Literature DB >> 35934336

Optimization of protein-level tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling conditions in complex samples with top-down proteomics.

Yanting Guo1, Dahang Yu1, Kellye A Cupp-Sutton1, Xiaowen Liu2, Si Wu3.   

Abstract

Isobaric chemical tag labels (e.g., iTRAQ and TMT) have been extensively utilized as a standard quantification approach in bottom-up proteomics, which provides high multiplexing capacity and enables MS2-level quantification while not complicating the MS1 scans. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of intact protein TMT labeling for the identification and quantification with top-down proteomics of smaller intact proteoforms (<35 kDa) in complex biological samples through the removal of large proteins prior to labeling. Still, the production of side products during TMT labeling (i.e., incomplete labeling or labeling of unintended residues) complicated the analysis of complex protein samples. In this study, we systematically evaluated the protein-level TMT labeling reaction parameters, including TMT-to-protein mass ratio, pH/concentration of quenching buffer, protein concentration, reaction time, and reaction buffer. Our results indicated that: (1) high TMT-to-protein mass ratio (e.g., 8:1, 4:1), (2) high pH/concentration of quenching buffer (pH > 9.1, final hydroxylamine concentration >0.3%), and (3) high protein concentration (e.g., > 1.0 μg/μL) resulted in optimal labeling efficiency and minimized production of over/underlabeled side products. >90% labeling efficiency was achieved for E. coli cell lysate after optimization of protein-level TMT labeling conditions. In addition, a double labeling approach was developed for efficiently labeling limited biological samples with low concentrations. This research provides practical guidance for efficient TMT labeling of complex intact protein samples, which can be readily adopted in the high-throughput quantification top-down proteomics.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isobaric labeling; Quantitative proteomics; Tandem mass tags (TMT); Top-down proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35934336      PMCID: PMC9371347          DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.911


  35 in total

1.  A summary of the measured pK values of the ionizable groups in folded proteins.

Authors:  Gerald R Grimsley; J Martin Scholtz; C Nick Pace
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Using the GELFREE 8100 Fractionation System for molecular weight-based fractionation with liquid phase recovery.

Authors:  Chuck Witkowski; Jay Harkins
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Quantitative profiling of serum samples using TMT protein labelling, fractionation and LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  John Sinclair; John F Timms
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Global Profiling of Lysine Accessibility to Evaluate Protein Structure Changes in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Kaiwen Yu; Mingming Niu; Hong Wang; Yuxin Li; Zhiping Wu; Bin Zhang; Vahram Haroutunian; Junmin Peng
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  N,N-dimethyl leucines as novel isobaric tandem mass tags for quantitative proteomics and peptidomics.

Authors:  Feng Xiang; Hui Ye; Ruibing Chen; Qiang Fu; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  NHS-based Tandem Mass Tagging of Proteins at the Level of Whole Cells: A Critical Evaluation in Comparison to Conventional TMT-Labeling Approaches for Quantitative Proteome Analysis.

Authors:  Dominik A Megger; Leona L Pott; Kristin Rosowski; Birgit Zülch; Stephanie Tautges; Thilo Bracht; Barbara Sitek
Journal:  Anal Sci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.081

7.  MASH Suite: a user-friendly and versatile software interface for high-resolution mass spectrometry data interpretation and visualization.

Authors:  Huseyin Guner; Patrick L Close; Wenxuan Cai; Han Zhang; Ying Peng; Zachery R Gregorich; Ying Ge
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Model studies on iTRAQ modification of peptides: sequence-dependent reaction specificity.

Authors:  John E Wiktorowicz; Robert D English; Zheng Wu; Alexander Kurosky
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Two-Dimensional Separation Using High-pH and Low-pH Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography for Top-down Proteomics.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Hongyan Ma; Kenneth Smith; Si Wu
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  TMTpro reagents: a set of isobaric labeling mass tags enables simultaneous proteome-wide measurements across 16 samples.

Authors:  Jiaming Li; Jonathan G Van Vranken; Laura Pontano Vaites; Devin K Schweppe; Edward L Huttlin; Chris Etienne; Premchendar Nandhikonda; Rosa Viner; Aaron M Robitaille; Andrew H Thompson; Karsten Kuhn; Ian Pike; Ryan D Bomgarden; John C Rogers; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.