| Literature DB >> 35922834 |
Yu Jin1,2, Qingquan Bi3, Guiqi Song4, Jun Wu5, Hui Ding6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Implicit absenteeism is very common among clinical nurses. We aimed to evaluate the role of psychological coherence in the inclusive leadership and implicit absenteeism among obstetrics and gynecology nurses, to provide evidence to the clinical management of nurses.Entities:
Keywords: Absenteeism; Care; Inclusive leadership; Management; Nurse; Psychological coherence
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35922834 PMCID: PMC9351111 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04137-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 4.144
The general information and characteristics of surveyed nurses (n = 1080)
| Variables | Cases (n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 1080 | 100.0% |
| Age(y) | ||
| ≤ 30 | 576 | 53.3% |
| 31 ~ 40 | 344 | 31.9% |
| 40 ~ 50 | 140 | 13.0% |
| ≥ 50 | 20 | 1.8% |
| Job title | ||
| Nurse | 316 | 29.3% |
| Nurse Practitioner | 436 | 40.4% |
| Nurse-in-charge | 311 | 28.8% |
| Professor of Nursing | 17 | 1.5% |
| Educational level | ||
| High school | 37 | 3.4% |
| College | 446 | 41.3% |
| Bachelor | 596 | 55.2% |
| Master | 1 | 0.1% |
| Working experience(y) | ||
| < 1 | 47 | 4.3% |
| 1 ~ 5 | 357 | 33.1% |
| 6 ~ 10 | 301 | 27.9% |
| ≥ 10 | 375 | 34.7% |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 751 | 69.6% |
| Unmarried | 307 | 27.9% |
| Divorced | 20 | 1.9% |
| Other | 2 | 0.2% |
| Having child | ||
| Yes | 704 | 65.2% |
| No | 376 | 34.8% |
| Employment relationship | ||
| Formal staffing | 232 | 21.5% |
| Contract | 836 | 77.4% |
| Dispatch | 12 | 1.1% |
| Number of night shifts per month | ||
| 0 ~ 5 | 652 | 60.4% |
| 5 ~ 10 | 360 | 33.3% |
| ≥ 10 | 68 | 6.3% |
| Number of patients in day shift nursing | ||
| 1 ~ 8 | 313 | 29.0% |
| 9 ~ 16 | 423 | 39.2% |
| > 16 | 344 | 31.8% |
| Number of patients in night shift nursing | ||
| 1 ~ 16 | 224 | 20.7% |
| 17 ~ 32 | 227 | 21.0% |
| > 32 | 629 | 58.3% |
The implicit absenteeism of 1080 obstetrics and gynecology nurses
| Variables | Low implicit absenteeism group ( | High implicit absenteeism group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Percentage | Cases | Percentage | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 487 | 100.0% | 593 | 100.0% | ||
| Age(y) | 8.901 | 0.03 | ||||
| ≤ 30 | 241 | 49.5% | 335 | 56.5% | ||
| 31 ~ 40 | 158 | 32.4% | 186 | 31.4% | ||
| 40 ~ 50 | 77 | 15.8% | 63 | 10.6% | ||
| ≥ 50 | 11 | 2.3% | 9 | 1.5% | ||
| Job title | 22.194 | < 0.01 | ||||
| Nurse | 152 | 31.2% | 164 | 27.7% | ||
| Nurse Practitioner | 166 | 34.1% | 270 | 45.5% | ||
| Nurse-in-charge | 155 | 31.8% | 156 | 26.3% | ||
| Professor of Nursing | 14 | 2.9% | 3 | 0.5% | ||
| Educational level | 4.848 | 0.18 | ||||
| High school | 13 | 2.7% | 24 | 4.0% | ||
| College | 214 | 43.9% | 232 | 39.1% | ||
| Bachelor | 259 | 53.2% | 337 | 56.8% | ||
| Master | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Working experience(y) | ||||||
| < 1 | 19 | 3.9% | 28 | 4.72% | 16.522 | < 0.01 |
| 1 ~ 5 | 157 | 32.24% | 200 | 33.73% | ||
| 6 ~ 10 | 113 | 23.2% | 188 | 31.7% | ||
| ≥ 10 | 198 | 40.66% | 177 | 29.85% | ||
| Marital status | 0.486 | 0.92 | ||||
| Married | 343 | 70.4% | 408 | 68.8% | ||
| Unmarried | 135 | 27.7% | 172 | 29.0% | ||
| Divorced | 8 | 1.6% | 12 | 2.0% | ||
| Other | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | ||
| Having child | 3.024 | 0.082 | ||||
| Yes | 331 | 68.0% | 373 | 62.9% | ||
| No | 156 | 32.0% | 220 | 37.1% | ||
| Employment relationship | 12.607 | < 0.01 | ||||
| Formal staffing | 127 | 26.1% | 105 | 17.7% | ||
| Contract | 357 | 73.3% | 479 | 80.8% | ||
| Dispatch | 3 | 0.6% | 9 | 1.5% | ||
| Number of night shifts per month | 22.965 | < 0.01 | ||||
| 0 ~ 5 | 332 | 68.2% | 320 | 54.0% | ||
| 5 ~ 10 | 128 | 26.3% | 232 | 39.0% | ||
| ≥ 10 | 27 | 5.5% | 41 | 6.9% | ||
| Number of patients in day shift nursing | 8.880 | 0.012 | ||||
| 1 ~ 8 | 162 | 33.3% | 151 | 25.5% | ||
| 9 ~ 16 | 186 | 38.2% | 237 | 40.0% | ||
| > 16 | 139 | 28.5% | 205 | 34.5% | ||
| Number of patients in night shift nursing | 2.397 | 0.302 | ||||
| 1 ~ 16 | 102 | 20.9% | 122 | 20.4% | ||
| 17 ~ 32 | 112 | 23.0% | 115 | 19.4% | ||
| > 32 | 273 | 56.1% | 356 | 60.0% | ||
Inclusive leadership scores of obstetrics and gynecology nurses (n = 1080)
| Dimensions | Number of entries (n) | Score range | Average score ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Openness | 4 | 4 ~ 20 | 11.81 ± 2.24 |
| Effectiveness | 3 | 3 ~ 15 | 13.14 ± 2.46 |
| Accessibility | 2 | 2 ~ 10 | 11.25 ± 2.15 |
| Total | 9 | 9 ~ 45 | 34.25 ± 7.23 |
Psychological coherence score of obstetrics and gynecology nurses (n = 1080)
| Items | Average score ( |
|---|---|
| Sense of understanding | 21.13 ± 4.22 |
| Sense of control | 19.22 ± 4.14 |
| Sense of meaning | 17.01 ± 4.08 |
| Total | 55.79 ± 8.28 |
Pearson correlation coefficient matrix of inclusive leadership, implicit absenteeism, psychological coherence of obstetrics and gynecology nurses (n = 1080)
| Variables | Implicit absenteeism | Openness | Effectiveness | Accessibility | Sense of understanding | Sense of control | Sense of meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implicit absenteeism | 1 | ||||||
| Openness | 601* | 1 | |||||
| Effectiveness | 625* | 704* | 1 | ||||
| Accessibility | 613* | 647* | 710* | 1 | |||
| Sense of understanding | 622* | 605* | 638* | 671* | 1 | ||
| Sense of control | 608* | 623* | 645* | 665* | 684* | 1 | |
| Sense of meaning | 621* | 633* | 674* | 685* | 704* | 723* | 1 |
*P < 0.05
Analysis of the mediating effect of psychological coherence between inclusive leadership and implicit absenteeism (n = 1080)
| Steps | Independent variable | Dependent variable | Standard regression coefficients | T | F | △R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inclusive leadership | Psychological coherence | 0.581 | 12.163* | 50.163* | 0.286 |
| 2 | Inclusive leadership | Implicit absenteeism | 0.605 | 12.145* | 45.062* | 0.309 |
| 3 | Inclusive leadership | Implicit absenteeism | 0.417 | 7.056* | 44.117* | 0.348 |
| psychological coherence | 0.352 | 5.267* |
*P < 0.05
Fig. 1The mediating effect model of psychological coherence between inclusive leadership and implicit absenteeism in obstetrics and gynecology nurses