Literature DB >> 35936065

Serum Endocan Levels and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney and End-Stage Renal Diseases.

Fatma M El-Senosy1, Rasha Elsayed Mohamed Abd El Aziz2, Sammar Ahmed Kasim1, Lamia Abdulbary Gad3, Donia Ahmed Hassan3, Seham Sabry1, Ismail Mohamed El Mancy4, Taiseer Ahmed Shawky4, Ibrahim Ghounim Ramadan Mohamed4, Rady Elmonier4, Essam Kotb5, Abeer Mohammed Abdul-Mohymen3.   

Abstract

Results: HD and CKD groups had significantly higher endocan levels when compared with control group (median (IQR): 519.0 (202.3-742.0) versus 409.0 (245.3-505.3) and 273.0 (168.0-395.5) ng/L, respectively). Also, HD patients had significantly higher endocan levels when compared with CKD levels. HD patients had significantly higher carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) when compared with CKD patients (median (IQR): 0.80 (0.80-0.90) versus 0.75 (0.73-0.75) mm, p < 0.001). HD patients had significantly higher frequency of SCA when compared with CKD patients (46.7% versus 13.3%, p=0.005). Patients with SCA had significantly higher hsCRP (median (IQR): 36.5 (26.8-43.5) versus 24.0 (15.8-29.0) mg/dl) and endocan levels (697.0 (528.3-974.8) versus 222.5 (158.8-565.8) ng/L) when compared with patients without SCA. ROC curve analysis of endocan for identification of SCA in HD patients showed that at a cutoff of 380.5 ng/L, endocan has an AUC of 0.862 with a sensitivity and specificity of 92.9% and 68.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Serum endocan levels are related to SCA in HD patients. In addition, it is associated with the hyperinflammatory state in those patients.
Copyright © 2022 Fatma M. El-Senosy et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35936065      PMCID: PMC9300358          DOI: 10.1155/2022/4524637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   3.149


1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its final stage: end-stage renal disease (ESRD), are common clinical conditions [1, 2]. CKD may be complicated by mineral and bone disorders, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and other complications [3]. Cardiovascular complications include coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive cardiac failure, and sudden arrest [4]. Atherosclerosis is one of the known cardiovascular complications in these patients [5]. Identification of subclinical atherosclerosis (SCA) in those patients is essential for prediction of forthcoming CVD [6]. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) provides a non-invasive measurement of the intima and media thickening in carotid arteries as an early indicator of systemic atherosclerosis. It is correlated with CHD and stroke in the ESRD patients [7]. Early atherogenesis is associated with endothelial dysfunction [8]. Endocan is a human endothelial cell-specific molecule produced by endothelial cells. Its production is related to activation of endothelium and angiogenesis [9]. Elevation of serum endocan was previously linked to SCA in type 2 diabetic patients [10], systemic lupus erythematosus [11], and psoriasis [12]. In this study, we assessed the relation between serum endocan levels and SCA in CKD and HD patients.

2. Subjects and Methods

The present case control study was conducted at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, from December 2020 to September 2021. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine, and all included subjects provided informed consent before enrollment in the study. The study included 30 patients on regular HD for at least 6 months, 30 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosed according to National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines, and 30 age and sex-matched healthy controls. Patients were excluded if they had other causes of chronic inflammation, active malignancies, acute and chronic infection, kidney transplantation, or other cardiovascular diseases. All participants were subjected to careful history taking and thorough clinical examination. For laboratory assessment, 4 ml of peripheral venous blood was withdrawn from each individual and divided into two aliquots; 2 ml was collected in an EDTA tube for CBC. The remaining part was collected in serum separator tube, centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min and divided into two parts; the first part was used for biochemical tests and for measurement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the remaining part of the serum was frozen at −20°C for analysis of endocan. Laboratory investigations included complete blood count, kidney functions, and serum cholesterol, triglycerides, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and PTH levels. Determination of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was performed by commercial solid-phase immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (DRG International Inc., Springfield, New Jersey, USA). Measurement of serum endocan was performed using quantitative double-antibody sandwich ELISA kit (Bioassay Technology Laboratory, China, Cat. No. E3160Hu). CIMT measurement was done using B-mode ultrasound with a high definition L12-5 linear wideband probe (Philips HDI 5000, Bothell, Washington, USA). Patients were categorized to have SCA if their CIMT measurement was ≥0.9 mm [13]. Data were computerized and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Quantitative data were described using mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) and were compared using t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, or Kruskal–Wallis test as appropriate. Qualitative data were presented in numbers and percentages and were compared using Fisher's exact test or chi-square test as appropriate. Correlation analysis was achieved using Spearman's correlation coefficient. p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify diagnostic value of the investigated marker. p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The present study included 30 patients under HD, 30 CKD patients, and 30 age and sex-matched healthy controls. HD and CKD groups had significantly higher endocan levels when compared with control group (median (IQR): 519.0 (202.3–742.0) versus 409.0 (245.3–505.3) and 273.0 (168.0–395.5) ng/L, respectively). Also, HD patients had significantly higher endocan levels when compared with CKD levels (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1

Clinical and laboratory data in the studied groups.

HD N = 30CKD N = 30 p value
Age (years) mean ± SD55.5 ± 11.656.9 ± 10.50.62
Male/female n20/1016/140.43
Cause of renal impairment n (%)
HTN22 (90.0)19 (63.3)0.41
DM13 (43.3)15 (50.0)0.61
PKD1 (3.3)0.31
Unknown1 (3.3)0.31
BMI (kg/m2) mean ± SD28.4 ± 2.627.9 ± 3.70.52
Laboratory findings mean±SD/median (IQR)
Urea (mg/dl)163.5 (136.3–193.5)118.5 (85.3–160.8) 0.005
Creatinine (mg/dl)9.8 (7.9–10.8)3.2 (2.2–4.8) <0.001
Ca (mg/dl)8.9 ± 1.08.5 ± 1.30.19
Po4 (mg/dl)4.9 ± 1.85.5 ± 1.60.19
Albumin (mg/dl)3.4 ± 0.74.1 ± 0.3 <0.001
PTH (pg/ml)538.0 (342.3–654.8)110.0 (50.0–170.0)0.052
Cholesterol (mg/dl)193.3 ± 43.6174.1 ± 52.40.13
Triglycerides (mg/dl)175.2 ± 75.1157.3 ± 73.40.36
WBCs (×103/ml)6.5 ± 2.47.6 ± 2.50.1
Hb (gm/dl)10.8 ± 1.510.4 ± 1.50.38
Platelets (×103/ml)205.2 ± 76.0272.7 ± 86.5 0.002
Uric acid (mg/dl)7.8 ± 1.56.2 ± 1.8 0.001
hsCRP (mg/dl)28.5 (21.8–39.5)15.0 (9.8–20.3) <0.001
CIMT mm0.80 (0.80–0.90)0.75 (0.73–0.75) <0.001
SCA n (%)14 (46.7)4 (13.3) 0.005
Endocan (ng/L)519.0 (202.3–742.0)409.0 (245.3–505.3) 0.014

BMI: body mass index, CIMT: carotid intima-media thickness, DM: diabetes mellitus, Hb: hemoglobin, hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, HTN: hypertension, PTH: parathyroid hormone, SCA: subclinical atherosclerosis, and WBCs: white blood cells. The values in italics are significant results.

Figure 1

Serum endocan levels in the studied groups.

Comparison between HD and CKD patients revealed significantly higher hsCRP levels in HD patients (median (IQR): 28.5 (21.8–39.5) versus 15.0 (9.8–20.3) mg/dl, p < 0.001). In addition, it was found that HD patients had significantly higher CIMT when compared with CKD patients (median (IQR): 0.80 (0.80–0.90) versus 0.75 (0.73–0.75) mm, p < 0.001). HD patients had significantly higher frequency of SCA when compared with CKD patients (46.7% versus 13.3%, p=0.005) (Table 1). Comparison between HD patients with SCA and patients without showed that patients with SCA had significantly higher hsCRP (median (IQR): 36.5 (26.8–43.5) versus 24.0 (15.8–29.0) mg/dl) and endocan levels (697.0 (528.3–974.8) versus 222.5 (158.8–565.8) ng/L) when compared with patients without SCA (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison between HD patients with and without SCA regarding clinical and laboratory data.

SCA + ve n = 14SCA −ve n = 16 p value
Age (years) mean ± SD60.8 ± 6.650.9 ± 13.2 0.017
Male/female n11/39/70.2

Cause of renal impairment n (%)
HTN12 (85.7)10 (62.5)0.15
DM7 (50.0)6 (37.5)0.49
PKD1 (6.3)0.34
Unknown1 (7.1)0.28
BMI (kg/m2) mean ± SD28.1 ± 2.328.7 ± 2.80.57

Laboratory findings mean±SD/median (IQR)
Urea (mg/dl)165.0 (102.5–184.8)162.0 (141.0–202.5)0.58
Creatinine (mg/dl)10.2 (7.3–11.0)9.8 (8.2–10.7)0.73
Ca (mg/dl)9.4 ± 0.98.6 ± 1.0 0.022
Po4 (mg/dl)4.1 ± 2.05.6 ± 1.5 0.029
Albumin (mg/dl)3.6 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.70.24
PTH (pg/ml)614.5 (571.5–752.5)384.5 (206.5–507.3) 0.01
Cholesterol (mg/dl)202.9 ± 52.1184.9 ± 34.10.27
Triglycerides (mg/dl)187.1 ± 77.7164.8 ± 73.70.43
WBCs (×103/ml)6.1 ± 1.86.9 ± 2.80.35
Hb (gm/dl)10.6 ± 1.510.9 ± 1.50.5
Platelets (×103/ml)219.3 ± 95.2193.0 ± 54.60.35
Uric acid (mg/dl)8.2 ± 1.37.4 ± 1.50.14
hsCRP (mg/dl)36.5 (26.8–43.5)24.0 (15.8–29.0) 0.003
Endocan (ng/L)697.0 (528.3–974.8)222.5 (158.8–565.8) <0.001

The values in italics are significant results.

Correlation analysis identified significant correlation between endocan levels and PTH levels (r = 0.5, p=0.005), hsCRP levels (r = 0.55, p=0.002), and CIMT measurements (r = 0.59, p=0.001) (Table 3). ROC curve analysis of endocan for identification of SCA in HD patients showed that at a cutoff of 380.5 ng/L, endocan has an AUC of 0.862 with a sensitivity and specificity of 92.9% and 68.7%, respectively (Figure 2).
Table 3

Correlations between serum endocan levels and clinical and laboratory data in the studied patients.

HDCKD
r p valuer p value
Age0.330.070.49 0.006
BMI0.050.81−0.260.17
Urea−0.020.90.130.5
Creatinine0.090.650.320.08
Ca0.290.12−0.130.49
Po4−0.30.10.050.78
Albumin−0.20.3−0.160.39
PTH0.5 0.005 −0.0040.98
Cholesterol0.280.14−0.040.82
Triglycerides0.310.10.090.64
WBCs0.120.53−0.060.74
Hb−0.290.120.190.31
Platelets0.30.11−0.190.33
Uric acid−0.030.880.070.71
hsCRP0.55 0.002 0.10.6
CIMT0.59 0.001 0.36 0.049

The values in italics are significant results.

Figure 2

ROC curve for endocan levels in HD patients.

4. Discussion

Serum endocan levels showed significant changes in many acute and chronic conditions [14, 15]. The present study found significantly higher endocan levels in patients' groups as compared to healthy controls. Moreover, HD patients were found to have significantly higher endocan levels when compared with their CKD counterparts. These findings are in line with other reports [16-18]. Lee et al. [16] noted that CKD patients have significantly higher serum endocan levels as compared to controls. They also noted a significant association between serum endocan levels and poor renal function. The study of Pawlak et al. [17] found similar results. They also noted significant correlations between endocan levels and other markers including soluble intercellular (sICAM-1) and vascular cellular (sVCAM-1) adhesion molecules and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), highlighting the contribution of endocan to vascular pathology and inflammation. Likewise, the study of Samouilidou et al. [18] found significantly higher endocan levels in CKD patients. Furthermore, they reported inverse correlation between endocan levels and paraoxonase 1 (PON), a marker known for its antiatherogenic properties. Their conclusions again confirm the detrimental influence of enhanced endocan expression on vascular health. Yilmaz et al. [19], in addition, found a positive correlation between endocan and CKD stage and negative correlation between it and eGFR. They also found a highly significant positive correlation between endocan and proteinuria. Similarly, Su et al. [20] found that endocan showed a drift of elevation in late-stage CKD. In our work, HD patients with SCA had significantly higher endocan level. This novel finding is supported by similar findings reported in other patient groups. In SLE patients, Icli et al. [11] showed an association between serum endocan levels and SCA. Likewise, Lv et al. [10] found that elevated endocan levels are significant risk factors for SCA associated with diabetes mellitus. Similarly, SCA was related to serum endocan levels in psoriatic patients [12]. In our work, HD patients with SCA had significantly higher hsCRP when compared with patients without. The relation between SCA and elevated CRP levels in HD patients is well documented. Yilmaz et al. [19], Buyukhatipoglu et al. [21], and Tirmenstajn-Jankovic and Dimkovic [20] identified a relation between CRP levels and CIMT. Interestingly, the present study identified a significant direct correlation between serum endocan and PTH levels in HD patients. The association between endocan and PTH levels was previously reported in renal transplant patients [22]. The association between endocan and PTH is probably related to the contribution of both biomarkers to the augmented inflammatory condition during HD. In our study, endocan was well correlated with the inflammatory biomarker CRP while previous reports documented the relation between PTH and CRP [23, 24]. There are multiple mechanisms that can explain the contribution of endocan to SCA in HD patients. Endocan was reportedly involved in endothelial dysfunction in many pathological conditions including sarcoidosis [25], preeclampsia [26], and silent brain infarction [27]. Endocan probably exerts its effects on the vascular endothelium through alteration of nitric oxide secretion by activation of AKT/eNOS and NF-κB/iNOS pathways [28]. Moreover, endocan expression was pronounced in association with exaggerated inflammatory conditions in multiple diseases including prediabetes and type 2 diabetes [29], systemic sclerosis [30], and chronic kidney disease [31]. Gaudet et al. [32] suggested that the inflammatory actions of endocan may be mediated through control of human leukocyte trans-endothelial migration. In conclusion, the present study suggests that serum endocan levels are related to SCA in HD patients. In addition, it is associated with the hyperinflammatory state and secondary hyperparathyroidism in those patients. Findings of this study may have therapeutic implications. Targeting endocan can be proposed as a novel approach for management of cardiovascular pathology in HD patients.
  32 in total

1.  Endocan: A Novel Predictor of Endothelial Dysfunction in Silent Brain Infarction.

Authors:  Yuksel Erdal; Nurettin Yavuz; Osman Oguz; Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoglu; Ufuk Emre
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Atherosclerosis in chronic kidney disease: the role of macrophages.

Authors:  Valentina Kon; MacRae F Linton; Sergio Fazio
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Inflammation as a risk factor for carotid intimal-medial thickening, a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis in haemodialysis patients: the role of chlamydia and cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  Hakan Buyukhatipoglu; Ozlem Tiryaki; Kadir Tahta; Celalettin Usalan
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Endocan alters nitric oxide production in endothelial cells by targeting AKT/eNOS and NFkB/iNOS signaling.

Authors:  Sarwareddy Kartik Kumar; Krishna Priya Mani
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.427

Review 5.  Endocan: A novel inflammatory indicator in cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Sevket Balta; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Sait Demirkol; Cengiz Ozturk; Turgay Celik; Atila Iyisoy
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Endocan Levels and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Gonul Aciksari; Murat Kavas; Adem Atici; Seref Kul; Hayriye Erman; Yusuf Yilmaz; Kenan Demircioglu; Emre Yalcinkaya; Asiye Kanbay; Mustafa Caliskan
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Endocan, a Soluble Marker of Endothelial Cell Activation Is a Molecular Marker of Disease Severity in Women with Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Sarah N Cross; Irina A Buhimschi; Christina Duzyj Buniak; Lydia Shook; Megan McCarthy; John Hardy; Yara El-Helou; Guomao Zhao; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Evaluation of endocan and endoglin levels in chronic kidney disease due to diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Betül Ekiz-Bilir; Bülent Bilir; Murat Aydın; Neslihan Soysal-Atile
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Prevalence and associated factors of subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis at the university hospital of Kinshasa.

Authors:  Christophe Mulumba; Pierrot Lebughe; Jean-Marie Mbuyi-Muamba; Jean-Robert Makulo; François Lepira; Jean Mukaya; Rene Westhovens; Patrick Verschueren; Jean-Jacques Malemba
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-09

10.  Analysis of the kinetics of the parathyroid hormone, and of associated patient outcomes, in a cohort of haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Guillaume Jean; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Eric Zaoui; Christie Lorriaux; Jean-Marc Hurot; Brice Mayor; Patrik Deleaval; Manolie Mehdi; Charles Chazot
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.