Literature DB >> 35927501

Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.

Annalisa Cogliandro1,2, Rosa Salzillo3, Mauro Barone3,4, Stefania Tenna3, Barbara Cagli3, Paolo Persichetti3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Immediate single stage breast reconstruction is a challenging procedure with the goal of improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate using the BREAST-Q patient satisfaction, body perception and quality of life after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction comparing unilateral and bilateral reconstructions.
METHODS: In this study we enrolled 56 women who underwent mastectomy and immediate single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction at Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome between 2013 and 2020. One year after surgery they were administered electronically the BREAST-Q post-operative module.
RESULTS: Our two cohorts of patients consisted in 34 women who received unilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and DTI breast reconstruction and 22 women who underwent bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and DTI breast reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 34 patients belonging to the unilateral group responded to the questionnaire (70.5%), while in the bilateral group responders were 16 out of 22 (72.7%). The BREAST-Q scores were compared between the two groups: patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction showed higher scores in every BREAST-Q domain compared to patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a statistically significant difference in the Satisfaction with breast (P = 0.01), Sexual well-being (P = 0.03), and Satisfaction with implants (P = 0.01) domains.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing bilateral DTI breast reconstruction have a favorable postoperative surgical cosmetic outcome with a better patient's body image perception and a higher post-operative level of satisfaction compared to unilateral DTI reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Breast-q; Mastectomy; PROMs; Plastic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927501     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-02986-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  20 in total

Review 1.  Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Constance M Chen; Stefan J Cano; Anne F Klassen; Tari King; Colleen McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Monica Morrow; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Preoperative digital mammography imaging in conservative mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Alberto Rancati; Claudio Angrigiani; Dennis Hammond; Maurizio Nava; Eduardo Gonzalez; Roman Rostagno; Gustavo Gercovich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

3.  Development and Psychometric Validation of BREAST-Q Scales Measuring Cancer Worry, Fatigue, and Impact on Work.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Manraj N Kaur; Elena Tsangaris; Claire E E de Vries; Louise Bordeleau; Toni Zhong; Stefan J Cano; Trisia Breitkopf; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.

Authors:  Rossella Sgarzani; Silvia Pasquali; Federico Buggi; Daniela Tognali; Francesco Marongiu; Matteo Mingozzi; Davide Melandri; Paolo Giovanni Morselli; Annalisa Curcio
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Reconstruction Practices in the United States.

Authors:  Walter J Joseph; Samyd S Bustos; Joseph E Losee; J Peter Rubin; Carolyn DE LA Cruz
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 7.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Amie M Scott; Jennifer A Klok; Peter G Cordeiro; Stefan J Cano
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes: Key Metrics in Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Jonas A Nelson; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 13.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.