PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of gastroschisis-related complications (GRCs) after closure of the abdominal wall defect, with a focus on frequency, type and timing of required surgical interventions, and to identify the impact of these on further outcome. METHODS: All gastroschisis patients treated from 1975 to 2008 in a tertiary-level center were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical procedures for GRCs following abdominal wall closure of simple gastroschisis [SG (intact continuous bowel)] and complex gastroschisis [CG (additional gastrointestinal malformations)] were compared, and outcomes were determined. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were identified with a median follow-up of 15.0 years (range 4-37). Ninety-four (87%) had SG, and 14 (13%) CG. Surgical interventions for GRCs were performed in 28 (26%) patients with 16 requiring multiple operations. Overall, 60 surgical procedures were performed. Bowel obstruction (n = 34) was the most common GRC, followed by anastomotic stricture (n = 8) and ischemic bowel (n = 3). The median interval between gastroschisis closure and secondary surgery for GRCs was 62.5 days (range 1 day-15 years). Surgical interventions were significantly more frequent in CG compared with SG [12/14 (86%) vs. 16/94 (17%); P < 0.0001]. The overall survival rate was 90%. Significantly, more patients required parenteral nutrition for more than 28 days [9/28 (32%) vs. 13/80 (16 %); P = 0.0468], longer median time to achieve full enteral feedings (87 vs. 33 days; P < 0.0001) and longer median hospital stay (117 vs. 54 days; P < 0.0001) compared with those not requiring additional surgery. CONCLUSION: GRCs requiring surgical interventions were more common in patients with CG, which were associated with delay in achieving full enteral feedings and prolonged hospital stay.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of gastroschisis-related complications (GRCs) after closure of the abdominal wall defect, with a focus on frequency, type and timing of required surgical interventions, and to identify the impact of these on further outcome. METHODS: All gastroschisis patients treated from 1975 to 2008 in a tertiary-level center were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical procedures for GRCs following abdominal wall closure of simple gastroschisis [SG (intact continuous bowel)] and complex gastroschisis [CG (additional gastrointestinal malformations)] were compared, and outcomes were determined. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were identified with a median follow-up of 15.0 years (range 4-37). Ninety-four (87%) had SG, and 14 (13%) CG. Surgical interventions for GRCs were performed in 28 (26%) patients with 16 requiring multiple operations. Overall, 60 surgical procedures were performed. Bowel obstruction (n = 34) was the most common GRC, followed by anastomotic stricture (n = 8) and ischemic bowel (n = 3). The median interval between gastroschisis closure and secondary surgery for GRCs was 62.5 days (range 1 day-15 years). Surgical interventions were significantly more frequent in CG compared with SG [12/14 (86%) vs. 16/94 (17%); P < 0.0001]. The overall survival rate was 90%. Significantly, more patients required parenteral nutrition for more than 28 days [9/28 (32%) vs. 13/80 (16 %); P = 0.0468], longer median time to achieve full enteral feedings (87 vs. 33 days; P < 0.0001) and longer median hospital stay (117 vs. 54 days; P < 0.0001) compared with those not requiring additional surgery. CONCLUSION: GRCs requiring surgical interventions were more common in patients with CG, which were associated with delay in achieving full enteral feedings and prolonged hospital stay.
Authors: F Abdullah; M A Arnold; R Nabaweesi; A C Fischer; P M Colombani; K D Anderson; H Lau; D C Chang Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk; Gijsbert D Musters; David J Nijssen; Wouter J de Jonge; Ralph de Vries; L W Ernest van Heurn; Joep P M Derikx Journal: Innov Surg Sci Date: 2021-08-17
Authors: Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk; Gijsbert D Musters; David J Nijssen; Wouter J de Jonge; Ralph de Vries; L W Ernest van Heurn; Joep Pm Derikx Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 4.379