| Literature DB >> 35936420 |
Lili Wang1, Yuanshun Xu1, Zehua Zhao1, Dapeng Zhang1, Xiaochen Lin1, Bing Ma1, Houhu Zhang1.
Abstract
As a resource treatment method, pyrolysis realizes the recovery of oil and immobilization of heavy metals in oily sludge (OS). The results showed that the composition of OS had little effect on the trend of the whole pyrolysis process, but it had different effects on the mass loss and maximum weight loss rate at each pyrolysis stage. SEM-EDS results showed that the pyrolysis residue had a porous internal structure, which was similar to that of activated carbon. The elements S, Ca, O, Fe, Al, and Si were embedded in the carbon skeleton. After OS pyrolysis, the oil content of the solid residue was far less than 2%, which met the pollution control requirements for comprehensive utilization specified in China's oil and gas industry standard. At the same time, the ratio of exchangeable fraction decreased and the ratio of residual fraction increased after OS pyrolysis. The potential ecological hazard coefficient (E r) of Cd in OS2, OS2-500, and OS2-600 was greater than 40, which were strong and medium hazards. The E r values of OS2-700 and other metals were far lower than 40, which were low hazards. With the increase of pyrolysis temperature, the comprehensive ecological hazard index (RI) of heavy metals in the residue gradually decreased and the RI value of OS2-700 decreased to 28.01. Therefore, the pyrolysis residue had an internal porous structure and controllable environmental risk. It could be used as an adsorption material for heavy metals to realize the comprehensive utilization of OS.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936420 PMCID: PMC9352164 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Basic Characteristics of Oily Sludge Samples Adopted in This Paper
Explanation of Tessier 5-Step Sequential Extraction
| heavy metal speciation | extractant | operating conditions |
|---|---|---|
| exchangeable fraction | 8 mL of 1.0 M MgCl2 (pH = 7.0) | shake at 25 ± 1 °C for 1 h |
| carbonate fraction | 8 mL of 1.0 M NaAc (pH = 5.0) | shake at 25 ± 1 °C for 5 h |
| Fe–Mn oxide fraction | 20 mL of 0.04 M NH2·OH·HCl in 25% (v/v) HAc | shake at 96 ± 3 °C for 6 h |
| 3 mL of 0.02 M HNO3, 5 mL of 30% (v/v) H2O2 (pH = 2.0) | shake at 85 ± 2 °C for 2 h | |
| organic matter bound fraction | 3 mL of 30% H2O2 (pH = 2) | shake at 85 ± 2 °C for 3 h |
| 5 mL of 3.2 M NH4Ac, add 20% (v/v) HNO3 and dilute to 20 mL | shake at 25 ± 1 °C for 30 min | |
| residual fraction | aqua regia | ISO specification (11466) |
Chemical Characteristics of the Oily Sludge
| proximate
analysis | ultimate
analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | moisture | volatile | ash | fixed carbon | C | H | N | S | oil content (%) | LHV |
| OS1 | 16.37 | 11.80 | 71.60 | 0.23 | 4.87 | 0.94 | 0.09 | 2.72 | 8.56 | 3.47 |
| OS2 | 18.99 | 13.93 | 66.27 | 0.81 | 7.43 | 1.59 | 0.11 | 0.70 | 10.5 | 4.26 |
| OS3 | 2.26 | 6.27 | 88.60 | 2.87 | 5.60 | 1.09 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 6.43 | 2.61 |
Receive basis.
Lower heating value.
Calculated by difference.
Elemental Analysis of Oily Sludge Detected by XRF (on Dry Basis)
| content
(%) | content
(%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| element | OS1 | OS2 | OS3 | element | OS1 | OS2 | OS3 |
| Si | 15.78 | 16.03 | 25.23 | Sr | 0.103 | 0.0449 | 0.0452 |
| Ca | 9.03 | 7.77 | 2.78 | P | 0.0524 | 0.0945 | 0.0771 |
| Al | 5.30 | 5.87 | 7.37 | Cr | 0.0107 | 0.0047 | 0.0043 |
| Fe | 4.14 | 3.33 | 2.98 | Cu | 0.0125 | 0.0048 | 0.0039 |
| S | 2.02 | 1.05 | 0.939 | W | 0.0099 | 0.0351 | |
| Mg | 1.93 | 1.22 | 1.21 | Zr | 0.0093 | 0.0090 | 0.0176 |
| Na | 1.93 | 1.20 | 1.26 | I | 0.0119 | ||
| Cl | 2.69 | 0.433 | 0.303 | Ni | 0.0075 | 0.0062 | 0.0043 |
| Ba | 2.41 | 0.432 | 0.0881 | V | 0.0053 | 0.0134 | 0.0086 |
| K | 1.70 | 1.44 | 2.17 | Pb | 0.0078 | ||
| Ti | 0.245 | 0.285 | 0.446 | Rb | 0.0038 | 0.0062 | |
| Mn | 0.171 | 0.0766 | 0.0535 | Ga | 0.0033 | ||
| Zn | 0.154 | 0.778 | 0.0100 | ||||
Figure 1TG analysis curves of the oily sludge. (a) TG curves; (b) DTG curves.
Figure 2Appearance and SEM–EDS images of oily sludge before and after pyrolysis. (a,c,e) OS2; (b,d,f) solid residue after OS2 pyrolysis.
Oil Content of Oily Sludge and Solid Residue
| oily sludge | oil content (%) | solid residue | oil content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS1 | 8.56 | OS1-500 | 0.1270 |
| OS1-600 | 0.0870 | ||
| OS1-700 | 0.0587 | ||
| OS2 | 10.5 | OS2-500 | 0.0850 |
| OS2-600 | 0.0839 | ||
| OS2-700 | 0.0674 | ||
| OS3 | 6.43 | OS3-500 | 0.0697 |
| OS3-600 | 0.0530 | ||
| OS3-700 | 0.0468 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra of oily sludge (a) and solid residue (b) at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 4Fraction distribution of heavy metals in oily sludge and solid residue at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Heavy Metals in Oily Sludge and Pyrolysis Residue
| concentration of heavy metals in oily sludge and pyrolysis residue (mg/kg) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | Cu | Zn | Pb | Ni | Cr | Cd | Hg | As |
| OS2 | 29.2 | 7140 | 13.4 | 49.9 | 44.3 | 58.2 | 0.516 | 17.6 |
| OS2-500 | 31.3 | 4850 | 17.9 | 50.0 | 47.4 | 42.9 | 0.197 | 12.4 |
| OS2-600 | 36.4 | 7210 | 18.1 | 68.6 | 54.8 | 55.3 | 0.131 | 21.1 |
| OS2-700 | 37.7 | 7990 | 19.4 | 55.5 | 52.7 | 14.5 | 0.072 | 12.7 |
| CJ/T 362-2011 | 1500 | 3000 | 1000 | 200 | 1000 | 20 | 15 | 75 |