| Literature DB >> 35919565 |
Abstract
Natural compounds are a good substitute for synthetic antioxidants. Attempts have been made to characterize the antioxidant capacity of natural resources (e.g., medicinal plants). Thus, the Rheum emodi Wall was evaluated using liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Three antioxidant compounds (i.e., myricitrin, myricetin-3-galloyl rhamnoside, and myricetin) were isolated, identified, and used to screen the antioxidant capacity of the new compounds. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and superoxide dismutase assay results are presented in the half-maximal inhibitory concentration values ranging 1.50∼28.46, 102.01∼137.55, and 4.06∼15.74 μg/mL, respectively. Myricetin had the highest antioxidant activity among the other compounds. A significantly positive correlation was noted between the ethyl acetate fraction and the antioxidant compound. In a partial least squares-discriminant analysis model, identified antioxidant compounds were shown to play a role in the structure of the compound and its contents based on the antioxidant activity. The study suggests that myricetin from R. emodi possesses the most potent antioxidant activity, and thus is the most efficient in extracting antioxidant contents.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH; Himalayan rhubarb; LC-DAD-ESI/MS; Rheum emodi Wall; antioxidant activity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35919565 PMCID: PMC9309074 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Fig. 1Extraction and fractionation of Rheum emodi.
|
|
Fig. 2(A) Liquid chromatography (LC) chromatogram (350 nm) of ethyl acetate fraction from Rheum emodi. LC, mass spectrometry, ultraviolet spectrum, and chemical structures of myricitrin (B), myricetin 3-galloyl rhamnoside (C), and myricetin (D). PDA, photodiode array detector; MW, molecular weight.
Radical scavenging and antioxidant compounds activity of Rheum emodi
| Fraction | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| DPPH radical scavenging | |
| Myricitrin | 28.46±2.82b |
| Myricetin 3-galloylrhamnoside | 26.66±0.73ab |
| Myricetin | 1.50±0.31a |
| Ascorbic acid | 64.24±0.43c |
| ABTS+ radical scavenging | |
| Myricitrin | 137.55±4.72d |
| Myricetin 3-galloylrhamnoside | 120.32±1.29c |
| Myricetin | 102.01±3.01b |
| Ascorbic acid | 91.55±3.69a |
| SOD activity | |
| Myricitrin | 15.74±2.12c |
| Myricetin 3-galloylrhamnoside | 8.18±1.04b |
| Myricetin | 4.06±0.52a |
| Ascorbic acid | 73.43±3.27d |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Values within a column followed by different letters (a-d) are significantly different (P<0.05).
Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control.
IC50, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Fig. 3Score plotting chart of principal components 1 and 2 of the partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) results obtained from the data set by compound profiling of the antioxidant compounds. This chart shows classification by the origin of all samples. Yellow circle indicates myricitrin, myricetin-3-galloylrhamnoside, and myrictin; blue circle indicates L-ascorbic acid.
Correlation between the total ethyl acetate fraction and the antioxidant activity of antioxidant compounds from Rheum emodi
| Variable | Fraction | Antioxidant activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Ethyl acetate | Myricitrin | Myricetin 3-galloylrhamnoside | Myricetin | ||
| Fraction | |||||
| Ethyl acetate | 1 | ||||
| Antioxidant activity | |||||
| Myricitrin | 0.992 | 1 | |||
| Myricetin 3-galloylrhamnoside | 0.998 | 0.997 | 1 | ||
| Myricetin | 0.972 | 0.991 | 0.984 | 1 | |
The values represent the correlation coefficient (r).
**P<0.01.