| Literature DB >> 35928116 |
Tongsheng Qi1,2, Jingkai Ai1,2, Jinfang Yang1,2, Heng Zhu1,2, Yuyu Zhou1,2, Yulu Zhu1,2, Heming Zhang1,2, Qi Qin1,2, Ming Kang1,2, Yali Sun1,2,3, Jixu Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Neosporosis is a worldwide infectious disease caused by intracellular parasite Neospora caninum that is a major pathogen of abortion in cattle and neurological disorders in other hosts. However, limited data are available on animals exposed to N. caninum in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Area (QTPA), and little is known about whether animals in the plateau area play an important role in the epidemiology of N. caninum. Therefore, indirect ELISAs based on a combination of NcSAG1 and NcGRA7 antigens were developed to examine both N. caninum-specific IgG and IgM antibodies in Tibetan sheep, yak, cow, pig, cattle, horse, chicken, camel, and donkey from the QTPA in this study. The results showed that all current species present- IgG and IgM-positive animals, and that the overall seroprevalence of N. caninum were 18.6 (703/3,782) and 48.1% (1,820/3,782) for the IgG and IgM antibodies, respectively. Further analysis found significant differences from different altitudes in IgG in Tibetan sheep and IgM in the yak. Hence, the present serological results indicate that the tested animal populations in the QTPA are suffering from N. caninum infections or have become carriers of N. caninum antibodies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on current N. caninum-infected animals in the QTPA, the first epidemiology of neosporosis in cow and camel in China, and the first record of N. caninum IgM antibodies in all the surveyed animals in China. This study provides the latest valuable data on the epidemiology of neosporosis in China and in plateau areas of the world.Entities:
Keywords: IgG; IgM; Neospora caninum; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; animals; seroepidemiology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35928116 PMCID: PMC9343756 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.953380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
The sampling sites of animals in the QTPA in this study.
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| HB | Menyuan (2,866 m) | 36 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 |
| Gangcha (3,827 m) | 404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 418 | |
| Haiyan (3,000 m) | 145 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 259 | |
| Total | 585 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 744 | |
| HN | Gonghe (3,200 m) | 190 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 265 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 475 |
| Guide (2,200 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
| Total | 190 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 265 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 505 | |
| HX | Delingha (2,980 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 |
| Golmud (2,780 m) | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
| Tianjun (3,993 m) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wulan (4,000 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | |
| Total | 8 | 20 | 0 | 50 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 172 | |
| YS | Zhiduo (4,897 m) | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| GL | Maqin (4,100 m) | 0 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 160 |
| Darlag (4,271 m) | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | |
| Banma (3,970 m) | 0 | 133 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 133 | |
| Total | 0 | 329 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 399 | |
| HUN | Jianzha (2,063 m) | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 |
| Henan (4,200 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | |
| Total | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 | |
| HD | Huzhu (2,535 m) | 21 | 40 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 37 | 176 |
| Ledu (2,000 m) | 0 | 20 | 389 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 576 | |
| Minhe (2,174 m) | 0 | 0 | 107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 137 | |
| Pingan (2,183 m) | 53 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 130 | |
| Total | 74 | 60 | 496 | 192 | 100 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 37 | 1,019 | |
| XN | Datong (2,756 m) | 0 | 219 | 0 | 24 | 200 | 30 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 553 |
| Huangzhong (2,645 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 118 | |
| Huangyuan (2,660 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 78 | |
| Xining (2,261 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | |
| Total | 0 | 219 | 0 | 184 | 200 | 40 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 793 | |
| Total | 902 | 792 | 496 | 456 | 451 | 389 | 210 | 49 | 37 | 3,782 | |
HB, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 36°44′-39°05′N and 98°5′-102°41′ E; HN, Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 34°38′-37°10′ N and 98°55–105°50′ E; HX, Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 35°01′-39°20′ N and 96°06′-99°42′ E; YS, Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 27°35′-36°35′ N and 89°35′-97°55′ E; GL, Guoluo Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 32°31′-35°37′ N and 96°54′-101°51′ E; HUN, Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 34°04′-36°10′ N and 100°34′-102°28′ E; HD, Haidong city, 35°25.9′-37°05′ N and 100°41.5′-103°04′ E; XN, Xining city, 36°34′ N and 101°49′ E.
Cut-off values of current indirect ELISA tests in this study.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Tibetan sheep | SAG1 | IgG | 0.373 |
| IgM | 0.232 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.288 | |
| IgM | 0.254 | ||
| Yak | SAG1 | IgG | 0.263 |
| IgM | 0.137 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.234 | |
| IgM | 0.148 | ||
| Cow | SAG1 | IgG | 0.273 |
| IgM | 0.136 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.238 | |
| IgM | 0.149 | ||
| Pig | SAG1 | IgG | 0.440 |
| IgM | 0.120 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.376 | |
| IgM | 0.135 | ||
| Cattle | SAG1 | IgG | 0.274 |
| IgM | 0.149 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.248 | |
| IgM | 0.167 | ||
| Horse | SAG1 | IgG | 0.262 |
| IgM | 0.237 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.234 | |
| IgM | 0.401 | ||
| Chicken | SAG1 | IgG | 0.397 |
| IgM | 0.252 | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.326 | |
| IgM | 0.145 | ||
| Camel | SAG1 | IgG | 0.370 |
| IgM | – | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.288 | |
| IgM | – | ||
| Donkey | SAG1 | IgG | 0.275 |
| IgM | – | ||
| GRA7 | IgG | 0.268 | |
| IgM | – |
–, not tested.
Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum- specific IgG and IgM in animals in the QTPA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tibetan sheep | HB | 585 | 103 (17.6, 14.5–20.7) | 362 (61.9, 57.9–65.8) | 80 (13.7, 10.9–16.5) | 23 (3.9, 2.4–5.5) | 282 (48.2, 44.2–52.3) |
| HN | 190 | 2 (1.1, 0.4–2.5) | 7 (3.7, 1.0–6.4) | 1 (0.5, 0.5–1.6) | 1 (0.5, 0.5–1.6) | 6 (3.2, 0.7–5.6) | |
| HX | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| HUN | 45 | 7 (15.6, 5.0–26.1) | 31 (68.9, 55.4–82.4) | 7 (15.6, 5.0–26.1) | 0 | 24 (53.3, 38.8–67.9) | |
| HD | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 902 | 112 (12.4, 10.3–14.6) | 400 (44.3, 41.1–47.6) | 88 (9.8, 7.8–11.7) | 24 (2.7, 1.6–3.7) | 312 (34.6, 31.5–37.7) | |
| Yak | HB | 124 | 0 | 24 (19.4, 12.4–26.3) | 0 | 0 | 24 (19.4, 12.4–26.3) |
| HN | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| YS | 20 | 0 | 4 (20.0, 2.5–37.5) | 0 | 0 | 4 (20.0, 2.5–37.5) | |
| HX | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| GL | 329 | 2 (0.6, 0.2–1.4) | 197 (59.9, 54.6–65.2) | 2 (0.6, 0.2–1.4) | 0 | 195 (59.3, 54.0–64.6) | |
| HD | 60 | 2 (3.3, 1.2–7.9) | 31 (51.7, 39.0–64.3) | 1 (1.7, 1.6–4.9) | 1 (1.7, 1.6–4.9) | 30 (50.0, 37.3–62.7) | |
| XN | 219 | 0 | 115 (52.5, 45.9–59.1) | 0 | 0 | 115 (52.5, 45.9–59.1) | |
| Total | 792 | 4 (0.5, 0.0–1.0) | 371 (46.8, 43.4–50.3) | 3 (0.4, 0.0–0.8) | 1 (0.1, 0.1–0.4) | 368 (46.5, 43.0–49.9) | |
| Cow | HD | 496 | 10 (2.0, 0.8–3.3) | 332 (66.9, 628–71.1) | 7 (1.4, 0.4–2.4) | 3 (0.6, 0.1–1.3) | 325 (65.5, 61.3–69.7) |
| Total | 496 | 10 (2.0, 0.8–3.3) | 332 (66.9, 628–71.1) | 7 (1.4, 0.4–2.4) | 3 (0.6, 0.1–1.3) | 325 (65.5, 61.3–69.7) | |
| Pig | HN | 30 | 25 (83.3, 70.0–96.7) | 6 (20.0, 5.7–34.3) | 6 (20.0, 5.7–34.3) | 19 (63.3, 46.1–80.6) | 0 |
| HX | 50 | 50 (100, 100–100.0) | 25 (50.0, 36.1–63.9) | 25 (50.0, 36.1–63.9) | 25 (50.0, 36.1–63.9) | 0 | |
| HD | 192 | 190 (99.0, 97.5–100.4) | 62 (32.3, 25.7–38.9) | 62 (32.3, 25.7–38.9) | 128 (66.7, 60.0–73.3) | 0 | |
| XN | 184 | 176 (95.7, 92.7–98.6) | 75 (40.8, 33.7–47.9) | 73 (39.7, 32.6–46.7) | 103 (56.0, 48.8–63.2) | 2 (1.1, 0.4–2.6) | |
| Total | 456 | 441 (96.7, 95.1–98.3) | 168 (36.8, 42.4–41.3) | 166 (36.4, 32.0–40.8) | 275 (60.3, 55.8–64.8) | 2 (0.4, 0.2–1.0) | |
| Cattle | HB | 11 | 0 | 3 (27.3, 1.0–53.6) | 0 | 0 | 3 (27.3, 1.0–53.6) |
| HX | 45 | 0 | 4 (8.9, 0.6–17.2) | 0 | 0 | 4 (8.9, 0.6–17.2) | |
| HUN | 45 | 0 | 23(51.1, 36.5–65.7) | 0 | 0 | 23(51.1, 36.5–65.7) | |
| GL | 50 | 0 | 10 (20.0, 8.9–31.1) | 0 | 0 | 10 (20.0, 8.9–31.1) | |
| HD | 100 | 0 | 25 (25.0, 16.5–33.5) | 0 | 0 | 25 (25.0, 16.5–33.5) | |
| XN | 200 | 0 | 23(11.5, 7.1–15.9) | 0 | 0 | 23(11.5, 7.1–15.9) | |
| Total | 451 | 0 | 88 (19.5, 15.9–23.2) | 0 | 0 | 88 (19.5, 15.9–23.2) | |
| Horse | HB | 24 | 0 | 24 (100, 100.0–100.0) | 0 | 0 | 24 (100, 100.0–100.0) |
| HN | 265 | 1 (0.4, 0.4–1.1) | 235 (88.7, 84.9–92.5) | 1 (0.4, 0.4–1.1) | 0 | 234 (88.3, 84.4–92.2) | |
| HUN | 60 | 2 (3.3, 1.2–7.9) | 59 (98.3, 95.1–101.6) | 2 (3.3, 1.2–7.9) | 0 | 57 (95.0, 89.5–100.5) | |
| XN | 40 | 0 | 39 (97.5, 92.7–102.3) | 0 | 0 | 39 (97.5, 92.7–102.3) | |
| Total | 389 | 3 (0.8, 0.1–1.6) | 357 (91.8, 89.0–94.5) | 3 (0.8, 0.1–1.6) | 0 | 354 (91.0, 88.2–93.8) | |
| Chicken | HD | 60 | 36 (60.0, 47.6–72.4) | 31 (51.7, 39.0–64.3) | 29 (48.3, 35.7–61.0) | 7 (11.7, 3.5–19.8) | 2 (33.0, 1.2–7.9) |
| XN | 150 | 54 (36.0, 28.3–43.7) | 73 (48.7, 40.7–56.7) | 34 (22.7, 16.0–29.4) | 20 (13.3, 7.9–18.8) | 39 (26.0, 19.0–33.0) | |
| Total | 210 | 90 (42.9, 36.2–49.6) | 104 (49.5, 42.8–56.3) | 63 (30.0, 23.8–36.2) | 27 (12.9, 8.3–17.4) | 41 (19.5, 14.2–24.9) | |
| Camel | HX | 49 | 7 (14.3, 4.5–24.1) | – | – | 7 (14.3, 4.5–24.1) | – |
| Total | 49 | 7 (14.3, 4.5–24.1) | – | – | 7 (14.3, 4.5–24.1) | – | |
| Donkey | HD | 37 | 36 (97.3, 92.1–102.5) | – | – | 36 (97.3, 92.1–102.5) | – |
| Total | 37 | 36 (97.3, 92.1–102.5) | – | – | 36 (97.3, 92.1–102.5) | – | |
| Total | 3,782 | 703 (18.6, 17.3–19.8) | 1,820 (48.1, 46.5–49.7) | 330 (8.7, 7.8–9.6) | 373 (9.9, 8.9–10.8) | 1,490 (39.4, 37.8–41.0) |
No., No. of tested in this study; %, prevalence; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HB, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; HN, Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; HX, Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; YS, Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; GL, Guoluo Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; HUN, Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture; HD, Haidong city; XN, Xining city.
Figure 1Neospora caninum-specific IgG and IgM antibodies in various animals in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area were detected by indirect ELISA methods based on the NcSAG1 and NcGRA7 antigens in this study. The blue short lines represented the cut-off values. (A) N. caninum-specific-IgG antibodies, (B) N. caninum-specific IgM antibodies, and (C) positive animals for neosporosis (%).
Analysis of the influence of altitude on the seroprevalence of the Neospora caninum IgG and IgM antibodies and distribution of toxoplasmosis and neosporosis in the QTPA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Tibetan sheep | IgG | 155 | 11 (7.1) | 747 | 103 (13.8) | 0 | – | 0.0403 |
| IgM | 67 (43.2) | 363 (48.6) | – | 0.4631 | ||||
| Yak | IgG | 319 | 2 (0.6) | 257 | 0 | 216 | 2 (0.9) | 0.3427 |
| IgM | 166 (52.0) | 50 (19.5) | 155 (71.8) | <0.0001 | ||||
| Cow | IgG | 496 | 10 (2.0) | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| IgM | 332 (66.9) | – | – | – | ||||
| Pig | IgG | 456 | 441 (96.7) | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| IgM | 168 (36.8) | – | – | – | ||||
| Cattle | IgG | 401 | 0 | 0 | – | 50 | 0 | – |
| IgM | 78 (19.5) | – | 10 (20.0) | 0.9397 | ||||
| Horse | IgG | 40 | 0 | 289 | 1 (0.3) | 60 | 2 (3.3) | 0.0517 |
| IgM | 39 (97.5) | 259 (89.6) | 59 (98.3) | 0.8645 | ||||
| Chicken | IgG | 210 | 90 (42.9) | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
| IgM | 104 (49.5) | – | – | – | ||||
| Camel | IgG | 0 | – | 0 | – | 49 | 7 (14.3) | – |
| Donkey | IgG | 37 | 36 (97.3) | 0 | – | 0 | – | – |
–, not tested; %, prevalence; n, no significant difference.