| Literature DB >> 35928842 |
Xinxin Wei1, Junxiu Yao2, Fangzhou Wang1,3, Dejun Wu2, Rentang Zhang1.
Abstract
The isolation, purification, and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides extracted from elderberry fruits were studied. Two neutral polysaccharides (EFP-0 and EFP-1) and three acidic polysaccharides (EFP-2, EFP-3, and EFP-4) were isolated from elderberry. EFP-0, EFP-1, EFP-2, EFP-3, and EFP-4 all contain arabinose, galactose, glucose, and mannose, with molecular weights of 1.7981 × 106, 7.0523 × 106, 7.7638 × 106, 4.3855 × 105, and 7.3173 × 105 Da, respectively. Structural characterization showed that the backbone of EFP-2 consisted of →4)-Manp (1→4)-β-D-Glcp (1→ and →4)-β-D-Glcp (1→5)-α-L-Araf (1→units, and T-α-L-Araf (1→ and T-β-D-Galp (1→ residues were detected by methylation analysis and NMR analysis. In addition, the MTT assay and zebrafish oxidative damage assay showed that EFP-2 had a protective effect on H2O2-damaged RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and zebrafish with the addition of EFP-2 would have low levels of ROS in vivo which showed significant antioxidant activity. Therefore, the results showed that the elderberry polysaccharides have antioxidant activity and can be used as potential antioxidants in functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; elderberry; polysaccharide; separation and purification; structural characterization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928842 PMCID: PMC9343709 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.947706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Flow chart of elderberry polysaccharide extraction, separation, and purification.
FIGURE 2Isolation and purification of five polysaccharide fractions from elderberry fruits. (A) Elution profile of elderberry polysaccharides on a DEAE cellulose-52 column. (B) Elution profiles of five fractions (EFP-0, EFP-1, EFP-2, EFP-3, and EFP-4) on a Sephadex G-100 column.
Molecular weight characteristic parameters.
| Sample | RT (min) | Mw (g/mol) | Mn (g/mol) | Mp (g/mol) | Mw/Mn |
| EFP-0 | 30.451 | 1.7981 × 106 | 9.3108 × 105 | 1.8289 × 104 | 1.931 |
| EFP-1 | 27.309 | 7.0523 × 106 | 3.3072 × 106 | 1.2336 × 104 | 2.132 |
| EFP-2 | 27.088 | 7.7638 × 106 | 3.6156 × 106 | 1.7536 × 104 | 2.147 |
| EFP-3 | 33.695 | 4.3855 × 105 | 2.5156 × 105 | 2.2593 × 104 | 1.743 |
| EFP-4 | 32.518 | 7.3173 × 105 | 4.0443 × 105 | 5.0097 × 104 | 1.809 |
Composition and percentage of monosaccharides.
| Sample | Arabinose (%) | Galactose (%) | Glucose (%) | Mannose (%) | Fucose (%) | Galacturonic acid (%) | Glucosamine hydrochloride (%) |
| EFP-0 | 47.70 | 14.10 | 15.00 | 4.10 | 17.60 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| EFP-1 | 55.00 | 22.30 | 16.30 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| EFP-2 | 41.40 | 24.80 | 18.00 | 6.60 | 0.00 | 6.90 | 2.30 |
| EFP-3 | 19.20 | 10.10 | 15.40 | 7.50 | 24.10 | 22.70 | 1.10 |
| EFP-4 | 23.20 | 16.10 | 19.40 | 8.70 | 0.00 | 30.60 | 2.00 |
FIGURE 3Infrared spectra of the five polysaccharide fractions of elderberry fruits and (A–E) represents the infrared spectra of EFP-0, EFP-1, EFP-2, EFP-3, and EFP-4, respectively.
FIGURE 4X-ray diffraction curve of EFP-2.
FIGURE 5SEM photo of the surface structure of EFP-2.
FIGURE 6Total ion chromatogram of the methylated production of EFP-2.
Analysis of polysaccharide methylated glycol acetates (PMAA) results.
| RT | Methylated fragments | Mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) | Molar ratio (%) | Glycosidic bond type |
| 17.225 | 2,3,5-Me3-Ara | 43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161 | 2.50 | Ara |
| 22.903 | 2,3-Me2-Ara | 43,71,87,99,101,117,129,161,189 | 1.90 | →5)-Ara |
| 23.233 | 2,3,4,6-Me4-Glc | 43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161,205 | 2.40 | Glc |
| 25.325 | 2,3,4,6-Me4-Man | 43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161,205 | 4.40 | Man |
| 26.394 | 2,3,4,6-Me4-Gal | 43,71,87,101,117,129,145,161,205 | 5.10 | Gal |
| 30.868 | 2,3,6-Me3-Man | 43,87,99,101,113,117,129,131,161,173,233 | 32.70 | →4)-Man |
| 31.307 | 2,3,6-Me3-Glc | 43,87,99,101,113,117,129,131,161,173,233 | 34.90 | →4)-Glc |
| 31.841 | 2,4,6-Me3-Gal | 43,87,99,101,117,129,161,173,233 | 1.30 | →3)-Gal |
| 34.497 | 2,3,4-Me3-Gal | 43,87,99,101,117,129,161,189,233 | 1.00 | →6)-Gal |
| 38.051 | 2,3-Me2-Glc | 43,71,85,87,99,101,117,127,159,161,201 | 10.80 | →4,6)-Glc |
| 38.465 | 2,3-Me2-Gal | 43,71,85,87,99,101,117,127,159,161,201,261 | 1.90 | →4,6)-Gal |
| 40.806 | 2,4-Me2-Gal | 43,87,117,129,159,189,233 | 0.50 | →3,6)-Gal |
FIGURE 7NMR spectra of EFP-3 in elderberry. (A) 1H NMR; (B) 13C NMR; (C) 1H-1H COSY; (D) HSQC; (E) 5-HMBC; and (F) NOESY.
Assignments of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for EFP-2.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
| A | T-α-L-Ara | C | 107.30 | 79.65 | 76.38 | 84.03 | 62.54 | |
| H | 5.22 | 4.30 | 4.11 | 4.10 | 3.82/3.72 | |||
| B | →4)-Man | C | 101.59 | 68.69 | 71.10 | 76.49 | 75.77 | 61.16 |
| H | 5.10 | 4.24 | 3.76 | 3.98 | 3.46 | 3.86/3.76 | ||
| C | →5)-α-L-Ara | C | 107.48 | 81.90 | 76.56 | 82.03 | 66.35 | |
| H | 5.09 | 4.23 | 4.15 | 4.25 | 3.90 | |||
| D | T-β-D-Gal | C | 104.03 | 72.01 | 73.59 | 69.15 | 75.12 | 61.16 |
| H | 4.70 | 3.58 | 3.84 | 4.02 | 3.72 | 3.86/3.76 | ||
| E | →4)-β-D-Glc | C | 102.91 | 76.27 | 74.31 | 82.10 | 72.43 | 61.16 |
| H | 4.45 | 3.42 | 3.58 | 3.85 | 3.72 | 3.86/3.76 |
FIGURE 8(A) Effect of EFP-2 on the survival rate of RAW264.7 cells with H2O2-induced injury; (B) comparison of the differences in morphology and number of RAW264.7 cells with H2O2-induced injury at different EFP-2 concentrations. Significant differences with model group were designated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 9Effect of EFP-2 on H2O2-induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells.
Fluorescence grayscale values for each group.
| Serial number | Blank group | GSH group | Subjects group |
| 1 | 434309 | 290555 | 205835 |
| 2 | 442634 | 195570 | 273728 |
| 3 | 325941 | 156175 | 155579 |
| 4 | 337943 | 215241 | 226494 |
| 5 | 344125 | 142899 | 243585 |
| 6 | 474124 | 242847 | 165656 |
| 7 | 433179 | 197831 | 209262 |
| 8 | 482588 | 199821 | 283857 |
| 9 | 460675 | 257933 | 251640 |
| 10 | 553025 | 149162 | 231248 |
| 11 | 302460 | 174076 | 239522 |
| 12 | 307248 | / | / |
| Average value | 408188 ± 81619.53 | 202010 ± 46949.15 | 226037 ± 40112.29 |
Values with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 10Partial fluorescence map in zebrafish.