Rossella Sgarzani1, Silvia Pasquali2, Federico Buggi3, Daniela Tognali3, Francesco Marongiu3, Matteo Mingozzi3, Davide Melandri4, Paolo Giovanni Morselli2, Annalisa Curcio3. 1. Servizio di Chirurgia Plastica, Centro Grandi Ustionati, Ospedale M. Bufalini, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy. rossella.sgarzani@auslromagna.it. 2. Chirurgia Plastica, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 3. Chirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy. 4. Servizio di Chirurgia Plastica, Centro Grandi Ustionati, Ospedale M. Bufalini, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nipple areola complex (NAC) sparing mastectomy allows good oncological and aesthetic results. The study compares the results, in terms of self-evaluated satisfaction and symmetry, of direct to implant (DTI) sub-muscular breast reconstruction, with the aid of human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus two-stage reconstruction with sub-muscular tissue expander, followed by implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center, non-randomized, case-control study. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral NAC sparing mastectomy at Forlì Hospital between 2014 and 2018; sub-muscular reconstruction; minimum follow-up of 12 months from the reconstructive stage; no history of radiotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with the aid of human ADM; group B were those who underwent a two-stage reconstruction with tissue expander then implant. We collected data on: (1) Self-evaluated satisfaction by Breast Q questionnaire (scores from 0 to 100). (2) Observer-evaluated symmetry. Bi-dimensional photographs were collected and evaluated by 11 breast surgeons blinded to each other, who assigned a score for symmetry (from 0 to 10). (3) Symmetry of anthropometric measures collected by hand and volume estimated by Breast V application. RESULTS: Group A included 28 patients; group included B 26 patients. Breast-Q questionnaires reported the following results: satisfaction with breasts in group A 65 ± 12 versus group B 68 ± 14; satisfaction with outcome in group A 88 ± 16 versus group B 93 ± 11; psychosocial well-being in group A 71 ± 20 versus group B 76 ± 17; sexual well-being in group A 63 ± 26 versus group B 60 ± 13; physical well-being in group A 68 ± 15 versus group B 60 ± 12. The average symmetry breast score assigned to group A was 6.9, versus group B 7.2. Regarding the anthropometric measures in group A, the differences between right and left were major to those in group B. Regarding breast volume, the mean difference between right and left in group A was 31.89 cc ± 24.97, whereas in group B was 25.46 cc ± 23.59. CONCLUSION: Our data show better symmetry and better psychosocial well-being in the two-stage reconstruction, and higher satisfaction with sexual and physical well-being in DTI reconstructions. These aspects should be discussed with the patient while collecting the informed consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: Nipple areola complex (NAC) sparing mastectomy allows good oncological and aesthetic results. The study compares the results, in terms of self-evaluated satisfaction and symmetry, of direct to implant (DTI) sub-muscular breast reconstruction, with the aid of human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus two-stage reconstruction with sub-muscular tissue expander, followed by implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center, non-randomized, case-control study. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral NAC sparing mastectomy at Forlì Hospital between 2014 and 2018; sub-muscular reconstruction; minimum follow-up of 12 months from the reconstructive stage; no history of radiotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with the aid of human ADM; group B were those who underwent a two-stage reconstruction with tissue expander then implant. We collected data on: (1) Self-evaluated satisfaction by Breast Q questionnaire (scores from 0 to 100). (2) Observer-evaluated symmetry. Bi-dimensional photographs were collected and evaluated by 11 breast surgeons blinded to each other, who assigned a score for symmetry (from 0 to 10). (3) Symmetry of anthropometric measures collected by hand and volume estimated by Breast V application. RESULTS: Group A included 28 patients; group included B 26 patients. Breast-Q questionnaires reported the following results: satisfaction with breasts in group A 65 ± 12 versus group B 68 ± 14; satisfaction with outcome in group A 88 ± 16 versus group B 93 ± 11; psychosocial well-being in group A 71 ± 20 versus group B 76 ± 17; sexual well-being in group A 63 ± 26 versus group B 60 ± 13; physical well-being in group A 68 ± 15 versus group B 60 ± 12. The average symmetry breast score assigned to group A was 6.9, versus group B 7.2. Regarding the anthropometric measures in group A, the differences between right and left were major to those in group B. Regarding breast volume, the mean difference between right and left in group A was 31.89 cc ± 24.97, whereas in group B was 25.46 cc ± 23.59. CONCLUSION: Our data show better symmetry and better psychosocial well-being in the two-stage reconstruction, and higher satisfaction with sexual and physical well-being in DTI reconstructions. These aspects should be discussed with the patient while collecting the informed consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast reconstruction; Breast symmetry; Breast-Q; NAC sparing mastectomy
Authors: Rossella Sgarzani; Luca Negosanti; Paolo Giovanni Morselli; Veronica Vietti Michelina; Luigi Maria Lapalorcia; Riccardo Cipriani Journal: Surg Res Pract Date: 2015-11-16