Literature DB >> 35930210

Endoscopic management of familial adenomatous polyposis targeting colorectal lesions greater than 5 mm in size: a single-center retrospective study.

Tatsuro Murano1, Hiroaki Ikematsu2, Kensuke Shinmura2, Kei Okumura2, Takeshi Kuwata3, Mineko Ushiama4, Teruhiko Yoshida4, Kenji Takashima2, Keiichiro Nakajo2, Tomohiro Kadota2, Yusuke Yoda2, Yasuhiro Oono2, Tomonori Yano2.   

Abstract

Preserving the colon while preventing colorectal cancer is challenging in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although prophylactic colectomy is the current standard of care, some patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may wish to postpone colectomy as long as polyposis can be managed by endoscopic resection. This study examined our endoscopic management and prognostic results for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who refused to undergo colectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis treated at our hospital between January 1995 and December 2020. All patients opted to postpone prophylactic colectomy although they had significant polyp burdens and underwent endoscopic management, in which colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were thoroughly resected during baseline colonoscopies and subsequently, newly arising colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were periodically resected during surveillance colonoscopies. Patients (median age, 33 years) were followed up for a median of 5.2 years. The median number of colonoscopies and resected lesions per patient was 2 and 14 at baseline as well as, 9 and 32 during surveillance, respectively. The interval between colonoscopies was 1.0 and 7.0 months for baseline and surveillance, respectively. The colons of all 12 patients were preserved, and no invasive colorectal cancer developed. In 10 patients, 35 cases of high-grade dysplasia were observed and managed by endoscopic resection. Repeated endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm with appropriate surveillance may be an alternative form of endoscopic management for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis wishing to postpone colectomy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Endoscopy; Familial adenomatous polyposis; Germline mutation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35930210     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00308-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.446


  17 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Kinesh Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  O Aziz; T Athanasiou; V W Fazio; R J Nicholls; A W Darzi; J Church; R K S Phillips; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Endoscopic management of familial adenomatous polyposis in patients refusing colectomy.

Authors:  Hideki Ishikawa; Michihiro Mutoh; Takeo Iwama; Sadao Suzuki; Takashi Abe; Yoji Takeuchi; Tomiyo Nakamura; Yasumasa Ezoe; Gen Fujii; Keiji Wakabayashi; Takeshi Nakajima; Toshiyuki Sakai
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Phenotypic variability of familial adenomatous polyposis in 11 unrelated families with identical APC gene mutation.

Authors:  F M Giardiello; A J Krush; G M Petersen; S V Booker; M Kerr; L L Tong; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene.

Authors:  J Groden; A Thliveris; W Samowitz; M Carlson; L Gelbert; H Albertsen; G Joslyn; J Stevens; L Spirio; M Robertson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A clinical overview of familial adenomatous polyposis derived from the database of the Polyposis Registry of Japan.

Authors:  Takeo Iwama; Kazuo Tamura; Takayuki Morita; Takashi Hirai; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Koichi Koizumi; Kazuo Shirouzu; Kenichi Sugihara; Takehira Yamamura; Tetsuichiro Muto; Joji Utsunomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  The 2010 WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a critical appraisal four years after its introduction.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Petrone; F Inzani
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 8.  The genetic basis of colonic adenomatous polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Bente A Talseth-Palmer
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 9.  Familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Half; Dani Bercovich; Paul Rozen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Authors:  H F A Vasen; G Möslein; A Alonso; S Aretz; I Bernstein; L Bertario; I Blanco; S Bülow; J Burn; G Capella; C Colas; C Engel; I Frayling; W Friedl; F J Hes; S Hodgson; H Järvinen; J-P Mecklin; P Møller; T Myrhøi; F M Nagengast; Y Parc; R Phillips; S K Clark; M Ponz de Leon; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; J R Sampson; A Stormorken; S Tejpar; H J W Thomas; J Wijnen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.