| Literature DB >> 35937003 |
Xinghui Xu1, Jin Yang2, Jun Li1, Deping Yao3, Pan Deng4, Boliang Chen1, Yifei Liu1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between fibular head height and the incidence and severity of osteoarthritis associated with varus knee deformity. The fibular head height, joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured in a three-dimensional model. Ordinal multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and K-L grade. A total of 232 patients (232 knees) were finally included in the study. There were significant differences in JLCA and hip-knee-ankle angle (P < 0.05), and both JLCA and hip-knee-ankle angle increased with severe aggravation of K-L grade. Both fibular head height and MPTA decreased as the K-L grade was severely aggravated. There was a significant negative correlation between K-L grade and fibular head height (r = -0.812, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fibular head height and hip-knee-ankle angle (r = -0.7905, P < 0.001). In addition to body mass index, fibular head height is a risk factor for the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis associated with varus knee deformity; the smaller the fibular head height, the more severe the degree of varus deformity.Entities:
Keywords: Kellgren–Lawrence grade; fibular head height; knee osteoarthritis; three-dimensional reconstruction; varus deformity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35937003 PMCID: PMC9307141 DOI: 10.1515/med-2022-0523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Med (Wars)
Figure 1Data measurement. (a) Fibular head height is the distance between the fibular head edge and the horizontal tangent through the lowest point of the lateral tibial plateau. (b) JLCA: the angle between the tangent through the lower edge of the medial and lateral femoral condyles and the tibial plateau plane. (c) MPTA: the medial angle between the tangent through the tibial plateau and the tibial mechanical axis. (d) Hip–knee–ankle angle: the angle between the extension line downward of the femoral mechanical axis (blue solid line) and the tibial mechanical axis (yellow solid line).
Comparison of the general data of patients in different groups
| Grouping | Cases | Gender (male/female) | Age (years) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 28 | 11/17 | 40.75 ± 5.73 | 160.07 ± 4.88 | 60.82 ± 3.76 | 23.79 ± 1.86 |
| Group B | 31 | 13/18 | 58.81 ± 5.58* | 160.45 ± 7.29 | 61.64 ± 6.08 | 24.09 ± 3.38 |
| Group C | 49 | 18/31 | 61.17 ± 6.43*# | 161.96 ± 6.48 | 62.15 ± 5.46 | 23.82 ± 2.96 |
| Group D | 53 | 20/33 | 62.17 ± 6.72*# | 161.57 ± 6.18 | 62.41 ± 6.47 | 24.01 ± 2.57 |
| Group E | 71 | 24/47 | 65.46 ± 7.12*#▲★ | 160.62 ± 6.08 | 65.47 ± 6.48*#▲★ | 25.45 ± 3.04*▲★ |
| Statistics | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 0.950 | 0.000 | 0.585 | 0.000 | 0.007 |
Note: *: There was significant difference compared with group A. #: There was significant difference compared with group B. ▲: There was significant difference compared with group C. ★: There was significant difference compared with group D.
Comparison of imaging measurement indicators between different groups
| Grouping | Cases | Fibular head height (mm) | JLCA (°) | MPTA (°) | Hip–knee–ankle angle (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 28 | 13.34 ± 1.61 | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 87.93 ± 1.05 | 1.86 ± 0.16 |
| Group B | 31 | 11.78 ± 1.34* | 0.88 ± 0.16* | 86.37 ± 1.67* | 3.16 ± 0.324* |
| Group C | 49 | 11.46 ± 1.27* | 1.73 ± 0.12*# | 86.21 ± 1.49* | 4.43 ± 0.67*# |
| Group D | 53 | 10.07 ± 1.20*#▲ | 3.46 ± 0.34*#▲ | 86.06 ± 1.70* | 5.49 ± 1.11*#▲ |
| Group E | 71 | 7.46 ± 1.24*#▲★ | 6.49 ± 0.86*#▲★ | 84.46 ± 1.07*#▲★ | 10.33 ± 1.08*#▲★ |
| Statistics | — |
|
|
|
|
|
| — | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Note: *: There was significant difference compared with group A. #: There was significant difference compared with group B. ▲: There was significant difference compared with group C. ★: There was significant difference compared with group D.
Figure 2Correlation between fibular head height and knee joint severity (a) and varus deformity (b).
Ordinal logistic regression with K–L grade as the dependent variable
| Parameters |
| S.E. | Wals |
| OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fibular head height | −1.078 | 0.110 | 95.645 | 0.000 | 0.745 | −1.294, −0.862 |
| Age | 0.318 | 0.038 | 68.741 | 0.053 | 1.134 | 0.243, 0.394 |
| Height | −0.524 | 0.174 | 9.042 | 0.432 | 1.045 | −0.865, −0.182 |
| Weight | 0.672 | 0.221 | 9.230 | 0.534 | 0.895 | 0.238, 1.105 |
| BMI | 0.325 | 0.565 | 8.795 | 0.019 | 1.246 | −2.781, −0.568 |
| Gender | −0.382 | 0.316 | 1.462 | 0.227 | 1.023 | −1.002,0.237 |
Note: β: regression coefficient, SE: standard error of regression coefficient, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
ROC curve analysis
| Parameters | Disease | Area |
| Progressive 95% CI | Cutoff value | Sensibility | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||||
| Fibular head height (mm) | (Ⅲ and IV) | 0.872 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 0.918 | 10.63 | 83.9% | 80.6% |
| Fibular head height (mm) | (IV) | 0.899 | 0.000 | 0.848 | 0.915 | 8.25 | 81.7% | 95.7% |
Figure 3ROC curve analysis, (a) K–L grade III and IV and (b) K–L grade IV.