A S Urquhart1, J K Douch1, T A Heafield1, A G Buddie2, A Idnurm1. 1. School of BioSciences, the University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. 2. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI), Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8DE, UK.
Abstract
Here we explore the diversity of one morphologically distinguishable genus in the Mucoromycotina, Backusella, in south-eastern Australia. We isolated more than 200 strains from locations across the states of Victoria and Tasmania. Characterization of these strains using a combination of approaches including morphology, sucrose utilization and whole genome sequencing for 13 strains, revealed 10 new species. The genetic basis for interspecies variation in sucrose utilization was found to be the presence of a gene encoding an invertase enzyme. The genus Backusella is revised and a new key for species identification produced. Given that we have more than doubled the number of species in this genus, this work demonstrates that there may be considerable undiscovered species diversity in the early diverging fungal lineages. Citation: Urquhart AS, Douch JK, Heafield TA, et al. 2021. Diversity of Backusella (Mucoromycotina) in south-eastern Australia revealed through polyphasic taxonomy. Persoonia 46: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.01.
Here we explore the diversity of one morphologically distinguishable genus in the Mucoromycotina, Backusella, in south-eastern Australia. We isolated more than 200 strains from locations across the states of Victoria and Tasmania. Characterization of these strains using a combination of approaches including morphology, sucrose utilization and whole genome sequencing for 13 strains, revealed 10 new species. The genetic basis for interspecies variation in sucrose utilization was found to be the presence of a gene encoding an invertase enzyme. The genus Backusella is revised and a new key for species identification produced. Given that we have more than doubled the number of species in this genus, this work demonstrates that there may be considerable undiscovered species diversity in the early diverging fungal lineages. Citation: Urquhart AS, Douch JK, Heafield TA, et al. 2021. Diversity of Backusella (Mucoromycotina) in south-eastern Australia revealed through polyphasic taxonomy. Persoonia 46: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.01.
Advances in DNA sequencing have increased the rate of discovery of new fungal species to over 2 000 species per year. However, despite their evolutionary and ecological significance, the basal fungal lineages not in the Dikarya represent only 1 % of this figure or just 24 species described in 2017 (Willis 2018). Of these lineages, species in the order Mucorales are significant decomposers in natural ecosystems, and some species are pathogens both to humans (Ribes et al. 2000) and other animals, such as Mucor amphibiorum of amphibians and platypuses (Obendorf et al. 1993). Many Mucorales species produce spores that are not optimized for dispersal in air, which might account for the development of greater endemic diversity compared to many ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. However, our understanding of the biogeography of these species is currently limited, and this hypothesis is largely untested.Despite being considered a ‘megadiverse’ country (Williams et al. 2001) only a handful of Mucorales species have been described as being unique to Australia. After some initial work at the end of the 19th century by Cooke and Massee (discovery of Spinellus gigasporus (Cooke 1889) and Pilobolus pullus (Massee 1901)) the next productive period, in terms of describing diversity, was in the 1970–1980s (for example Halteromyces radiatus (Shipton & Schipper 1975), Mucor amphibiorum (Schipper 1978), Umbelopsis ovata and U. fusiformis (Yip 1986b), U. swartii and U. westeae (Yip 1986a), and Mucor laxorrhizus var. ovalisporus (Schipper 1989)). However, since this time new species reports have slowed, despite rapid progress elsewhere in fungal taxonomy. Only two new species, Pilaira australis and Syncephalastrum contaminatum, have been described, both from single specimens, in the last 30 yr (Urquhart et al. 2017, Urquhart & Idnurm 2020).Two hypotheses might explain the lack of reported diversity in Australia. One is that the continent is depauperate in Mucoromycotina species and the second is the consequence of limited sampling. In this study we set out to address this dearth of knowledge by examining diversity in the genus Backusella in south-eastern Australia. Backusella is a convenient genus within the Mucorales to study because it can be readily distinguished in culture by its recurved juvenile sporangiophores (Walther et al. 2013). Currently, the genus consists of 14 species: B. circina (Ellis & Hesseltine 1969), B. constricta (Lima et al. 2016), B. gigacellularis (De Souza et al. 2014), B. granulispora and B. johoriensis (Loh et al. 2001), B. lamprospora (Benny & Benjamin 1975), B. locustae (Wanasinghe et al. 2018), B. grandis, B. indica, B. oblongielliptica, B. oblongispora, B. recurva, B. tuberculispora, and B. variabilis (Walther et al. 2013). It has previously been noted that B. grandis is likely to be a synonym of B. variabilis (Walther et al. 2013). The only report of Backusella in Australia is of Backusella recurva (strain CBS 673.75), isolated from north Queensland.Here, through sampling from over 25 locations in south-eastern Australia more than 200 strains of Backusella were isolated and then analysed. Using a polyphasic approach integrating whole-genome-sequencing-based molecular phylogenies, morphology and physiology we identify 10 new species, one new combination (Backusella dispersa) and suggest synonymisation for two previously described species (B. johoriensis = B. circina; B. variabilis = B. grandis), and discuss how the taxonomy of B. granulispora does not conform to a modern morphological understanding of the genus. Collectively, the new species and refinements to existing taxa adjusts the total number of species in the genus from 14 to 23. As such, these findings provide an example in which diversity in a single genus is markedly increased by sampling in Australia, a potential indicator of a high level of diversity among Australian fungi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation of strains
Leaf litter and soil samples were collected from locations in the Australian states of Victoria and Tasmania under permits 10008557 (Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning) or FL 18158 (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment). Samples of soil (c. 7 g each) were mixed with sterilized water and then plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with cefotaxime (100 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (100 μg/mL) to inhibit bacterial growth. After 2–4 d growth at ambient temperature, colonies displaying the characteristic recurved juvenile sporangia were selected and plated onto fresh medium. All isolates were purified by single spore isolation to ensure a homogeneous culture.
DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing
DNA was extracted from fungal material scraped from agar culture as described previously (Pitkin et al. 1996). Taq polymerase purified from the pTaq plasmid (Desai & Pfaffle 1995) was used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following standard procedures. The internal transcribed spacers (ITS) were amplified with primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990); the large subunit rRNA (LSU) was amplified with primers NL1 (Kurtzman & Robnett 1997) and LR3 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990); and a partial arginosuccinate lyase gene fragment (argA) was amplified using primers AP52 (5′ TGGGGAGGTCGYTTCTCC 3′) and AP53 (5′ TATCAGGRTTCTTCTTTTGAGG 3′), designed based on examination of the whole genome sequencing data described in the following sections. PCR products were purified with a gel purification kit (Qiagen) and Sanger-sequenced at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF).It was necessary in some cases to clone the ITS sequences before sequencing due to different versions occurring in the same strain. To achieve this, modified ITS1 and ITS4 primers were developed with the addition of SacII restriction sites (ITS1SacII 5′ AGACCGCGGTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG 3′; ITS4SacII 5′ CTCCGCGGTCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC 3′). The PCR products were then cloned into plasmid pKLAC2 (New England Biolabs) linearized with SacII. SacII was chosen as it does not cut any previously obtained Backusella ITS sequences or any of the ITS sequences assembled from next generation sequencing (see below). Additionally, given that the SacII recognition site is 100 % GC and the ITS sequences in Backusella are AT rich there is a low probability of cleaving the ITS DNA amplicons.
DNA extraction and next generation sequencing
Candidate isolates for next generation sequencing were chosen, based on LSU and ITS phylogenies, to represent putative species clades. DNA was extracted from pulverized lyophilized mycelia from 7-d-old liquid cultures using a buffer containing CTAB and incubation at 65 °C, before chloroform extraction and precipitation with an equal volume of 100 % isopropanol (Pitkin et al. 1996) and treatment with RNAse A. Sequencing was performed using 125 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument at AGRF. Assembly was conducted using Velvet (Zerbino & Birney 2008) with a k-mer length of 65. The completeness of each assembly was predicted using BUSCO (Simao et al. 2015).
Phylogenetic analyses
Published sequences were obtained from NCBI (O’Donnell et al. 2001, Shirouzu et al. 2012, Walther et al. 2013, De Souza et al. 2014, Lima et al. 2016, Wanasinghe et al. 2018, Vu et al. 2019). Gene sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) or in the case of the ITS region CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994) and phylogeny inferred using a Bayesian approach implemented through MrBayes (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001) and by maximum likelihood implemented in MEGA v. 7.0.26. The species boundaries for the large ribosomal DNA region were poorly resolved using maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches, with UPGMA trees implemented in Geneious v. 11.1.5 providing clearer phylogenetic insight. The UPGMA method is, however, limited in that it makes basic assumptions such as a constant rate of evolution. Thus, to confirm that these trees represent true phylogenetic relationships, we compared them to Bayesian inference trees generated using MrBayes (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001) based on the single copy argA gene and whole genome sequencing.Single copy genes in the whole genome assemblies were initially selected by examining MycoCosm (Grigoriev et al. 2014) for Markov Clustering (MCL) gene clusters present in single copy in Backusella circina FSU 941 and other Mucorales species. The list of genes was manually examined for those that showed sufficient conservation to allow unambiguous alignment and a subset of these was randomly selected for further analysis. The list of genes selected is given in Table 1. Partial gene sequences were aligned using MUSCLE and concatenated (Edgar 2004) into a final alignment of c. 50 kb.
Table 1
Gene regions used in the multigene phylogeny; ID refers to B. circina FSU 941.
Gene ID
Function based on homology
185987
WD40-repeat-containing subunit of the 18S rRNA processing complex
205947
GatB/YqeY domain-containing protein
216514
rRNA-processing protein FCF1
220627
Nucleolar ATPase Kre33
225083
Mitochondrial ribosomal protein
228697
DNA replication licensing factor
234491
Carbohydrate kinase
234892
Transport protein particle (TRAPP) complex subunit
235092
Mitochondrial DNA-directed RNA polymerase RPO41
237414
Argininosuccinate lyase
238565
WD40-repeat-containing subunit of the 18S rRNA processing complex
241757
Golgi SNAP receptor complex member
242843
WD40-repeat-containing
246934
Translocation protein sec63
249721
DUF323 domain-containing protein
251931
WD40-repeat-containing protein
252236
Ribonuclease III
252238
MIR motif-containing protein
252550
Molecular chaperone (ABC1)
257118
Dynein heavy chain
260240
WD40-repeat-containing subunit of the 18S rRNA processing complex
Sucrose utilization and genetic testing of function by complementation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase mutant
The ability to utilize sucrose as a sole carbon source was assessed on yeast nitrogen base (YNB) agar (Sigma) supplemented with 5 g/L of either sucrose or glucose. A putative invertase sequence was identified in the strains via BLAST searches using B. circina protein ID 331483 as a query (Altschul et al. 1990, Grigoriev et al. 2014). We named this gene sucB after the S. cerevisiae homolog SUC2.A SUC2 deletion mutant of S. cerevisiae was generated by homologous recombination; SUC2 null mutants of S. cerevisiae are unable to utilize sucrose (Carlson et al. 1981). The G418 resistance cassette of pFA6a-GFP(S65T)-kanMX6 (Bähler et al. 1998) was amplified with primers AP142 (5′ AAAAAGCTTTTCTTTTCACTAACGTATATGCGTACGCTGCAGGTCGAC 3′) and AP143 (5′ AAATAAAAAAGACAATAAGTTTTATAACCTATCGATGAATTCGAGCTC 3′) and transformed into S. cerevisiae strain BY4742 using a lithium acetate/polyethylene glycol method (Gietz & Schiestl 2007) with selection on G418. A gene replacement transformant was identified via PCR screening with primers AP148 (5′ GCCTATTACCATCATAGAGACG 3′) and AP149 (5′ AAATCATAAAGTTTTACATTCG 3′). A complementation construct carrying the sucB gene of B. westeae strain UoMAU4 was generated by amplifying the two exons of the gene with primer pairs AP144 (5′ CCAAGCATACAATCAACTCCAAGCTTATGGTATTCGTAAAATCAGG 3′) AP153 (5′ CCCCACGTCATATTGCCCCAGATTTGATCAAAAGGATTATGC 3′) and AP147 (5′ TAGCTTGGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCTTATTTCAAGGTTCTATCAAATGC 3′) AP152 (5′ GGGGCAATATGACGTGGGG 3′) off genomic DNA and combining them into the plasmid pTH19 (Harashima & Heitman 2005) linearized with EcoRI, using the NEBuilder DNA assembly cloning kit (New England Biolabs). This construct allows the yeast to grow on media without uracil and will express sucB under the control of a constitutive promoter. The construct and the empty plasmid pTH19 were transformed into the S. cerevisiae SUC2 mutant with selection on medium lacking uracil. Growth of the SUC2 mutant carrying either the sucB plasmid or empty pTH19 vector was compared on media containing either glucose or sucrose as the sole carbon source (YNB +histidine +leucine +lysine).
Mating
The mating type locus was identified via BLAST searches (Altschul et al. 1990) of the assembled genomes for the sexP and sexM homologs (Idnurm et al. 2008, Schulz et al. 2017). The mating type locus of B. circina FSU741 (+) has been identified (Schulz et al. 2017). Crosses were carried out on V8 medium (20 % Campbell’s V8 juice, 2 % agar, 3.75 g/L CaCO3; modified from Benny 2008) in the dark at ambient temperature for 4 wk between closely related strains to identify a representative mating pair for each species, where possible.
Morphological examinations
Colony characters were recorded at 3 d after inoculation of spores on PDA plates. Bright-field microscopy was performed on unstained samples immersed in water using either an Olympus BX51 or Leica DM6000 microscope. Measurements of asexual spore dimensions were from 30 spores. Spore quotient (Q) was calculated for each isolate by dividing the average spore length by average spore width. Air-dried fungal materials taken from culture plates were sputter-coated with gold using a Dynavac SC100 sputter coater and then examined with a Philips XL30 FEG scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS
Isolation of Backusella strains from south-eastern Australia
In total, 206 strains with a transiently-recurvate sporangium were isolated from a range of natural environments across the states of Victoria and Tasmania (Fig. 1, Table 2). Strains were preserved as living cultures in the Jena Microbial Resource Collection, Germany, and the type specimens at the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL), Australia. Additionally, ‘B. johorensis’ IMI 350574 was cultured from the IMI collection at CABI, UK.
Fig. 1
Strains of Backusella were isolated across the south-eastern corner of Australia. Collections covered a range of habitats including wet sclerophyll forest in: a. Wilson’s Promontory National Park; b. Pittosporum undulatum dominated warm temperate rainforest in Uralla Nature Reserve; c. Nothofagus cunninghamii dominated cool temperate rainforest in Toolangi State Forest; d. dry Eucalyptus woodland in the Brisbane Ranges National Park; e. damp Eucalyptus forest of Jack Cann Reserve. — f. Distribution of collection sites. Map data: Google, SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO.
Table 2
Strains isolated in this study.
Strain name
Species
Location*
State
GenBank accession numbers
Jena Microbial Resource Collection
MEL herbarium
LSU
ITS
argA
UoMAU4
B. westeae
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958796
MK959061
MK982268
SF014021
2417242
UoMAU5
B. tarrabulga
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958804
MK959060
MK982263
SF014022
2446982
UoMAU6
B. luteola
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958795
MK959058
MK982265
SF014023
2446983
UoMAU7
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958628
MK959107
MK982253
SF014024
2446984
UoMAU9
Backusella ‘group X’
Silvan reservoir park
Victoria
MK958787
MK959098
MK982280
SF014025
2446985
UoMAU10
Backusella ‘group X’
Silvan reservoir park
Victoria
MK958788
MK959096; MK959100
–
SF014026
2446986
UoMAU11
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958776
MK959077; MK959086; MK959088
MK982278
SF014027
2446987
UoMAU12
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958777
MK959087; MK959089
–
SF014028
2446988
UoMAU13
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958772
MK959081; MK959091
–
SF014029
2446989
UoMAU14
B. morwellensis
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958806
–
–
SF014030
2446990
UoMAU15
B. morwellensis
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958807
–
–
SF014031
2446991
UoMAU16
B. morwellensis
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958808
MK959059
MK982267
SF014032
2446992
UoMAU17
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958610
–
–
SF014033
2446993
UoMAU18
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958602
–
–
SF014034
2446994
UoMAU19
B. macrospora
Macedon RP
Victoria
MK958609
–
–
SF014035
2446995
UoMAU20
B. macrospora
Macedon RP
Victoria
MK958604
–
–
SF014036
2446996
UoMAU21
B. macrospora
Macedon RP
Victoria
MK958605
–
–
SF014037
2446997
UoMAU22
B. macrospora
Macedon RP
Victoria
MK958606
–
–
SF014038
2446998
UoMAU23
B. macrospora
Macedon RP
Victoria
MK958607
–
–
SF014039
2446999
UoMAU24
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958778
MK959080
–
SF014040
2447000
UoMAU25
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958773
MK959082; MK959083
–
SF014041
2447001
UoMAU26
B. psychrophila
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958748
–
–
SF014042
2447002
UoMAU27
B. psychrophila
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958746
–
–
SF014043
2447003
UoMAU28
B. psychrophila
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958766
–
–
SF014044
2447004
UoMAU29
B. psychrophila
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958747
–
–
SF014045
2447005
UoMAU30
B. macrospora
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958634
–
–
SF014046
2447006
UoMAU31
B. macrospora
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958637
–
–
SF014047
2447007
UoMAU32
B. australiensis
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958802
–
–
SF014048
2447008
UoMAU33
B. australiensis
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958801
–
–
SF014049
2447009
UoMAU34
B. australiensis
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958800
MK959062
MK982270
SF014050
2447010
UoMAU35
B. parvicylindrica
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958727
MK959109
MK982259
SF014051
2447011
UoMAU36
B. luteola
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958794
–
MK982266
SF014052
2447012
UoMAU37
B. parvicylindrica
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958745
–
–
SF014053
2447013
UoMAU38
B. parvicylindrica
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958744
–
–
SF014054
2447014
UoMAU39
B. parvicylindrica
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958728
–
–
SF014055
2447015
UoMAU40
B. australiensis
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958803
–
–
SF014056
2447016
UoMAU41
B. parvicylindrica
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958725
–
MK982261
SF014057
2447017
UoMAU42
B. australiensis
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958799
–
MK982272
SF014058
2447018
UoMAU43
B. parvicylindrica
Wombat SF
Victoria
MK958726
–
MK982262
SF014059
2447019
UoMAU44
B. macrospora
Wanderslore Sanctuary
Victoria
MK958638
–
–
SF014060
2447020
UoMAU45
B. macrospora
Wanderslore Sanctuary
Victoria
MK958639
–
MK982255
SF014061
2447021
UoMAU47
B. mclennaniae
Wanderslore Sanctuary
Victoria
MK958774
MK959066; MK959071
–
SF014063
2447023
UoMAU48
B. mclennaniae
Wanderslore Sanctuary
Victoria
MK958784
MK959057; MK959067
–
SF014064
2447024
UoMAU49
B. mclennaniae
Wanderslore Sanctuary
Victoria
MK958783
MK959068; MK959078
MK982279
SF014065
2447025
UoMAU50
B. macrospora
Toolangi SF
Victoria
MK958640
–
–
SF014066
2447026
UoMAU51
B. macrospora
Toolangi SF
Victoria
MK958641
–
–
SF014067
2447027
UoMAU52
B. macrospora
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958630
–
MK982254
SF014068
2447028
UoMAU53
B. macrospora
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958656
–
–
SF014069
2447029
UoMAU54
B. macrospora
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958629
–
–
SF014070
2447030
UoMAU55
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958749
MK959093
MK982283
SF014071
2447031
UoMAU56
B. macrospora
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958642
–
–
SF014072
2447032
UoMAU57
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958750
–
–
SF014073
2447033
UoMAU58
B. liffmaniae
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958734
MK959065
MK982276
SF014074
2447034
UoMAU59
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958751
–
–
SF014075
2447035
UoMAU60
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958752
–
–
SF014076
2447036
UoMAU61
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958753
–
–
SF014077
2447037
UoMAU62
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958754
–
–
SF014078
2447038
UoMAU63
B. psychrophila
Black sugar loaf
Tasmania
MK958743
–
MK982285
SF014079
2447039
UoMAU64
B. psychrophila
Black sugar loaf
Tasmania
MK958739
–
–
SF014080
2447040
UoMAU65
B. psychrophila
Black sugar loaf
Tasmania
MK958755
–
–
SF014081
2447041
UoMAU66
B. psychrophila
Black sugar loaf
Tasmania
MK958742
–
–
SF014082
2447042
UoMAU67
B. psychrophila
Black sugar loaf
Tasmania
MK958767
–
MK982286
SF014083
2447043
UoMAU68
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958768
–
–
SF014084
2447044
UoMAU69
B. psychrophila
Jack Cann Reserve
Victoria
MK958756
–
–
SF014085
2447045
UoMAU70
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958680
–
–
SF014086
2447046
UoMAU71
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958681
–
–
SF014087
2447047
UoMAU72
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958682
–
–
SF014088
2447048
UoMAU73
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958683
–
–
SF014089
2447049
UoMAU74
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958723
–
–
SF014090
2447050
UoMAU75
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958684
–
–
SF014091
2447051
UoMAU76
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958685
–
–
SF014092
2447052
UoMAU77
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958686
–
–
SF014093
2447053
UoMAU78
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958687
–
–
SF014094
2447054
UoMAU79
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958688
–
–
–
2447055
UoMAU80
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958689
MK959108
MK982250
–
2447056
UoMAU81
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958690
–
–
SF014097
2447057
UoMAU82
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958691
–
–
SF014098
2447058
UoMAU83
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958692
–
–
SF014099
2447059
UoMAU84
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958693
–
–
SF014100
2447060
UoMAU86
B. tuberculispora
Ross-Edwards Reserve
Victoria
MK958694
–
–
SF014101
2447062
UoMAU87
B. macrospora
Toolangi SF
Victoria
MK958611
–
MK982252
SF014102
2447063
UoMAU88
B. macrospora
Toolangi SF
Victoria
MK958631
–
–
SF014103
2447064
UoMAU89
B. macrospora
Toolangi SF
Victoria
MK958633
–
–
SF014104
2447065
UoMAU90
B. australiensis
Kalimna
Victoria
MK958797
MK959063; MK959064
MK982269
SF014105
2447066
UoMAU91
B. australiensis
Kalimna
Victoria
MK958798
–
MK982271
SF014106
2447067
UoMAU92
B. macrospora
Colquhoun SF
Victoria
MK958643
–
–
SF014107
2447068
UoMAU93
B. macrospora
Kalimna
Victoria
MK958644
–
–
SF014108
2447069
UoMAU94
B. macrospora
Kalimna
Victoria
MK958645
–
–
SF014109
2447070
UoMAU95
B. macrospora
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958646
–
–
SF014110
2447071
UoMAU96
B. macrospora
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958647
–
MK982258
SF014111
2447072
UoMAU98
Backusella ‘group X’
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958789
MK959099; MK959101
–
SF014113
2447074
UoMAU99
B. psychrophila
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958757
–
–
SF014114
2447075
UoMAU102
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958671
–
–
SF014116
2447077
UoMAU103
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958695
–
–
SF014117
2447078
UoMAU104
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958673
–
–
SF014118
2447079
UoMAU105
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958671
–
–
SF014119
2447080
UoMAU106
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958674
–
–
SF014120
2447081
UoMAU107
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958675
–
–
SF014121
2447082
UoMAU108
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958676
–
–
SF014122
2447083
UoMAU109
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958677
–
–
SF014123
2447084
UoMAU110
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958678
–
–
SF014124
2447085
UoMAU111
B. tuberculispora
Blue Tier FR
Tasmania
MK958696
–
–
SF014125
2447086
UoMAU112
B. tuberculispora
Myrtle Bank
Tasmania
MK958697
–
–
SF014126
2447087
UoMAU114
B. tuberculispora
Myrtle Bank
Tasmania
MK958698
–
–
SF014127
2447088
UoMAU115
B. tuberculispora
Pipers Brook
Tasmania
MK958663
–
–
SF014128
2447089
UoMAU116
B. dispersa
Scottsdale
Tasmania
MK958769
–
MK982274
SF014129
2447090
UoMAU118
B. psychrophila
Scottsdale
Tasmania
MK958740
–
–
SF014131
2447092
UoMAU119
B. dispersa
Scottsdale
Tasmania
MK958770
–
MK982275
SF014132
2447093
UoMAU120
B. dispersa
Scottsdale
Tasmania
MK958771
–
MK982273
SF014133
2447094
UoMAU121
Backusella ‘group X’
Kalimna west
Victoria
MK958792
MK959103; MK959105
–
SF014134
2447095
UoMAU122
Backusella ‘group X’
Kalimna west
Victoria
MK958790
–
–
SF014135
2447096
UoMAU123
B. macrospora
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958648
–
–
SF014136
2447097
UoMAU124
B. psychrophila
Lake Tyers SP
Victoria
MK958758
–
MK982287
SF014137
2447098
UoMAU125
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958699
–
–
SF014138
2447099
UoMAU126
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958700
–
–
SF014139
2447100
UoMAU128
B. liffmaniae
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958735
–
–
SF014140
2447101
UoMAU129
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958701
–
–
SF014141
2447102
UoMAU130
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958702
–
–
SF014142
2447103
UoMAU131
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958703
–
–
SF014143
2447104
UoMAU132
B. liffmaniae
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958736
–
–
SF014144
2447105
UoMAU133
B. liffmaniae
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958737
–
–
SF014145
2447106
UoMAU134
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958704
–
–
SF014146
2447107
UoMAU135
B. tuberculispora
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958705
–
–
SF014147
2447108
UoMAU137
B. liffmaniae
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958738
–
MK982277
SF014148
2447109
UoMAU138
B. psychrophila
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958759
–
–
SF014149
2447110
UoMAU139
B. psychrophila
Pegarah SF
King Island (Tasmania)
MK958760
–
MK982284
SF014150
2447111
UoMAU140
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958706
–
–
SF014151
2447112
UoMAU141
B. mclennaniae
W.A.G Walker Rhododendron Garden
Tasmania
MK958785
MK959069; MK959070
–
SF014152
2447113
UoMAU142
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958707
–
–
SF014153
2447114
UoMAU143
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958708
–
–
SF014154
2447115
UoMAU144
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958709
–
–
SF014155
2447116
UoMAU145
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958710
–
–
SF014156
2447117
UoMAU146
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958711
–
–
SF014157
2447118
UoMAU147
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958712
–
–
SF014158
2447119
UoMAU148
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958713
–
–
SF014159
2447120
UoMAU149
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958714
–
–
SF014160
2447121
UoMAU150
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958660
–
MK982249
SF014161
2447122
UoMAU151
B. tuberculispora
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958661
–
–
SF014162
2447123
UoMAU152
Backusella ‘group X’
Hollybank FR
Tasmania
MK958791
MK959102; MK959104
MK982281
SF014163
2447124
UoMAU153
B. tuberculispora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958659
–
MK982251
SF014164
2447125
UoMAU154
B. psychrophila
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958741
–
–
SF014165
2447126
UoMAU155
B. macrospora
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958612
–
–
SF014166
2447127
UoMAU156
B. parvicylindrica
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958729
–
MK982260
SF014167
2447128
UoMAU157
B. macrospora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958636
–
–
SF014168
2447129
UoMAU158
B. mclennaniae
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958779
MK959074; MK959075
–
SF014169
2447130
UoMAU159
B. psychrophila
Uralla reserve
Victoria
MK958761
–
–
SF014170
2447131
UoMAU160
B. macrospora
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958649
–
–
SF014171
2447132
UoMAU161
B. macrospora
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958650
–
MK982256
SF014172
2447133
UoMAU162
B. mclennaniae
Morwell NP
Victoria
MK958782
MK959072; MK959073
–
SF014173
2447134
UoMAU163
B. macrospora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958613
–
–
SF014174
2447135
UoMAU164
B. macrospora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958635
–
–
SF014175
2447136
UoMAU165
B. macrospora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958614
–
–
SF014176
2447137
UoMAU166
B. macrospora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958615
–
–
SF014177
2447138
UoMAU167
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958662
–
–
SF014178
2447139
UoMAU168
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958664
–
–
SF014179
2447140
UoMAU169
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958665
–
–
SF014180
2447141
UoMAU170
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958666
–
–
SF014181
2447142
UoMAU171
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958667
–
–
SF014182
2447143
UoMAU172
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958668
–
–
SF014183
2447144
UoMAU173
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958669
–
–
SF014184
2447145
UoMAU174
B. tuberculispora
Gillespies road, Nabowla
Tasmania
MK958670
–
–
SF014185
2447146
UoMAU175
B. tuberculispora
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958715
–
–
SF014186
2447147
UoMAU178
Backusella ‘group X’
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958786
MK959094; MK959095
MK982282
SF014189
2447150
UoMAU179
B. tuberculispora
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958716
–
–
SF014190
2447151
UoMAU180
B. tuberculispora
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958724
–
–
SF014191
2447152
UoMAU183
B. tuberculispora
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958717
–
–
SF014194
2447155
UoMAU184
B. mclennaniae
Mirboo North RP
Victoria
MK958775
MK959079; MK959085
–
SF014195
2447156
UoMAU186
B. parvicylindrica
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958730
–
–
SF014197
2447158
UoMAU187
B. tarrabulga
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958805
–
MK982264
SF014198
2447159
UoMAU189
B. parvicylindrica
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958731
–
–
SF014200
2447161
UoMAU190
B. tuberculispora
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958718
–
–
SF014201
2447162
UoMAU191
B. mclennaniae
Uralla Reserve
Victoria
MK958781
MK959076; MK959084
–
SF014202
2447163
UoMAU197
Backusella ‘group X’
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958793
MK959097; MK959106
–
SF014208
2447169
UoMAU198
B. mclennaniae
Crinigan Road Reserve
Victoria
MK958780
MK959090; MK959092
–
SF014209
2447170
UoMAU202
B. macrospora
Mirboo North RP
Victoria
MK958657
–
–
SF014213
2447174
UoMAU203
B. macrospora
Mirboo North RP
Victoria
MK958651
–
MK982257
SF014214
2447175
UoMAU205
B. tuberculispora
Jackey’s Marsh, Western Tiers
Tasmania
MK958679
–
–
SF014216
2447177
UoMAU206
B. tuberculispora
Jackey’s Marsh, Western Tiers
Tasmania
MK958719
–
–
SF014217
2447178
UoMAU207
B. macrospora
Jeeralang Junction
Victoria
MK958658
–
–
–
2447179
UoMAU209
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958616
–
–
SF014219
2447180
UoMAU210
B. macrospora
Edward Hunter Reserve
Victoria
MK958652
–
–
SF014220
2447181
UoMAU211
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958632
–
–
SF014221
2447182
UoMAU213
B. parvicylindrica
Holey Plains SP
Victoria
MK958732
–
–
SF014223
2447184
UoMAU214
B. macrospora
Edward Hunter Reserve
Victoria
MK958653
–
–
SF014224
2447185
UoMAU215
B. tuberculispora
Edward Hunter Reserve
Victoria
MK958720
–
–
SF014225
2447186
UoMAU218
B. macrospora
Edward Hunter Reserve
Victoria
MK958654
–
–
SF014228
2447189
UoMAU219
B. macrospora
Edward Hunter Reserve
Victoria
MK958655
–
–
SF014229
2458421
UoMAU220
B. macrospora
Tarra-Bulga NP
Victoria
MK958617
–
–
SF014230
2447190
UoMAU222
B. macrospora
Morwell River Falls Reserve
Victoria
MK958618
–
–
SF014232
2447192
UoMAU224
B. psychrophila
University of Melbourne
Victoria
MK958762
–
–
SF014234
2447194
UoMAU225
B. psychrophila
Brisbane Ranges NP
Victoria
MK958763
–
–
SF014235
2458422
UoMAU226
B. tuberculispora
Baluk Willam Nature Conservation Reserve
Victoria
MK958721
–
–
SF014236
2447195
UoMAU228
B. tuberculispora
Baluk Willam Nature Conservation Reserve
Victoria
MK958722
–
–
SF014238
2447197
UoMAU236
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958619
–
–
SF014243
2447202
UoMAU237
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958620
–
–
SF014244
2447203
UoMAU239
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958621
–
–
SF014245
2447204
UoMAU241
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958608
–
–
SF014247
2447206
UoMAU242
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958622
–
–
SF014248
2447207
UoMAU244
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958623
–
–
SF014250
2447209
UoMAU246
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958624
–
–
SF014251
2447210
UoMAU247
B. psychrophila
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958764
–
–
SF014252
2447211
UoMAU248
B. psychrophila
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958765
–
–
SF014253
2447212
UoMAU252
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958625
–
–
SF014256
2447216
UoMAU253
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958626
–
–
SF014257
2447217
UoMAU254
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958627
–
–
SF014258
2447218
UoMAU255
B. macrospora
Wilson Prom NP
Victoria
MK958603
–
–
SF014259
2447219
* NP = National Park; SP = State Park; RP = Regional Park; SF = State Forest; FR = Forest Reserve.
Phylogenetic analysis of the argA, ITS and LSU regions revealed 13 Backusella species in Australia, 10 of them new
For delineating boundaries between species, the LSU region was found to be more practical than the ITS regions because variation between ITS copies within a single strain precluded direct sequencing of PCR products. In contrast to the ITS, the LSU could be directly sequenced after amplification in all cases. An LSU phylogeny was generated including all the isolates collected. This revealed 12 phylogenetic groups (Fig. 2). Given that the LSU is highly conserved, phylogenies based solely on LSU may miss some species diversity (Schoch et al. 2012, Vu et al. 2019). As such in addition to the ITS and LSU we sequenced a region encoding argininosuccinate lyase (argA) (Fig. 3, 4). The ITS and argA trees generally supported the same species groups as the LSU. Of the 12 clades, 10 were clearly distinct from previously described species. One clade was closely related to B. tuberculispora and we thus assigned these strains to that species. The final clade, which we named Backusella ‘group X’, showed close affinity to B. lamprospora CBS118.08; however, ITS similarity was only around 92 %, which is less than the typically accepted threshold for conspecificity (Vu et al. 2019). Thus, further detailed studies are required to resolve the taxonomy of this clade.
Fig. 2
UPGMA tree based on partial LSU sequence. Nodes are labelled with % bootstrap support from 1 000 replicates. The bootstrap support values derived from maximum likelihood analysis are given in parentheses based on 1 000 repeats for clades which were supported. Taxa in bold indicate sequences derived from type specimens. First dot represents growth on sucrose: green = utilizes sucrose, red = does not utilize sucrose. Second dot represents growth at 30 °C after 3 d. Red = no growth, amber = less than 2 cm growth, green = more than 2 cm growth.
Fig. 3
Bayesian phylogeny based on the arginine succinate lyase (argA) region. Taxa in bold indicate sequences derived from type specimens. Mucor circinelloides (Corrochano et al. 2016) and Rhizopus microsporus (Mondo et al. 2017) sequences were used as outgroups. Posterior probabilities are indicated. Bootstrap support values derived from maximum likelihood analysis are given in parentheses based on 1 000 repeats.
Fig. 4
Bayesian phylogeny based on the ITS region. The letter c followed by a number indicates a sequence from cloned DNA. Taxa in bold indicate sequences derived from type specimens. Backusella oblongispora was used as the outgroup. Sequences with accession numbers were obtained from GenBank. Posterior probabilities are indicated. Bootstrap support values derived from maximum likelihood analysis are given in parentheses based on 1 000 repeats.
The LSU and ITS regions of ‘B. johorensis’ strain IMI 350574 were sequenced (deposited to GenBank as MK966409 and MK958733, respectively). These regions showed 100 % simi-larity to B. circina strains, and hence we conclude that B. johorensis is a synonym of B. circina.
A highly resolved multigene phylogeny supports the Backusella species relationships inferred from the single gene trees
Representative isolates were selected based on the single gene phylogenies to be subjects for next generation sequencing. The aim was to produce whole genome sequencing information for subsequent highly resolved multi-gene phylogenies, which should better resolve the evolutionary relationships between the species. Between 15 and 21 M reads were generated from each strain, all of which were assembled into reasonably complete genomes, as assessed by BUSCO (Simao et al. 2015) (Table 3). Raw reads and assembled genomes are deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA544350. The genome assemblies were between 44.5 and 48.5 Mb each except for the sister taxa B. macrospora and B. tuberculispora, which produced relatively large genome assemblies (> 56 Mb).
Table 3
Details of genome assemblies of Backusella strains.
Strain
Backusella species
Number of reads
Coverage
Contigs
Size (bp)
BUSCO completeness
UoMAU4
B. westeae
17 536 088
45×
4 172
48 348 398
94.8 %
UoMAU5
B. tarrabulga
16 645 616
44×
2 526
47 344 639
87.3 %
UoMAU6
B. luteola
17 567 962
46×
3 540
47 953 259
85.9 %
UoMAU7
B. macrospora
17 543 504
39×
5 407
56 332 687
86.2 %
UoMAU9
B. ‘group X’
18 173 802
49×
1 840
46 112 820
88.0 %
UoMAU11
B. mclennaniae
20 457 596
55×
2 119
46 408 055
84.1 %
UoMAU16
B. morwellensis
17 371 966
45×
2 949
48 384 723
89.0 %
UoMAU34
B. australiensis
19 936 302
52×
3 598
47 841 325
90.0 %
UoMAU35
B. parvicylindrica
20 679 958
54×
4 332
47 841 626
91.0 %
UoMAU55
B. psychrophila
15 493 552
43×
2 051
45 155 991
85.1 %
UoMAU58
B. liffmaniae
18 536 626
51×
3 206
44 962 020
84.5 %
UoMAU80
B. tuberculispora
18 564 934
40×
5 511
57 697 485
86.6 %
UoMAU90
B. australiensis
18 283 128
48×
3 192
47 594 588
88.0 %
Forty-eight concatenated partial gene regions (Table 1), totalling c. 50 kb, were used to infer a highly-resolved phylogeny. Some multi-species clades shown in the single gene trees were strongly supported in the multiple gene tree. From this analysis, two major clades are resolved in Backusella, one that consists of B. psychrophila, Backusella ‘group X’, B. liffmaniae, and B. mclennaniae (Clade 1) and the another consists of B. luteola, B. westeae, B. australiensis, B. morwellensis, and B. tarrabulga (Clade 2) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
A multi-locus Bayesian phylogenetic tree resolves two species groups within the genus Backusella in Australia. Branches are labelled with posterior probabilities (%). Bootstrap support values derived from a maximum likelihood analysis are given in parentheses based on 1 000 repeats.
Morphological characteristics support species differentiation of molecular phylogenies
To determine if the species designations based on molecular data were supported by morphology, measurements of spore size were made for each strain (Fig. 6). On a plot of length vs ‘Q’ (length/width) four species were distinct from all others (B. luteola, B. tarrabulga, B. macrospora, and B. parvicylindrica). Backusella psychrophila and B. morwellensis showed an overlapping distribution. The remaining species (B. westeae, B. dispersa, B. australiensis, B. liffmanniae, Backusella ‘group X’, B. mclennaniae, B. parvicylindrica, and B. tuberculispora) all have relatively small, globose spores.
Fig. 6
Graph of spore dimensions for the strains of Backusella isolated in this study. Q represents the quotient of average spore length and width.
Examination of colony pigmentation revealed support for the distinction between the Clade 1 and Clade 2. Species belonging to Clade 2 show only yellow colony pigmentation, while Clade 1 displayed a range of colony pigmentation (including a single case of pale yellow). This is most obvious after scraping fungal material from agar plate cultures (Fig. 7). Before scraping all of the Clade 1 species appear close to white but three of the species, i.e., B. mclennaniae, Backusella ‘group X’, and B. liffmaniae, darken to a greyish colour when scraped. Backusella macrospora is a salmon colour and B. tuberculispora is brownish (greyish brown before scraping). Backusella parvicylindrica shows no colour change upon scraping, i.e., remaining white-cream.
Fig. 7
Pigmentation of the whole genome sequenced strains of Backusella after scraping from potato dextrose agar culture. Strains are labelled with UoMAU numbers, with the Clade 1 and Clade 2 species indicated. All strains within each species had consistent colony pigmentation conforming to that of the representative stains shown here.
All Backusella species are presumably heterothallic
Earlier studies indicated that many previously described Backu-sella species are heterothallic (Schipper 1969, Stalpers & Schipper 1980). Given the absence of zygospore production in strains derived from single asexual spore cultures, we thus expected the newly isolated strains to also be heterothallic. This was investigated using the genome sequencing data to identify the putative sex loci in these strains. A putative sex (mating type) locus, typical of heterothallic mating, was revealed in all sequenced strains.Four strains had the sexM gene and nine had the sexP gene (Fig. 8a). The genes flanking the sexM/sexP genes (algL, sagA and glrR) were the same as those observed previously for B. circina and linked to the locus in other Mucorales species (Schulz et al. 2017). To confirm that the species were heterothallic, mating reactions were set up between the sequenced strains of known mating type with strains of the same species to identify a strong mating partner. Successful partners were identified for four of the species: B. australiensis, B. luteola, B. mclennaniae, and B. parvicylindrica. In agreement with previous studies (Stalpers & Schipper 1980), comparing the morphology of the zygospores produced by different species was less informative than the differences between the respective asexual reproductive structures (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8
Newly described Backusella species are heterothallic. a. Diagram of the mating type locus of the sequenced strains. The mating type of UoMAU7 was fragmented in the assembly, hence one flank is missing; b. SEM of zygospores for the four species for which mating partners were identified. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Sucrose utilization and thermotolerance provide evidence for physiological differences between Backusella species
After pilot studies examining carbon utilization using API® 50 CH strips (bioMérieux), sucrose utilization on defined medium was investigated as a species delineating trait. Some strains were unable to grow well on defined medium with either glucose or sucrose as the sole carbon source. The nutritional requirements of these strains would need to be further studied to be able to assess their ability to utilize sucrose. Nonetheless, most of the strains grew either well on both sucrose and glucose (indicating an ability to metabolize sucrose into its constitutive glucose and fructose monosaccharides) or only well on glucose (indicating a lack of the ability to use sucrose as a carbon source). The ability or inability to use sucrose appears to be stable between strains within a species. Backusella liffmaniae, B. mclennaniae, Backusella ‘group X’, B. tarrabulga, B. westeae, and B. morwellensis are able to utilize sucrose whereas B. psychrophila, B. tuberculispora, B. australiensis, B. parvicylindrica, and B. macrospora are not (Fig. 9a; cf
Fig. 2).
Fig. 9
Sucrose assimilation in Backusella corresponds to the presence of a functional sucB gene encoding invertase. a. Growth of strains on sucrose as the sole carbon source is variable between species; b. strains that are able to utilize sucrose have alleles of sucB with a full open reading frame. Shown is a translated nucleotide alignment with polymorphisms highlighted in black and stop codons in red in UoMAU7 and UoMAU55; c. the sucB gene from B. westeae confers the ability to utilize sucrose to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUC2Δ deletion mutant; d. two B. australiensis strains that are unable to grow on sucrose have a sucB allele. One possible explanation is that deletions in the promoter region are affecting expression of the gene, illustrated by the black lines in UoMAU34 and UoMAU90.
Examination of the next generation sequencing data revealed variation in the presence of a putative gene (sucB) encoding invertase that was concordant with the ability to utilize sucrose (Fig. 9b). The strains UoMAU7, UoMAU35, UoMAU55, and UoMAU80 lack both a functional copy of this gene and the ability to grow on sucrose. The strains UoMAU4, UoMAU5, UoMAU6, UoMAU9, UoMA11, UoMAU16, and UoMAU56 both have a copy of sucB and the ability to utilize sucrose.The exception to this generalization was the two sequenced B. australiensis strains that lack the ability to utilize sucrose but have a copy of invertase. However, examination of the sucB alleles revealed a large deletion in the promoter sequence of the invertase sucB gene in these strains when compared to the sister species B. westeae (Fig. 9d). This might affect expression of the gene.To examine if the sucB gene does indeed encode a functional invertase, the gene was tested for its ability to complement a S. cerevisiae invertase mutant. The SUC2 gene was mutated in a S. cerevisiae strain by homologous recombination replacing the open reading frame with the KanMX selectable marker. The cDNA of the sucB gene was amplified from B. westeae, cloned into an expression vector, and this plasmid or the empty plasmid were transformed into the S. cerevisiae SUC2Δ mutant. The B. westeae gene was able to complement the loss of sucrose utilization in the S. cerevisiae mutant (Fig. 9c).In addition to the ability to utilize sucrose we examined a second physiological trait: growth at restrictive temperatures. There was variation at both the inter-species and intra-species level for growth at 30 °C (Fig. 10). Two species showed either no growth or limited growth in all strains, these being B. macrospora (n = 53) and B. psychrophila (n = 29). Two species show strong growth at 30 °C in all strains, i.e., B. westeae (n = 1) and B. morwellensis (n = 3), but it should be noted that for both these species there are a limited number of strains available. The remaining strains showed variable thermotolerance; for example strains of B. tuberculispora showed a wide range of growth from very minimal growth (e.g., UoMAU108) to very strong growth (e.g., UoMAU80).
Fig. 10
Backusella strains have variable temperature dependent growth. Growth of representative strains at 22 °C and 30 °C. Note the wide intraspecific variation between B. tuberculispora UoMAU80 and B. tuberculispora UoMAU108.
A third physiological trait, utilization of dulcitol, was tested in the three species Backusella ‘group X’, B. mclennaniae, and B. liffmaniae to provide a trait to distinguish B. liffmaniae from the former two species. Dulcitol was chosen based on preliminary data of carbon utilization capabilities obtained using API® 50 CH test strips. The B. liffmaniae strains grow less vigorously on dulcitol compared to Backusella ‘group X’ and B. mclennaniae (Fig. 11). The utilization of dulcitol has not been studied in the Mucorales and we have yet to identify the genetic basis for this trait.
Fig. 11
Growth of Backusella ‘group X’, B. mclennaniae and B. liffmaniae on media containing either dulcitol or glucose as a sole carbon source.
Morphology of Backusella australiensis strain UoMAU34. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the country from which it was isolated.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Morwell National Park, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2447010, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU34, JMRC SF014050).Sporangiophores up to 12.3 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 22.9–95.0 × 21.7–92.2 (av ± SD = 57.7 ± 24.6 × 55.4 ± 23.8) μm, globose to subglobose (Q = 1.00–1.08 (av ± SD = 1.04 ± 0.02)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 18.8–32.2 × 15.9–29.9 (av ± SD = 24.1 ± 4.5 × 22.0 ± 4.6) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.02–1.21 (av ± SD = 1.10 ± 0.06)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 10.50–13.5 × 9.8–12.1 (av ± SD = 12.2 ± 1.2 × 10.8 ± 0.8) μm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.05–1.29 (av ± SD = 1.13 ± 0.07)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 41 mm diam and 19 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming yellow by 4 wk. Reverse pale yellow to yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — The species shows a close genetic and morphological similarity to its sister taxon B. westeae; however, based on whole genome sequencing of two independently isolated B. australiensis strains and the single B. westeae strain there is sufficient separation to warrant its treatment as a separate species. Backusella australiensis can be distinguished from B. westeae by physiological differences such as its inability to grow on sucrose as a sole carbon source.J.J. Ellis & Hesselt., Mycologia 61: 865. 1969Synonym. Backusella johorensis L.S. Loh et al., Mucoraceous Fungi from Malaysia: 70. 2001.Notes — Backusella johorensis was reportedly unavailable for study (Lima et al. 2016) and no sequencing information is available. However, the original description of the species (Loh et al. 2001) cites an ex-type strain IMI 350574 deposited in the IMI collection at CABI, which is available as a living strain. LSU and ITS sequence information obtained from this strain indicates that B. johorensis is a synonym of B. circina.(Hagem) Urquhart & Douch, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB831145; Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Morphology of Backusella dispersa strain UoMAU119. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Basionym. Mucor dispersus Hagem, Ann. Mycol. 8 (3): 271. 1910.The following description is of UoMAU119 and is intended to illustrate the characteristics of the Australian collections, not replace Hagem’s original diagnosis of the ex-type strain CBS 107.09.Sporangiophores up to 11.3 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 30.2–47.5 × 28.3–46.1 (av ± SD = 37.5 ± 6.1 × 36.6 ± 6.2) μm, globose (Q = 1.00–1.06 (av ± SD = 1.03 ± 0.02)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 19.5–38.7 × 18.5–33.4 (av ± SD = 27.9 ± 6.8 × 25.4 ± 5.2) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.02–1.17 (av ± SD = 1.09 ± 0.05)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 8–12 × 7–10 (av ± SD = 9.5 ± 0.8 × 8.7 ± 0.9) μm, globose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.29 (av ± SD = 1.09 ± 0.08)). Abundant giant cells. Chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 49 mm diam and 21 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming yellow by 4 wk. Reverse pale yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — All three phylogenetic trees indicate a clear separation between a clade consisting of three new collections (UoMAU116, UoMAU119, and UoMAU120) as well as several strains of ‘B. lamprospora’ (CBS 224.67, 196.28, 107.09, and 195.28) which were originally identified as Mucor dispersus (Hagem 1910) from the ex-type strain of B. lamprospora (CBS 118.08) isolated by Lendner (Lendner 1908). Mucor dispersus was subsequently synonymized with Mucor lamprospora (Schipper 1969) prior to the transfer of Mucor lamprospora to the genus Backusella (Benny & Benjamin 1975). Hence these strains are currently considered to be B. lamprospora. However, synonymizing Mucor dispersus with Mucor lamprospora was not universally agreed upon, with different authors giving different weight to morphological differences vs the ability to form zygospores in interspecific crosses (Schipper 1969, Mehrotra et al. 1974, Benny & Benjamin 1975). The key morphological difference supporting the separation of M. dispersus from B. lamprospora is the presence of giant cells (Hagem 1910, Sarbhoy 1968, Ellis & Hesseltine 1969, Mehrotra et al. 1974). We therefore examined our strains for the presence of giant cells (Fig. 14). We found that these could be readily observed in the three strains which grouped with M. dispersus in the molecular phylogenies (and not in other species). These cells closely resemble those illustrated in the original description of M. dispersus (Hagem 1910) and are distinct from the inflated droplet-filled hyphal region that have been observed more widely among Backusella species (e.g., B. tuberculispora and B. westeae,
Fig. 14). Another species, B. gigacellularis, was recently reported to produce ‘giant cells’ (De Souza et al. 2014), however, these interesting cells appear to represent an unrelated cell type. In light of the clear molecular and morphological differences between M. dispersus and B. lamprospora, it is our opinion that they should be considered separate, despite the formation of zygospores in crosses between these two species. The new combination Backusella dispersa is proposed.
Fig. 14
Backusella dispersa strains produced abundant giant cells in their substrate mycelia that are distinct from the inflated droplet filled hyphal regions seen in other strains like B. tuberculispora and B. westeae. — Scale bar = 100 μm.
(Loh et al. 2001)Notes — The ex-type strain cited by species (Loh et al. 2001) is not in the IMI collection at CABI in Egham, UK. The herbarium component of the IMI collection was transferred to the herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; however, the specimen is not available (Begoña Aguirre-Hudson pers. comm.). Thus, type material for this species is unavailable. The description of B. granulispora states that the species does not have recurved juvenile sporangia and therefore it does not conform to the current morphological understanding of the genus (Loh et al. 2001, Walther et al. 2013). The issues presented when dealing with so-called ‘old names’ in taxonomy, i.e., those without an available type or sufficient description have been discussed previously (Dayarathne et al. 2016). While it is clear that this species is not a true member of the genus Backusella, future research will hopefully clarify the true taxonomy of this species.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831151; Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Morphology of Backusella liffmaniae strain UoMAU58. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Recognition of the contribution made by Patricia Liffman in protecting the natural environment where the ex-type strain was isolated (Liffman 2016).Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Jack Cann Reserve, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2447034, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU58, JMRC SF014074).Sporangiophores up to 13.6 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 26.5–55.2 × 26.0–54.1 (av ± SD = 38.5 ± 10.8 × 36.9 ± 10.6) μm, globose to subglobose (Q = 1.02–1.12 (av ± SD = 1.04 ± 0.03)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 14.8–26.3 × 14.8–24.4 (av ± SD = 20.8 ± 3.7 × 19.4 ± 3.2) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.00–1.24 (av ± SD = 1.07 ± 0.07)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 9.0–12.9 × 8.6–12.0 (av ± SD = 11.4 ± 1.3 × 10.4 ± 1.2) μm, globose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.01–1.17 (av ± SD = 1.09 ± 0.06)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 32 mm diam and 17 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming yellowish grey by 4 wk. Reverse creamy white, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — Can be distinguished from Backusella ‘group X’ and B. mclennaniae by its inability to efficiently utilize dulcitol as a sole carbon source.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831149; Fig. 16
Fig. 16
Morphology of Backusella luteola strain UoMAU6. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the yellow colony pigmentation, which is a trait in common with other Clade 2 species.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Jack Cann Reserve, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2446983, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU6, JMRC SF014023).Sporangiophores up to 9.7 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 25.8–59.2 × 22.9–55.0 (av ± SD = 41.6 ± 10.8 × 38.0 ± 10.2) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.01–1.43 (av ± SD = 1.10 ± 0.12)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 16.9–26.4 × 14.7–23.4 (av ± SD = 22.0 ± 3.4 × 18.2 ± 2.6) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.12–1.52 (av ± SD = 1.21 ± 0.13)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 12.9–20.1 × 12.3–16.7 (av ± SD = 16.2 ± 2.2 × 14.8 ± 1.4) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.34 (av ± SD = 1.10 ± 0.10)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 42 mm diam and 38 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse very pale yellow, becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse pale yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — Known from two independent collections taken 225 km apart in Victoria. Both isolates have similar spore dimensions which are unique from all other species isolated in this study (Fig. 6).Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831143; Fig. 17
Fig. 17
Morphology of Backusella macrospora strain UoMAU7. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the large sporangiospores.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Tarra-Bulga National Park, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2446984, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU7, JMRC SF014024).Sporangiophores up to 10.5 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 37.8–76.4 × 34.3–70.7 (av ± SD = 60.6 ± 12.2 × 54.3 ± 10.4) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.01–1.40 (av ± SD = 1.12 ± 0.12)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 16.8–30.4 × 13.0–27.3 (av ± SD = 25.0 ± 4.3 × 20.9 ± 3.9) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.00–1.48 (av ± SD = 1.20 ± 0.15)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 21.4–33.3 × 19.6–26.8 (av ± SD = 27.7 ± 3.8 × 22.6 ± 2.5) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.39 (av ± SD = 1.20 ± 0.13)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 42 mm diam and 14 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming cream by 4 wk. Reverse white to very pale salmon, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — Can be distinguished from all other species isolated in this study by its large sporangiospores, the shape of which is variable between isolates.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831152; Fig. 18
Fig. 18
Morphology of Backusella mclennaniae strain UoMAU11. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. For Australian mycologist Ethel Irene McLennan (Ducker 2012).Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Morwell National Park, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2446987, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU11, JMRC SF014027).Sporangiophores up to 8.7 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 25.6–39.6 × 24.2–39.1 (av ± SD = 31.8 ± 4.3 × 30.2 ± 4.7) μm, globose to subglobose (Q = 1.01–1.10 (av ± SD = 1.06 ± 0.03)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 13.0–25.3 × 9.1–23.8 (av ± SD = 18.8 ± 3.8 × 16.5 ± 4.5) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.00–1.42 (av ± SD = 1.1 ± 0.14)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 9.6–13.6 × 9.2–12.0 μm (av ± SD = 11.4 ± 1.3 × 10.3 ± 0.8) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.02–1.32 (av ± SD = 1.10 ± 0.09)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 42 mm diam and 44 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming yellowish grey by 4 wk. Reverse white sometimes with grey zones. becoming paler towards edges.Notes — See Backusella ‘group X’.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831148; Fig. 19
Fig. 19
Morphology of Backusella morwellensis strain UoMAU16. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to Morwell National Park, the origin of the type specimen.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Morwell National Park, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2446992, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU16, JMRC SF014032).Sporangiophores up to 10.9 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 23.5–71.6 × 23.2–57.2 (av ± SD = 37.0 ± 14.8 × 34.1 ± 10.9) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.01–1.25 (av ± SD = 1.07 ± 0.09)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 18.6–29.8 × 16.1–28.0 (av ± SD = 23.5 ± 3.7 × 20.9 ± 3.5) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.01–1.30 (av ± SD = 1.13 ± 0.08)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 9.4–17.4 × 7.7–13.0 μm (av ± SD = 13.2 ± 2.6 × 9.9 ± 1.8) μm, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid (Q = 1.15–1.55 (av ± SD = 1.33 ± 0.14)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 45 mm diam and 23 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse very pale yellow becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — Spore dimensions overlap those of B. psychrophila. Despite the similar spore morphology, molecular data show that these two species are not closely related. Backusella morwellensis can be readily distinguished from B. psychrophila by the ability of B. morwellensis to utilize sucrose.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831150; Fig. 20
Fig. 20
Morphology of Backusella parvicylindrica strain UoMAU35. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. From the Latin parvus meaning small and cylindrica from the Greek kylindros meaning a roller or cylinder, referring to the dimensions of the sporangiospores.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Jack Cann Reserve, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2447011, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU35, JMRC SF014051).Sporangiophores up to 11.8 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 23.5–47.2 × 23.1–45.9 (av ± SD = 33.9 ± 7.5 × 32.4 ± 7.4) μm, globose to subglobose (Q = 1.02–1.09 (av ± SD = 1.05 ± 0.03)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 23.3–29.6 × 19.6–25.4 (av ± SD = 26.8 ± 2.3 × 22.4 ± 2.0 μm), variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.06–1.44 (av ± SD = 1.20 ± 0.10)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 10.2–17.6 × 5.9–9.9 (av ± SD = 13.7 ± 2.0 × 7.8 ± 1.2) μm, ellipsoid to cylindric (Q = 1.57–2.31 (av ± SD = 1.78 ± 0.24)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 40 mm diam and 22 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming pale yellow by 4 wk. Reverse white to creamy white.Notes — Can be morphologically distinguished from all other species isolated in this study by its unique spore dimensions that are on average less than 15 μm long and have a width/length ratio of less than 0.6.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831154; Fig. 21
Fig. 21
Morphology of Backusella psychrophila strain UoMAU55. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella, c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Referring to the inability of all strains to grow above 30 °C.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Jack Cann Reserve, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2447031, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU55, JMRC SF014071).Sporangiophores up to 14.1 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 28.1–43.5 × 28.1–40.5 (av ± SD = 34.8 ± 5.9 × 33.5 ± 4.9) μm, globose to subglobose (Q = 1.00–1.13 (av ± SD = 1.03 ± 0.04)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 9.3–25.8 × 8.4–19.6 (av ± SD = 18.7 ± 4.6 × 15.7 ± 3.0) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.04–1.39 (av ± SD = 1.18 ± 0.11)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 10.6–16.9 × 9.1–11.7 (av ± SD = 14.2 ± 1.9 × 1.0 ± 0.9) μm, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid (Q = 1.17–1.57 (av ± SD = 1.42 ± 0.11)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 47 mm diam and 20 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse pale yellow to cream.Notes — See B. morwellensis.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831147; Fig. 22
Fig. 22
Morphology of Backusella tarrabulga strain UoMAU5. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. Derived from Tarra-Bulga, the name of the National Park where it was collected.Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Tarra-Bulga National Park, isolated from leaf litter (holotype MEL 2446982, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU5, JMRC SF014022).Sporangiophores up to 8.4 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 29.7–48.0 × 24.2–41.8 (av ± SD = 36.8 ± 6.1 × 34.0 ± 6.5) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.01–1.24 (av ± SD = 1.09 ± 0.08)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 20.4–34.0 × 16.2–27.4 (av ± SD = 25.3 ± 4.1 × 19.8 ± 3.4) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.16–1.51 (av ± SD = 1.28 ± 0.10)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 12.2–23.4 × 11.9–20.1 (av ± SD = 17.0 ± 3.1 × 15.8 ± 2.6) μm, globose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.17 (av ± SD = 1.08 ± 0.06)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 41 mm diam and 21 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse pale yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — Only two strains of B. tarrabulga have been obtained from two independent sites c. 40 km apart in eastern Victoria. Both these strains showed very similar spore morphology (av. length = 17 μm) which make B. tarrabulga unique among the Backusella species isolated in this study (Fig. 6).G. Walther & de Hoog, Persoonia 30: 41. 2013 — Fig. 23
Fig. 23
Morphology of Backusella tuberculispora strain UoMAU80. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Basionym. Mucor tuberculisporus (Schipper 1978).The following description is based on strain UoMAU80 to illustrate the morphology of the Australian collections.Sporangiophores up to 13.8 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia brown minutely spinulose, length 32.8–58.6 × width 32.7–57.9 (av ± SD = 47.7 ± 9.5 × 46.9 ± 9.1) μm, globose (Q = 1.00–1.05 (av ± SD = 1.02 ± 0.01)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 19.6–40.1 × 19.5–39.3 (av ± SD = 33.4 ± 6.1 × 31.8 ± 6.1) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.01–1.13 (av ± SD = 1.05 ± 0.04)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 7–11 × 7–10 (av ± SD = 8.8 ± 0.9 × 8.2 ± 0.8) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.38 (av ± SD = 1.08 ± 0.11)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 56 mm diam and 17 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse light grey due to darkly coloured sporangia, becoming dark brown by 4 wk. Reverse creamy white.Notes — The B. tuberculispora strains isolated in this study are clearly distinguished by their darkly pigmented sporangia. These give the colonies a darker appearance than any of the other Australian species. This is consistent with descriptions of the ex-type strain CBS 562.66 which is light grey on PDA. However, the eponymous rounded projections on the sporangiospores have not been observed despite being reported in the type strain on a number of media including PDA (Baijal & Mehrotra 1965, Schipper 1978). Despite this difference, given the supporting evidence, we believe that these strains should be considered as B. tuberculispora.(A.K. Sarbhoy) G. Walther & de Hoog, Persoonia 30: 41. 2013Synonyms. Mucor grandis Schipper & Samson, Mycotaxon 50: 479. 1994.Backusella grandis (Schipper & Samson) G. Walther & de Hoog, Persoonia 30: 41. 2013.Notes — Previous authors have noted the close relationship between B. variabilis and B. grandis (Walther et al. 2013) and suggested the possibility of future synonymisation of these species. While there are morphological differences between the species, we believe that in light of the more detailed phylogenetic understanding of the genus presented here, the sequence similarity between these species justifies the formal synonymisation of these two species.Urquhart & Douch, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB831155; Fig. 24
Fig. 24
Morphology of Backusella westeae strain UoMAU4. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Etymology. In honour of mycologist Gretna Weste (Linden 2007).Typus. AUSTRALIA, Victoria, Tarra-Bulga National Park, isolated as a contaminant during attempts to culture Laccaria species from freshly collected sporocarps (holotype MEL 2417242, dried culture on filter paper, National Herbarium of Victoria, Victoria, culture ex-type UoMAU4, JMRC SF014021).Sporangiophores up to 9.5 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 26.2–64.0 × 22.4–58.4 (av ± SD = 47.1 ± 11.5 × 42.5 ± 10.5) μm, globose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.03–1.23 (av ± SD = 1.11 ± 0.07)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 10.3–25.8 × 8.9–22.3 (av ± SD = 17.5 ± 4.8 × 15.3 ± 4.6) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = 1.02–1.38 (av ± SD = 1.16 ± 0.11)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 10.5–13.5 × 8.7–13.3 (av ± SD = 12.6 ± 1.0 × 11.2 ± 1.7) μm, globose to ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.41 (av ± SD = 1.14 ± 0.13)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 35 mm diam and 20 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse yellow, becoming paler towards edges.Notes — See B. australiensis.— Fig. 25
Fig. 25
Morphology of Backusella ‘group X’ strain UoMAU9. a. SEM of sporangium; b. light microscope image of columella; c. light microscope image of sporangiospores; d, e. obverse and reverse of colony. — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Sporangiophores up to 8.1 μm diam, generally tapering very slightly towards sporangia, occasionally branched, hyaline, with or without pale yellow contents. Sporangia minutely spinulose, 23.6–56.0 × 23.1–55.2 (av ± SD = 38.2 ± 11.4 × 37.6 ± 11.3) μm, globose (Q = 1.00–1.04 (av ± SD = 1.02 ± 0.01)). Columellae smooth-walled with pale yellow granular content, 17.9–34.1 × 16.8–29.2 (av ± SD = 25.0 ± 4.8 × 23.3 ± 4.0) μm, variably shaped globose, ellipsoid or applanate (Q = x = 1.00–1.17 (av ± SD = 1.07 ± 0.06)). Collars small and uncommon. Sporangiospores smooth-walled, 9.3–12.1 × 7.6–11.3 (av ± SD = 10.4 ± 1.0 × 9.7 ± 1.1) μm, globose to broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.00–1.22 (av ± SD = 1.07 ± 0.06)). Giant cells and chlamydospores not observed. Sporangiola present.Culture characteristics — Colony cottony in texture, reaching 48 mm diam and 22 mm height after 3 d growth on PDA at 22 °C. Obverse white, becoming brownish yellow by 4 wk. Reverse creamy white. Grey zones sometimes visible close to substrate.Notes — Morphologically and physiologically similar, Backusella ‘group X’ and B. mclennaniae cannot yet be discriminated based on the characters examined but show clear separation in the molecular data. ITS similarity between Backusella ‘group X’ and the type of B. lamprospora CBS 118.08 is only around 92 %, however, further taxonomic work will be required to determine whether ‘group X’ should be included in B. lamprospora or described as a separate species.1. Spore length av = 22–35 μm . . . . . . . . . . . B. macrospora1. Spore length av ~ 17 μm; Q ~ 1.1 . . . . . . . . . . . B. tarrabulga1. Spore length av ~ 14 μm; Q ~ 1.05 . . . . . . . . . . . B. luteola1. Spore length av = < 15 μm long; Q > 1.6 . . . . . . . . . . . B. parvicylindrica1. Spore length av = < 15 μm long; Q 1.2–1.51 . . . . . . . . . . . 21. Spore length av = < 13 μm long; Q < 1.15 . . . . . . . . . . . 32. Utilizes sucrose as sole carbon source . . . . . . . . . . . B. morwellensis2. Does not utilize sucrose as sole carbon source . . . . . . . . . . . B. psychrophila3. Giant cells present . . . . . . . . . . . B. dispersa3. Giant cells absent . . . . . . . . . . . 44. Utilizes sucrose as sole carbon source . . . . . . . . . . . 54. Does not utilize sucrose as sole carbon source . . . . . . . . . . . 65. Reverse colony colour typically yellow . . . . . . . . . . . B. westeae5. Colony colour typically white, sometimes showing black pigmentation close to substrate . . . . . . . . . . . 76. Colony colour typically yellow, especially after ‘scraping’ . . . . . . . . . . . B. australiensis6. Darkened sporangia giving colony a grey appearance . . . . . . . . . . . B. tuberculispora7. Strong growth on dulcitol . . . . . . . . . . . B. liffmannii7. Weak growth on dulcitolBackusella ‘group X’; . . . . . . . . . . . B. mclennaniae*
KEY TO THE BACKUSELLA SPECIES OF SOUTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA
*Backusella ‘group X’ and B. mclennaniae are distinguished by analysis of DNA sequences.
DISCUSSION
Globally, the discovery rate of new, non-Dikarya fungal species is remarkably low. In contrast to 2017, when 24 non-Dikarya species were identified (Willis 2018), here we report 10 new species in the genus Backusella. These species were shown to be genetically, morphologically, and physiologically distinct. Phylogenies based on comparing the sequences of DNA regions between different strains revealed clear separation between species (Fig. 2–5). Additionally, we describe a group of species which we tentatively refer to as B. ‘group X’ with affinity to B. lamprospora, the taxonomy of which requires further study, and may potentially be another novel species. The most phylogenetically informative morphological trait that we examined was spore dimensions, which strongly support the species groups made apparent by phylogenetic trees based on DNA sequences.Both the discovery and then analysis of the Mucorales has been hampered by features of their genomes that are less commonly encountered in the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. In particular, the genomes of Mucorales species can contain whole and/or segmental genome duplications (Corrochano et al. 2016), potentially confounding phylogenies based on what are single genes in other fungi (e.g., the gene encoding actin). To circumvent such problems, we turned to whole genome sequencing to provide a far more substantial set of DNA information, and identified the argA gene as one example of a single copy gene that could potentially be adopted more widely to explore relationships between species and genera in the Mucorales. The argA gene encodes a putative argininosuccinate lyase, which breaks down argininosuccinate into arginine and fumarate. Being essential for the production of arginine, it is well conserved between plants, fungi and animals. Examining the MCL cluster data available through MycoCosm shows that of 54 genomes of Mucoromycotina species, 52 have a single copy argA homolog (Grigoriev et al. 2014). The two exceptions are Rhizopus microsporus var. chinensis CCTCCM201021 which carries two copies as a result of a large duplicated region (Wang et al. 2013) and Endogone sp. FLAS 5907 which lacks an argA homolog, this might reflect either an incomplete assembly or the interesting biology of this species (Chang et al. 2019).With decreasing costs in genome sequencing, reporting a draft genome sequence could become a mandatory requirement for the description of new fungal species, providing future investigators with a far more comprehensive gene set from which to choose regions that may establish relationships, thereby providing the resolution of multi-gene phylogenetic inferences.In addition to DNA sequences and morphology, we also examined two physiological traits – utilization of sucrose and growth at different temperatures. Sucrose was found to be consistently utilized by the strains corresponding to some species but not others. This is in keeping with previous work suggesting carbon source utilization can sometimes discriminate between species (Scholer & Müller 1966, Schwarz et al. 2007, Pawłowska et al. 2019). Sucrose is known to be broken-down by the enzyme invertase in fungi, including some Mucorales (Watanabe & Oda 2008, Dong et al. 2018). Examination of the genome sequences revealed a putative invertase gene that was present in the genomes of the sucrose-utilizing species but absent or mutated from those which lack this ability. The ability of B. westeae sucB DNA to complement the S. cerevisiae SUC2 deletion mutant phenotype confirms the prediction that sucB is a functional invertase. The appearance of invertase-producing species in two places on the tree implies that the ability to utilize sucrose has been lost multiple times during the evolution of the genus. This hypothesis is supported by the presence of independently-derived non-functional alleles in UoMAU7 and UoMAU55 (stop codons within the reading frame); and UoMAU34 and UoMAU90 (with large deletions in the promoter region). The fact that these species are apparently under different selection pressures in regard carbon source utilization suggests that there may be niche separation between the species based on their ability to utilize different carbon sources. More generally, the discovery of sucrose utilization as a potentially taxon-discriminating character provides an example of how implementation of polyphasic taxonomy can link morphological or physiological taxonomic traits backed by DNA sequence analysis.The impacts of climate change on soil biodiversity have been considered previously (Classen et al. 2015). Given the different capacity of Backusella strains to withstand increased temperature (Fig. 2), there is a possibility that a warming climate will disturb the species composition (selecting against those species which appear to be uniformly heat sensitive) or in the case of those species with variable tolerance shifting population structures. Compared to sucrose utilization, thermotolerance is a more complex trait likely involving the contributions of many genes. Further studies at the population-level, particularly in the case of B. tuberculispora, might help us to understand the genetic basis for thermotolerance in this genus and allow us to predict the evolutionary effects of climate change on it.The biological species concept is one system by which species may be deliminated. While mating reactions could be a powerful tool to understand taxon boundaries, interpretation of mating reactions in the Mucorales is complicated by the production of azygospores in some interspecific crosses that morphologically resemble zygospores and the frequent lack of interaction, even between closely related strains (Schipper 1978, Stalpers & Schipper 1980). Furthermore, zygospore dormancy, which is found in other Mucorales, may hamper the ability to resolve post-zygotic isolation, which requires reliable production of progeny from compatible crosses.A limitation of this study was that we were unable to directly study a number of non-Australian isolates, in large part due to quarantine restrictions. We hope that future research will result into detailed observations of these strains, particularly their ability to utilize sucrose so that this information can be integrated with that described here. The study of the non-Australian isolate CBS 118.08 will be particularly important to clarify the relationship between this species and the Backusella ‘group X’ strains that we isolated.In summary, this study has uncovered a considerable and previously unexplored diversity of one Mucorales genus, Backusella, in south-eastern Australia. The low degree of overlap between the species isolated in this study and those isolated internationally in the last decade (B. gigacellularis and B. constricta from Brazil and B. locustae from South Korea) provides initial evidence that different geographical areas may possess unique Backusella flora. This work highlights how understudied the mucoralean flora of Australia are, and will stimulate other researchers to focus greater efforts on understanding other basal genera in both this region and around the world.
Authors: G Walther; J Pawłowska; A Alastruey-Izquierdo; M Wrzosek; J L Rodriguez-Tudela; S Dolatabadi; A Chakrabarti; G S de Hoog Journal: Persoonia Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Luis M Corrochano; Alan Kuo; Marina Marcet-Houben; Silvia Polaino; Asaf Salamov; José M Villalobos-Escobedo; Jane Grimwood; M Isabel Álvarez; Javier Avalos; Diane Bauer; Ernesto P Benito; Isabelle Benoit; Gertraud Burger; Lola P Camino; David Cánovas; Enrique Cerdá-Olmedo; Jan-Fang Cheng; Angel Domínguez; Marek Eliáš; Arturo P Eslava; Fabian Glaser; Gabriel Gutiérrez; Joseph Heitman; Bernard Henrissat; Enrique A Iturriaga; B Franz Lang; José L Lavín; Soo Chan Lee; Wenjun Li; Erika Lindquist; Sergio López-García; Eva M Luque; Ana T Marcos; Joel Martin; Kevin McCluskey; Humberto R Medina; Alejandro Miralles-Durán; Atsushi Miyazaki; Elisa Muñoz-Torres; José A Oguiza; Robin A Ohm; María Olmedo; Margarita Orejas; Lucila Ortiz-Castellanos; Antonio G Pisabarro; Julio Rodríguez-Romero; José Ruiz-Herrera; Rosa Ruiz-Vázquez; Catalina Sanz; Wendy Schackwitz; Mahdi Shahriari; Ekaterina Shelest; Fátima Silva-Franco; Darren Soanes; Khajamohiddin Syed; Víctor G Tagua; Nicholas J Talbot; Michael R Thon; Hope Tice; Ronald P de Vries; Ad Wiebenga; Jagjit S Yadav; Edward L Braun; Scott E Baker; Victoriano Garre; Jeremy Schmutz; Benjamin A Horwitz; Santiago Torres-Martínez; Alexander Idnurm; Alfredo Herrera-Estrella; Toni Gabaldón; Igor V Grigoriev Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: J Bähler; J Q Wu; M S Longtine; N G Shah; A McKenzie; A B Steever; A Wach; P Philippsen; J R Pringle Journal: Yeast Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Igor V Grigoriev; Roman Nikitin; Sajeet Haridas; Alan Kuo; Robin Ohm; Robert Otillar; Robert Riley; Asaf Salamov; Xueling Zhao; Frank Korzeniewski; Tatyana Smirnova; Henrik Nordberg; Inna Dubchak; Igor Shabalov Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 16.971