Bovine abortion caused by the Apicomplexan parasite Neospora caninum is a major economic problem in the livestock industry worldwide. Our study measured the prevalence and temporal changes in levels of antibodies specific for two N. caninum derived antigens, NcSAG1 and NcGRA7, to determine an appropriate strategy for serodiagnosis. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), blood samples showed that 71 cows out of 129 were positive for anti-NcSAG1 antibodies and that only nine cows were positive for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies. By longitudinal sampling, it was revealed that positive and negative antibody conversion occurred frequently for anti-NcGRA7, but that anti-NcSAG1 antibodies persisted for a long-term. These results indicate the usefulness of measuring anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels for the detection of chronically infected cows. Twelve cows showed positive seroconversion during pregnancy, nine of which showed seropositivity for anti-NcGRA7 antibody at the sixth and/or seventh month of pregnancy; serum samples were not obtained from the remaining three cows during this period. Therefore, the optimal time for detection of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies appears to be between the fifth and eighth month of pregnancy.
Bovine abortion caused by the Apicomplexan parasite Neospora caninum is a major economic problem in the livestock industry worldwide. Our study measured the prevalence and temporal changes in levels of antibodies specific for two N. caninum derived antigens, NcSAG1 and NcGRA7, to determine an appropriate strategy for serodiagnosis. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), blood samples showed that 71 cows out of 129 were positive for anti-NcSAG1 antibodies and that only nine cows were positive for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies. By longitudinal sampling, it was revealed that positive and negative antibody conversion occurred frequently for anti-NcGRA7, but that anti-NcSAG1 antibodies persisted for a long-term. These results indicate the usefulness of measuring anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels for the detection of chronically infected cows. Twelve cows showed positive seroconversion during pregnancy, nine of which showed seropositivity for anti-NcGRA7 antibody at the sixth and/or seventh month of pregnancy; serum samples were not obtained from the remaining three cows during this period. Therefore, the optimal time for detection of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies appears to be between the fifth and eighth month of pregnancy.
Neospora caninum is an intracellular Apicomplexan protozoan parasite similar
to Toxoplasma gondii [4]. Neosporosis,
the disease caused by N. caninum, is mainly observed in dogs and cattle.
Canine neosporosis causes neuromuscular paralysis [12],
while bovine neosporosis causes fetal abortion and neonatal mortality [6]. Failure of reproduction associated with N. caninum is a
major economic problem in the livestock industry [6]. If
naïve cattle are infected by oocysts shed by definitive hosts, such as dogs [10] or coyotes [7],
sporozoites in the oocyst differentiate to tachyzoites and spread through the body of the cow.
Parasites can exist over long periods as quiescent tissue cysts contained within the host
tissue [6].In the case of human abortion associated with T. gondii, a closely related
parasite, transmission of the parasite to the placenta occurs predominantly in women who are
primarily infected during the gestation period [11].
Congenital transmission of T. gondii in chronically infected women is very
rare. In contrast to humantoxoplasmosis, quiescent tissue cysts of N.
caninum in latently infected cows are reactivated during pregnancy and cause
reproduction failure [15]. For the control of cattle
neosporosis, it is therefore important to detect and eliminate chronically infected cows from
the cattle herd.To detect latent infection of N. caninum in cattle, an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using recombinant antigens derived from N.
caninum has been developed as a highly specific and sensitive method for
serodiagnosis [5]. This is especially the case for the
N. caninum surface antigen NcSAG1 and the dense granule protein NcGRA7
antigen [1, 3, 9]. NcSAG1 is expressed in the tachyzoite
and downregulated during the conversion from tachyzoite to bradyzoite [14]. The NcGRA7 protein is an immunodominant antigen shared by both
tachyzoites and bradyzoites [2, 13]. It has been
reported that titers of anti-NcGRA7 antibody in cows with a history of abortion are
significantly higher than in non-aborting cows that were infected with N.
caninum [9]. In addition, the frequency of
anti-NcGRA7 antibody-positive individuals was higher among cows with a recent history of
N. caninum-associated abortion than among cows that had experienced
N. caninum-associated abortion more than 30 days previously [8]. In contrast, the frequency of anti-NcSAG1
antibody-positive individuals was similar between the two groups [8]. These phenomena might reflect the fact that anti-NcGRA7 antibodies are
observed only during acute infection, including those infections arising out of recrudescence
from a latent infection [1]. Serodiagnosis by ELISA with
NcGRA7 antigens has potential as a method to estimate abortion risk associated with N.
caninum infection. However, it is difficult to detect a temporal increase in
anti-NcGRA7 antibodies during pregnancy by a single examination without knowing the time
course of seroconversion. For practical use of ELISA using NcGRA7 antigen, it is necessary to
determine the timing of positive conversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody. In this study, we
examined frequency and dynamics of serological reactions to NcSAG1 and NcGRA7.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Serum samples: A total of 129 cow serum samples were obtained from three
herds, A, B and C (n=33, 61 and 35 cows, respectively), in Gifu Prefecture, Japan, in
February 2009. To measure the time-dependent changes in antibody titers, repeat serum
samples were obtained each month from a total of 29 individuals of herd C. Serum samples of
28 cattle were collected each month from July 2009 to March 2010 or until the cattle were
removed from the farms. Blood samples of another cow were collected from December 2009 to
March 2010. The 29 cows were separated into two groups; eighteen cows showed positive for
anti-NcSAG1 antibody at the first blood sampling (Group I) and eleven cows were negative
(Group II). In the sample collection period, 9 cattle in herd C showed seroconversion for
anti-NcGRA7 antibody during gestation. Serum samples of three pregnant cattle in herd A were
also collected from April 2012 to October 2012. Two of the three cattle delivered during the
sampling period. Serum samples of the newborn calves and dams in herd A were also collected
immediately after delivery but before the newborn calves suckled colostrums. These samples
were used for analyzing dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody during gestation and estimating
vertical transmission of the parasite to newborn calves. All blood samples were collected
from the tail vein and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min before the serum
was collected and stored at −20°C for later use. All animal experiments were approved by the
animal research committee of the Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Gifu University.Measurement of N. caninum-specific antibodies by ELISA: Measurement of
N. caninum-specific antibodies by ELISA was carried out as described
previously [8]. Briefly, NcSAG1 and NcGRA7 recombinant
proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli as glutathione S-transferase
(GST) fusion proteins. Fifty microliters of purified rNcSAG1, rNcGRA7 and their control,
GST, at a final concentration of 0.1 µM were coated onto ELISA plates.
After blocking with PBS containing 3% skim milk (PBSSM), 50 µl of each
serum sample diluted to 1:250 with PBSSM was added to duplicate wells, and the ELISA plate
was incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20,
horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-bovine total IgG (Bethyl Laboratories,
Montgomery, TX, U.S.A.) diluted to 1:10,000 with PBSSM was added to each well and incubated
at 37°C for 1 hr. After washing, 100 µl 2,2’-azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonicsulphonic acid) substrate solution was added to each well.
The absorbance at 415 nm was read after 1 hr of incubation at room temperature. Absorbance
values (Abs) were determined as the difference in the mean optical density measured at 415
nm (OD415 nm) between the recombinant antigen (NcSAG1 or NcGRA7) and the GST protein. As an
internal control, the OD415nm of standard Neospora-negative sera produced
by our laboratory (n=9) [8] was also measured for each
ELISA plate. Absorbance values of samples were standardized by the following formula:Standardized values=(Abs of sample serum − average of Abs of negative sera)/standard
deviation of Abs of negative sera.When the standardized values were more than 3.00, the sample was considered positive.Statistic analysis: Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient was
calculated to assess the correlation between anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody
titers.
RESULTS
Prevalence of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies: To investigate the
frequency of anti-NcGRA7 and/or anti-NcSAG1 antibody-positive individuals, we examined serum
samples of 129 cows selected from three herds, A, B and C (n=33, 61 and 35, respectively).
In herds A, B and C, 63.6% (21/33), 55.7% (34/61) and 45.7% (16/35) of cows were positive
for anti-NcSAG1 antibody, respectively. On the other hand, 6.1% (2/33), 9.8% (6/61) and 2.9%
(1/35) were positive for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies. All anti-NcGRA7 antibody-positive cows were
also anti-NcSAG1 antibody-positive (Fig. 1). In total, 7.0% (9/129) of cows were double positive for anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7
antibodies, 48.1% (62/129) were were double negative for anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7
antibodies, and 45.0% (58/129) were anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody double-negative. No
cows were identified as anti-NcSAG1 antibody negative and anti-NcGRA7 antibody positive
(Fig. 1). No clear correlation was observed
between anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels. The correlation coefficients between
anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in herds A, B and C were −0.0081
(P>0.05), 0.37 (P<0.01) and 0.44
(P<0.05), respectively.
Fig. 1.
(A, B, C) Relationships between anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in
individual cows from three herds A, B and C. (D) Data for a total of 129 cows in A, B
and C are shown. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate standardized values of
anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the
positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. Numeric characters inserted below
indicate individual numbers in each area of the upper dot-blot graph.
(A, B, C) Relationships between anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in
individual cows from three herds A, B and C. (D) Data for a total of 129 cows in A, B
and C are shown. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate standardized values of
anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the
positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. Numeric characters inserted below
indicate individual numbers in each area of the upper dot-blot graph.Dynamics of Anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies: To investigate the
dynamics of anti-NcSAG1 and NcGRA7 antibodies, serum samples were collected monthly from 29
cows in herd C, and the time-dependent changes in anti-NcGRA7 and anti-NcSAG1 antibody
levels were observed between February 2009 and March 2010. Eighteen of 29 cows were positive
for anti-NcSAG1 antibody at the first blood sampling (February 2009 for 17 cows and December
2009 for one cow) (Group I), and eleven cows were negative (February 2009 for all eleven
cows) (Group II). All 18 cows in group I maintained anti-NcSAG1 seropositivity throughout
the investigated period (February 2009 to March 2010) (Fig. 2). Although the anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels of 4 cows in Group II slightly exceeded
the cutoff point during the study, a large increase in antibody levels was not observed in
any cow in Group II (Fig. 2). Seven other cows in
Group II maintained a negative status for anti-NcSAG1 antibodies throughout the investigated
period (Fig. 2). These results indicated that the
anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels of each individual were constant, regardless of the timing of
the sampling.
Fig. 2.
Dynamics of anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels in cows from herd C, (Groups I and II). (A)
Time-dependent changes in the anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels of cows. The vertical line
indicates standardized values of anti-NcSAG1 antibody titer. The Dashed line indicates
the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. (B) Standardized values of
anti-NcSAG1 antibody titer in each individual were summarized. The color of each box
indicates the antibody titer according to the inserted legend symbols. An asterisk (*)
indicates individuals that showed seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody, as shown in
Fig. 3.
Dynamics of anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels in cows from herd C, (Groups I and II). (A)
Time-dependent changes in the anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels of cows. The vertical line
indicates standardized values of anti-NcSAG1 antibody titer. The Dashed line indicates
the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. (B) Standardized values of
anti-NcSAG1 antibody titer in each individual were summarized. The color of each box
indicates the antibody titer according to the inserted legend symbols. An asterisk (*)
indicates individuals that showed seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody, as shown in
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in cows from herd C, (Groups I and II). (A)
Time-dependent changes in the anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels of cows. The vertical line
indicates standardized values of anti-NcGRA7 antibody titer. The dashed line indicates
the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. (B) Standardized values of
anti-NcGRA7 antibody titer in each individual are summarized. The color of each box
indicates the antibody titer according to the inserted legend symbols. An asterisk (*)
indicates individuals that showed seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody during
gestation, as shown in Fig. 4.
In contrast, as shown in Fig. 3, anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels of cows from Group I were drastically changed during the
investigated period. At the time of the first blood sampling, only one cow in Group I was
positive for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies. However, nine cows in Group I showed seroconversion to
anti-NcGRA7 antibodies at some point during the investigated period (Fig. 2). Cows in group II were negative for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies
during the majority period of the investigation, except for three cows that displayed a very
slight excess of anti-NcGRA7 above the cutoff point for a short period (Fig. 2). Clear seasonality of the seroconversion was not observed in
either Group I or II (Fig. 2).Dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in cows from herd C, (Groups I and II). (A)
Time-dependent changes in the anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels of cows. The vertical line
indicates standardized values of anti-NcGRA7 antibody titer. The dashed line indicates
the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. (B) Standardized values of
anti-NcGRA7 antibody titer in each individual are summarized. The color of each box
indicates the antibody titer according to the inserted legend symbols. An asterisk (*)
indicates individuals that showed seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody during
gestation, as shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels during gestation. Time-dependent changes in
anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in 9 cows from herd C and three cows from herd A are
shown. Black and white boxes indicate anti-NcGRA7 antibody positive and negative,
respectively. Asterisks (* and **) indicate individuals whose newborn calves were
examined, as shown in Fig. 5
Dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody during gestation: Monthly collected blood
samples from 9 cows that showed seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody during gestation
were analyzed to investigate the relationship between the term of pregnancy and the dynamics
of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4, all the cows studied, except for the three cows from which serum could not be
collected during the middle gestation period, showed seroconversion at the sixth and/or
seventh month of pregnancy. Twelve cows did not show any abortion or stillbirth during the
study.Dynamics of anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels during gestation. Time-dependent changes in
anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels in 9 cows from herd C and three cows from herd A are
shown. Black and white boxes indicate anti-NcGRA7 antibody positive and negative,
respectively. Asterisks (* and **) indicate individuals whose newborn calves were
examined, as shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5.
Levels of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies of dams A-1 and A-3 and their
newborn calves (white and gray bars, respectively). The vertical line indicates
standardized values of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody titers. The dashed line
indicates the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. Serum samples of dams and
newborn calves were collected just after birth and before suckling colostrums.
Levels of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies of newborn calves: To
examine the possibility that the seroconversion for anti-NcGRA7 antibody during the sixth
and/or seventh month of pregnancy reflected the recrudescence of latent parasites, we
collected sera of 2 newborn calves in herd A (dams are shown as A-1 and A-3 in Fig. 3). In both cases, the sera of the newborn calves
contained a high level of anti-NcGRA7 antibody even before suckling any colostrum (Fig. 5). It is likely that the seroconversion of dams
during the sixth and/or seventh month of pregnancy reflected the recrudescence of latent
infection. In contrast to the newborn calves, both A-1 and A-3 dams were negative for
anti-NcGRA7 antibody in the calving month (Figs. 4
and 5).Levels of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies of dams A-1 and A-3 and their
newborn calves (white and gray bars, respectively). The vertical line indicates
standardized values of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibody titers. The dashed line
indicates the positive boundary value (3.00) of the ELISA. Serum samples of dams and
newborn calves were collected just after birth and before suckling colostrums.
DISCUSSION
The detection and elimination of chronically infected cows is important for preventing the
endogenous vertical transmission of N. caninum. At the same time, to
evaluate abortion risk caused by N. caninum, it is important to
discriminate between active and latent infection. To determine appropriate deployment of
ELISA using relatively well-studied antigens, NcSAG1 and NcGRA7, for the diagnosis of cattle
neosporosis, we investigated the prevalence and dynamics of antibodies against these
antigens. In our study, only a few cows were positive for anti-NcGRA7 antibodies, while 55%
of cows (71/129) were positive for anti-NcSAG1 antibody. In addition, consistent with
previous studies [8], anti-NcSAG1 antibody levels of
each individual were constant regardless of the timing of the examination. Considering that
the anti-NcGRA7 antibody level increases during acute infection [1], it is likely that the majority of anti-NcSAG1-positive cows in the
herds were in the latent phase. This suggests that ELISA using anti-NcSAG1 antigen is a
promising tool for detecting latently-infected cattle and that examinations do not have to
be too frequent, e.g., once a year. In contrast, levels of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies varied
greatly over time, and a one-off ELISA test would not be efficient for detecting anti-NcGRA7
antibody within a herd. The usefulness of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies as a marker of abortion
risk has been reported previously [9], but repeated
analysis at frequent intervals will be necessary to detect and measure anti-NcGRA7 antibody
accurately. In this study, we showed that positive conversion of anti-NcGRA7 antibody
occurred at the sixth and/or seventh month of gestation. These results strongly suggest that
recrudescence from latent cysts does not occur in a random manner, but occurs specifically
from the sixth to seventh month of gestation. This period must therefore be the optimal time
point for the detection of anti-NcGRA7 antibodies.During this study, no cow showed clinical symptoms associated with neosporosis including
abortion and stillbirth. However, anti-NcGRA7 antibody titer increases during acute
infection [1]. The temporal increase in anti-NcGRA7
antibody levels during gestation therefore suggest recrudescence of latently infected
parasites without obvious symptoms in the dam. In addition, we showed that newborn calves
born from such dams with anti-NcGRA7 antibodies were serologically positive to the same
antigen before suckling colostrums. Considering that maternal antibody does not transfer to
the fetus through the ruminant placenta, the results indicate that both of the newborn
calves were infected in the uterus and that the antibodies were being produced by the fetus.
It is strongly suggested that vertical transmission occurred to newborn calves from dams
that had shown positive conversion for the anti-NcGRA7 antibody during gestation. An
increase in anti-NcGRA7 antibody levels during gestation can be a marker for recrudescence
of the parasite. Such vertical transmission is a severe concern for the spread of the
parasite, because congenitally infectedcalves remain persistently infected and can pass the
infection on to the next generation [5]. Repeated
examination, particularly during the sixth and seventh month of pregnancy, by ELISA using
the NcGRA7 antigen can be a useful diagnostic tool to detect asymptomatic congenital
infection with N. caninum.In this study, we described the dynamics of anti-NcSAG1 and anti-NcGRA7 antibodies in
cattle with special reference to changes during the gestation period. Measurement of
antibodies against these two N. caninum antigens could be a valuable
diagnostic tool for the control of cattle neosporosis.
Authors: G Alvarez-García; A Pitarch; A Zaballos; A Fernández-García; C Gil; M Gómez-Bautista; A Aguado-Martínez; L M Ortega-Mora Journal: Parasitology Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: A Aguado-Martínez; G Alvarez-García; A Fernández-García; V Risco-Castillo; I Arnaiz-Seco; X Rebordosa-Trigueros; V Navarro-Lozano; L M Ortega-Mora Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 2.738
Authors: Francine A Sinnott; Leonardo G Monte; Thais F Collares; Bruno M De Matos; Diene B Pacheco; Sibele Borsuk; Renato Andreotti; Cláudia P Hartleben Journal: Curr Microbiol Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 2.188