Literature DB >> 26710317

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes.

Nisha Patel1, Kinesh Patel2, Hutan Ashrafian3, Thanos Athanasiou3, Ara Darzi3, Julian Teare1.   

Abstract

With a drive towards minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now gaining popularity. In a number of East Asian countries, ESD is now the treatment of choice for early non-metastatic gastric cancer, but the outcomes of ESD for colorectal lesions are unclear. The present review summarizes the mid-term outcomes of colorectal ESD including complication and recurrence rates. A systematic literature search was done in May 2014, identifying 20 publications reporting the outcomes of colorectal ESD which were included in this review. En-bloc resection rates, complete (R0) resection rates, endoscopic clearance rates, complication and recurrences rates were analyzed. Statistical pooling was done to calculate weighted means using random effects modeling. Twenty studies reporting the outcomes of 3060 colorectal ESD procedures were reported. Overall weighted en-bloc resection rate was 89% (95% CI: 83-94%), R0 resection rate 76% (95% CI: 69-83%), endoscopic clearance rate 94% (95% CI: 90-97%) and recurrence rate 1% (95% CI: 0.5-2%). Studies that followed up patients for over 1 year were found to have an en-bloc resection rate of 91% (95% CI: 86-96%), R0 resection rate of 81% (95% CI: 75-88%), endoscopic clearance rate 93% (95% CI: 90-97%) and recurrence rate of 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4-1%). Colorectal ESD can be carried out effectively and safely with a 1% recurrence rate. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are required to determine whether colorectal ESD is a viable alternative to conventional surgical therapy.
© 2015 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic polyp; colorectal; colorectal lesion; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopic submucosal dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26710317     DOI: 10.1111/den.12597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  10 in total

1.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel articulating devices: a comparative study in a live porcine model.

Authors:  Yasuharu Okamoto; Ryu Nakadate; Shotaro Nakamura; Jumpei Arata; Susumu Oguri; Tomohiko Moriyama; Motohiro Esaki; Tsutomu Iwasa; Kenoki Ohuchida; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Tetsuo Ikeda; Takanari Kitazono; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.

Authors:  Reza V Milano; Edi Viale; Michael J Bartel; Chiara Notaristefano; Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  What is the cost of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)? A medico-economic study.

Authors:  Martin Dahan; Emmanuelle Pauliat; Sandra Liva-Yonnet; Sonia Brischoux; Romain Legros; Arnaud Tailleur; Paul Carrier; Aurélie Charissoux; Virginie Valgueblasse; Véronique Loustaud-Ratti; Abdelkader Taibi; Sylvaine Durand-Fontanier; Denis Valleix; Denis Sautereau; Sébastien Kerever; Jérémie Jacques
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Endoscopic management of familial adenomatous polyposis targeting colorectal lesions greater than 5 mm in size: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Tatsuro Murano; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kensuke Shinmura; Kei Okumura; Takeshi Kuwata; Mineko Ushiama; Teruhiko Yoshida; Kenji Takashima; Keiichiro Nakajo; Tomohiro Kadota; Yusuke Yoda; Yasuhiro Oono; Tomonori Yano
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.446

5.  Case of pediatric traditional serrated adenoma resected via endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Sonoko Kondo; Hirohito Mori; Noriko Nishiyama; Takeo Kondo; Ryuichi Shimono; Hitoshi Okada; Takashi Kusaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Use of an endoscopic flexible grasper as a traction tool for excision of polyps: preclinical trial.

Authors:  Shinya Urakawa; Teijiro Hirashita; Yuka Hirashita; Lea Lowenfeld; Krishna C Gurram; Makoto Nishimura; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predictors of lymph-node metastasis in surgically resected T1 colorectal cancer in Western populations.

Authors:  Zhen Zong; Hui Li; Ce-Gui Hu; Fu-Xin Tang; Zhi-Yang Liu; Peng Deng; Tai-Cheng Zhou; Cheng-Hao Yi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-01-26

Review 8.  Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Dysplasia in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qi-Shan Zeng; Zhi-Jing Zhao; Jiao Nie; Min Zou; Jia-Hui Yang; Jin-Zhi Zhang; Hua-Tian Gan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 9.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.

Authors:  Andrew Emmanuel; Shraddha Gulati; Margaret Burt; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Amyn Haji
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-13

10.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms: A single center experience in north China.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Tao Wang; Zhongqing Zheng; Xin Chen; Wentian Liu; Chao Sun; Bangmao Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.