| Literature DB >> 35937271 |
Quynh Anh Tran1, Vu Thuy Huong Le1,2, Van Toan Ngo1,3, Thi Hoan Le1, Dung T Phung4, Jesse D Berman2, Huong Lien Thi Nguyen5.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the short-term effects of ambient temperature on hospital admissions due to respiratory diseases among Hanoi residents. We collected 34,653 hospital admissions for 365 days (November 1, 2017, to November 31, 2018) from two hospitals in Hanoi. A quasi-Poisson regression model with time series analysis was used to explore the temperature-health outcome relationship's overall pattern. The non-linear curve indicated the temperatures with the lowest risk range from 22 degrees (Celcius) to 25 degrees (Celcius). On average, cold temperatures showed a higher risk than hot temperatures across all genders and age groups. Hospital admissions risk was highest at 13 degrees (Celcius) (RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.26-1.54) for cold effects and at 33 degrees (Celcius) (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.39) for the hot effects. Temporal pattern analysis showed that the most effect on respiratory diseases occurred at a lag of 0 days for hot effect and at a lag of 1 day for cold effect. The risk of changing temperature among women and people over 5 years old was higher than other groups. Our results suggest that the risk of respiratory admissions was greatest when the temperature was low. Public health prevention programs should be enhanced to improve public awareness about the health risks of temperature changes, especially respiratory diseases risked by low temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: Hanoi; cold and hot effects; hospital admission; respiratory disease (RD); temperature
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35937271 PMCID: PMC9350518 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.903623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Summary statistics of daily hospital admissions counts and daily hospital admissions counts stratified by age and genders, and daily weather conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 95.16 (42.21) | 11 | 53 | 104 | 127 | 200 |
|
| ||||||
| >=5 | 34.27 (12.26) | 5 | 26 | 34 | 43 | 69 |
| <5 | 60.98 (33.55) | 3 | 23 | 71 | 87 | 139 |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 45.76 (21.71) | 6 | 26 | 49 | 64 | 104 |
| Male | 50.23 (21.98) | 6 | 30 | 54 | 65 | 113 |
|
| ||||||
| Mean temperature (°C) | 24.31 (5.37) | 10.70 | 20.73 | 25.02 | 28.41 | 35.85 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 67.49 (13.90) | 23.86 | 59.14 | 70.51 | 78.65 | 89.99 |
| PM2.5 (mg/m3) | 36.88 (7.91) | 23.91 | 30.89 | 35.36 | 41.69 | 64.08 |
| Ozone (mg/m3) | 5.61 (11.21) | 0.30 | 1.45 | 2.64 | 6.38 | 95.80 |
Figure 1Plot of overall relative risk (RR) between daily mean temperature and hospital admissions, and individual lag-response curves for hot and cold effects. Shaded areas denote 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Figure 2Plot of RR between daily mean temperature and hospital admissions and individual lag-response curves for hot and cold effects, stratified by genders. Shaded areas denote 95% CI.
Figure 3Plot of RR between daily mean temperature and hospital admissions and individual lag-response curves for hot and cold effects, stratified by age groups. Shaded areas denote 95% CI.