| Literature DB >> 35935508 |
Xiyu Cheng1, Ying Luo1, Yifan Gao1, Shen Li1, Chunming Xu2, Shangyuan Tang1,2,3,4, Yongkun Yang1, Zehua Zhang1, He Jiang3, Hanli Xu1, Shuobo Shi4, Qiong Yan1.
Abstract
Surfactants play a vital role in the delignification and saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. A strategy for coupling surfactant-assisted alkaline pretreatment (SAP) with surfactant-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis (SEH) has been proposed for improving sugar recovery from a potential energy crop, Miscanthus sinensis. Poly (ethylene glycol) 2000 (PEG 2000) was found to be more efficient in SAP than in other tested surfactants. Compositional and structural analysis revealed that the SAP process with 1% of PEG 2000 produced more efficient lignin removal and microstructure disruption of the pretreated sample, thus indicating much higher reducing sugar yields of 544.4-601.2 mg/g compared to the samples that were untreated or pretreated by alkali alone. Moreover, SEH with 1% Tween 80, which could block the lignin-enzyme interactions, produced a substantial reduction of 33.3% in the enzyme loading to achieve a higher sugar recovery from the SAP sample.Entities:
Keywords: Miscanthus sinensis; biomass; poly (ethylene glycol) 2000; surfactant-assisted alkaline pretreatment; surfactant-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935508 PMCID: PMC9355570 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.918126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1The effect of SAP with Tween 60 and CTAB surfactants on enzymatic hydrolysis.
FIGURE 2The effect of SAP with PEG surfactants on enzymatic hydrolysis.
FIGURE 3The compositional analysis of untreated and pretreated samples.
FIGURE 4SEM observations of the stalk samples before and after pretreatments (500×). (A) Raw sample; (B) AP sample; (C) SAP sample.
FIGURE 5The effect of alkali concentrations in PEG 2000-mediated SAP on enzymatic hydrolysis (A) and accessibility (B) of these pretreated samples.
FIGURE 6The effect of SEH of SAP sample on the fermentable sugar production.
Comparison of the fermentable sugar recovery from different biomass.
| Biomass | Pretreatment conditions | Enzyme loading (FPU/g) | Sugar yield (mg/g)1 | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1% H2SO4, 120°C, 10 min | 20 | < 150 (GY) |
|
| 1% NaOH, 120°C, 10 min | 20 | 320 (GY) | ||
| Wild rice grass | 2% H2SO4, 121°C, 60 min | 20 | 457 |
|
|
| 12.5% [TBA][OH] or 2% NaOH, ultrasound irradiation | 35 | 362.3–426.6 |
|
|
| 2% Ca(OH)2 or NaOH, 121°C, 60 min | 15 | 324–5372 |
|
| Pine foliage | 1% C-TAB, 1% H2SO4, 121°C, 60 min | 100 | 588 |
|
| 1% PEG-6000 1% NaOH, 121°C, 60 min | 100 | 477 | ||
| Bamboo | 1% NaOH, 3% Tween 80,121°C, 60 min | 40 | 629 |
|
| Chili post-harvest residue | 3% PEG 6000,121°C, 60 min | 30 | 445 |
|
|
| 4% NaOH, 121°C, 20 min | -- | 590–700 |
|
| 4% H2SO4, 121°C, 20 min | -- | 370–530 | ||
|
| 1.2% NaOH, 120°C, 30 min | 15 | 526.5 |
|
|
| 0.9% NaOH, 1% PEG 2000,121 °C, 10 min | 15 | 601.2 | This study |
|
| 0.9% NaOH, 1% PEG 2000,121°C, 10 min | 10–12 | 567.8–574.4 | This study |
Note: 1The soluble sugar yields were calculated based on per g pretreated stalk. 2The soluble sugar yields were calculated on the basis of the reported data of glucose and/or xylose yields in their studies. GY: glucose yield; Ref.: references.