Literature DB >> 35922861

Oral eltanexor treatment of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome refractory to hypomethylating agents.

Sangmin Lee1,2, Sanjay Mohan3, Jessica Knupp4, Kamal Chamoun4, Adrienne de Jonge4, Fan Yang4, Erkan Baloglu5, Jatin Shah4, Michael G Kauffman4, Sharon Shacham4, Bhavana Bhatnagar5.   

Abstract

Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have limited therapeutic options and an expected overall survival (OS) of 3-5 months. Eltanexor is an investigational oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export with low central nervous system penetrance and an acceptable tolerability profile. Preclinical studies suggest that myeloid malignancies are sensitive to nuclear export inhibition. Eltanexor exhibited efficacy in hematologic models, supporting exploration in a clinical trial. This phase 1/2 study (NCT02649790) assessed single-agent activity of eltanexor in patients with higher-risk MDS and 5-19% myeloblasts. Two starting doses of eltanexor were evaluated: 20 mg (n = 15), 10 mg (n = 5), both administered on days 1-5 each week of a 28-day cycle. Twenty patients with primary HMA-refractory MDS, with a median age of 77 years (range 62-89), and a median of two prior treatment regimens (range 1-4) were enrolled. Of these, 15 were evaluated for efficacy and 20 for safety. The overall response rate (ORR) was 53.3%, with seven patients (46.7%) achieving marrow complete remission (mCR) and one additional patient achieving hematologic improvement (HI). In the 10 mg group, three patients (60%) reached mCR and two (40%) stable disease (SD), while for 20 mg, four patients (40%) had mCR and two (20%) SD. A total of three patients (20%) had HI and became transfusion independent ≥ 8 weeks. Median OS for the efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 15) was 9.86 months (7.98, NE). Overall, the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (45%), diarrhea (35%), decreased appetite (35%), fatigue and neutropenia (both 30%). Single-agent oral eltanexor was active, safe, and well tolerated in patients with higher-risk, primary HMA-refractory MDS.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35922861      PMCID: PMC9351096          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01319-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   23.168


To the Editor:

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) carries a significant risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and decreased survival [1]. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are first-line therapies for this population, demonstrating tolerability and improved overall survival (OS) [2-5]. However, HMAs are not curative for MDS, and thus, treatment of refractory or relapsed higher-risk MDS patients after HMA therapy represents a profound unmet medical need, with no approved therapeutics and median OS (mOS) of 4–5.6 months [6, 7]. Selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds are a class of novel and specific antagonists of the karyopherin exportin 1 protein (XPO1). Eltanexor is a reversible, oral SINE compound, which in non-clinical AML mouse studies showed robust single-agent activity, with improved tolerability and overall survival [8, 9]. We therefore analyzed eltanexor treatment in a phase 1 cohort of patients with higher-risk, HMA-refractory MDS. Twenty patients with MDS were treated with single-agent eltanexor at a starting dose of 20 mg (n = 15) or 10 mg (n = 5) on days 1–5 of each week of each 28-day cycle (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The majority of patients were aged ≥ 75 years with de novo MDS, and all patients had MDS primary refractory to HMAs (Additional file 1: Table S1). Of the 20 patients, seven (35%) had marrow complete remission (mCR), including two patients that also achieved hematologic improvement (HI). One (5%) additional patient had HI and stable disease (SD), and four patients (20%) had SD. Overall, the disease control rate (DCR) was 60% (95% CI 36.1–80.9), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI 19.1–64.0). Of the 20 patients enrolled, 15 patients were evaluable for efficacy, as five 20 mg patients discontinued the study and were thus not evaluable for disease response; ORR for the efficacy-evaluable patients was 53.3% (95% CI 26.6–78.7; Table 1).
Table 1

Efficacy in evaluable patients

Eltanexor (10 mg)N = 5Eltanexor (20 mg)N = 10TotalN = 15
ORR, n (%)3 (60)5 (50)8 (53.3)
MCR, n (%)3 (60)4 (40)7 (46.7)
HI, n (%)1 (20)2 (20)3 (20)
 HI with MCR1 (20)1 (10)2 (13.3)
 HI with SD01 (10)1 (6.7)
SD, n (%)2 (40)2 (20)4 (26.7)
PD, n (%)03 (30)3 (20)
Treatment duration, weeks151213
Median time to response, weeks8.19.18.4
Median duration of response, weeks (95% CI)

7.86

(NE, NE)

25.29

(13.12, NE)

19.21

ORR overall response rate; MCR marrow complete remission; HI hematologic improvement; SD stable disease; PD progressive disease; CI confidence interval; NE not evaluable

Efficacy in evaluable patients 7.86 (NE, NE) 25.29 (13.12, NE) ORR overall response rate; MCR marrow complete remission; HI hematologic improvement; SD stable disease; PD progressive disease; CI confidence interval; NE not evaluable Three patients (20%) had HI and became transfusion independent ≥ 8 weeks. Among patients on eltanexor at the 20 mg dose, four patients (40%) reached mCR, including one patient who reached mCR with HI, one patient (10%) had HI and SD, and two (20%) had SD. Of patients on the 10 mg dose, three patients (60%) reached mCR, including one patient who had mCR with HI, and two patients had SD (40%). After 3–4 cycles of treatment, levels of normal neutrophils and platelets improved, while blasts decreased, and patients had a median reduction in bone marrow blasts from baseline of -78.2% (range −86% to 33%; Additional file 1: Figure S2). mOS for the entire efficacy-evaluable cohort was 9.86 months. OS for patients who reached mCR was longer than for those who did not reach mCR, with a median of 11.86 vs 8.67 months, respectively (HR = 0.28, p = 0.11; Fig. 1). Additionally, mOS for patients with mCR was longer than mOS for patients with progressive disease (PD; 3.15 months [HR = 0.23, p = 0.08]), and patients with SD had longer OS than patients with PD (9.86 vs 3.15 months, HR = 0.38, p = 0.09).
Fig. 1

Overall Survival. The median OS for all patients was 9.86 months. OS was higher in mCR patients (n = 7) than patients who did not reach mCR (n = 8): median 11.86 vs 8.67 months (HR = 0.28, p = 0.11), and longer than OS for patients with PD (n = 3, mOS = 3.15 months, HR = 0.23, p = 0.08). mCR = marrow complete remission; OS = overall survival; HR = hazard ratio; PD = progressive disease

Overall Survival. The median OS for all patients was 9.86 months. OS was higher in mCR patients (n = 7) than patients who did not reach mCR (n = 8): median 11.86 vs 8.67 months (HR = 0.28, p = 0.11), and longer than OS for patients with PD (n = 3, mOS = 3.15 months, HR = 0.23, p = 0.08). mCR = marrow complete remission; OS = overall survival; HR = hazard ratio; PD = progressive disease None of the patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The most frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) of any grade were non-hematologic and occurred more often in the 20 mg treatment group than the 10 mg group (Additional file 1: Table S2). Serious AEs (grade 3/4) were infrequent, and there were no grade 5 events. Of the 20 patients initially treated with eltanexor, seven patients (35.0%) required a dose delay, and eight patients (40.0%) required a dose reduction to 10 mg due to adverse events. Novel agents to treat relapsed/refractory MDS patients are currently in development, though recent phase 3 trials to develop novel treatments for higher-risk MDS patients were unsuccessful, failing to meet the primary endpoints of improving OS [10, 11]. All patients in this study had MDS primary refractory to HMAs, 19/20 were considered higher risk by IPSS scoring, and 25% of patients had poor risk cytogenetics. Despite these factors, the ORR was still 53.3% in efficacy-evaluable patients, demonstrating an encouraging initial response to eltanexor monotherapy. Consistent with the selectivity of eltanexor for leukemic cells, responses included both a substantial reduction in blasts and commensurate increases in normal neutrophils and platelets, even for patients who achieved SD rather than a response [12]. A limitation of this report is the small patient population. Overall, eltanexor represents a mechanistically novel, oral agent with good tolerability and robust single-agent activity conferring improved survival relative to historical controls, supporting the continued development of this novel agent. Additional file 1. Methods, supplementary tables S1 and S2, and supplementary figures S1 and S2.
  9 in total

1.  5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ronit Gurion; Liat Vidal; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Yulia Belnik; Moshe Yeshurun; Pia Raanani; Ofer Shpilberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group and the German MDS Study Group.

Authors:  Michael Lübbert; Stefan Suciu; Liliana Baila; Björn Hans Rüter; Uwe Platzbecker; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; Boris Labar; Ulrich Germing; Helmut R Salih; Filip Beeldens; Petra Muus; Karl-Heinz Pflüger; Corneel Coens; Anne Hagemeijer; Hans Eckart Schaefer; Arnold Ganser; Carlo Aul; Theo de Witte; Pierre W Wijermans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure.

Authors:  Thomas Prébet; Steven D Gore; Benjamin Esterni; Claude Gardin; Raphael Itzykson; Sylvain Thepot; François Dreyfus; Odile Beyne Rauzy; Christian Recher; Lionel Adès; Bruno Quesnel; C L Beach; Pierre Fenaux; Norbert Vey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Craig S Rosenfeld; John M Bennett; Maher Albitar; John DiPersio; Virginia Klimek; James Slack; Carlos de Castro; Farhad Ravandi; Richard Helmer; Lanlan Shen; Stephen D Nimer; Richard Leavitt; Azra Raza; Hussain Saba
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Pierre Fenaux; Aref Al-Kali; Maria R Baer; Mikkael A Sekeres; Gail J Roboz; Gianluca Gaidano; Bart L Scott; Peter Greenberg; Uwe Platzbecker; David P Steensma; Suman Kambhampati; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Lucy A Godley; Ehab Atallah; Robert Collins; Hagop Kantarjian; Elias Jabbour; Francois E Wilhelm; Nozar Azarnia; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Next-generation XPO1 inhibitor shows improved efficacy and in vivo tolerability in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Z A Hing; H Y J Fung; P Ranganathan; S Mitchell; D El-Gamal; J A Woyach; K Williams; V M Goettl; J Smith; X Yu; X Meng; Q Sun; T Cagatay; A M Lehman; D M Lucas; E Baloglu; S Shacham; M G Kauffman; J C Byrd; Y M Chook; R Garzon; R Lapalombella
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  High-risk MDS after HMAs.

Authors:  Lionel Adès
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2019-06-30

8.  KPT-8602, a second-generation inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export, is well tolerated and highly active against AML blasts and leukemia-initiating cells.

Authors:  J Etchin; A Berezovskaya; A S Conway; I A Galinsky; R M Stone; E Baloglu; W Senapedis; Y Landesman; M Kauffman; S Shacham; J C Y Wang; A T Look
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.528

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers.

Authors:  Gui-Hong Liu; Tao Chen; Xin Zhang; Xue-Lei Ma; Hua-Shan Shi
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-10-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.