A retrospective exploratory study of fetal genetic invasive procedures at a University Hospital.

This is a retrospective analysis of the patient demographics and cytogenetic results of patients who underwent prenatal invasive testing for genetic analysis at the Foetal Medicine Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute. The main objective of this study was to characterise the changing trends in indications of pregnant women for foetal karyotyping in a 7-year period. A total of 257 procedures were performed in this period, and there was a significant change in the trend of indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis from an advanced maternal age in 2009 to a positive screen test by 2014. Chromosome abnormalities were observed in 9.8% of the cases, with trisomy 21 being the most frequent finding. The findings demonstrate the changing trends in screening and diagnostic testing in the tertiary care centre, with an acceptance of the first and second trimester maternal serum screening tests as a determinant for high-risk pregnancies. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Despite the fact that India has one of the world's highest birth rates, there is still no public health care policy for the application of cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis. Nevertheless, we have been offering this test in our university teaching hospital since 2008, allowing us to characterise the changing trends in indications of pregnant women who sought invasive diagnostic procedures for foetal genetic studies. What do the results of this study add? The results of our study show that there were major changes in the common indications for prenatal diagnosis during the study period. In 2009, the main indication was an advanced maternal age, referred to in 31% of the cases, which declined steadily to 5% by 2014. In 2014, 51% of cases opted for a prenatal diagnosis because of a first trimester screen positive result, increasing from 12% in 2009. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This data is relevant as it would encourage other tertiary hospitals in developing countries like India to consider extending first trimester screening for all women, regardless of age and educate them on the options of prenatal genetic diagnosis for reassurance.