal of SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyNo2007–2015OmphaloceleX0/6XX
Avci2018Eastern Journal of MedicineTurkeyRetrospective cohort studyNo2008–2017Duodenal obstructionX2/32XX
Peng2018Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyNo2011–2015Small intestinal atresiaX2/41XX
Xiao2018MedicineChinaProspective cohort studyYes2011–2014ARMXXX0/56
Xiao2018Journal of Surgical ResearchChinaProspective RCTYes2011–2015Biliary atresiaX5/166XX
Zhang2018Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2011–2014Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX0/23
England2012Journal of Paediatric SurgerySouth AfricaRetrospective cohort studyYes2005–2009ARMXXX12/42
Wakhlu2000Journal of Paediatric SurgeryIndiaRetrospective cohort studyYes1972–1998OmphaloceleX2/64XX
Pratap2007Journal of Paediatric SurgeryIndiaRetrospective cohort studyYes2002–2006Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXXx
Abbas2016Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohort studyYes2002–2015MalrotationX6/56XX
Chan2019Journal of laparoendoscopicHong KongRetrospective databaseYes1993–2007Biliary atresiaX2/22XX
de Bie2019Journal of Paediatric SurgeryBelgiumRetrospective multicentre databaseYes2000–2016Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX1/62XX
Dewberry2019Journal of Paediatric SurgeryUSARetrospective cohortNo2008–2018Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX5/70XX
Dewberry2019Journal of surgical researchUSARetrospective cohortYes2007–2017Small intestinal atresiaX2/47X2/47
Dübbers2002European Journal of Paediatric SurgeryGermanyRetrospective cohortYes1990–2000Hirschsprung’s diseaseX2/35XX
Gabler2018South African Medical JournalSouth AfricaRetrospective cohortNoXARMX0/50XX
Gao2019Journal of International Medical ResearchChinaRetrospective cohortNo2018Meckel’s diverticulumX0/12XX
Gao2019Journal of International Medical ResearchChinaRetrospective cohortNo2018Hirschsprung’s diseaseX0/35XX
He2016Journal of LaparoendoscopicChinaRetrospective cohortYes2011–2016Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX1/14XX
Joda2019Updates in SurgeryIraqProspective cohortYes2010–2017Small intestinal atresiaX3/34X4/34
Jona2001Paediatric Endo-Surgery & Innovative TechniquesUSARetrospective cohortNo1993–2000Hirschsprung’s diseaseX0/44XX
Long2019Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal EdEnglandRetrospective national database cohortYes2009–2010Congenital diaphragmatic herniaX9/140XX
Marei2019Egyptian Paediatric Association GazetteEgyptRetrospective cohortYes2014–2017Small intestinal atresia3/22X1/22X
Narang2019Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyNew ZealandRetrospective cohort studyYes2011–2016GastroschisisX6/71XX
Narang2019Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyNew ZealandRetrospective cohort studyYes2011–2016OmphaloceleX0/22XX
Jung1995Journal of Paediatric SurgerySouth KoreaRetrospective cohort studyNo1980–1991Hirschsprung’s diseaseX2/77XX
Ren2018Journal of LaparoendoscopicChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2005–2016ARM1/25XXX
Ryu2019Annals of Surgery Treatment and ResearchSouth KoreaRetrospective cohort studyNo2001–2018Choledochal cystX1/43XX
Sakaguchi2019World journal of Paediatric SurgeryJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo1995–2004ARM3/39XXX
Sato1998Journal of Paediatric SurgeryJapanRetrospective cohort studyNo1970–1997Small intestinal atresiaX2/88X2/88
Sola2018Paediatric Surgery InternationalUSARetrospective cohort studyNo1999–2016Hirschsprung’s diseaseX4/100XX
Yang2019MedicineChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2013–2016Small intestinal atresiaX2/42X3/42
H. Zhu2019Journal of Paediatric SurgeryChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2008–2017Small intestinal atresiaX4/39X3/39
H. Zhu2019Paediatric Surgery InternationalChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2003–2017MalrotationX10/252XX
T. Zhu2019International Journal of Colorectal DiseaseChinaRetrospective cohort studyYes2010–2015Hirschsprung’s diseaseXXX0/157
Study characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed and is shown in Table 2. Most studies included reported fair quality on the NOS which was also the case for the two RCTs using the Jadad score. The mean scores on the NOS of articles describing paralytic ileus and early anastomotic stenosis was slightly lower (5, 5) compared to articles describing adhesive small bowel obstruction and late onset anastomotic stenosis [6].
Table 2:

Assessment risk of bias.

AuthorYearJadad
New Ottawa scale (NOS)
ScoreSelectionComparabilityOutcomeTotal
(0–5)(0–4*)(0–2*)(0–3*)(0–9)
Stollman2008*******7
Guo2010******6
Walter-Nicolet2009********8
Wang2013*******7
Lee2012******6
Cox2005******6
Festen2002******6
Escobar2005******6
Yan2017********8
Mirshemirani2007******6
Dariel2015*******7
Mendez-Martinez2016******6
Fredriksson2015******6
Werbeck2010****4
Demirogullari2011****4
Rouzrokh2010*******7
S. Li2017******6
Ghosh2016******6
Chen2014********8
Bianchi1998******6
Mattioli1998****4
Teitelbaum1998*****5
Demirbilek1999******6
Santos1999******6
de la Torre2000******6
Fleet2000******6
Hay2000******6
Langer2000******6
Patwardhan2001******6
Snyder2001*******7
Höllwarth2002******6
Saxena2001*******7
Önen2003*****5
Shah2003*****5
Weidner2003******6
Escobar2004******6
Kubota2004*****5
Wester2004*****5
Majid2015********8
Sauer2005******6
Thepcharoennirund2005****4
Chiu2006******6
Choudhry2006******6
Lee2006******6
A. Li2006*******7
Liem2006****4
Maksoud-Filho2006*****5
Owen2006******6
Banieghbal2007*****5
Dutta2007****4
Menon2007*****5
Riehle2007*****5
Stringer2007******6
Baglaj2007*****5
Henrich2007****4
Ishikawa2008*****5
Shinall2008*******7
Spilde2008******6
Tongsin2008******6
van Eijck2008*****5
Zheng2008******6
Dassinger2009*****5
Ferreira2009****4
Gourlay2008******6
Hua2009*******7
Liu2009*******7
Obermayr2008*******7
Takahashi2009*****5
Gunnarsdottir2009********8
Hong2010*****5
Payne2010********8
Vu2010*******7
de Vos2011******6
Hill2011*****5
Karimi2011*****5
Kozlov2010*******7
Travassos2011********8
van der Zee2011******6
Li2012*****5
Liem2012*****5
Romao2012******6
Sato2012******6
Weil2011*******7
Ghaffarpour2013******6
Ferreira2013******6
Jensen2013*******7
Nam2013********8
Nio20132
van der Zee2013*****5
Diao2014******6
Elder2014******6
Friedmacher2014********8
Ming2014*******7
Nasr2014*******7
Shrestha2014******6
Sulkowski2014********8
Yang2014****4
Madadi-Sanjani2015*******7
Martinez-Criado2015*******7
Miyano2015******6
Shangjie2014******6
Almosallam2016*****5
Diao2016*****5
Guerra2016******6
Inoue2016*****5
Matsumoto2016******6
Raitio2016******6
Diao2017****4
Dingemann2017*******7
C. Lu2017******6
Y. Lu2017*******7
Oh2017*******7
Risby2017*****5
Son2017*******7
Tyson2017******6
van den Eijnden2017*******7
Zani2017*******7
Zmora2016*****5
Avci2018******6
Peng2018******6
Xiao20183
Zhang2018******6
England2012******6
Wakhlu2000*****5
Pratap2007******6
Abbas2016*******7
Chan2019*****5
de Bie2019******6
Dewberry2019*******7
Dübbers2002*****5
Gabler2018*****5
Gao2019****4
He2016********8
Joda2019********8
Jona2001****4
Long2019********8
Marei2019******6
Narang2019******6
Jung1995***3
Ren2018*****5
Ryu2019******6
Sakaguchi2019******6
Sato1998*****5
Sola2018******6
Yang2019******6
H. Zhu2019*******7
T. Zhu2019******6
Assessment risk of bias.

Paralytic ileus

In total, 22 studies reported on paralytic ileus and entailed 1,332 patients and 120 events of paralytic ileus [35, 42, 46, 48, 49, 51, 61, 65, 81, 82, 96, 98, 100, 103, 109, 112, 114, 115, 132, 151, 153, 155]. The pooled proportion of total paralytic ileus was 0.07 (95%-CI: 0.05–0.11; I 2=71%, p≤0.01). Separate pooled proportions were calculated for the following conditions: Hirschsprung’s disease 0.07 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.24; n=45/426; I 2=91%; p≤0.01); small intestinal atresia 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.03–0.09; n=16/314; I 2=18%; p=0.25); gastroschisis 0.14 (95%-CI: 0.08–0.23; n=30/228; I 2=52%; p=0.03); biliary atresia 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.11; n=5/103; I 2=0%; p=0.45); omphalocele 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.13; n=5/96; I 2=8%; p=0.27); anorectal malformations 0.06 (95%-CI: 0.03–0.15; n=5/77; I 2=0%; p=0.83). Duodenal obstruction (n=58) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n=30) are included in the overall proportion but did not meet the criteria for separate statistical analysis (Figure 2).
Figure 2:

Pooled proportion of paralytic ileus.

Pooled proportion of paralytic ileus.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO)

In total, 99 studies reported on small bowel obstruction entailing 8,470 patients and 572 events of SBO all anomalies combined [10, 11, 14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19, 21, 24, 26, 29], [30], [31, 33, 34, 37], [38], [39], [40], [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51], [52], [53], [54, 56], [57], [58], [59], [60, 62, 63, 67, 70], [71], [72], [73], [74, 79], [80], [81, 85], [86], [87], [88], [89, 92], [93], [94, 96, 97, 99], [100], [101, 103, 105, 106, 109], [110], [111, 113, 115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121, 123], [124], [125], [126, 128, 131, 132, 134, 136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150, 152, 154, 156], [157], [158], [159], [160]. Length of follow up was at least half a year in 56 (57%) of the studies. The pooled proportion of total SBO was 0.06 (95%-CI: 0.05–0.07; I 2=74%, p≤0.01). Separate proportions were calculated for the following conditions: Hirschsprung’s disease 0.05 (95%-CI: 0.03–0.07; n=174/3,044; I 2=77%; p≤0.01); gastroschisis 0.09 (95%-CI: 0.06–0.14; n=130/1,147; I 2=75%; p≤0.01); congenital diaphragmatic hernia 0.08 (95%-CI: 0.06–0.11; n=60/736; I 2=35%; p=0.09); duodenal obstruction 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.08; n=28/728; I 2=61%; p=0.01); small intestinal atresia 0.09 (95%-CI: 0.05–0.14; n=60/690; I 2=74%; p≤0.01); biliary atresia 0.03 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.05; n=19/543; I 2=0%; p=0.48); malrotation 0.11 (95%-CI: 0.06–0.19; n=46/492; I 2=73%; p≤0.01); anorectal malformations 0.03 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.06; n=17/476; I 2=37%; p=0.54); omphalocele 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.02–0.24; n=21/357; I 2=51%; p=0.31); choledochal cyst 0.03 (95%-CI: 0.01–0.08; n=5/143; I 2=0%; p=0.48). Meconium ileus (n=54), Meckel’s diverticula (n=46) and colonic atresia (n=14) are included in the overall proportion but did not meet the criteria for separate statistical analysis (Figure 3).
Figure 3:

Pooled proportion of small bowel obstruction.

Pooled proportion of small bowel obstruction.

Anastomotic stenosis

Of the 14 studies reporting on anastomotic stenosis within one month of follow-up, 365 patients were included and 22 events of anastomotic stenosis occurred [13, 18, 20, 35, 57, 59, 64, 75, 78, 108, 109, 118, 129, 151]. The pooled proportion of total anastomotic stenosis within a month was 0.03 (95%-CI: 0.01–0.10; I 2=81%, p=0.02). Diseases reported on were: small intestinal atresia (n=8/163), Hirschsprung’s disease (n=10/60), duodenal obstruction (n=2/56), anorectal malformations (n=0/30), choledochal cyst (n=0/30) and colonic atresia (n=2/26). In total, 40 studies reported on anastomotic stenosis after one month of follow-up entailing 4,468 patients and 214 events of anastomotic stenosis occurred [12, 18, 22, 23, 25, 32], [33], [34], [35], [36, 38, 40, 44, 49, 55, 62, 66, 68, 73, 75], [76], [77], [78, 81, 83, 84, 95, 99, 102, 104, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 116, 119, 120, 122, 129, 130, 132], [133], [134], [135, 142, 156, 158, 159, 161]. Length of follow up was at least half a year in 29 (73%) of the studies. The pooled proportion of anastomotic stenosis was 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.03–0.06; I 2=59%, p=0.30). Separate proportions were calculated for the following conditions: Hirschsprung’s disease 0.04 (95%-CI: 0.03–0.07; n=162/3,238; I 2=70%; p=0.11); small intestinal atresia 0.06 (95%-CI: 0.04–0.08; n=32/548; I 2=0%; p=0.77); duodenal obstruction 0.02 (95%-CI: 0.01–0.04; n=11/547; I 2=42%; p=0.29); gastroschisis 0.08 (95%-CI: 0.04–0.14; n=9/118; I 2=0%; p=0.77). Colonic atresia (n=17) is included in the overall proportion but did not meet the criteria for separate statistical analysis (Figure 4).
Figure 4:

Pooled proportion of anastomotic stenosis after 1 month.

Pooled proportion of anastomotic stenosis after 1 month.

Discussion

This systematic review pooled the reported proportions on different types of ileus following abdominal surgery for birth defects in infants. These proportions can be seen as an approximation of the incidences of these complications. According to our reported approximation, these incidences were 7% for paralytic ileus, 6% for adhesive small bowel obstruction, 3% for anastomotic stenosis within one month after surgery and 4% after one month. Within the different birth defects there is a large variation in the occurrence and the spread of these forms of ileus. Although risk factor identification is beyond the scope of this review, the available literature gives some suggestions why these diseases seem to be more at risk. Out of all diseases paralytic ileus was most common in gastroschisis patients (14%). In these patients, a defect of the abdominal wall leads to extrusion of abdominal content antenatally. Postnatally, this content is reduced intra-abdominally either by primary closure or temporally use of silo and delayed closure. During both procedures the intestine is manipulated severely, which is known to increase the incidence and duration of paralytic ileus in adults [4]. Adhesions, which cause SBO, have long been accepted as a partly inevitable consequence of surgery. They occur as part of the natural healing process. It is hard to define the clinical significance of adhesions, since most are asymptomatic, but when they lead to small bowel obstruction, they can be fatal with mortality rates in children between 2 and 15% [121, 162, 163]. Recently duration of surgery and staged procedures have been identified as risk factors for SBO [37, 162, 164]. Our reported pooled incidence of 6% is comparable to most recent large (n≥100) individual cohort studies reporting on abdominal surgery in infants. These studies report an incidence of SBO between 6 and 10% [37, 165]. It is important to acknowledge that this review entails an aggregated incidence for birth defects only. Acquired diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis, which seems to be at high risk with a reported incidence of SBO between 25 and 64%, are therefore not included [37, 162]. We found that patients with a malrotation, small intestinal atresia or gastroschisis were relatively most at risk of SBO. This is in concordance with previous studies [37, 121, 162], [163], [164], [165]. We divided anastomotic stenosis into two groups based on reported occurrence within or after one month of surgery since early onset is suggested to be caused by technical error or tissue oedema, whereas a delayed onset and stricture formation is related to chronic inflammation in time leading to anastomotic scarring [166]. Early onset of an anastomotic stenosis is not widely reported and might even be overlooked in the infantile cohort. This review shows that early stenosis does occur and should be considered when conducting research into post-operative complications in the infantile cohort. Technical factors, such as suture reportion speed or mode of suturing, of influence during anastomotic creation should be evaluated to identify risk factors. Gastroschisis, and to a smaller extent intestinal atresias, were most at risk for late onset anastomotic stenosis. The process of anastomotic healing is to a great extent unclear. Most research has focussed on surgical innovations and techniques without the results leading to a conclusive resolution. Future research in the pathobiology at the cellular level might bring clarification on this matter [166]. This study has its limitations. Because of the variety in study designs and reported outcomes we were not able to look into risk factors which could have lowered heterogeneity. Although it must be noted that, by stratifying for birth defect, some outcomes had moderate to low heterogeneity. Another limitation was that because certain birth defects such as gastroschisis only occur in neonates, our stratification might have resulted in differences in mean age when comparing birth defects. This age difference could be an important reason why certain birth defects are more at risk of certain form of ileus. However, it is not the aim of this review to compare different birth defects but rather report an incidence for each individually. Thus, we believe that this age difference will not hinder the message of our review. If we had only included neonates in this review important birth defects, such as Hirschsprung’s disease, diagnosed beyond the neonatal period would have been excluded. Furthermore, it has to be stated that our results are based on retrospective cohorts available in the literature most of which did not have ileus as a primary outcome. This has undoubtedly increased the chances of occurrence of forms of bias such as selection, publication and reporting bias. Our risk of bias assessment showed most articles to have only fair quality mostly caused by the retrospective, observational nature of most included studies. Moreover, most studies did not have a strict definition of complications possibly resulting in observer bias. Lastly, only 57% of the included articles had a follow-up of at least half a year. Many other articles were unclear about the length of follow up. This lack of long-term follow-up might result in an underestimate of the real incidence of SBO and anastomotic stenosis. SBOs, for instance mostly arise within a year after surgery however episodes are reported 28 years after the initial laparotomy [17, 37, 121, 162], [163], [164], [165]. Although these limitations might have influenced the pooled analyses, at this moment the presented data is the best available approximation of these complications in this cohort.

Conclusion

This review is the first to aggregate the known literature in order to approximate the incidence of different forms of ileus for each abdominal birth defect. We showed these complications are common and the distribution differs between birth defects. Knowing which birth defects are most at risk might aid clinicians in taking prompt action when an ileus is suspected. Future research should focus on the identification of risk factors and preventative measures. The incidences provided by this review can be used as a starting point for sample size calculations. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  156 in total

1.  Gastroschisis and omphalocele: treatments and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Katharina Henrich; Hans P Huemmer; Bertram Reingruber; Peter G Weber
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Transanal pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: matched case-control comparison of Soave and Swenson techniques.

Authors:  Ahmed Nasr; Ramanath N Haricharan; Julie Gamarnik; Jacob C Langer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Guidelines for the management of postoperative obstructive symptoms in children with Hirschsprung disease.

Authors:  J C Langer; M D Rollins; M Levitt; A Gosain; L de la Torre; R P Kapur; R A Cowles; J Horton; D H Rothstein; A M Goldstein
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention.

Authors:  A Venara; M Neunlist; K Slim; J Barbieux; P A Colas; A Hamy; G Meurette
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.043

Review 5.  Postoperative ileus: Recent developments in pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Damian Bragg; Ahmed M El-Sharkawy; Emmanouil Psaltis; Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Excellent long-term outcome for survivors of apple peel atresia.

Authors:  S Festen; J C Brevoord; G A Goldhoorn; C Festen; F W Hazebroek; L W van Heurn; Z J de Langen; D C van Der Zee; D C Aronson
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Anorectal malformations and the impact of HIV on surgical outcome.

Authors:  T D Gabler; J Loveland; A Theron; C Westgarth-Taylor
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  Multicenter randomized trial of postoperative corticosteroid therapy for biliary atresia.

Authors:  Masaki Nio; Toshihiro Muraji
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Kasai portoenterostomy: 12-year experience with a novel adjuvant therapy regimen.

Authors:  Mark D Stringer; Suzanne M Davison; Sanjay R Rajwal; Patricia McClean
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Hirschsprung's disease: one surgeon's experience in one institution.

Authors:  P M Jung
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.