Literature DB >> 35928088

Spectrum of Chromosomal Abnormalities Detected by Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis Following Invasive Prenatal Testing of Fetuses with Abnormal Ultrasound Scans.

Anne George Cherian1, Vandana Kamath2, Vivi Srivastava2, Sumita Danda3, Tunny Sebastian4, Manisha Madhai Beck1.   

Abstract

Objectives: The frequent association between malformations and chromosomal abnormalities is now well-established. This study looks at the incidence and type of chromosomal abnormalities detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis in women undergoing invasive tests following detection of fetal anomalies on antenatal scans as well as incidence of other genetic abnormalities detected by DNA analysis of fetuses with congenital anomalies that had a normal karyotype. Materials and
Methods: A retrospective, observational study of pregnant women undergoing invasive testing following identification of fetal anomalies by ultrasonography was carried out in a tertiary care facility, Vellore, India, between 2011 and 2018.
Results: 169 women underwent an invasive diagnostic procedure following detection of fetal anomalies. The most common indication for doing fetal karyotype was the presence of major fetal structural anomalies (142/169, 84%) with over a third (48/142, 34%) having multisystem involvement. Fetal hydrops was the next most common indication, detected in 18/169 (10%) fetuses. Aneuploidy was seen 19 of 25 fetuses (76%) with an abnormal karyotype with autosomal aneuploidy accounting for 13 (68%) and sex chromosome aneuploidy for seven (37%) of the fetuses. One fetus had double aneuploidy. In fetuses with normal karyotype, no additional information was obtained from further genetic testing. Conclusions: The overall detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in our study using conventional cytogenetic analysis was 14.8%, the majority (72%) being associated with structural malformations, 20% with non-immune hydrops and 4% with soft markers. Abnormal karyotypes were seen in 12.7% of fetuses with structural malformations. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal abnormalities; Fetal congenital anomalies; Karyotype; Morphology scans; Prenatal invasive testing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35928088      PMCID: PMC9343546          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-022-01626-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  23 in total

1.  Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; R J Snijders; C M Gosden; C Berry; S Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-09-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?

Authors:  Sameer Raniga; P D Desai; Hetal Parikh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-11

3.  Trends in the utilization of invasive prenatal diagnosis in The Netherlands during 2000-2009.

Authors:  Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; Peter G Scheffer; Philip Stoutenbeek; Peter C J I Schielen; Lieve C M L Page-Christiaens; G Heleen Schuring-Blom
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ : a new technology for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  F Vialard; G Simoni; A Aboura; S De Toffol; D Molina Gomes; L Marcato; S Serero; P Clement; P Bouhanna; E Rouleau; B Grimi; J Selva; E Gaetani; F Maggi; A Joseph; B Benzacken; F R Grati
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Polyploidies in abortion material decrease with maternal age.

Authors:  M Neuber; H Rehder; C Zuther; R Lettau; E Schwinger
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Karyotype abnormalities in fetuses diagnosed as abnormal on ultrasound before 20 weeks' gestational age.

Authors:  J Halliday; J Lumley; A Bankier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Efficient direct chromosome analyses and enzyme determinations from chorionic villi samples in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  G Simoni; B Brambati; C Danesino; F Rossella; G L Terzoli; M Ferrari; M Fraccaro
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities. A comparison of the results of various techniques, with special emphasis on mosaicism.

Authors:  M Murer-Orlando; L Zahed; Z Docherty
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  A retrospective exploratory study of fetal genetic invasive procedures at a University Hospital.

Authors:  Chitra Andrew; Teena Koshy; Shivani Gopal; Solomon Franklin Durairaj Paul
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.