Pakawat Chittratan1,2, Jongjit Chalitangkoon1,2, Karn Wongsariya3, Arjnarong Mathaweesansurn1,4, Ekarat Detsri1,5, Pathavuth Monvisade1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand. 2. Polymer Synthesis and Functional Materials Research Unit, School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand. 3. Department of Biology School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand. 4. Applied Analytical Chemistry Research Unit, School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand. 5. Integrated Applied Chemistry Research Unit, School of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Abstract
Chitosan-grafted thymol (CST) coated on gold nanoparticles has been synthesized and characterized for the design of antimicrobial materials. CST was synthesized via adapting the Mannich reaction, and it acted as the capping agent for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The grafting of thymol onto the side chain of chitosan has provided a degree of substitution value (%DSNMR) of 10.0%, calculated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. UV-visible spectrometry and elemental analysis were used to confirm the successful synthesis of CST through adapting the Mannich reaction. The appropriate concentration of CST for AuNP synthesis was found to be 0.020%w/v. A red-wine colloidal AuNP solution of 2.41-3.30 nM particle size exhibits a strong surface plasmon resonance at 502 nm, which shows negative charges at pH = 9 of -36.37 mV. This result evidenced that the AuNPs showed electrostatic repulsion and CST played a role as a capping agent to provide a good dispersion and stability state. CST coated on the AuNP surface was successfully utilized for the control of cariogenic bacteria in the oral cavity. The results obtained from this study show that the tuning of the capping agent used in the synthesis step strongly influences the latter antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 and Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 33402 activity, with an inhibition zone of 15.90 and 14.25 mm, respectively. The average minimum inhibitory concentration values against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402 were found to be 25 and 100 mg/L, respectively, whereas the minimum bactericidal concentration values were 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively.
Chitosan-grafted thymol (CST) coated on gold nanoparticles has been synthesized and characterized for the design of antimicrobial materials. CST was synthesized via adapting the Mannich reaction, and it acted as the capping agent for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The grafting of thymol onto the side chain of chitosan has provided a degree of substitution value (%DSNMR) of 10.0%, calculated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. UV-visible spectrometry and elemental analysis were used to confirm the successful synthesis of CST through adapting the Mannich reaction. The appropriate concentration of CST for AuNP synthesis was found to be 0.020%w/v. A red-wine colloidal AuNP solution of 2.41-3.30 nM particle size exhibits a strong surface plasmon resonance at 502 nm, which shows negative charges at pH = 9 of -36.37 mV. This result evidenced that the AuNPs showed electrostatic repulsion and CST played a role as a capping agent to provide a good dispersion and stability state. CST coated on the AuNP surface was successfully utilized for the control of cariogenic bacteria in the oral cavity. The results obtained from this study show that the tuning of the capping agent used in the synthesis step strongly influences the latter antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 and Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 33402 activity, with an inhibition zone of 15.90 and 14.25 mm, respectively. The average minimum inhibitory concentration values against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402 were found to be 25 and 100 mg/L, respectively, whereas the minimum bactericidal concentration values were 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively.
Some oral infections including
cavities, gingivitis, and periodontal
disease are common from childhood to adulthood. Cavities are one of
the most common oral infections caused by the bacteria Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus), one of the principal cariogenic dental
biofilm inhabitants that feeds on sugary, sticky foods, and beverages. S. mutans and S. sobrinus secrete glucosyltransferase on its cell wall, which allows the bacteria
to produce polysaccharides from sucrose. These sticky polysaccharides
are responsible for the bacteria’s ability to aggregate with
one another and adhere to tooth enamel.[1,2] To prevent
the oral infections, daily brushing, flossing, and the use of appropriate
mouthwash can significantly reduce the number of oral bacteria. Three
different types of clinically used and most frequently studied antiplaque
agents are sodium fluoride, ampicillin, and chlorhexidine.[1,3] However, some inherent issues of these antiplaque agents could not
be avoided such as brown staining of the teeth and tongue, an unpleasant
taste, enhanced supragingival calculus formation, and rarely painful
desquamations of the oral mucosa all of which have led to the search
for new formulations. Recently, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been
proposed as an antimicrobial agent to prevent the oral infections.[4−6] Most of the published work has mainly focused on the preparation
of AuNPs conjugated with antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, and
ligands[4,7−12] in order to enhance the antibacterial abilities. AuNPs with smaller
sizes have various benefits in antibiotic delivery such as regulating
size and morphology, high-density surface ligands, and delivery without
losing drugs which protects them from destruction. Darabpour et al.,[13] developed AuNPs using the chemical reduction
technique and immobilized methylene blue onto AuNP surface. The particle
sizes of AuNPs and zeta potential were found to be 85 nm and +32 mV,
respectively. AuNPs conjugated with methylene blue demonstrated important
photoinactivation across Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) biofilms. A reduction
of greater than 5log10 CFU was found. Singh et al.,[14] explored the aqueous extract of C. sativa to synthesized AuNPs without any additional
reducing and capping agents. The synthesized AuNPs were crystalline
with an average diameter of 12–18 nm and showed bactericidal
effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. Jiang and co-workers[15] fabricated AuNPs with 4,6-diamino-2-pyrimidinethiol
in order to kill Escherichia coli ATCC11775
(E. coli) with multidrug-resistance
Gram-negative bacteria efficiency to induce drug resistance to a much
smaller degree than conventional antibiotics.In this research,
we have performed synthesis and characterization
of chitosan-grafted thymol (CST) on the AuNP surface for antimicrobial
activities in the oral cavity. It is well known that chitosan[16−19] and thymol[20−22] are most frequently used for antimicrobial and antiplaque
agents. Chitosan has received much more attention as a chemical agent
for mouthwashes that provides clinical benefits for plaque control.
Chitosan is a linear polysaccharide composed of randomly distributed
β-linked D–glucosamine and N–acetyl–D–glucosamine.
The protonated amino groups upon chitosan chains interact with bacterium
cell walls negatively charged, disrupting them and providing microbial
death. Various methods have been tried to improve its antibacterial
activity either by a physical or chemical strategy. Chemical modification
requires introducing new groups onto the backbone by reacting with
hydroxyl or with amino groups such as saccharization, alkylation,
acylation, quaternization, and metallization.[23−27] These modifications bring chitosan a better antibacterial
activity and expand its application as well with S.
aureus and E. coli.
However, there are a few research studies on the effects of chitosan
derivatives against S. mutans and S. sobrinus especially for oral application. For
this reason, the objective was to designed chitosan modified with
thymol via adapting the Mannich reaction to enhance the antimicrobial
properties and use them as a capping agent for AuNP synthesis. Many
characterization techniques, such as UV–visible spectrometry,
X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), zeta
potential analyzer elemental analysis (EA), and 1H NMR,
were used to confirm the successful synthesis of CST and AuNPs. Finally,
CST coated on gold nanoparticles was applied as the antimicrobial
agent to control the growth of bacteria in oral application.
Experimental Section
Chemicals
High-molecular-weight chitosan
(320,000 Da) was purchased from Eland Co., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand).
The percentage of degree of deacetylation (%DD) of chitosan (CS) is
85%. Formaldehyde (HCHO: 37% w/w), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) were purchased form Carlo Erba (Italy). Thymol (C10H14O), gold(III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Germany. All chemicals are of
analytical reagent grade (AR grade) and used without further purification.
Ultrapure deionized water (Milli–Q ultrapure water) with a
resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm at 25 °C was used for preparing
all chemical solutions.
Preparation of CST
CST was synthesized
by a well-described method through the Mannich reaction adapted from
our previous research.[28] The preparation
steps can be summarized as follows: chitosan (1 g) was dissolved in
100 mL of 1% w/v acetic acid solution under vigorous stirring. Then,
0.7932 g of thymol dissolved in 10 mL of dimethylformamide and 0.2147
g of formaldehyde were slowly dropped into chitosan solution and stirred
at 60 °C for 24 h. After that, 0.5 M of fresh NaOH solution was
added into the solution mixture for precipitation. The mixture was
then filtered using filter paper and washed with ethanol and distilled
water. The precipitate was dried at 60 °C to obtain a CST product.The structural characterization of CST was performed by 1H NMR, EA, and UV–vis spectroscopy techniques. The UV–vis
spectra were scanned from 200–800 nm using a BlueStar B spectrophotometer
(Lab Tech, China). The 1H NMR spectra were determined using
a JNM-ECZ-500R/S1 spectrometer (JEOL, Japan) at 500 MHz. D2O/CF3COOH was used to dissolve CST. The degree of substitution
(%DS) determination of CST was calculated using 1H NMR
and EA followed eqs and 2, respectively.where %DS is the degree of
substitution percentage, and Hf and H2 are the
integral areas of protons indicated in Figure .where %DSEA is
the degree of substitution percentage obtained from EA data; (C/N)D is the carbon to nitrogen mass ratios of the chitosan derivative;
and (C/N)O is the carbon to nitrogen mass ratios of the
original chitosan.
Figure 1
1H NMR spectra of (a) chitosan and (b) CST
in CF3COOH/D2O.
1H NMR spectra of (a) chitosan and (b) CST
in CF3COOH/D2O.
Synthesis of CST Coated on Gold Nanoparticles
AuNPs were synthesized by chemical reduction using CST and NaBH4 as the capping and reducing agents, respectively. Briefly,
10 mL of 10 mM HAuCl4·3H20 was mixed with
0.1% w/v of CST. Then, an aliquot of 0.5 mL NaBH4 (50 mmol/L)
was rapidly added to a solution mixture under stirring for 10 min
at 25 °C. The color of the solution was changed rapidly from
light yellow to red-wine immediately. The stirring process was continued
for 30 min to complete reduction and homogenization. Finally, the
dark red solution of CST–AuNPs with pH 9.0 was obtained. The
synthesized solution was purified with a dialysis tube and stored
at 4 °C in a refrigerator for 24 h before further use.To estimate the concentration of CST–AuNPs, the stock colloidal
CST–AuNP solution was diluted three times using ultrapure water,
and the absorbance intensity was measured at λmax = 502 nm using UV–vis spectrometry. The concentration of
CST–AuNPs was 3.637 nanomolar [nM] calculated using Beer’s
law according to the extinction coefficient on particle diameter (ε
= 7.19 × 109 M–1 cm–1 for the particle size of CST–AuNPs = 2.41 nm). For references,
the extinction coefficient for CST–AuNPs is calculated using
the following equation of ln ε = 1.4418 lnD + 18.955 and D is the diameter in nanometer (nm).[29]
Characterization
Ultraviolet–visible
(UV–vis) absorption spectra of AuNPs were measured using a
double-beam UV1800 (Shimadzu, China) spectrophotometer with a 1 cm
path length quartz cuvette. All the measurements were repeated at
least three times. The morphology, particle size, and distribution
of AuNPs were photographed using a transmission electron microscope
(TEM, JEM–2010 model, JEOL Co., Ltd. Japan) at an accelerating
voltage of 200 kV. Zeta potential of NPs was measured using a Nano
ZS–Malvern instrument, England with a 633 nm helium–neon
laser. An X-ray diffractometer was used to analyze the crystallographic
structure of the NPs. The XRD patterns were recorded over a 2θ
(Smartlab SE diffractometer, RIGAKU, Japan). pH of the synthesized
solution was adjusted using a benchtop pH meter (Mettler)
Antimicrobial Assay
The antimicrobial
activity of chitosan, CST, and CST–AuNPs against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402 was evaluated by the agar well diffusion method and macrodilution
method.
Agar Well Diffusion Assay
The 104 CFU/mL of inoculum was swapped onto Mueller–Hinton
agar plates; afterward, a well with a size of 5 mm was cut in the
agar plate. Each well was aseptically filled up with 20 μL of
(a) Control: prepared by mixing 1% v/v CH3COOH with 4%
w/v of Tween80, (b) Chitosan: prepared by dissolving 1% w/v of chitosan
pH 4.5 in control solution), (c) CST: prepared by dissolving 1% w/v
of CST pH 4.5 in control solution, and (d) CST–AuNPs: prepared
by dissolving pH 9.0 of AuNPs coated with CST0.020%w/v mixed
with 4% w/v of Tween80. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for
24 h. 4% of Tween 80 was introduced as controls. The diameter of the
inhibition zone around each well was measured and expressed in the
mean diameter of the inhibition zone in millimeters (n = 3).
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and
Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) Assay
MIC and MBC
values were determined by broth macrodilution assay. Colonies of the
same morphological type were selected and transferred to 0.85% w/v
of sterile saline. To achieve the turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard,
inoculum was diluted with Brain Heart Infusion broth 1:200 (approximately
5 × 105 CFU/mL). Each stock as-synthesized chitosan,
CST, and CST–AuNPs were dissolved in 4% w/v of tween 80 with
the final concentration ranging from 0.40 to 200 mg/L. Then, 50 μL
of adjusted S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402 were added into each tube.
After that, the samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C for
24 h. MICs and MBCs were evaluated by no visible growth of bacteria
and lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent that kills 99.9%
of the initial bacterial population method, respectively.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of CST
To graft thymol onto the chitosan side chain, the Mannich reaction
was used in the experimental step. An amino group of chitosan can
react with formaldehyde to form an electrophile imine compound (−N=CH2) and then react with attached by introducing at the para
position of the phenol group to yield secondary amines or benzylamine.
Thus, chitosan could be grafted with thymol through the carbene bridge.
The synthesis pathway of CST is shown in Scheme a. The product was structurally characterized
by 1H NMR as shown in Figure . The chitosan spectra showed characteristic
peaks at 1.86 and 2.97 ppm assigned to H7 and H2, respectively. The peaks at 3.25–4.02 ppm were assigned to
H3–H6 and H2’–H6’. In terms of CST, it showed a characteristic peak
of chitosan and found new peaks at 1.00 and 2.15 ppm which correspond
to protons of the methyl group of thymol (Hf and Hb), respectively. Moreover, the doublet peaks around 6.74 and
7.10 ppm of aromatic protons of thymol (Hc and Hd) were also observed, respectively. Thus, it was indicated that thymol
was successfully grafted onto chitosan through the Mannich reaction.
The degree of substitution of CST was 10.0%, as calculated from the 1H NMR data. For EA results, the C/N ratio of CST was higher
than that of chitosan, indicating that additional carbon atoms existed
after the reaction. The data also revealed that the degree of substitution
value (%DSEA) was 9.2% (Table S1, Supporting Information).
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of the Synthesis
of (a) CST and (b) CST Coated
on the Gold Nanoparticle Surface
The UV–vis spectra of chitosan, CST,
thymol, and chitosan
mixed thymol are displayed in Figure . It was found that the chitosan spectrum did not show
any peak ranging from 250 to 350 nm while CST spectra exhibited broad
peaks at 281 nm corresponding to the aromatic structure of thymol.
Comparison with the spectra of chitosan mixed thymol which showed
absorption peaks at 276 and 282 nm, corresponding to the characteristic
peak of thymol, the CST spectra showed a red shift phenomenon implying
chemical modification on thymol molecules.[30] The results suggested that thymol was grafted onto the chitosan
backbone.
Figure 2
UV–vis spectra of CST, chitosan, thymol, and chitosan mixed
with 0.05% w/v thymol in 0.1 M HCl solution.
UV–vis spectra of CST, chitosan, thymol, and chitosan mixed
with 0.05% w/v thymol in 0.1 M HCl solution.
Synthesis and Characterization of CST Coated
on the Gold Nanoparticle Surface
Our main motivation in this
work was to produce AuNPs using CST as the capping agent. The capping
agent is needed to prevent the growth of the nanoparticles (NPs).
This process occurs during the formation of the NPs when a capping
agent adsorbs at the NP surface. In the present case, CST-modified
AuNPs were synthesized according to a very simple and rapid chemical
method as shown in Scheme b. The synthesis of AuNPs with CST can be achieved through
chemical reduction with NaBH4 as a reducing agent. Au3+ ions were reduced to Au0 in the presence of CST
as a capping agent obtaining stable AuNPs. A zeta potential analyzer
has been used to clarify the stability of NPs. Zeta potential analysis
(Figure S1, Supporting Information) demonstrated
that the as-synthesized CST–AuNPs had negative potential (pH
= 9), which can prevent nanoparticle–nanoparticle aggregation
and be dispersed from each other in the aqueous phase.To study
the influence of CST concentration for AuNP synthesis, four different
CST concentrations of 0.006, 0.008, 0.010, and 0.020% w/v were used
for investigation. The visual observation and absorption characteristics
of various concentrations of AuNPs stabilized with CST are shown in Figure . The AuNPs formed
in the solution, through nucleation growth, displayed a characteristic
of vivid blue to dark red color when the concentration of CST increased
from 0.006–0.020% w/v. Indeed, when the concentration of CST
increased from 0.006–0.020%, the absorption spectra shifted
to blue-shift due to the surface plasmon resonance phenomenon. The
extinction spectrum of CST0.020%w/v – AuNPs exhibited
a single peak around 502 nm with the zeta potential at pH 9 of −33.8
mV.
Figure 3
Visual observation and absorption spectra of CST coated on gold
nanoparticles with various concentrations of CST (a) 0.006%w/v, (b)
0.008%w/v, (c) 0.010%w/v, and (d) 0.020%w/v and CST as the control
on the synthesis step.
Visual observation and absorption spectra of CST coated on gold
nanoparticles with various concentrations of CST (a) 0.006%w/v, (b)
0.008%w/v, (c) 0.010%w/v, and (d) 0.020%w/v and CST as the control
on the synthesis step.To further confirm the successful formation of
CST–AuNPs,
XRD measurements were carried out in order to identify the crystallinity
structure of the NPs, and corresponding XRD patterns are shown in Figure . CST–AuNPs
exhibited four distinct peaks corresponding to standard Bragg reflections.
The 2θ (Bragg reflections) values are 38.1(111), 44.3(200),
64.5(220), and 77.7(311) of the face centered cubic (FCC) lattice.
The potent diffraction at 38.1 peak shows that the preferred growth
orientation of zero valent gold was fixed in the (111) direction.[31] These experimental observations clearly demonstrate
that AuNP capping with CST was found to be in agreement with the literature
report.[8]
Figure 4
XRD pattern of (a) chitosan, (b) CST,
(c) CST coated on gold nanoparticles,
and (d) thymol.
XRD pattern of (a) chitosan, (b) CST,
(c) CST coated on gold nanoparticles,
and (d) thymol.To examine the size and particle morphology, TEM
analysis was performed.
As shown in Figure , the effect of CST concentration onto the preparation of AuNPs has
been studied. The concentration of HAuCl4·3H2O was kept constant at 1 mM in the synthesis step, and different
batches were prepared with CST concentration increasing from 0.006
to 0.02% w/v. The TEM images show that AuNPs are nanosize in shape
and well dispersed in aqueous media. The particle size of AuNP capping
with different CST concentrations from 0.006 to 0.02% w/v was found
in the range of 1.50–5.10 nm. The particle size of CST–AuNPs
was found to be not statistically significant different. The appropriate
concentration of CST for AuNP synthesis was found at 0.020%w/v showing
a particle size of 2.41–3.30 nM. This observation suggested
that CST played a role as a stabilizing agent to provide a good dispersion
state of the AuNPs.
Figure 5
TEM images and size distribution of CST coated on gold
nanoparticles
at a CST concentration of (a) 0.006% w/v, (b) 0.008% w/v, (c) 0.01%
w/v, and (d) 0.02% w/v.
TEM images and size distribution of CST coated on gold
nanoparticles
at a CST concentration of (a) 0.006% w/v, (b) 0.008% w/v, (c) 0.01%
w/v, and (d) 0.02% w/v.
Stability of CST Coated on the Gold Nanoparticle
Surface
The stability of CST–AuNPs under various conditions
was also investigated. The results are shown in Figure . It is well known that chitosan was soluble
under acid conditions due to the protonation of amino groups on the
chitosan backbone. The derivatives of CST could be dissolved under
acid conditions at about pH < 5. The pH values of the CST would
affect the interaction of AuNPs conjugated with CST. Therefore, it
was necessary to investigate the effect of pH values on the stability
of CST–AuNPs. Figure a shows the UV–visible absorbance at λmax of 502 nm of CST–AuNPs when varying pH from 3–11.
CST–AuNPs could be dispersed in pH less than 5 and higher than
7 whereas the precipitation occurred at pH 7. As a result of the addition
of NaBH4, the pH solution was 9, and the solution was well
dispersed, as reported in several studies.[32,33] Adjusting pH to basic range seemed to have no effect on their stability.
When the pH was changed to acidity (pH 7), however, all particles
precipitated. This could be because the electrostatic repulsion of
negatively charged BO3– has been destroyed, and
deprotonated CST has no charge (zeta potential value near zero), causing
AuNPs to precipitate. In a more acidic solution (pH 3), the amino
groups of CST were protonated, making it more positively charged (corresponding
to a higher zeta potential value) and causing AuNPs to have good dispersion.
Figure 6
Effect
of (a) pH, (b) ionic strength, and (c) time on the stability
of CST coated on gold nanoparticles.
Effect
of (a) pH, (b) ionic strength, and (c) time on the stability
of CST coated on gold nanoparticles.Another important parameter for the stability of
CST–AuNPs
is ionic strength. The stability of CST–AuNPs as a function
of salt concentration and salt type such as NaCl, Na2SO4, and Na3PO4 was investigated (Figure b). At low salt concentration,
CST–AuNPs showed higher stability more than that at high concentration.
The monovalent (Cl–) and divalent (SO42–) showed the slow precipitation of CST–AuNPs,
while for trivalent (PO43–), the CST–AuNP
colloid tends to precipitate the fastest. The precipitation could
be attributed to the lower of the electrostatic repulsion between
CST and AuNPs and thus lead to the aggregation and sedimentation of
AuNPs.Figure c showed
the effect of time onto the stability of CST–AuNPs. CST–AuNPs
with pH 9 can be more stable more than 3 months.The antibacterial
activity of CST–AuNPs was assessed by the agar well diffusion
method. The results are shown in Figure . The CST–AuNPs showed good antibacterial
activity against almost all pathogenic bacteria. The tuning of the
capping agent used in the synthesis step strongly influences latter
antimicrobial activity of the NPs against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402,
with an inhibition clear zone of 15.90 and 14.25 mm against S. mutans and S. sobrinus, respectively. Indicated AuNPs show antibacterial properties when
CST binds with the AuNP surface.
Figure 7
Bacterial inhibition photographs of chitosan,
CST, and CST coated
on gold nanoparticles and control against using the agar well diffusion
method (a) S. mutans and (b) S. sobrinus.
Bacterial inhibition photographs of chitosan,
CST, and CST coated
on gold nanoparticles and control against using the agar well diffusion
method (a) S. mutans and (b) S. sobrinus.
MIC and MBC Assay
The antibacterial
activity of chitosan, CST, and CST–AuNPs against the bacterial
strains was assessed by MIC and MBC. MIC and MBC values for CS, CST,
and CST–AuNPs against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402
are shown in Table . The MICs and MBCs of CST–AuNPs against S.
mutans ATCC 25175 were found to be 25 and 100 mg/L,
respectively, while S. sobrinus ATCC
33402 was found to have an MIC and MBC of 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively.
The report indicated that CST–AuNPs exhibited antibacterial
activity against both bacterial species. Therefore, the modification
of thymol into the backbone of chitosan was considered essential for
antimicrobial activity enhancement.
Table 1
MICs and MBCs of Chitosan, CST, and
CST Coated on Gold Nanoparticles against S. mutans and S. sobrinus
synthesis materials
S.mutans ATCC 25175
S. sobrinus ATCC 33402
MIC (mg/L)
MBC (mg/L)
MIC (mg/L)
MBC (mg/L)
chitosan
100
100
100
100
CST
50
50
50
50
CST–AuNPs
25
100
100
200
Metallic nanoparticles have been widely studied and
applied as
an effective antibacterial agent. The antibacterial properties of
modified metallic nanoparticles in the previous study are shown in Table . According to our
proposed method, CST–AuNPs can be deemed to have potential
with strong antimicrobial activity. CST coated on the AuNP surface
can thus be employed as an antibacterial agent in a variety of biological
applications.
Table 2
Comparison of Antibacterial Properties
of Metallic Nanoparticles
method
microorganism
inhibition
zone (mm)
MIC (mg/L)
MBC (mg/L)
ref.
peptide (extracted from Vespa orientalis waspvenom) −AuNPs
S. mutans
14.71
18.78
32
(34)
chitosan gel –
AuNPs
S. mutans
8.56
(35)
lycopene
– AgNPs
S. aureus
12
(36)
S. mutans
12
Aspergillus terreus IF0
– AuNPs
E. coli
13
(37)
S. mutans
Not Active
CST–AuNPs
S. mutans ATCC 25175
15.90
25
100
Present work
S. sobrinus ATCC 33402
14.25
100
200
Conclusions
A novel control of cariogenic
bacteria in the oral cavity was made
from a simple chemical reduction method using CST coated on the AuNP
surface. The grafting of thymol onto the chitosan backbone was synthesized
through adapting the Mannich reaction which provided degree of substitution
values (%DSNMR) of 10.0%. Excellent properties of CST are
very effective in stabilization of AuNPs. The electrostatic properties
of CST were used to primarily provide the stabilization of the AuNPs
by electrostatic repulsion. The particles of AuNPs were found to be
well dispersed and mostly spherical in shape with an average particle
size of 2.41–3.30 nm. The presence of AuNPs with CST enhanced
bactericidal activity against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sobrinus ATCC 33402.
This CST coated on the AuNP surface potentially constitutes an important
new weapon in the fight of cariogenic bacteria-related infection.
Authors: Luis E Chávez de Paz; Anton Resin; Kenneth A Howard; Duncan S Sutherland; Peter L Wejse Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Antonio Franconetti; Jose M Carnerero; Rafael Prado-Gotor; Francisca Cabrera-Escribano; Carlos Jaime Journal: Carbohydr Polym Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 9.381
Authors: Munusamy Chamundeeswari; S S Liji Sobhana; Justin P Jacob; M Ganesh Kumar; M Pandima Devi; Thotapalli P Sastry; Asit B Mandal Journal: Biotechnol Appl Biochem Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Paulina Abrica-González; José Alberto Zamora-Justo; Antonio Sotelo-López; Guillermo Rocael Vázquez-Martínez; José Abraham Balderas-López; Alejandro Muñoz-Diosdado; Miguel Ibáñez-Hernández Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.703