| Literature DB >> 27499809 |
Han-Yin Li1, Xue Chen1, Chen-Zhou Wang1, Shao-Ni Sun1, Run-Cang Sun2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The biomass recalcitrance resulting from its chemical compositions and physical structures impedes the conversion of biomass into fermentable sugars. Pretreatment is a necessary procedure to increase the cellulase accessibility for bioconversion of lignocelluloses into bioethanol. Alternatively, ionic liquids, a series of promising solvents, provide unique opportunities for pretreating a wide range of lignocellulosic materials. In this study, a two-step treatment including ionic liquids pretreatment and successive alkali fractionations was performed on Eucalyptus to achieve a high enzymatic digestibility. The compositional and structural changes of Eucalyptus cell walls and their possible effect on saccharification ratio were comprehensively investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Alkali fractionation; Anatomical changes; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Eucalyptus; Ionic liquids pretreatment
Year: 2016 PMID: 27499809 PMCID: PMC4974680 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0578-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1SEM images of the control and ILs-pretreated Eucalyptus at magnification ×2000, ×4500, and ×10,000
Fig. 2Bright field images of the cell wall of the control and ILs-pretreated Eucalyptus (a). Selected areas (blue rectangle) shown in bright field images were used for Raman imaging. Raman images of the main components distribution in the Eucalyptus cell walls before (control) and after each ILs pretreatment by integrating from 1560 to 1625 cm−1 (b) and from 2830 to 2920 cm−1 (c)
Fig. 3Average Raman spectra of S regions in the cross sections of the control and ILs-pretreated Eucalyptus (a), and zoom into the average Raman spectra in the range of 1250–1710 cm−1 (b)
Chemical compositions of the control, ILs-pretreated, and alkali post-treated substrates obtained after the synergistic treatment
| Samplesa | Glucan (%) | Xylan (%) | AIL (%) | ASL (%) | Lignin (%) | Solid recovery (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Control | 41.58 | 15.85 | 25.44 | 3.96 | 29.40 | 100 | |||
| BCl | 42.32 | 0.57 | 15.87 | 2.18 | 23.77 | 4.07 | 27.84 | 7.50 | 97.69 |
| BAc | 43.94 | 1.05 | 14.84 | 12.33 | 21.81 | 4.26 | 26.07 | 16.97 | 93.64 |
| Control-4 | 46.99 | 10.49 | 12.17 | 39.18 | 25.20 | 3.88 | 29.08 | 21.65 | 79.21 |
| BCl-4 | 47.94 | 11.32 | 12.24 | 40.60 | 24.02 | 3.66 | 27.68 | 27.58 | 76.92 |
| BAc-4 | 48.90 | 11.99 | 11.94 | 43.63 | 23.09 | 3.81 | 26.90 | 31.53 | 74.83 |
aControl: raw material; BCl and BAc: samples obtained after the pretreatment with [Bmim]Cl and [Bmim]OAc at 120 °C for 30 min, respectively; Control-4, BCl-4, and BAc-4: residues obtained after the successive treatment with 0.5, 2.0, and 4.0 % NaOH at 90 °C for 2 h from the untreated, [Bmim]Cl-pretreated, and [Bmim]OAc-pretreated Eucalyptus, respectively
AIL acid insoluble lignin, ASL acid soluble lignin, C the content of each composition, R the removal of each composition after treatment on the basis of its original amount in the raw material
Fig. 4XRD spectra of the control, ILs-pretreated, and alkali post-treated substrates
Fig. 5SEM images of the control, [Bmim]OAc-pretreated, and alkali post-treated Eucalyptus at magnification ×2000, ×4500, and ×10,000
Fig. 6AFM height images of the control, [Bmim]OAc-pretreated, and [Bmim]OAc-alkali-treated Eucalyptus fiber cell wall from S layers at different magnifications. The white arrows point out the cracks between microfibrils after [Bmim]OAc pretreatment
Fig. 7The enzymatic hydrolysis of the control, ILs-pretreated, and alkali post-treated substrates. The error bars are standard deviations from the average values of duplicate determinations