Antonella Giuri1, Nicholas Rolston2, Silvia Colella2,3, Andrea Listorti4, Carola Esposito Corcione1,5, Hannah Elmaraghi2, Simone Lauciello6, Reinhold H Dauskardt2, Aurora Rizzo1. 1. CNR NANOTEC, Institute of Nanotechnology, Via Monteroni, Lecce 73100, Italy. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 3. CNR NANOTEC-Istituto di Nanotecnologia, Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Via Orabona 4, Bari 70126, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Via Orabona 4, Bari 70126, Italy. 5. Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Innovazione, Università del Salento, via per Monteroni, km 1, Lecce 73100, Italy. 6. Electron Microscopy Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego 30, Genova 16163, Italia.
Abstract
Herein, we focus on improving the long-term chemical and thermomechanical stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), two major challenges currently limiting their commercial deployment. Our strategy incorporates a long-chain starch polymer into the perovskite precursor. The starch polymer confers multiple beneficial effects by forming hydrogen bonds with the methylammonium iodide precursor, templating perovskite growth that results in a compact and homogeneous film deposited in a simple one-step coating (antisolvent-free). The inclusion of starch in the methylammonium lead iodide films strongly improves their thermomechanical and environmental stability while maintaining a high photovoltaic performance. The fracture energy (G c) of the film is increased to above 5 J/m2 by creating a nanocomposite that provides intrinsic reinforcement at grain boundaries. Additionally, improved optoelectronic properties achieved with the starch polymer enable good photostability of the active layer and enhanced resistance to thermal cycling.
Herein, we focus on improving the long-term chemical and thermomechanical stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), two major challenges currently limiting their commercial deployment. Our strategy incorporates a long-chain starch polymer into the perovskite precursor. The starch polymer confers multiple beneficial effects by forming hydrogen bonds with the methylammonium iodide precursor, templating perovskite growth that results in a compact and homogeneous film deposited in a simple one-step coating (antisolvent-free). The inclusion of starch in the methylammonium lead iodide films strongly improves their thermomechanical and environmental stability while maintaining a high photovoltaic performance. The fracture energy (G c) of the film is increased to above 5 J/m2 by creating a nanocomposite that provides intrinsic reinforcement at grain boundaries. Additionally, improved optoelectronic properties achieved with the starch polymer enable good photostability of the active layer and enhanced resistance to thermal cycling.
The
outstanding optoelectronic properties[1−4] make hybrid halide perovskites
ideal photoactive materials for next-generation solar cells, enabling
the development of single-junction lab-scale devices with a record
power conversion efficiency (PCE) of up to 25.5% only 12 years after
the first demonstration of perovskite solar cells (PSCs).[5,6] However, significant perovskite compositional and structural degradation
mechanisms result from the intrinsic thermal and chemical instabilities
in the presence of several factors, such as oxygen and humidity under
ambient conditions, at visible and UV light, high temperature, and
electrical bias.[7−13] Furthermore, perovskites are mechanically fragile and require improvement
to produce a durable material compatible with large-area manufacturing.[14] The biggest challenges currently limiting the
commercial deployment and manufacturability of PSCs are the lack of
long-term chemical and thermomechanical stability.[15−17]Improving
the durability of perovskite materials under operational
conditions remains a requirement for device scalability. In addition
to inherent mechanical fragility, the stresses generated in perovskite
films during fabrication create a driving force for defect generation
and propagation during operation, contributing significantly to light-,
heat-, and moisture-based chemical degradation as well as fracture
in devices.[18] The fracture energy, Gc, represents one of the most important thermomechanical
reliability metrics of PSCs.[19] Previous
work for a range of monolithic PSCs featuring diverse architectures,
cation compositions, and microstructures[14,20] discovered that the Gc of perovskite
films (<1.5 J/m2) was the lowest of any photovoltaic technology.
As such, an increased resistance to fracture is central to improve
the operational stability and manufacturability of PSCs.Various
strategies have been developed to improve perovskite thermomechanical
stability: (i) intrinsically, through the engineering of the material
by tuning the cation composition or introducing bulky cation additives
that modify the perovskite crystal structure to form 2D perovskite
layers or by adding additives that stabilize and protect perovskite
from decomposition[21−26] and (ii) extrinsically, involving the use of scaffold-based reinforcement—although
these efforts introduce an additional processing step during fabrication[27,28]—or to a lesser extent, device encapsulation with different
packaging materials.[20]In previous
work, an effective intrinsic toughening approach incorporating
a long-chained amino acid additive, 5-aminovaleric acid (5-AVA), was
proposed—showing a significant improvement in the Gc of perovskite—but at the expense of reduced charge
extraction and device performance with the addition of a bulky, insulating
organic layer.[29] Our recently developed
perovskite–starch-based nanocomposite[23] showed improved tolerance to moisture when incorporated into PSCs
at optimized concentrations without the penalty of reducing the device
performance. We have demonstrated that the starch also modifies the
rheological behavior of the perovskite precursor solution and interacts
with methylammonium iodide (CH3NH3I; MAI) by
hydrogen bonding, forming a persistent sol–gel network that
delays the crystallization process.[30] The
longevity of the wet precursor solvate phase guarantees the formation
of a compact and homogeneous film morphology in a single-step coating
(antisolvent dripping-free) and enhances the thermodynamic stability
of the starch–perovskite composite. Most importantly, the as-developed
material used as the active layer of PSCs shows very high power conversion
efficiency despite the insulating properties of the starch. Moreover,
the hygroscopic nature of the long-chain starch network likely stabilizes
and protects the perovskite from decomposition in an ambient environment,
improving the solar cell device moisture resistance, while the plasticity
of the polymer conferred enhanced resistance to bending stress. In
this work, we perform an in-depth study on the nanocomposite perovskite/starch
film through mechanical, chemical, and morphological characterization
with the aim of rationalizing how the long-chain starch polymer influences
both the thermomechanical and environmental stability of methylammonium
lead iodide (MAPbI3) perovskite under accelerated aging
conditions.
Results
Films based on several starch/precursor
ratio wt % (0–10–15–20),
reported in Table S1, were fabricated in
a one-step spin-coating deposition by following a previously optimized
recipe.[23] Compared with previous work,[23] here, a purer corn starch from maize (Maize,
∼73% amylopectin and 27% amylose, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich,
characterized by the chemical structure reported in Figure S1) was utilized.The influence of the polymer
on the mechanical properties of perovskite
was tested using the double cantilever beam (DCB) method, where perovskite
films with varying concentration of Maize were deposited on poly(N,N′-bis-4-butylphenyl-N,N′-bisphenyl)benzidine (poly-TPD)/indium
tin oxide (ITO)-glass substrates and bonded to an identical glass
superstrate. The perovskite fracture energy (Gc), reported in Figure a, was calculated from a load–displacement curve that
was generated by applying a uniaxial load to one end of the beams.
Once crack propagation occurred, the sample was unloaded slightly
and reloaded to propagate the crack and enable several measurements
of Gc across the length of the sample.
MAPbI3 control films had a Gc value of 1.3 ± 0.2 J/m2, comparable to previous
measurements on perovskite films without additives. The inclusion
of Maize additives had a marked increase in Gc to 4.8 ± 1.0 J/m2 for 10 wt %, 4.9 ±
0.8 J/m2 for 15 wt %, and 5.6 ± 0.8 J/m2 for 20 wt %. A minor increase was observed with increased Maize
concentration (from 10 wt % to 20 wt %), while the largest improvement
was observed with the addition of 10 wt % Maize compared to control
MAPbI3. This result indicates that starch effectively acts
as an intrinsic reinforcement strategy that enhances perovskite Gc to exceed 5 J/m2, a value at which
materials are considered mechanically robust and not susceptible to
cracking from the stresses induced during processing and handling.[27]
Figure 1
(a) Gc measured for different
Maize
concentrations (10–15–20 wt %) and MAPbI3-control with a sketch representing the increased Maize content in
the inset. (b) Current–voltage characteristics for the best
devices based on different Maize concentrations (10–15–20
wt %) and MAPbI3-control with a scheme of the photovoltaic
device architecture based on the perovskite–Maize photoactive
layer in the inset.
(a) Gc measured for different
Maize
concentrations (10–15–20 wt %) and MAPbI3-control with a sketch representing the increased Maize content in
the inset. (b) Current–voltage characteristics for the best
devices based on different Maize concentrations (10–15–20
wt %) and MAPbI3-control with a scheme of the photovoltaic
device architecture based on the perovskite–Maize photoactive
layer in the inset.Notably, the inclusion
of Maize into perovskite showed very high
photovoltaic performance, among the highest reported for fully organic
p–i–n devices based on the MAPbI3–polymer
active layer,[31] especially considering
that the nanocomposite films were produced with one-step spin coating
without the use of an antisolvent or a curing source. In particular,
the different concentrations of Maize into perovskite (from 10 to
20 wt %) were explored by implementing the films in a fully organic
inverted device whose layout, reported in the inset of Figure b, comprised ITO/poly-TPD/MAPbI3–Maize/phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM)/bathocuproine
(BCP)/gold (Au). As evidenced in Figure b and Table , the best photovoltaic performance was obtained with
a MAPbI3-10Maize-based device, reaching a high PCE of 18.8%
with a high open-circuit voltage (VOC)
of 1.1 V. This excellent voltage output was likely due to the high-quality
perovskite film obtained with the Maize additive that produced an
optimized band energy alignment. Additionally, a high short-circuit
current density (Jsc) of 21.9 mA/cm2 and a fill factor (FF) of 78.3% suggested a low series resistance
and reduced carrier recombination at the photoactive layer interfaces
(confirming the results observed previously[23] with a commercial starch). Importantly, these devices show no hysteresis
when measured in forward and reverse scan directions, as reported
in Figure S2.
Table 1
Photovoltaic
Parameters of the Best
Devices, Measured by Reverse Scans, and Average Reverse Values for
the Different Maize Concentrations Explored (10–15–20
wt %) and MAPbI3-Control
FF (%)
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
PCE (%)
MAPbI3-10Maize
best device
78.3
1.10
21.9
18.8
average
73.4 ± 5.5
1.09 ± 0.01
19.8 ± 1.6
15.7 ± 1.1
MAPbI3-15Maize
best device
71.9
1.09
20.1
15.8
average
67.4 ± 6.4
1.08 ± 0.02
16.8 ± 1.7
12.3 ± 1.9
MAPbI3-20Maize
best device
70.9
1.10
15.8
12.3
average
64.7 ± 2.8
1.11 ± 0.01
14.7 ± 1.4
10.6 ± 1.2
MAPbI3-control
best device
75.5
1.09
20.5
17.0
average
72.0 ± 6.6
1.06 ± 0.05
19.8 ± 1.6
15.0 ± 1.6
Incident-photon-to-current
efficiency (IPCE) spectra of the solar
cells based on MAPbI3-10Maize, reported in Figure S3, showed a shape close to that of standard
MAPbI3. By increasing the Maize content from 10 to 15 wt
% the PCE decreased to 15.8% along with decreasing FF to 71.9%. The
device based on the highest Maize content of 20 wt % showed a lower
PCE of 12.3% with a decrease of both Jsc to 15.8 mA/cm2 and FF to 70.9%. By increasing the Maize
content, the device performance decreased—in particular, the
FF and Jsc—likely due to the insulating
nature of the polymer and due to the increase in the perovskite film
thickness. Indeed, a noticeable increase in the thickness of the final
film was observed from about 450 nm for MAPbI3-10Maize
to 1 μm for MAPbI3-15Maize and up to 1.4 μm
for MAPbI3-20Maize. The change in the film thickness with
higher polymer content is primarily due to the increase in the viscosity
of the perovskite precursor solution, as reported in previous work.[23]The morphological study of the influence
of Maize inclusion into
perovskite was carried out by scanning electron microscopy–energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) analyses reported in Figure . As evidenced from
the top view of the films (Figure a,c), the inclusion of Maize enabled a smooth and homogeneous
morphology of the perovskite layer, characterized by a uniform distribution
of the polymer into the film, both on the top and through the thickness
and around the grain boundaries. The presence of Maize throughout
the thickness of the perovskite film indicates that the likely mechanism
for improved Gc in the perovskite-Maize
films is the reinforcement of grain boundaries, which have been found
as weak points that enable crack propagation in typical, fine-grained
MAPbI3 films.[32] 10 wt % of Maize
appears to be sufficient to reinforce the majority of grain boundaries
within the film, as further increments of polymer addition only result
in minor improvements in Gc. Since the
contributions to Gc are related to energy
dissipated from bond breaking and from plastic deformation, the latter
is potentially the cause of the slight increase from 10 to 20 wt %
since the Maize is a compliant and plastically deformable polymeric
material as compared to the brittle perovskite.
Figure 2
SEM–EDS images
of MAPbI3-10Maize—top view
(a) and cross section (b) and of MAPbI3-20Maize—top
view (c) and cross section (d).
SEM–EDS images
of MAPbI3-10Maize—top view
(a) and cross section (b) and of MAPbI3-20Maize—top
view (c) and cross section (d).As can be observed from SEM–EDS analyses of the cross section
of the film reported in Figure b,d, the polymer is homogeneously distributed along the thickness
of the film, even at high concentrations (Figure d), resulting in the formation of a compact
and uniform photoactive layer. However, it is interesting to note
that despite the insulating nature of the polymer used, the device
retains a respectable performance in the presence of high Maize content.
This unexpected effect will be further explored in a later section
by performing further characterization on the optoelectronic and chemical
properties of the perovskite films.To further understand the
mechanism for higher PCE and stability
with the addition of Maize, time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL)
measurements were performed on glass/poly-TPD/perovskite films. A
slight improvement in the charge carrier lifetime was observed for
all Maize-containing perovskite compositions (Figure a), which indicates that surface recombination
was likely mitigated by the polymer. The carrier lifetimes did not
change markedly with increased Maize content, an effect that is similar
to the measured Gc data. The observed
correlation between mechanical and optoelectronic properties indicates
that the changes in film chemistry and morphology induced by the polymer
can improve both the device performance and thermomechanical reliability.
Figure 3
TRPL measurements
of MAPbI3 (black), MAPI3-10Maize (red), MAPI3-15Maize (dark red), and MAPI3-20Maize (orange)
(a); X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
analysis of perovskite films with the same range of Maize concentrations
tracking carbon (b), oxygen (c), nitrogen (d), lead (e), and iodine
(f) peaks.
TRPL measurements
of MAPbI3 (black), MAPI3-10Maize (red), MAPI3-15Maize (dark red), and MAPI3-20Maize (orange)
(a); X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
analysis of perovskite films with the same range of Maize concentrations
tracking carbon (b), oxygen (c), nitrogen (d), lead (e), and iodine
(f) peaks.Larger carrier lifetime improvements
have been observed in other
studies with perovskite surface passivation strategies,[33,34] but the minor improvements in lifetime with the addition of Maize
coupled with the SEM–EDS maps indicate that Maize is uniformly
distributed throughout the film rather than forming a continuous layer
atop the perovskite film. This further supports the hypothesis that
Maize acts as a rheology modifier that interacts with precursors and
templates perovskite grain formation during the deposition, eventually
segregating as a thin layer at the grain boundaries. This segregation
is quite important to ensure adequate charge transport through the
perovskite grains and is fundamental to the improved mechanical properties
and stability.The surface chemistry of the perovskite films
in the presence and
absence of Maize was characterized using XPS, and the results are
reported in Figure b–f. The addition of Maize led to a noticeable increase in
the oxygen 1s core level peak along with a concomitant reduction in
the signal for the nitrogen 1s, lead 4f, and iodine 3d peaks. The
higher Maize content enhanced the change in various peak intensities,
which further supports the claim that Maize is not a surface passivating
agent, but it thoroughly mixes with the perovskite domains in the
active layer. In fact, higher Maize content leads to more additive-rich
clusters throughout the thickness of the perovskite film and around
grain boundaries. At 20 wt % Maize, the lead and iodine peaks are
substantially reduced, and this large drop in the active elements
of the perovskite could indicate one reason why Jsc was noticeably lower at this perovskite–Maize
composition (Figure b), in addition to the previous observation that thicker films were
produced at the highest Maize concentration. These characterization
results indicate that controlling the Maize addition in the perovskite
precursor can be used to effectively tune the film chemistry of the
resulting perovskite–Maize nanocomposite film.In our
previous work, the stability of the developed perovskite–starch
nanocomposite was analyzed by placing the films and the respective
devices without encapsulation in ambient air (temperature: ∼22
°C; moisture content: 40–70%)[23] to investigate the influence of the starch on moisture resistance.
The observed retention of 50% of initial PCE after about 400 h of
aging test, compared to the complete degradation of the control device
just after 145 h, was attributed to the beneficial protection effect
of the hygroscopic starch from ambient environment contamination (in
particular, oxygen and moisture) according to the ISOS-D-1 protocol.[15] Here, the device stability of the best performing
composition, MAPbI3-10Maize, was investigated further through
the use of separate accelerated aging protocols by evaluating the
impact of thermal cycles (ISOS-T-1I) and the combination of light
and bias in the presence of oxygen and moisture (ISOS-LC-1).[15]Thermal stability was investigated through
device thermal cycling
from room temperature to 85 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere, mimicking
the temperature change during the day. As evidenced in Figure a, the degradation occurring
in both devices was mainly due to a decrease in the FF, reducing the
PCE by about 33% in MAPbI3-10Maize and 40% in standard
MAPbI3 after six steps of cycling thermal aging for a total
of 150 h of testing in temperature, as reported in Figure a, characterized by 8 h at
room temperature between each step at high temperatures. In the device,
thermal degradation could be due to the interfacial degradation and
ion accumulation at the contacts[11] proved
by the loss of FF. However, these effects could be reduced in the
nanocomposite due to the presence of robust Maize in the mechanically
fragile perovskite. Additionally, the Maize could slow the rate of
perovskite decomposition by trapping the volatile MA cation and iodine
species, limiting further degradation through diffusion and reactions
that would occur in control devices (i.e., iodine reacting with the
metal in contact).
Figure 4
Normalized average parameters of PCE, VOC, JSC, and FF of MAPbI3-10Maize
(red) and a reference MAPbI3 (black) perovskite (deposited
by the dripping method)-based device as a function of thermal cycles,
measured under the ISOS-T-1I-like aging condition (a); TGA (b) and
DTGA (c) curves of perovskite material without and with Maize; linear
fit of the data (based on eq ) is displayed in the inset of figure (b); and characteristic
parameters, extrapolated from TGA, related to MAI sublimation of perovskite
material without and with Maize (d).
Normalized average parameters of PCE, VOC, JSC, and FF of MAPbI3-10Maize
(red) and a reference MAPbI3 (black) perovskite (deposited
by the dripping method)-based device as a function of thermal cycles,
measured under the ISOS-T-1I-like aging condition (a); TGA (b) and
DTGA (c) curves of perovskite material without and with Maize; linear
fit of the data (based on eq ) is displayed in the inset of figure (b); and characteristic
parameters, extrapolated from TGA, related to MAI sublimation of perovskite
material without and with Maize (d).Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out to understand
how the presence of the polymer around the perovskite grains influences
the MAI sublimation, which is the main factor responsible for perovskite
thermal degradation. TGA results of the perovskite material without
and with Maize are reported in Figure b together with the derivative TGA (DTGA) results in Figure c. The three mass
losses corresponding to MAPbI3 perovskite are observed:
the first one attributed to the residual dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
evaporation[35,36] (Tonset around 187.9 ± 5.9 °C), followed by the loss of organic
component CH3NH3I (Tonset around 290.8 ± 9.3 °C) and second, the loss of HI and
CH3NH2, as confirmed by the two peaks evidenced
from the DTGA curve[37] at around 319.8 and
334.0 °C, respectively. Finally, the weight loss with Tonset around 482.7 ± 16.7 °C is due
to lead(II) iodide PbI sublimation.[35−37]In the perovskite-containing
Maize (red curve) the residual DMSO
evaporation step was followed by a consequential loss step, as also
evidenced by the peak at around 213 °C in the DTGA curve, that
can be attributed to the loss of the polymer. Interestingly, a slight
shift of the Tonset related to the MAI
degradation weight loss up to 300.6 ± 1.2 °C was observed
as well as the replacement of the MAPbI3 sample double
peak in the DTGA with a peak at about 325.1 °C. The delay in
the loss of MAI is also demonstrated by the slight 4% increase of
the activation energy (Ea) of MAI sublimation
(Figure d) calculated
from the slope of the linear fit of the data (based on eq ) in the inset of Figure b, by applying the Broido model
to the TGA curves of the samples.The thermal characterization
reinforced the hypothesis of the beneficial
role of Maize surrounding the perovskite grains that prevented the
physical loss of the MAI precursor, delaying the perovskite degradation
and improving the thermal stability of the active material.A further stability test of the developed nanocomposite was performed
by applying realistic operational conditions to the unencapsulated
device by tracking the current density at the maximum power point
(MPP) under light cycling test (continuous irradiation for 8 h, followed
by 16 h of dark), in ambient air (T: ∼ 25
°C; RH: ∼50%) to mimic the diurnal light–dark cycle
in the presence of a moderate humidity content according to the ISOS-LC-1
protocol.[15] In Figure a, the tracking of the normalized current
density at the MPP (JMPP) was reported
until the PCE of the devices dropped below 50% (Figure b). The JMPP tracking
of the devices under light cycling aging followed the typical double
exponential decay of the maximum power output traces, irrespective
of the perovskite composition.[38−40] In detail, the initial rapid
decay regime is representative of the intrinsic reversible performance
losses,[38] as also confirmed by the recovery JMPP observed after leaving the devices in dark.
However, the subsequent slower decay regime is due to several mechanisms
involving the irreversible degradation of device components.[41,42]
Figure 5
Normalized
current density at the MPP (JMPP) extracted
from continuous MPP tracking for MAPbI3-10Maize
and MAPbI3-control measured under the ISOS-LC-1-like aging
condition (a) and average normalized parameters of PCE, FF, VOC, and JSC of MAPbI3-10Maize and MAPbI3-control measured under the
ISOS-LC-1-like aging condition (b).
Normalized
current density at the MPP (JMPP) extracted
from continuous MPP tracking for MAPbI3-10Maize
and MAPbI3-control measured under the ISOS-LC-1-like aging
condition (a) and average normalized parameters of PCE, FF, VOC, and JSC of MAPbI3-10Maize and MAPbI3-control measured under the
ISOS-LC-1-like aging condition (b).It is interesting to note that during the first cycle, a slower JMPP decay was observed for the MAPbI3-control-based device, mainly due to the stable Jsc, while the Voc and FF decreased
by about 2 and 5%, respectively (Figure b). The MAPbI3-10Maize-based devices
also showed a slight Jsc and Voc reductions of about 10 and 2%, respectively; however,
there was an increase in the FF of about 12%, an effect which further
supports the improved stability of the interfacial contact between
the perovskite and the hole-transport layer,[43] potentially due to the denser morphology (visible in the cross-sectional
SEM in Figure ) and
improved fracture energy that reduced the number of voids/degradation.
This effect could be one of the key mechanisms for stability enhancement
with starch incorporation.Overall, the different aging response
observed during the first
cycle without and with Maize resulted in a similar PCE change in both
perovskites. During the second cycle, a comparable JMPP reduction rate was observed: the MAPbI3-control-based device started to show a Jsc reduction of about 10% compared to about 25% for MAPbI3-10Maize, which nevertheless showed an increase in the FF. From the
third cycle, an inverted trend was observed, with a faster and higher JMPP decay in the MAPbI3-control device
caused by a rapid drop of Jsc and Voc values, and after the fifth cycle, the FF
decrease accelerated, eventually determining the decrease of PCE and JMPP down to 40 and 45% of the initial values,
respectively. Improved stability was observed instead in the presence
of Maize, especially due to a stable FF and a slower decrease of both Voc and Jsc, showing
40% and 45% of the initial PCE and JMPP value, respectively, after the seventh aging cycle. Compared with
the standard MAPbI3-based device, the presence of Maize
in perovskite also contributes to the improvement of the photostability
of the device in the presence of humidity. A reversible degradation/recovery
phenomenon was observed even in the presence of Maize, confirming
that the reversible performance losses attributed to the slow cation
migration are intrinsic to the perovskite material, regardless of
the composition.[38] Moreover, the presence
of the biopolymer in the active layer of the device plays a beneficial
role in retarding the perovskite degradation, possibly by improving
the stability of the interfaces and by limiting the moisture–assisted
ion migration and formation of defects,[44] as demonstrated by the slower decrease of Voc and stable FF of the
MAPbI3-10Maize-based device under operation.
Conclusions
In this work, we studied the influence of a
long-chain starch polymer
(Maize) additive on the thermomechanical properties and operational
stability of MAPbI3.We have previously demonstrated
the multiple beneficial effects
provided by the use of the Maize additive in perovskite film formation:
(i) it interacts with MAI by hydrogen bonding, already in solution,
forming a sol–gel network that delays and guides the crystallization
process, allowing a better control of film formation; (ii) it modifies
the rheology of perovskite precursor’s solution and guarantees
the deposition of a compact, homogeneous, and high-quality film morphology
in a single-step coating (antisolvent dripping-free); (iii) the hygroscopic
nature of the long-chain of the Maize network stabilizes and protects
the perovskite from decomposition in an ambient environment, while
the plasticity of the polymer conferred enhanced resistance to bending
stress.The use of Maize increased the Gc of
the film to above 5 J/m2, creating a nanocomposite that
provided intrinsic reinforcement at perovskite grain boundaries. The
uniform distribution of Maize throughout the film thickness at the
grain boundaries enabled among the highest photovoltaic performance
reported for fully organic p–i–n devices based on the
MAPbI3-polymer active layer deposited in one step (dripping-free
method), while enhancing the environmental stability. Compared with
standard MAPbI3, the perovskite–Maize nanocomposite
also contributed to improved photostability during diurnal cycles
in the presence of moderate humidity and resistance to thermal cycling.
The use of Maize is an effective strategy to improve several aspects
concerning perovskite-based devices: from film processing, by allowing
the deposition in a simple one-step dripping-free method, to the improvement
of perovskite properties in terms of thermomechanical reliability,
efficiency, and stability, even under accelerated operational conditions
in an effort to achieve a commercially viable photovoltaic technology.
Experimental Section/Methods
Materials
Lead(II) iodide PbI, ultradry
99.999% (metal basis) was purchased from Alfa Aesar and MAI from Dyesol.
Maize; DMSO anhydrous, 99.9%; chlorobenzene anhydrous, 99.8% (CB);
2-isopropanol (IPA); and BCP, 96% were purchased from Aldrich. Poly-TPD
was purchased from Solaris Chem Inc. and PCBM was purchased from Nano-c.
All the materials were used as received, without any further purification,
with the exception of Maize which has been dried for 2 weeks at 60
°C before adding it to a perovskite precursor solution.
Methods
Starch–Perovskite Solution Preparation
The perovskite
precursor solutions were prepared, as reported in
previous work,[23] by mixing MAI and PbI
at an equimolar stoichiometric ratio (1:1) in DMSO with a precursor
concentration of 30 wt %, followed by stirring at 80 °C for 30
min. After precursor solubilization, Maize was added to perovskite
precursors in variable amounts (i.e., 0, 10, 15, and 20 wt %), followed
by stirring at 80 °C for 5 h. All the solutions were prepared
in a N2-filled glovebox. The ID of each sample and perovskite
precursor/starch concentrations are reported in Table S1.
Starch–Perovskite
Film Formation
The perovskite–Maize-based solutions
were deposited by spin-coating
at 9000 rpm for 20 s onto different substrates, followed by annealing
at 100 °C for 30 min in a nitrogen atmosphere.
Device Fabrication
Glass ITO-coated
substrates (Visiontek Systems Ltd.) were sequentially cleaned by ultrasonication
in acetone and deionized water. After plasma treatment, a solution
of poly-TPD (1.5 mg/ml in CB) was deposited on glass/ITO by spin-coating
at 4000 rpm for 60 s, followed by annealing at 110 °C for 30
min in air and UV treatment in air for 30 min to improve the poly-TPD
surface wettability.[45] Subsequently, the
device fabrication was completed in a N2-filled glovebox.
The perovskite–starch formulations reported in Table S1 were spin-coated at 9000 rpm for 20
s on the poly-TPD film and then annealed at 100 °C for 30 min
on a hot plate. PCBM (25 mg/mL in CB) and BCP (0.5 mg/mL in IPA) solutions
were sequentially deposited on the active perovskite layer at 1000
rpm. for 60 s and at 5000 rpm for 20 s, respectively. Finally, Au
cathodes were evaporated through a shadow mask in high vacuum. The
active area of the device was 0.04 cm2.For a reference
device, the perovskite–starch film was replaced by a standard
MAPbI3 perovskite, whose solution was prepared by dissolving
(after stirring at room temperature for several hours) stoichiometric
amounts of MAI, PbI, and DMSO (1:1:1) in dimethylformamide with a
precursor concentration of 48 wt %. Then, the solution was deposited
by spin-coating at 4000 rpm for 25 s, and the toluene was dripped
onto the substrate after 15 s from the beginning of the process. The
coated substrate was finally annealed on a hot plate at 100 °C
for 10 min.
SEM–EDS Characterization
The
samples were characterized by high-resolution (HR)SEM using a JEOL
JSM-7500LA (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a cold field-emission
gun, operating at 10 kV acceleration voltage. Back-scattered electrons
were used in order to enhance the differences in the sample chemical
composition. EDS (Oxford Instruments, X-Max, 80 mm2) was
utilized to distinguish the presence and the distribution of Cs, I,
O, and C. All experiments were done at 8 mm working distance, 10 kV
acceleration voltage, and 15 sweep counts for each sample.
Device Characterization
Current–voltage
characteristics of the devices were studied by using a Keithley 2400
Source Measure Unit and an Air Mass 1.5 Global (AM1.5G) solar simulator
(Newport 91160A) under an irradiation intensity of 100 mW/cm2. The measurement was made setting a range of voltage from 1.2 to
−0.2 V in the reverse mode.The IPCE measurements were
carried out on unencapsulated devices by using a Newport 140 W xenon
lamp (66,920) power source with a Newport Cornerstone 260 monochromator,
a Newport 2936-C power meter, and a Newport 71675_71580 photodiode.
Gc Measurements
In order to measure Gc with a DCB test,
a setup comprising a load cell and an actuator was used to control
the displacement of the specimen (delaminator testing system) and
to generate a load versus displacement curve. A uniaxial load was
applied to each glass beam normal to the films on one end of the test
structure. Displacement of the beams continued until the specimen
underwent critical fracture. The specimen was loaded in tension with
a displacement rate of 1 μm s–1 until reaching
the critical load (Pc)—the value
for which the load dropped at a given displacement—before unloading
slightly to calculate the compliance of the specimen, C = dΔ/dP. The specimens were then loaded again
to Pc and the process was repeated iteratively
until the crack length reached the end of the specimen. The compliance
relation was used to extract a during the test using
the previously defined specimen dimensions and the plane-strain elastic
modulus, ′The elegance of the DCB test
is that
no further information is required once the load–displacement
curve is obtained in order to calculate Gc. The fundamental definition of the strain-energy release rate is
derived from the change in potential energy from a loading system
and is given by eqThis result is independent of the loading configuration
and therefore
can directly be applied to the DCB geometry assuming the compliance
relation is known. Beam mechanics can be used—the details of
which are left to the engineers—in order to derive the moment
of inertia (I) and the relationship between the displacement
and the moment. The result is given as eqSubstituting eq into eq in the critical condition
yieldswhere the term
in parentheses is known as
the Kanninen correction[46] which accounts
for the boundaries of the beams. Note that a Gc value was calculated for each critical load and averaged
in order to obtain multiple data points per specimen.
Thermogravimetric Analysis
TGA of
the perovskite samples without and with 10 wt % of Maize was carried
out using a TA Instruments SDT Q600. About 10 μL of precursor
solution was put in an alumina holder and annealed at 100 °C
for 1 h under a nitrogen atmosphere to allow the perovskite formation
after solvent evaporation. Subsequently, the samples were heated through
a dynamic ramp up to 700 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min
in order to evaluate the thermal stability of the samples. Three measurements
were performed on each sample. The onset temperature, Tonset, was calculated by extrapolating the intersection
point between the tangent lines to the curve at the beginning of the
weight loss.A further kinetic analysis of MAI thermal decomposition
was carried out by applying the Broido method to the respective weight
loss step based on eq wherewhere w0, w(t), and w∞ are the
weight of the sample before degradation, at a certain time t during
degradation, and after degradation, respectively.(t) is the degree of reaction of
the sample component
during degradation at a given time t, defined asEa is
the activation energy,R is the gas constant (8,31 J/mol K).By applying this method for TGA of the samples, the slope of the
straight line observed between ln(−ln(1 – α(t))) and 1/T is obtained, represented as −Ea/R. Therefore, by interpolating
with a linear fit, the activation energy of the degradation process
without and with Maize can be calculated.
Durability
Test
Light Aging Test
Light aging tests
were performed by tracking JMPP of the
unencapsulated devices under a light cycling test (continuous irradiation
for 8 h, followed by 16 h of dark), in ambient air (temperature: ∼25
°C; moisture content: ∼50%) to mimic the diurnal light–dark
cycle in the presence of a moderate humidity content according to
the ISOS-LC-1 protocol.
Thermal Aging Test
Thermal aging
tests were performed by placing the solar cells at 85 °C on a
hot plate in a N2-filled environment and in the dark for
several hours (details are reported in Figure ), alternating about 8 h at room temperature
between each high-temperature step.
PL
Measurements
TRPL was performed
using a Horiba Fluorolog fluorimeter. Perovskite films on poly-TPD/glass
were excited with a 635 nm laser to give time-correlated single-photon
counting lifetime measurements.
X-ray
Photoelectron Spectroscopy
XPS was performed with a PHI VersaProbe3
system using a monochromatized
Al(Ka) source at 1486 eV. The elemental
surface composition was characterized by high-resolution binding energy
measurements of chemical spectra under high vacuum.
Authors: Jonas A Schwenzer; Lucija Rakocevic; Robert Gehlhaar; Tobias Abzieher; Saba Gharibzadeh; Somayeh Moghadamzadeh; Aina Quintilla; Bryce S Richards; Uli Lemmer; Ulrich W Paetzold Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Konrad Domanski; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Nicolas Mine; Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin; Antonio Abate; Michael Saliba; Wolfgang Tress; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Samuel D Stranks; Giles E Eperon; Giulia Grancini; Christopher Menelaou; Marcelo J P Alcocer; Tomas Leijtens; Laura M Herz; Annamaria Petrozza; Henry J Snaith Journal: Science Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Wei Zhang; Miguel Anaya; Gabriel Lozano; Mauricio E Calvo; Michael B Johnston; Hernán Míguez; Henry J Snaith Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Michael Saliba; Taisuke Matsui; Ji-Youn Seo; Konrad Domanski; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Wolfgang Tress; Antonio Abate; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel Journal: Energy Environ Sci Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 38.532