Literature DB >> 35920821

Clinically unrecognized plasma volume expansion predicts long-term all-cause-mortality in chronic heart failure.

Christoph Ahlgrim1, Florian Seiler2, Philipp Birkner2, Simon Schoechlin1, Sebastian Grundmann2, Christoph Bode2, Torben Pottgiesser2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with elevated total blood volume (BV) and distinct phenotypes of total red cell volume (RCV) and plasma volume (PV) elevations. Especially PV expansion during clinical decompensation is linked with adverse clinical outcomes. The role of PV expansion in compensated CHF patients is less clear. Aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of BV parameters on long-term mortality in CHF patients investigated at a compensated state. METHODS AND
RESULTS: BV, PV and RCV were determined in 44 (9 female) compensated CHF patients using an abbreviated carbon monoxide method, who were followed up for 6.0 years, (range: 3.7-6.5 years) for all-cause mortality. In univariate analysis PV expansion but not BV and RCV predicted all-cause mortality (p = .021). A cutoff of 1800 ml PV/m² body-surface area allows stratification for all-cause mortality (p = .044). PV expansion but not RCV reduction explains the significantly lower hematocrit values of nonsurvivors. DISCUSSION: In this pilot study, PV expansion, which was unnoticed from a clinician's perspective, but is indicated by significantly lower hematocrit, appears to be a relevant predictor of long-term all-cause mortality. Whether PV expansion constitutes an adverse CHF phenotype and can be targeted by diuretic therapy is currently unclear.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; mortality; plasma volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35920821      PMCID: PMC9574737          DOI: 10.1002/clc.23893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   3.287


INTRODUCTION

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is frequently associated with an expansion of the total blood volume (BV). In decompensated CHF patients, this elevation of intravascular volume is the key therapeutic target, and a clinically unrecognized increase of the intravascular fluids even after clinical recompensation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. , Even at a clinically compensated state, an increased intravascular volume is frequently observed in CHF patients. , This increase in BV is assumed a compensatory mechanism to maintain organ perfusion when cardiac output is decreased. The two constituents of the total blood, plasma volume (PV) and red cell volume , , (RCV) can both be increased in heart failure: most authors have reported an expansion of PV in heart failure patients, , , which predicted adverse outcomes. , Elevated values of RCV have also, but not equivocally, been reported in heart failure patients by some authors, including our group reporting on RCV expansion, , whereas others did not report on significantly increased RCV expansion in HF patients. In a recent study, it was shown that CHF patients with an increased RCV have a reduced risk for the occurrence of a composite clinical endpoint of mortality or rehospitalization. The individual phenotype of the intravascular volumes (e.g. an elevated RCV) appears to be preserved in CHF patients when measured repeatedly over the course of several months. , Most work reporting on the impact of directly measured blood compartments on clinical outcomes have emphasized the period directly after discharge after hospital admission. , , Data focusing on the long‐term impact of the volume status is lacking. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the association of the intravascular volumes with long‐term mortality in a cohort of compensated chronic heart failure patients.

METHODS

Study design and subjects

During a recruitment visit, BV, RCV, PV, and clinical data were determined in patients with known compensated systolic CHF and a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, who were referred to our center either for regular follow‐up or specific diagnostic methods such as right‐heart catheterization. The study population has been previously described in more detail. 47 patients were initially recruited for the study from either the outpatient heart failure clinic or the cardiology ward (if hospitalized for reasons other than cardiac decompensation, e.g. right‐heart catheterization) between June 2014 and July 2015. All subjects provided signed informed consent to participate in the study. Long‐term all‐cause mortality data were retrieved from hospital records, contacting the physician who had initially referred the patient to our hospital, and public records for 44 subjects. Three subjects were lost to follow‐up and were considered missing‐at‐random. The baseline characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 1. The study design is in line with the latest revised form of the Declaration of Helsinki, the study is approved by the ethics committee of our University Hospital (31/14) and is registered in the German registry for clinical studies (DRKS‐ID: DRKS00006078).
Table 1

. Baseline characteristics (n = 44)

ParameterNonsurvivors (n = 9)Survivors (n = 35) p
Sex6 m/3 f (33%)29 m/6 f (17%).283
Age (years)59.6 ± 10.157.6 ± 8.9.281
Body‐mass index (kg/m²)25.2 ± 4.528.2 ± 3.5.034*
NYHA class2.0 ± 0.72.2 ± 0.8.101
Etiology of heart failureIschemic cardiomyopathy 4Ischemic cardiomyopathy 16
Idiopathic cardiomyopathy 4Idiopathic cardiomyopathy 15
Myocarditis 1Myocarditis 2
Hypertensive cardiomyopathy 1
Congenital heart disease 1
Diabetes mellitus (n (%))0 (0%)6 (17%).181
Blood volume (ml/m² BSA)3570 ± 6463294 ± 527.188
Plasma volume (ml/m² BSA)2306 ± 4731989 ± 336.025*
Red cell volume (ml/m² BSA)1264 ± 2491305 ± 228.633
Hematocrit (%)39.0 ± 4.343.6 ± 3.5.002*
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)1.2 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.3.534
proBNP (pg/ml)* 1870 [1468 – 2968]1030 [458–1601].225
LVEF (%)29 ± 830 ± 10.766
E/e'18 ± 1212 ± 5.102
Vena cava collapse7 yes/2 no (22%)25 yes/5 no (20%)*** .712
Sum of diuretics** 1.6 ± 0.91.7 ± 0.9.686

Abbreviations: BNP, B‐type natriuretic peptide; BSA, body surface area; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction.

Data for proBNP are presented as median ± interquartile range and between‐group differences were compared by the Wilcoxon test due to non‐normality of the distribution of values; 10 values were missing (n = 1 in non‐survivors, n = 9 in survivors).

“Sum of diuretics” is the number of individual diuretic substances concomitantly used.

For 5 patients, assessment of vena cava was not available.

. Baseline characteristics (n = 44) Abbreviations: BNP, B‐type natriuretic peptide; BSA, body surface area; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction. Data for proBNP are presented as median ± interquartile range and between‐group differences were compared by the Wilcoxon test due to non‐normality of the distribution of values; 10 values were missing (n = 1 in non‐survivors, n = 9 in survivors). “Sum of diuretics” is the number of individual diuretic substances concomitantly used. For 5 patients, assessment of vena cava was not available.

Endpoint definitions

For the purpose of this study, we evaluated the measurements made at the first determination of intravascular volumes at the recruiting visit. End‐of‐follow‐up (EoF) was December 31, 2020. Patients were either censored at the time of the last contact to our department or at the time of EoF. The primary endpoint was all‐cause death.

Determination of vascular volumes and clinical parameters

BV, RCV, and PV were determined using an abbreviated CO‐rebreathing method, which has been evaluated in CHF patients before. In brief, the abbreviated CO‐rebreathing method is a dilutor‐indicator method based on carbon monoxide (CO), which is inhaled by the subject using a closed‐circuit spirometer (SpiCO, Blood Tec) and binds to hemoglobin. By withdrawing capillary samples from the hyperemized earlobe and analyzing these samples for the carboxyhemoglobin level before and after the application of a defined bolus of CO with a standard blood gas analyzer (Radiometer ABL 700series, Radiometer), the total amount of hemoglobin of all erythrocytes (Hb mass) can be precisely determined. From Hb mass, RCV, PV, and BV can be calculated using simple formulas. MCHC is the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and hematocrit is adjusted to the whole body hematocrit using the factor of 0.91 as proposed by Hugh Chaplin Jr. and coworkers. Clinical data were retrieved from the clinical record of the patient at our hospital. A compensated state was necessary to participate in the study. A physician clinically performed the assessment whether a patient was in a compensated state at the time of inclusion into the study. This assessment was complemented by echocardiographic evaluation of the vena cava (collapsing vs. non‐collapsing). The echocardiographic assessment was performed by an experienced sonographer at the same day of the CO rebreathing procedure for all outpatients and within the same hospital admission for inpatients using a Philipps IE 33 ultrasound machine (Philipps Healthcare).

Statistical analysis

Data for this study was managed using SAS JMP 9.0; statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. A standard t‐test or a chi‐squared test were applied to compare values between groups. For proBNP, non‐parametric statistics (median and interquartile range, Wilcoxon test) were applied due to non‐normal distribution of the values. An area‐under‐the curve‐analysis was used to analyze the predictive value of the plasma volume (PV) (normalized to body surface area, PVBSA) for mortality. The Youden‐index, basing on sensitivity and specificity was chosen to determine an optimal cut‐off value for PV value to predict mortality. Cumulative event rates were assessed according to the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by a log‐rank test. We derived hazard ratios with associated 95% confidence intervals from Cox proportional hazards models. To adjust for differences in baseline and procedural variables between the strata defined by PVBSA and to identify independent predictors of mortality we fitted uni‐and multivariable Cox models with variables displayed in Table 1 that showed a difference between survivors and non‐survivors after follow‐up at p < .1. An alpha level of .05 was accepted for statistical significance.

RESULTS

The mean follow‐up (of survivors) was 6.0 years, (range: 3.7–6.5 years) in which 9 patients died. The subject characteristics of the surviving patients and the non‐survivors are presented in Table 1. PV (normalized by body‐surface area, PVBSA) was significantly distinct between survivors and non‐survivors. In contrast, the echocardiographic assessment of the vena cava was not different between these groups. The results of the cox regression analysis concerning all‐cause‐mortality as the primary endpoint and relevant predictors are depicted in Table 2. When all significant predictors (PVBSA, and body‐mass‐index) are included in multivariate analysis, PVBSA predicts all‐cause mortality independent from body‐mass‐index.
Table 2

Cox regression analysis, all‐cause‐mortality

UnivariateMultivariate
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
PVBSA 1.002 (1.000–1.004).021*1.002 (1.000–1.003).024
Age1.026 (0.954–1.103).495
Sex.200
MaleReference
Female0.415 (0.103–1.662).214
Body‐mass‐index0.765 (0.621–0.942).015*0.774 (0.629–0.952).015
NYHA class.354
IIIReference
II3.085 (0.597–15.942).701
I1.469 (0.207–10.431).179
LVEF0.995 (0.929–1.065).876
E/e'1.089 (0.979–1.211).116

Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; PV, plasma volume.

Cox regression analysis, all‐cause‐mortality Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; PV, plasma volume. No relevant difference was found concerning RCV between survivors and non‐survivors. Thus, the significantly lower hematocrit value observed in non‐survivors is solely due to a PV expansion and not a reduction of RCV in this group. Therefore the hematocrit was excluded from univariate and multivariate modeling. The area under the curve to predict death within the study course by PVBSA is 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.87). The optimal cutoff value for PVBSA to distinguish survivors from non‐survivors estimated by the Youden index is 1800 ml/m². None of the 12 subjects below this threshold died during the observational period, whereas 9 of the 32 subjects above this threshold died. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan–Meyer curve stratified by a PVBSA‐cutoff of 1800 ml/m2. Table 3 shows the subject characteristics of our cohort when stratified by this PVBSA‐cutoff. When stratified by PVBSA, the groups differ with respect to all intravascular volumes; in consequence, subjects with PVBSA > 1800 ml/m² feature lower hematocrit values. There is a trend towards an increased number of diuretics in the subjects with a higher PVBSA.
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meyer curve with life‐table displaying survival of the cohort of 44 CHF patients stratified by a PVBSA‐cutoff of 1800 ml/m² (shaded area describes 95% confidence intervals for the point estimates).

Table 3

Subject characteristics when stratified by a cutoff value of 1800 ml/m²

ParameterPVBSA < 1800 ml/m² (n = 12)PVBSA > 1800 ml/m² (n = 32) p
Sex9 m/3 f (25%)26 m/6 f (19%).647
Age (years)55.9 ± 8.258.8 ± 9.4.351
Body‐mass index (kg/m²)27.7 ± 2.827.5 ± 4.2.874
NYHA class2.1 ± 0.82.2 ± 0.8.790
Diabetes mellitus (n (%))1 (8%)5 (16%).530
Blood volume (ml/m² BSA)2761 ± 2853572 ± 465<.001*
Plasma volume (ml/m² BSA)1641 ± 1532208 ± 326<.001*
Red cell volume (ml/m² BSA)1120 ± 1881363 ± 210.001*
Hematocrit (%)44.4 ± 4.242.0 ± 3.9.074
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)1.0 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.3.311
proBNP (pg/ml)* 417 [250–1047]1592 [796–2309].007*
LVEF (%)32 ± 1029 ± 9.393
E/e'12 ± 514 ± 8.418
Sum of diuretics** 1.3 ± 0.61.8 ± 1.0.053

Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; PV, plasma volume.

Data for proBNP are presented as median ± interquartile range and between‐group differences were compared by the Wilcoxon test due to non‐normality of the distribution of values.

“sum of diuretics” is the number of individual diuretic substances concomitantly used.

Kaplan–Meyer curve with life‐table displaying survival of the cohort of 44 CHF patients stratified by a PVBSA‐cutoff of 1800 ml/m² (shaded area describes 95% confidence intervals for the point estimates). Subject characteristics when stratified by a cutoff value of 1800 ml/m² Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; PV, plasma volume. Data for proBNP are presented as median ± interquartile range and between‐group differences were compared by the Wilcoxon test due to non‐normality of the distribution of values. “sum of diuretics” is the number of individual diuretic substances concomitantly used.

DISCUSSION

The major finding of the present study evaluating the prognostic utility of the intravascular volumes in a cohort of CHF patients, who were in a clinically compensated state, is that PV expansion of >1800 ml/m² BSA is associated with a significantly increased mortality risk, whereas no deaths were observed in subjects with a normalized PV below that threshold. The importance of unrecognized excess of intravascular volumes has been investigated before: In recompensated heart failure patients, unrecognized volume excess predicted rehospitalization and mortality during a median follow‐up of approximately 2‐years and 180 days. To the best of our knowledge, the follow‐up of more than 2100 days of our study presents the longest follow‐up of a cohort of patients for whom the intravascular parameters were determined at a compensated state. Remarkably, mortality in our cohort was not solely determined by early deaths within the first years of observation, but also by deaths occurring after the third year of follow‐up. This might point towards the distinct importance of early detection (and possibly treatment) of PV expansion in CHF patients. In this context, guiding decongestion by establishing intravascular volumes has been shown to be associated with better outcomes in CHF patients in a propensity‐score‐matched control design. Unconditional use of diuretics, especially loop diuretics, is not encouraged by current guidelines. Diuretics should only be used to reduce signs and symptoms of congestion. A clear effect of diuretics use on mortality has not been established, however, diuretics use has been associated with a reduction of the risk of worsening disease and improved exercise capacity. In this context, proBNP, which was not included in the uni‐ or multivariate analysis because no significant difference was observed between survivors and non‐survivors, is significantly increased in subjects with a PV > 1800 ml/m², who also feature significantly higher RCV and BV. A decongestion strategy guided by BNP has been shown to improve survival in CHF. Our data, therefore, highlights the importance of recognition of proBNP, which, also in our cohort, is associated with an excess of intravascular volumes and, most probably consequential, survival. When determining vascular volumes in CHF patients, distinct types of alterations of PV and RCV occur in non‐anemic subjects. First, some subjects feature a PV expansion but not an RCV expansion leading to lower hematocrit values without anemia. A second group of CHF patients features an RCV expansion without PV expansion, and a third group featuring expansions of both compartments. , Recent data has highlighted a protective role of an elevated RCV and the consequent polycythemia in CHF patients. The alterations of intravascular volumes appear to be preserved over time, , whilst the mechanisms by which these alterations are mediated remain unclear. Remarkably, when compared with a CHF cohort, previous CHF patients after heart transplantation feature the phenotype of a healthy cohort and do not show significant expansion of the PV or RCV. Importantly, an expansion of BV does not necessarily translate into an elevated filling pressure of the left ventricle in CHF, because these two factors are only moderately correlated. Just recently, and aiming to understand the role of the complex interaction between BV and intracardiac pressures in cardiac congestion better, Dmitry Yaranov and coworkers highlighted the necessity to specifically consider the volume distribution to the central vascular compartment and the venous tone rather than whole intravascular compartment reflected by BV or PV alone. In our cohort, RCV and BV did not predict outcomes and were not different between survivors and non‐survivors. Therefore, PV expansion was associated with significantly lower hematocrit values in non‐survivors pointing towards a key importance of this universally available parameter when planning diuretic therapy. However, when comparing diuretics use between those subjects with an elevated PV (Table 3), the number of diuretics is higher (with a nonsignificant trend) in those subjects with an elevated PV (with PVBSA > 1800 ml/m2). Whether this is due to the history of the patients, possibly featuring previous decompensations at the time of inclusion into the study, or there is a link between an impaired kidney function due to diuretics use, consequently leading to an increased PV, cannot be clarified by our study. Nevertheless, subclinical congestion is a frequent observation in heart failure patients. Investigation of intravascular volumes has a long history in CHF. , , Our cohort can be considered a contemporary cohort, because treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists , and angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitors was available during the study course, although no patient was treated with angiotensin‐receptor‐neprilysin inhibitors at initiation of the study; as it was only recommended by major heart failure guidelines in 2016. Inhibitors of sodium‐glucose Cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) were not used at the time of inclusion into the study, and most probably were not used widely during most of the later course of our study. SGLT‐2 inhibitors have the specific feature of lowering the circulating PV, which, hypothesizing, may be one of the main features of lowering mortality in HFrEF patients. SGLT‐2‐inhibitors are currently recommended as a standard treatment for heart failure. Our work, featuring 32/44 (72%) of CHF patients with a PVBSA of >1800ml/m² thus indirectly supports the importance of early initiation of therapy with an SGLT‐2‐inhibitor at an early stage.

LIMITATIONS

First, the prospective but observational design of this study does not allow a cause‐and‐effect relationship to be established. Second, even when analyzing the present data with care, there is the inherent limitation of possible bias due to unmeasured confounding factors: All patients were recruited at a single center, which might lead to selection bias. Women were underrepresented in the study sample; however, sex did not appear as a relevant predictor for mortality in our cohort. Third, by design, we cannot elucidate the mechanism(s) behind the observation of some HF patients developing PV expansion while others do not. This is a key issue in further understanding the pathophysiology of chronic HF. Finally, by design of the study, we assessed all‐cause mortality only. Therefore, we cannot distinguish between cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular causes of death, but probably underestimate the true association of PV excess with cardiovascular mortality.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Despite the safety and general feasibility of the method, the clinical applicability of establishing the vascular parameters by CO rebreathing is limited by a somewhat lengthy experiment and the restriction of patients to NYHA levels below IV. However, our work contributes to understanding the impact of the pathophysiological expansion of PV. The significantly decreased hematocrit values observed in non‐survivors are explained by PV expansion but not RCV reduction. Therefore, from a clinician's point of view, it appears important to assess the individual course of hematocrit values to detect early signs of PV excess (and possibly, “subclinical decompensation”) when hematocrit values are decreasing. In this context estimating PV or other blood volumes from hematocrit and sex may be of a limited value for as they are only moderately associated with true PV excess. Moreover, our data emphasizes on recognition of proBNP as an indicator of excess intravascular volumes in stable CHF.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Christoph Ahlgrim contributed to conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the manuscript. Torben Pottgiesser contributed to conception and design, interpretation of the data, and drafting and revising the manuscript. Philipp Birkner and Florian Seiler contributed to acquisition of data as well as interpretation of data, and revising the manuscript. Simon Schoechlin, Sebastian Grundmann, and Christoph Bode contributed to conception and design, and revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All above authors have approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  33 in total

1.  The body/venous hematocrit ratio: its constancy over a wide hematocrit range.

Authors:  H CHAPLIN; P L MOLLISON; H VETTER
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1953-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  CARDIAC OUTPUT, BLOOD AND INTERSTITIAL FLUID VOLUMES, TOTAL CIRCULATING SERUM PROTEIN, AND KIDNEY FUNCTION DURING CARDIAC FAILURE AND AFTER IMPROVEMENT.

Authors:  W B Seymour; W H Pritchard; L P Longley; J M Hayman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1942-03       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Authors:  Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  The prevalence and clinical associations of ultrasound measures of congestion in patients at risk of developing heart failure.

Authors:  Joseph J Cuthbert; Pierpaolo Pellicori; Rachel Flockton; Anna Kallvikbacka-Bennett; Javed Khan; Alan S Rigby; Nicolas Girerd; Faiez Zannad; John G F Cleland; Andrew L Clark
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  Relation of unrecognized hypervolemia in chronic heart failure to clinical status, hemodynamics, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ana Silvia Androne; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Alhakam Hudaihed; Donna Mancini; John Lamanca; Stuart D Katz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.

Authors:  John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Akshay S Desai; Jianjian Gong; Martin P Lefkowitz; Adel R Rizkala; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Intravascular Volume Profiles in Patients With Class I and II Systolic Heart Failure: Heterogeneity and Volume Overload Are Common Even in Mild Heart Failure.

Authors:  Wayne L Miller; Diana P Albers; Denise N Gansen; Brian P Mullan
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  Calculated plasma volume status and prognosis in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Hua Zen Ling; Julia Flint; Morten Damgaard; Peter K Bonfils; Adrian S Cheng; Suneil Aggarwal; Shanti Velmurugan; Michelle Mendonca; Mohammed Rashid; Swan Kang; Francesco Papalia; Susanne Weissert; Caroline J Coats; Martin Thomas; Michael Kuskowski; Jay N Cohn; Simon Woldman; Inder S Anand; Darlington O Okonko
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Applying the Optimized CO Rebreathing Method for Measuring Blood Volumes and Hemoglobin Mass in Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Christoph Ahlgrim; Philipp Birkner; Florian Seiler; Sebastian Grundmann; Manfred W Baumstark; Christoph Bode; Torben Pottgiesser
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Blood volume and hemoglobin mass in long-term heart transplant recipients with and without Anemia.

Authors:  Florian Seiler; Christoph Ahlgrim; Philipp Birkner; Nina Wrobel; Jonathan Rilinger; Sebastian Grundmann; Christoph Bode; Torben Pottgiesser
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinically unrecognized plasma volume expansion predicts long-term all-cause-mortality in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christoph Ahlgrim; Florian Seiler; Philipp Birkner; Simon Schoechlin; Sebastian Grundmann; Christoph Bode; Torben Pottgiesser
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.287

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.