Literature DB >> 21483003

Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group and the German MDS Study Group.

Michael Lübbert1, Stefan Suciu, Liliana Baila, Björn Hans Rüter, Uwe Platzbecker, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Dominik Selleslag, Boris Labar, Ulrich Germing, Helmut R Salih, Filip Beeldens, Petra Muus, Karl-Heinz Pflüger, Corneel Coens, Anne Hagemeijer, Hans Eckart Schaefer, Arnold Ganser, Carlo Aul, Theo de Witte, Pierre W Wijermans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare low-dose decitabine to best supportive care (BSC) in higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) age 60 years or older and ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred thirty-three patients (median age, 70 years; range, 60 to 90 years) were enrolled; 53% had poor-risk cytogenetics, and the median MDS duration at random assignment was 3 months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Decitabine (15 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over 4 hours three times a day for 3 days in 6-week cycles.
RESULTS: OS prolongation with decitabine versus BSC was not statistically significant (median OS, 10.1 v 8.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.17; two-sided, log-rank P = .38). Progression-free survival (PFS), but not acute myeloid leukemia (AML) -free survival (AMLFS), was significantly prolonged with decitabine versus BSC (median PFS, 6.6 v 3.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.88; P = .004; median AMLFS, 8.8 v 6.1 months, respectively; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.12; P = .24). AML transformation was significantly (P = .036) reduced at 1 year (from 33% with BSC to 22% with decitabine). Multivariate analyses indicated that patients with short MDS duration had worse outcomes. Best responses with decitabine versus BSC, respectively, were as follows: complete response (13% v 0%), partial response (6% v 0%), hematologic improvement (15% v 2%), stable disease (14% v 22%), progressive disease (29% v 68%), hypoplasia (14% v 0%), and inevaluable (8% v 8%). Grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of patients on decitabine versus 7% of patients on BSC; grade 3 to 4 infections occurred in 57% and 52% of patients on decitabine and BSC, respectively. Decitabine treatment was associated with improvements in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) parameters.
CONCLUSION: Decitabine administered in 6-week cycles is active in older patients with higher-risk MDS, resulting in improvements of OS and AMLFS (nonsignificant), of PFS and AML transformation (significant), and of QOL. Short MDS duration was an independent adverse prognosticator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21483003     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  188 in total

Review 1.  New ways to use DNA methyltransferase inhibitors for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Steven D Gore
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2011

2.  Myelodysplastic syndromes--many new drugs, little therapeutic progress.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Palliative chemotherapy followed by methylation inhibitor in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: An in vitro and clinical study.

Authors:  Bingjie Ding; Zhixiang Wang; Xuejie Jiang; Xiaodong Li; Chunli Wang; Qingxiu Zhong; Ling Jiang; Min Dai; Y U Zhang; Q I Wei; Fanyi Meng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21

Review 4.  Why methylation is not a marker predictive of response to hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Voso; Valeria Santini; Emiliano Fabiani; Luana Fianchi; Marianna Criscuolo; Giulia Falconi; Francesco Guidi; Stefan Hohaus; Giuseppe Leone
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Mutation-Driven Therapy in MDS.

Authors:  David M Swoboda; David A Sallman
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 6.  Treatment of older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): the emerging role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo HSCT).

Authors:  Ehab Atallah; Kathryn Bylow; Jesse Troy; Wael Saber
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  DNA Hypomethylating Drugs in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Takahiro Sato; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Patricia Kropf
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Hematology: Azacitidine improves survival in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Michal G Rose
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ronit Gurion; Liat Vidal; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Yulia Belnik; Moshe Yeshurun; Pia Raanani; Ofer Shpilberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Oral cedazuridine/decitabine for MDS and CMML: a phase 2 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elizabeth A Griffiths; David P Steensma; Gail J Roboz; Richard Wells; James McCloskey; Olatoyosi Odenike; Amy E DeZern; Karen Yee; Lambert Busque; Casey O'Connell; Laura C Michaelis; Joseph Brandwein; Hagop Kantarjian; Aram Oganesian; Mohammad Azab; Michael R Savona
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.